The relationship between the application of the sustainable growth policy of the enterprise and the growth of the enterprise on the capital market: examples of European countries

• Autorzy: Gniadkowska-Szymańska Agata , Keller Jakub , Zengin Burcu

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.202.7

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The primary aim of this study is to examine whether the Van Horne coefficient model impacts company growth, as indicated by the EPS indicator. Design/methodology/approach: The study was conducted on non-financial companies listed on the WIG, DAX, and OMX indices. The main tool of the analysis is the Van Horn sustainable growth model and its correlation with the EPS of the companies. Findings: The study found that the VSGR coefficient has a negative impact on the 3-year growth of companies listed on stock exchanges in Germany and Sweden. Similar results were obtained in the 5-year period study. For the Polish market, the VSGR coefficient is not statistically significant (OLS model). However, the study highlighted the significant role of the ROE coefficient and the level of company assets in shaping EPS. Research limitations/implications: At this stage, the study compares the Polish market to two other selected markets, which serve more as indicators of the future for us rather than as a comparative group. This perspective on the researched issue is significant but requires further investigation, taking into account other markets, including those similar to the Polish market. It is also important to extend the research to include longer time horizons in the models. Practical implications: The conducted study aligns with the current and important trend of research on sustainable development, which is a priority element in building company strategies within the European Union. Given the lower level of development of the Polish market compared to the German or Scandinavian markets, the findings for the comparative markets provide an insight into the situation we may encounter in Poland if we choose a similar pattern of actions and development. Originality/value: The conducted analyses are the first to use the Van Horne model on such a broad sample, indicating the potential for implementing sustainable development strategies in Polish companies with the aim of achieving development according to the model observed in Western European countries.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

company growth; WACC; cost of capital; Van Horne coefficient model

PL

wzrost przedsiębiorstwa; WACC; koszt kapitału; model współczynnika Van Horne'a

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 202
• Strony: 113--125
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Gniadkowska-Szymańska Agata

• Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7321-3360

autor

Keller Jakub

• Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8213-9887

autor

Zengin Burcu

• Business, Ankara Haci Bayram Veli University, Emniyet Mahallesi, Muammer Bostanci Cad. No:4,06500 Beçevler, Ankara

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-6748

Bibliografia

• 1. Andreicovici, I., van Lent, L., Nikolaev, V.V., Zhang, R. (2023). Accounting measurement intensity.
• 2. Arda, O.A., Montabon, F., Tatoglu, E., Golgeci, I., Zaim, S. (2023). Toward a holistic understanding of sustainability in corporations: Resource-based view of sustainable supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(2), 193-208.
• 3. Barra, C., Ruggiero, N. (2021). Do microeconomic and macroeconomic factors influence Italian bank credit risk in different local markets? Evidence from cooperative and non- cooperative banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 114, 105976.
• 4. Bryant, L., Jones, D.A., Widener, S.K. (2004). Managing value creation within the firm: An examination of multiple performance measures. Journal of management accounting research, 16(1), 107-131.
• 5. Chikwira, C., Mohammed, J.I. (2023). The impact of the stock market on liquidity and economic growth: Evidence of volatile market. Economies, 11(6), 155.
• 6. Damodaran, A. (2024). The little book of valuation: How to value a company, pick a stock, and profit. John Wiley & Sons.
• 7. Dhannapal, C., Ganesan, G. (2010). Enterprise sustainable growth rate analysis: An empirical study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business and Economics, Malaysia. March 15-16, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.globalresearch.com.my/proceeding/icber2010_proceeding/PAPER_24_Entrep riseSustainable.pdf
• 8. Farooq, U., Ahmed, J., Khan, S. (2021). Do the macroeconomic factors influence the firm's investment decisions? A generalized method of moments (GMM) approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(1), 790-801.
• 9. Fernanda, J., Marley, R., Suhendra, F. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on Company Financial Performance: Insights into Economic Indicators and Sectoral Heterogeneity. Journal on Economics, Management and Business Technology, 2(2), 73-83.
• 10. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 11. Galema, R., Plantinga, A., Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking Finance, 32, 26462654.
• 12. García-Meca, E., Pedro Sánchez-Ballesta, J. (2011). Firm value and ownership structure in the Spanish capital market. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 11(1), 41-53.
• 13. Gnap, M., Pitera, R. (2023). The relevance of using cash flows and economic profit-based methods in capital budgeting: a focus on techniques-FCFF, FCFE and EVA. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie. Politechnika Śląska.
• 14. Jensen, M.C. (2010). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1), 32-42.
• 15. Jensen, M.C. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corpo Rate Finance, 14, 8-21.
• 16. Khanka, S.S., Gupta, C.B. (2022). Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management. Sultan Chand & Sons.
• 17. Kineber, A.F., Ali, A.H., Elshaboury, N., Oke, A.E., Arashpour, M. (2024). A multi-criteria evaluation and stationary analysis of value management implementation barriers for sustainable residential building projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(2), 199-212.
• 18. Koller, T., Goedhart, M., Wessels, D. (2010). Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies, Vol. 499. John Wiley and Sons.
• 19. Kumar, J. (2004). Does ownership structure influence firm value? Evidence from India. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 9(2), 61-93.
• 20. Lin, X., Mazlan, A.N., Ismail, S., Hu, L., Kasiman, E.H.B., Yahya, K. (2023). Status of value management studies in construction projects: A systematic review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(1), 101820.
• 21. Lins, K.V. (2003). Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 159-184.
• 22. Massa, M., Taraporevala, K., Van der Heyden, L. (2023). Value Creation for Owners and Directors. Springer Books.
• 23. Octaviani, M.N., Harahap, L. (2022). Corporate governance, firm value, institutional, ownership and corporate social responsibility. AKURASI: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(3), 221-236.
• 24. Otley, D. (2002). Measuring performance: The accounting perspective. Business performance measurement: Theory and practice, 3-21.
• 25. Peng, M.W., Heath, P.S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of management review, 21(2), 492-528.
• 26. Prokopenko, O., Kurbatova, T., Khalilova, M., Zerkal, A., Prause, G., Binda, J., Komarnitskyi, I. (2023). Impact of investments and R&D costs in renewable energy technologies on companies' profitability indicators: Assessment and forecast. Energies, 16(3), 1021.
• 27. Putra, G.H., Marlina, M. (2021). The Influence of Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Profitability on Value Company. El Barka: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 4(2), 209-231.
• 28. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412-1421.
• 29. Rusnaeni, N., Gursida, H., Sasongko, H., Hakim, D.R. (2023). Financial performance, capital structure, and firm's value: The moderating role of dividend policy. Journal of Business, Social and Technology (Bustechno), 4(1), 1-15.
• 30. Salvi, A., Vitolla, F., Rubino, M., Giakoumelou, A., Raimo, N. (2021). Online information on digitalisation processes and its impact on firm value. Journal of Business Research, 124, 437-444.
• 31. Schoenmaker, D., Schramade, W. (2023). Corporate finance for long-term value. Springer Nature, p. 630.
• 32. Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S., García-Muiña, F.E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: a new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), 107-132.
• 33. Skalicka, M., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A.P., Pietrzak, M.B. (2023). Business angels and early stage decision making criteria: empirical evidence from an emerging market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 25-50.
• 34. Sondakh, R. (2019). The effect of dividend policy, liquidity, profitability and firm size on firm value in financial service sector industries listed in Indonesia stock exchange 2015- 2018 period. Accountability, 8(2), 91-101.
• 35. Souza, M.L.H., da Costa, C.A., de Oliveira Ramos, G., da Rosa Righi, R. (2020). A survey on decision-making based on system reliability in the context of Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 56, 133-156.
• 36. Stubelj, I. (2010). Valuation of publicly traded companies with a valuation model based on expected earnings and growth opportunities. Managing Global Transitions, 8(1), 23.
• 37. Subaida, I., Nurkholis, N., Mardiati, E. (2018). Effect of intellectual capital and intellectual capital disclosure on firm value. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(1), 125-135.
• 38. Sun, J., Maksimov, V., Wang, S.L., Luo, Y. (2021). Developing compositional capability in emerging-market SMEs. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101148.
• 39. Szutowski, D. (2024). The impact of macroeconomic factors on the profitability of companies. analysis using neural networks. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management [Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie], 193.
• 40. Tannady, H., Pahlawi, N., Hernawan, M.A., Arta, D.N.C., Yusuf, S.D. (2023). Role of Stock Performance as an Intervening Variable in a Relationship Between Profitability, Leverage, Growth and Company Value. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), 9(2), 220-225.
• 41. Van Horne, J.C. (1983). Financial management and policy. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• 42. Van Horne, J.C. (1987). Sustainable growth modeling. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1, 19-25.
• 43. Van Horne, J.C., Wachowicz, J.M. (2009). Fundamentals of financial management. Pearson.
• 44. Venkataraman, R.R., Pinto, J.K. (2023). Cost and value management in projects. John Wiley & Sons.
• 45. Worokinasih, S., Zaini, M.L.Z.B.M. (2020). The mediating role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on good corporate governance (GCG) and firm value. A technical note. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(1), 88-96.
• 46. Zinecker, M., Skalicka, M., Balcerzak, A.P., Pietrzak, M.B. (2022). Business angels in the Czech Republic: Characteristics and a classification with policy implications. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 273-298.