Evaluation of the Reliability of the Shoulder and Knee Joint of the KPSIT C50 Dummy Adapted to Crash tests carried out at low speeds

• Autorzy: Jaśkiewicz Marek

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17531/ein/178376

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the results of experimental studies on the reliability and monitoring of the condition of the knee and shoulder joints of an anthropometric dummy designed for low-speed crash tests. Next, the characteristics of the resistance moments in the joints of the KPSIT C50 dummy are compared with the characteristics of the drag torque of the HYBRID III C50 dummy. The patented and manufactured knee and shoulder joints of the KPSIT C50 dummy characterized by a simple structure. The article presents a comparison of the resistance moments in the knee and shoulder joints of the KPSIT C50 dummy before crash tests and after a series of 200 crash tests. It has been shown that the patented solutions that have been used for low-speed crash tests do not need to be calibrated after a series of 5 crash tests, as is the case with the Hybrid III dummy. In addition, the results of experimental research presented in the article confirm the durability of the KPSIT C50 dummies joints and the possibility of using thejoints for other centiles of anthropometric dummies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

dummy reliability; exploitation of mannequin's joins; crash test; anthropometric dummies

• Wydawca: Polskie Naukowo-Techniczne Towarzystwo Eksploatacyjne
• Czasopismo: Eksploatacja i Niezawodność
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 26, no. 1
• Strony: art. no. 178376
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., fot., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Jaśkiewicz Marek

• Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-9477

Bibliografia

• 1. Van Ratingen, M., Williams, A., Anders, L., Seeck, A., Castaing, P., Kolke, R., Miller, A., The european new car assessment programme: A historical review. Chinese journal of traumatology, 2016, 19(02), 63-69.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.11.016
• 2. Parenteau, C. S., Viano, D. C., Burnett, R.. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.Traffic injury prevention, 2021, 22(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1842380
• 3. Kostek, R. Algorithms of identification of car body contact parameters from a movie of crash test. InAIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, 2949, 1.https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0165471
• 4. Murawski J, Szczepański E, Jacyna-Gołda I, Izdebski M, Jankowska-Karpa D. Intelligent mobility: A model for assessing the safety of children traveling to school on a school bus with the use of intelligent bus stops. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność –Maintenance and Reliability. 2022;24(4):695-706. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2022.4.10
• 5. Lawton, G. Crash test dummies.New scientist,2018, 238(3177), 42-43.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(18)30846-7
• 6. Schäuble, Andreas.Crash test dummies–how realistic are currently used dummies?. Diss. Wien, 2019.
• 7. Linder, A., Svensson, M. Y. Road safety: the average male as a norm in vehicle occupant crash safety assessment.Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,2019, 44(2), 140-153.https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2019.1603870
• 8. Wang, Z. J., Loeber, B., Tesny, A., Hu, G., Kang, Y. S. Neck biofidelity comparison of THOR-AV, THOR and Hybrid III 50th dummies. InIRCOBI Conference Proceedings2021, 8-10.
• 9. Carroll, J., Kruse, D., Mishra, E., Mroz, K., Lubbe, N. Comparison of Hybrid III and THOR 5th percentile female dummies in frontal crash tests. InProceedings of IRCOBI Conference. 2021.
• 10. Eggers, A., Schießler, M., Ott, J., Langner, T., Wisch, M. Sensitivity of Chest Deflection Measurements in Thor-5F and Hybrid III Small Female Dummies to Different Seat and Belt Settings. In27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration2023, 23-0301.
• 11. Guan, S., Liao, Z., Xiang, H., Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Zhao, H., Lai, X., Experimental Study of Thoracoabdominal Injuries Sufferedfrom Caudocephalad Impacts Using Pigs.Applied bionics and biomechanics,2018.https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2321053
• 12. Gabauer, D., Thomson, R., Correlation of vehicle and roadside crash test injury criteria. In19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)-Washington DC June2005, 6-9.
• 13. Linder, A., Svensson, M. Y., BioRID, a crash test dummy for rear impact: a review of development, validation and evaluation. InProceedings of the 2000 Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Brisbane, Queensland., 2000.
• 14. Lizbetin, J., Stopka, O. Proposal of a Roundabout Solution within a Particular Traffic Operation. Open Engineering, 2016, 6, 1, 441-445, DOI: 10.1515/eng-2016-0066.
• 15. Malin, F., Norros, I., Innamaa, S., Accident risk of road and weather conditions on different road types.Accident Analysis & Prevention,2019, 122, 181-188.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.014
• 16. Goniewicz, K., Goniewicz, M., Pawłowski, W., Fiedor, P., Road accident rates: strategies and programmes for improving road traffic safety.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery,2016, 42, 433-438.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0544-6
• 17. The World’s First Car Accident, (in): https://historyofyesterday.com/the-worlds-first-car-accident/?utm_content=cmp-true, access from 23.09.2023
• 18. Guizzo, Erico. Anatomy of a Crash-Test Dummy, IEEE Spectrum, October 2007.https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2007.4337665
• 19. Roach, Mary. Stiff: The Curious lives of Human Cadavers. New York: W.W. Norton, 2003
• 20. The father of anthropomorphic dummy testing, (in): https://www.humaneticsgroup.com/about-us/history, access from 23.09.2023
• 21. Frej D. Analysis of Head Displacement during a Frontal Collision at a Speed of 20 km/h—Experimental Studies.Sustainability. 2023; 15(22), 16015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216015
• 22. Jackson, K. E., Boitnott, R. L., Fasanella, E. L., Jones, L. E., Lyle, K. H., A history of full-scale aircraft and rotorcraft crash testing and simulation at NASA Langley Research Center. In 4th Triennial International Aircraft and Cabin Safety Research Conference, 2004.
• 23. Croft, A. C., Philippens, M. M., The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: A pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2007, 39(2), 340-346.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.003
• 24. Woitsch, G., Sinz, W., Influences of pre-crash braking induced dummy –Forward displacements on dummy behaviour during EuroNCAP frontal crashtest. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014, 62, 268-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.012..
• 25. Gabler, L. F., Crandall, J. R., Panzer, M. B., Assessment of kinematic brain injury metrics for predicting strain responses in diverse automotive impact conditions. Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016, 44, 3705-3718.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1697-0
• 26. Sanchez, E. J., Gabler, L. F., McGhee, J. S., Olszko, A. V., Chancey, V. C., Crandall, J. R., Panzer, M. B. Evaluation of head and brain injury risk functions using sub-injurious human volunteer data. Journal of neurotrauma, 2017, 34(16), 2410-2424.https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4681
• 27. Frej, D., Jaśkiewicz, M., Comparison of Volunteers’ Head Displacement with Computer Simulation—Crash Test with Low Speed of 20 km/h. Sensors,2022, 22(24), 9720.https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249720
• 28. Podosek K, Frej D, Górniak A, Elvira N. 50 percentile dummy movement analysis using TEMA Automotive software. The Archives ofAutomotive Engineering –Archiwum Motoryzacji. 2022;97(3):25-50. doi:10.14669/AM/155002.
• 29. Bruski, D., Burzyński, S., Chróścielewski, J., Jamroz, K., Pachocki, Ł., Witkowski, W., Wilde, K., Experimental and numericalanalysis of the modified TB32 crash tests of the cable barrier system. Engineering failure analysis, 2019, 104, 227-246.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.05.023
• 30. Górniak, A.; Matla, J.; Górniak, W.; Magdziak-Tokłowicz, M.; Krakowian, K.; Zawiślak, M.; Włostowski, R.; Cebula, J. Influence of a Passenger Position Seating on Recline Seat on a Head Injury during a Frontal Crash. Sensors 2022, 22, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22052003
• 31. Przegub barkowy manekina antropometrycznego do testów zderzeniowych, (Shoulder joint of the anthropometric crash test dummy Application), Zgłoszenie oznaczono numerem: P.433041,[WIPO ST 10/C PL433041].
• 32. Przegub kolanowy manekina antropometrycznego do testów zderzeniowych, (Knee-joint of the anthropometric crash test dummy), Zgłoszenie oznaczono numerem: P.431522,[WIPO ST 10/C PL431522].
• 33. Prochowski, L., Dębowski, A., Żuchowski, A., Zielonka, K., Evaluation of the influence of velocity on dynamic passenger loads during a frontal minibus impact against an obstacle. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 148, 1, 012024). IOP Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/148/1/012024
• 34. Frej DP, Zuska A. The impact of the Covid -19 pandemic on the frequency of vehicle accidents in Poland. The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji. 2023;99(1):30-44. doi:10.14669/AM/162666.
• 35. Stopka, O., Stopkova, M., Kampf, R., Application of the Operational Research Method to Determine the Optimum Transport Collection Cycle of Municipal Waste in a Predesignated Urban Area. Sustainability, 2019, 11(8), Article no: 2275. DOI: 10.3390/su11082275.
• 36. Borucka A, Pyza D. Influence of meteorological conditions on road accidents. A model Indexed by: for observations with excesszeros. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność –Maintenance and Reliability. 2021;23(3):586-92. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.3.20
• 37. Świderski A., Borucka A., SkoczyńskiP. Characteristics and Assessment of the Road Safety Level in Poland with Multiple Regression Model, Transport Means part I, 2018, Lithuania 2018, 92 -97
• 38. Gorzelanczyk, P., Tylicki, H. Forecasting the Number of Road Accidents in Poland Depending on the Day of the Week using Neural Networks. LOGI –Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 2023, 14(1), 35-42. DOI: 10.2478/logi-2023-0004.
• 39. Szumska EM, Pawełczyk M, Jurecki R. Total Cost of Ownership analysis and energy efficiency of electric, hybrid and conventional urban buses. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability. 2022;24(1):7-14. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2022.1.2.
• 40. Joszko, K., Wolański, W., Burkacki, W., Suchoń, S., Zielonka, K., Muszyński, A., Gzik, M., Biomechanical analysis of injuries of rally driver with head supporting device. Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics, 2016, 18(4), 159-169.
• 41. Kozłowski E, Borucka A, Oleszczuk P, Jałowiec T. Evaluation of the maintenance system readiness using the semi-Markov model taking into account hidden factors. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność –Maintenance and Reliability. 2023;25(4). https://doi.org/10.17531/ein/172857
• 42. Borucka A. Three-state Markov model of using transport means, Business Logistics in Modern Management, 2018, 18, 3-19, ISSN 1849-5931
• 43. Karwala Ł. Analysis of the selection of a child seat. The Archives of Automotive Engineering –Archiwum Motoryzacji. 2023;101(3):86-95. https://doi.org/10.14669/AM/172370