Closure of municipal solid waste dumps. Site rating for odor impact

• Autorzy: Kumar A. , Datta M. , Nema A. K. , Singh R. K. , Gurjar B. R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5277/epe180203

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

More than 60% of the waste dumps in India are within 500 m from the communities. The odor impact from these sites may be the sole criterion to prioritize these sites for closure/remediation. The existing rating systems do not consider odor impact in their assessment. A new system, proposed in the study, employs seven parameters derived from the literature review and selects their ratings based on data obtained from a survey of waste dumps in Indian cities having population more than one million and expert judgment. Application of the new system to the waste sites with continuously varying characteristics shows that the scores are spread over the full range of 0–1000 and have minimum clustering. The sensitivity analysis of the new system shows that the system exhibits medium to high sensitivity to five out of seven parameters employed in the system. The odor impact ratings for the fifteen waste dumps from the new system prioritize these dumps into three categories for remedial action and help suggesting a particular cover alternative for these dumps.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

population statistics; waste dumps; odour nuisance

PL

statystyki ludności; składowiska odpadów; uciążliwość zapachowa

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Environment Protection Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 44, nr 2
• Strony: 37--56
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Kumar A.

• CTRANS, Indian Institute of Technology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India

autor

Datta M.

• Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.

autor

Nema A. K.

• Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.

autor

Singh R. K.

• HUDCO, Ltd., New Delhi 110003, India.

autor

Gurjar B. R.

• Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, 27667, India.

Bibliografia

• [1] Planning Commission, Report of the Task Force on Waste to Energy, Vol. 1, New Delhi, India, 2014.
• [2] D-Waste.com, Waste Atlas: The world’s 50 biggest dumpsites, 2014.
• [3] DATTA M., KUMAR A., Waste Dumps and Contaminated Sites in India. Status and Framework for Remediation and Control, Geo-Chicago 2016, ASCE, Chicago 2016, 664.
• [4] EL-FADEL M., FINDIKAKIS A.N., LECKIE J.O., Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling, J. Environ. Manage., 1997, 50, 1.
• [5] HENSHAW P., NICELL J., SIKDAR A., Parameters for the assessment of odor impacts on communities, Atmos. Environ., 2006, 40, 1016.
• [6] SHUSTERMAN D., Critical review. The health significance of environmental odor pollution, Arch. Environ. Health An. Int. J., 1992, 47, 76.
• [7] FARBER S., Undesirable facilities and property values. A summary of empirical studies, Ecol. Econ., 1998, 24, 1–14.
• [8] FANG J.-J., YANG N., CEN D.-Y., SHAO L.-M., HE P.-J., Odor compounds from different sources of landfill. Characterization and source identification, Waste Manage., 2012, 32, 1401.
• [9] BROSSEAU J., HEITZ M., Trace gas compound emissions from municipal landfill sanitary sites, Atmos. Environ., 1994, 28, 285.
• [10] LÓPEZ A., LOBO A., Emissions of C&D refuse in landfills. A European case, Waste Manage., 2014, 34, 1446.
• [11] GARG A., ACHARI G., JOSHI R.C., A model to estimate the methane generation rate constant in sanitary landfills using fuzzy synthetic evaluation, Waste Manage. Res., 2007, 24, 363.
• [12] KLINK R.E., HAM R.K., Effects of moisture movement on methane production in solid waste landfill samples, Resour. Conserv., 1982, 8, 29. [13] SULISTI E., WATSON-CRAIK I.A., Interactive effects of temperature and o-cresol co-disposal on the methanogenic fermetation of refuse, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 1997, 24, 405.
• [14] KUMAR A., REINHART D., TOWNSEND T., Temperature inside the landfill. Effects of liquid injection, Global Waste Manage. Symp., 2008, 1 (on CD).
• [15] KIM H.G., LEE C.M., Pollutant dispersion over two-dimensional hilly terrain, KSME Int. J., 1998, 12, 96.
• [16] AATAMILA M., VERKASALO P.K., KORHONEN M.J., VILUKSELA M.K., PASANEN K,, TIITTANEN P., NEVALAINEN A., Odor annoyance near waste treatment centers. A population-based study in Finland, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 2010, 60, 412.
• [17] NICOLAS J., CRAFFE F., ROMAIN A.C., Estimation of odor emission rate from landfill areas using the sniffing team method, Waste Manage., 2006, 26, 1259.
• [18] ISWA, A roadmap for closing waste dumpsites. The world’s most polluted places, Vienna, Austria, 2016.
• [19] CHE Y., YANG K., JIN Y., ZHANG W., SHANG Z., TAI J., Residents’ concerns and attitudes toward a municipal solid waste landfill: integrating a questionnaire survey and GIS techniques, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2013.
• [20] National Research Council, Ranking hazardous-waste sites for remedial action, National Academic Press, 1994.
• [21] SINGH R.K., DATTA M., NEMA A.K., A new system for groundwater contamination hazard rating of landfills, J. Environ. Manage., 2009, 91, 344.
• [22] KUMAR A., DATTA M., NEMA A.K., SINGH R.K., A new system for determining odor potential hazard of old MSW landfills (waste dumps), Proc. Int. Conf. Solid Waste Know. Transf. Sustain. Resour. Manage., Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China, 2015, 643.
• [23] KUMAR A., DATTA M., NEMA A.K., SINGH R.K., An improved rating system for assessing surface water contamination potential from MSW landfills, Environ. Model. Assess., 2016, 21, 489.
• [24] SIRONI S., CAPELLI L., CÉNTOLA P., DEL ROSSO R., GRANDE M., Odor emission factors for assessment and prediction of Italian MSW landfills odor impact, Atmos. Environ., 2005, 39, 5387.
• [25] TCHOBANOGLOUS G., THEISEN H., VIGIL S., Integrated Solid Waste Management. Engineering Principles and Management Issues, McGraw-Hill, 1993.
• [26] CPCB, Guidelines on Odor Pollution and Its Control, Delhi 2008.
• [27] USEPA, Hazard ranking system, final rule December 14, 1990, 1990.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).