Exploring Growth Variability and Crown Vitality of Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea) in the Czech Republic

• Autorzy: Rybníček M. , Čermák P. , Žid T. , Kolář T. , Trnka M. , Büntgen U.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/geochr-2015-0003

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Unraveling climatic effects on growth of oak — Europe’s most ecologically and economically important forest species — has been the subject of many recent studies; however, more insight based on field data is necessary to better understand the relationship between climate and tree growth and to adapt forest management strategies to future climate change. In this report, we explore the influence of temperature, precipitation and drought variability on the productivity and vitality of oak stands in the Czech Highlands. We collected 180 cores from mature oaks (Quercus petraea) at four forest stands in the Czech Drahany Highlands. Standard dendro-methods were used for sample preparation, ring width measurements, cross-dating, chronology development, and the assessment of growth-climate response patterns. Crown vitality was also evaluated, using the modified ICP Forests methodology. Late spring precipitation totals between May and June as well as the mean July temperature for the year of ring formation were found to be the most important factors for oak growth, whereas crown condition was significantly affected by spring and summer drought. This study is representative for similar bio-ecological habitats across Central Europe and can serve as a dendroclimatological blueprint for earlier periods for which detailed meteorological information is missing.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Central Europe; crown condition; precipitation; sessile oak; temperature; tree rings

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Geochronometria
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 42, no.1
• Strony: 17--27
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Rybníček M.

• Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
• Global Change Research Centre, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic v.v.i, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Čermák P.

• Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Žid T.

• Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Kolář T.

• Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
• Global Change Research Centre, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic v.v.i, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Trnka M.

• Global Change Research Centre, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic v.v.i, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic
• Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Büntgen U.

• Global Change Research Centre, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic v.v.i, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic
• Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zuercherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
• Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland

Bibliografia

• 1. Assmann E, 1970. The Principles of Forest Yield Study: Studies in the Organic Production, Structure, Increment and Yield of Forest Stands. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 506pp.
• 2. Barbaroux C and Bréda N, 2002. Contrasting distribution and seasonal dynamics of carbohydrate reserves in stem wood of adult ringporous sessile oak and diffuse-porous beech trees. Tree Physiology 22: 1201–1210, DOI 10.1093/treephys/22.17.1201.
• 3. Becker M, Nieminen TM and G1érémia F, 1994. Short-term variations and long-term changes in oak productivity in northeastern France. The role of climate and atmospheric CO2. Annals of Forest Science 51: 477–492.
• 4. Bergès L, Nepveu G and Franc A, 2008. Effects of ecological factors on radial growth and wood density components of sessile oak (Quercus petraea Liebl.) in Northern France. Forest Ecology and Management 255(3–4): 567–579, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.027.
• 5. Biondi F and Waikul K, 2004. DendroClim2002: AC++ program for statistical calibration of climate signals in tree ring chronologies. Computers & Geosciences 30: 303–311, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2003.11.004.
• 6. Bréda N and Granier A, 1996. Intra and inter-annual variation of transpiration, leaf area index and radial growth of a sessile oak stand. Annals of Forest Science 53: 521–536.
• 7. Bronisz A, Bijak S, Bronisz K and Zasada M, 2012. Climate influence on radial increment of oak (Quercus SP.) in central Poland. Geochronometria 39(4): 276–284, DOI 10.2478/s13386-012-0011-7.
• 8. Büntgen U, Trouet V, Frank D, Leuschner HH, Friedrichs D, Luterbacher J and Esper J, 2010. Tree-ring indicators of German summer drought over the last millennium. Quaternary Science Reviews 29: 1005–1016, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.01.003.
• 9. Cedro A, 2007. Tree-ring chronologies of downy oak (Quercus pubescens), pedunculate oak (Q. robur) and sessile oak (Q. petraea) in the Bielinek Nature Reserve: Comparison of the climatic determinants of tree-ring width. Geochronometria 26: 39–45, DOI 10.2478/v10003-007-0005-2.
• 10. Cudlín P, Novotný R, Moravec I and Chmelíková E, 2001. Retrospective evaluation of the response of montane forest ecosystems to multiple stress. Ekológia 20: 108–124.
• 11. Čejková A and Poláková S, 2012. Growth responses of sessile oak to climate and hydrological regime in the Zbytka nature reserve, the Czech Republic. Geochronometria 39(4): 285–294, DOI 10.2478/s13386-012-0017-1.
• 12. Doležal J, Mazůrek P, Klimešová J, 2010. Oak decline in southern Moravia: the association between climate change and early and late wood formation in oaks. Preslia 82(3): 289–306.
• 13. Drobyshev I, Linderson H and Sonesson K, 2007. Relationship Between Crown Condition and Tree Diameter Growth in Southern Swedish Oaks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 128(1–3): 61– 73, DOI 10.1007/s10661-006-9415-2.
• 14. Eckstein D and Bauch J, 1969. Beitrag zur Rationalisierung eines dendrochronologischen Verfahrens und zur Analyse seiner Aussagesicherheit. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 88: 230–250.
• 15. Eichhorn J, Roskams P, Ferretti M, Mues V, Szepesi A and Durrant D, 2010. Visual Assessment of Crown Condition and Damaging Agents. 49 pp. Manual Part IV. In: Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre, Hamburg. ISBN: 978-3-926301- 03-1. [http://www.icp-forests.org/Manual.htm]
• 16. Fajvan MA, Rentch J and Gottschalk K, 2008. The effects of thinning and gypsy moth defoliation on wood volume growth in oaks. Trees – Structure and Function 22(2): 257–268.
• 17. Fonti P and García-González I, 2008. Earlywood vessel size of oak as a potential proxy for spring precipitation in mesic sites. Journal of Biogeography 35(12): 2249–2257, DOI 10.1111/j.1365- 2699.2008.01961.x.
• 18. Friedrichs D, Büntgen U, Esper J, Frank D, Neuwirth B and Löffler J, 2009. Complex climate controls on 20th century oak growth in Central-West Germany. Tree Physiol 29: 39–51, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpn003.
• 19. Fritts HC, Mosimann JE and Bottorff CP, 1969. A Revised Computer Program for Standardizing Tree – Ring Series. Tree Ring Bulletin 29: 15–20.
• 20. Fritts HC, 1976. Tree ring and climate. Academic Press. London, New York, San Francisco: 567pp.
• 21. Grissino-Mayer HD, Holmes R and Fritts HC, 1992. International tree– ring data bank program library. Version 1.1. Laboratory of Tree– Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson.
• 22. Hlavinka P, Trnka M and Balek J, 2011. Development and evaluation of the S oilClim m odel f or water b alance and soil climate estimates. Agricultural Water Management 98(8): 1249–1261, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.03.011.
• 23. Holmes R L, Adams RK and Fritts HC, 1986. Tree–Ring Chronologies of Western North America: California, Eastern Oregon and Northern Great Basin with Procedures Used in the Chronology Development Work Including Users Manuals for Computer programs Cofecha and Arstan. – Chronology Series VI. Laboratory of Tree – Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA: 50–56.
• 24. Horáček P, Šlezingerová J and Gandělová L, 2003. Analysis of cambial activity and formation of wood in Quercus robur L. under conditions of a floodplain forest. Journal of Forest Science 49(9): 412– 418.
• 25. Kienast F, Schweingruber FH, Bräker OU and Schär E, 1987. Tree ring studies on conifers along ecological gradients and the potential of single-year analyses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17: 683–696, DOI 10.1139/x87-111.
• 26. Kolář T, Rybníček M and Kyncl T, 2012. Oak chronology development in the Czech Republic and its teleconnection on a European scale. Dendrochronologia 30(3): 243–248, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2012.02.002.
• 27. Lebourgeois F, Cousseau G and Ducos Y, 2004. Climate-tree-growth relationships of Quercus petraea Mill. stand in the Forest of Bercé (‘Futaie des Clos’, Sarthe, France). Annals of Forest Science 61: 361–372, DOI 10.1051/forest:2004029.
• 28. Lichtenthaler HK, 2006. The Stress Concept in Plants: An Introduction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 851: 187–198.
• 29. McKee TB, Doesken NJ and Kleist J, 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time steps. Preprints, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, January 17–22, 179–184.
• 30. Michelot A, Breda N, Damesin C and Dufrene E, 2012. Differing growth responses to climatic variations and soil water deficits of Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris in a temperate forest. Forest Ecology and Management 265: 161–171, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.024.
• 31. Mérian P, Bontemps JD, Bergès L and Lebourgeois F, 2011. Spatial variation and temporal instability in climate-growth relationships of sessile oak (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.) under temperate conditions. Plant Ecology 212(11): 1855–1871, DOI 10.1007/s11258-011-9959-2.
• 32. MZe ČR, 2012. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2011(Report on Forest Management of the Czech Republic in 2011). MZe ČR, Praha: 138pp (in Czech).
• 33. Palmer WC, 1965. Meteorological Drought. Office of Climatology Research Paper 45. U.S. Weather Bureau, Washington, 65pp.
• 34. Petráš R and Mecko J, 2011. Effect of climatic factors on the dynamics of radial increments of Norway spruce, European beech and Sessile oak. Journal of Forest Science 57 (7): 293–302.
• 35. Popa I, Leca S, Crăciunescu A, Sidor C and Badea O, 2013. Dendroclimatic Response Variability of Quercus species in the Romanian Intensive Forest Monitoring Network. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 41 (1): 326–332.
• 36. Rybníček M, Čermák P, Kolář T and Žid T, 2010. Radial Growth and Health Condition of Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) Stands in Relation to Climate (Silesian Beskids, Czech Republic). Geochronometria 36(1): 9–16, DOI 10.2478/v10003-010-0017-1.
• 37. Rybníček M , Č ermák P , H adaš P , Ž id T a nd K olář T, 2 012. Dendrochronological Analysis and Habitual Stress Diagnostic Assessment of Norway Spruce (Picea abies) Stands in the Drahany Highlands. Wood Res-Slovakia 57 (2): 189–206.
• 38. Schweingruber FH, Eckstein D, Serre-Bachet F and Bräker OU, 1990. Identification, presentation and interpretation of event years and pointer years in dendrochronology. Dendrochronologia 8: 9–38.
• 39. Schweingruber FH, 1996. Tree Rings and Environment Dendroecology. Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Bern, Stuttgart, Vienna, 609pp.
• 40. Spiecker H, 1991. Zur Steuerung des Dickenwachst ums und der Astreinigung von Stiel- und Traubeneichen (Quercus petraea (MATT.) LIEBL. und Quercus robur L.). Schriftenreihe der Landesforstverwaltung Baden-Württemberg Band 72 Stuttgart, Selbstverlag der Landesforstverwaltung Baden-Württemberg, 155pp.
• 41. Štěpánek P, 2007. ProClimDB – software for processing climatological datasets. CHMI, regional office Brno. WEB site: <http://www.climahom.eu/ProcData.html>
• 42. Tegel W, Vanmoerkerke J and Büntgen U, 2010. Updating historical tree-ring records for climate reconstruction. Quaternary Science Reviews 29: 1957–1959, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.018.
• 43. Trnka M, Olesen JE, Kersebaum KC, Skjelvag AO, Eitzinger J, Seguin B, Peltonen-Sainio P, Rötter R, Iglesias A, Orlandini S, Dubrovsky M, Hlavinka P, Balek J, Eckersten H, Cloppet E, Calanca P, Gobin A, Vucetic V, Nejedlik P, Kumar S, Lalic B, Mestre A, Rossi F, Kozyra J, Alexandrov V, Semeradova D and Žalud Z, 2012. Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change. Global Change Biology 17(7): 2298–2318, DOI 10.1111/j.1365- 2486.2011.02396.x.
• 44. Vavrčík H and Gryc V, 2012. Analysis of the annual ring structure and wood density relations in English oak and Sessile oak. Wood Res- Slovakia 57 (4): 573–580.
• 45. Vicente-Serrano SM, Beguería S and López-Moreno JI, 2010. A Multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index – SPEI. J Climate 23: 1696–1718, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1.
• 46. Viewegh J, Kusbach A and Mikeska M, 2003. Czech forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Forest Science 49(2): 85–93.