Quantifi cation of ecological preferences of the Capercaille Tetrao urogallus by means of the habitat suitability index: a case study in the Augustów Forest (N-E Poland)

• Autorzy: Brzeziecki B. , Drozdowski S. , Zawadzka D. , Zawadzki J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Habitat structure and selection by the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus were assessed in the Augustów Forest (NE Poland), where a population of 50–80 birds and 11 active leks existed. Habitat preferences in the local scale were studied, based on measurements of total 1952 circular sample plots with radius of 15 m. On plots, in total, 10 variables describing forest structure (e.g. successional stage, canopy cover, vertical stand structure, share of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris, shrub layer cover, bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus cover, average height of ground vegetation, occurrence of feeding and roosting trees), as well as signs of Capercaillie presence, were assessed. Then, the model of Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) was constructed. Plots with high HSI scores were used by Capercaillie more often than expected in a case of a random choice, and those with low scores – less than expected. Capercaillie in the Augustów Forest prefers relatively old, one-layered stands, dominated by Scot pine with a sparsely developed shrub layer. The most important differences between abandoned and active leks were related to shrub cover in ground vegetation and height of ground vegetation and share of bilberry.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Augustów Forest; Capercaillie; forest structure; Habitat Suitability Index; Tetrao urogallus

PL

głuszec; Puszcza Augustowska; struktura lasu; Wskaźnik Przydatności Biotopu

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 60, nr 4
• Strony: 805--814
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Brzeziecki B.

• Department of Silviculture, University of Life Sciences in Warsaw, Nowoursynowska 159, 02–776 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Drozdowski S.

• Department of Silviculture, University of Life Sciences in Warsaw, Nowoursynowska 159, 02–776 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Zawadzka D.

• Institute of Forest Science, University of Łódź, Branch in Tomaszów Mazowiecki, Konstytucji 3 Maja 65/67, 97–200 Tomaszów Mazowiecki, Poland

autor

Zawadzki J.

• Grouse Specialist Group IUCN

Bibliografia

• 1. Angelstam P. 2004 – Habitat threshold and effects of forest landscape change on the distribution and abundance of black grouse and capercaillie – Ecological Bulletins, 51: 173–187.
• 2. Bollmann K., Weibel P., Graf R.F. 2005 An analysis of central Alpine capercaillie spring habitat at the forest stand scale – For. Ecol. Manage. 215: 307–318.
• 3. Bollmann K., Friedrich A., Fritsche B., Graf R.F., Imhof S., Weibel P. 2008 – Kleinräumige Habitatnutzung des Auerhuhns Tetrao urogallus im Alpenraum – Ornithol. Beob. 105: 53–61.
• 4. Braunisch V., Suchant R. 2007 – A model for evaluating ‘habitat potential’ of a landscape for capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: a tool for conservation planing – Wildl. Biol. 13, (Suppl.1): 21–33.
• 5. Głowaciński Z., Profus P. 2001 – Głuszec [Capercaillie] (In: Polska czerwona księga zwierząt. Kręgowce [Polish Red Data Book of Animals. Vertebrates.], Ed: Z. Głowaciński) – PWRiL, Warszawa, pp. 173–177 (in Polish).
• 6. Graf R.F., Bollmann K., Suter W., Bugmann H. 2005 – The importance of spatial scale in habitat models: capercaillie in the Swiss Alps – Lands. Ecol. 20: 703–717.
• 7. Graf R.F., Bollmann K., Sachot S., Suter W., Bugmann H. 2006 – On the generality of habitat distribution models: a case study of capercaillie in three Swiss regions – Ecography, 29: 319–328.
• 8. Hurstel A. 2005 – The HSI-model for capercaillie: a valuable management tool for the conservation of the species in the Vosges (France) – X^th International Grouse Symposium, 26–30^th September 2005, Luchon, France, 33 pp.
• 9. Klaus S., Andreev A.V., Bergmann H.H., Müller H.H., Porkert J. 1989 – Die Auerhühner – Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei. Band 86.Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg, Germany, 276 pp.
• 10. Krebs C.J. 1989 – Ecological methodology – Harper and Row, New York, New York, USA, 654 pp.
• 11. Miettinen J., Helle P., Nikula A., Niemelä P. 2008 – Large-scale landscape composition and capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) density in Finland – Ann. Zool. Fen. 45: 161–173.
• 12. Morrison M.L., Marcot B.G., Mannan R.W. 1992 – Wildlife-habitat relationships - University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 343 pp.
• 13. Palahí M., Pukkala T., Pascual L., Trasobares A. 2004 – Examining alternative landscape metrics in ecological forest landscape planning: a case for capercaillie in Catalonia Investigaciones Agrarias: Sist. Recur. For. 13: 527–538.
• 14. Pavlushchick T.E., Cherkas N.D.1997 – Vesennee pitanie glucharja Tetrao urogallus v Belovezskoj Pusce [Spring feeding of the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in the Białowieża Forest] – Parki Nar. Rez. Przyr. 16: 47–57 (in Russian, English summary).
• 15. Picozzi N., Catt D. C., Moss R. 1992 – Evaluation of capercaillie habitat – J Appl. Ecol. 29: 751–762.
• 16. Quevedo M., Bañuelos M.J., Sáez O., Obeso R. 2006 – Habitat selection by Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus at the edge of the species’ distribution – Wildl. Biol. 12: 267–276.
• 17. Rolstad J., Rolstad E., Wegge P. 2007 – Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus lek formation in young forest – Wildl. Biol. 13 (Suppl. 1): 59–67.
• 18. Rolstad J., Wegge P. 1987 – Distribution and size of capercaillie leks in relation to old forest fragmentation – Oecologia, 72: 389–394.
• 19. Rolstad J., Wegge P., Gjerde I. 1997 – Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus leks in fragmented forests: a 17-year study of the Varaldskogen population, southeastern Norway – Wildl. Biol. 3: 293–302.
• 20. Saniga M. 1996 – Habiatat characterisctics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus leks in central Slovakia – Biologia, Bratislava, 51: 191–199.
• 21. Saniga M. 2003 – Ecology of the capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and forest management in relation to its protection in the West Carpathians J. For. Sci. 49: 229–239.
• 22. Sirkiä S., Lindén A., Helle P., Nikula A., Knape J., Lindén H. 2010 – Are the declining trends in forest grouse populations due to changes in the forest age structure? A case study of Capercaillie in Findland – Biol. Conserv. 143: 1540–1548.
• 23. Solon J., Matuszkiewicz J. M. 2008 – Zmiany typów fitosocjologicznych lasów: kierunki, przyczyny i możliwości przeciwdziałania [Changes in phytosociological forest types: directions, causes, and possibility to counteract] (In: Zagrożenia ekosystemów leśnych przez człowieka. VIII Sympozjum Ochrony Ekosystemów Leśnych) [Anthropogenic threats to forest ecosystems. 8th Symposium of Forest Ecosystem Protection], Eds: S. Mazur, H. Tracz) – Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warsaw, pp. 56–66 (in Polish).
• 24. Storch I. 1993– Habitat selection by capercaillie in summer and autumn: Is bilberry important? – Oecologia, 95: 257–265.
• 25. Storch I. 2000 – Grouse: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000-2004 – WPA/BirdLife SSC Grouse Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and the World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK, 112 pp.
• 26. Storch I. 2001 – Capercaillie – Bird of Western Palearctic Update, 3: 1–24.
• 27. Storch I. 2002 – On spatial resolution in habitat models: Can small-scale forest structure explain capercaillie numbers? – Conserv. Ecol. 6: 6: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art6
• 28. Storch I. 2007 – Grouse: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2006–2010 – IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and World Pheasant Association, Fordingridge, UK, 114 pp.
• 29. Summers R.W., Proctor R., Thorton M., Avey G. 2004 – Habitat selection and diet of the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in Abernethy Forest, Strathspey, Scotland – Bird Study, 51: 58–68.
• 30. Summers R.W., McFarlane J., Pearce-Higgins J. 2007 – Measuring avoidance by Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus of woodlands close to tracks – Wildl. Biol. 13: 19–27.
• 31. Szczygielski M. 2007 – Changes in phytosociological features of fresh coniferous forest Peucedano-Pinetum in Piska and Augustowska Forest in span of 50 years – Stud. Mat. CEPL, Rogów 9 (2/3): 153–167 (in Polish, English summary).
• 32. Valkeajärvi P., Ijäs L., Lamberg T. 2007 – Capercaillie display grounds move - short and long term observations] – Suomen Riista, 53: 104–120 (in Finnish, English summary).
• 33. Van Horne B., Wiens J. A. 1991 – Forest bird habitat suitability index models and the development of general habitat model Fish and Wildlife Researches 8. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D. C. USA.
• 34. Verner J., Morrison M.L., Ralph C.J. 1986 Wildlife 2000: Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates – University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 470 pp.
• 35. Zawadzka D., Zawadzki J. 2008 – Dynamika populacji głuszca w Puszczy Augustowskiej w latach 1911–2005 [The population dynamics of capercaillie in the Augustowska Primeval Forest in 1911-2005] (In: Ochrona kuraków leśnych [Conservation of forest grouse] – Conference Proceedings, Janów Lubelski, 16-18 October 2007, Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych, pp. 25–34 (in Polish, English summary).