PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Influence of Cultivation Technology on the Productivity of Spring Wheat and the Humus State of Southern Carbonate Soils of Northern Kazakhstan

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Intensive use of the chernozem soils of Northern Kazakhstan since the development of virgin lands has led to soil erosion and loss of humus. Since 1954, according to researchers, 1.2 bln tons of organic matter have been irretrievably lost. During this period, the methods of tillage have changed significantly from surface to subsurface tillage, which led to a change in the method of accumulation of organic residues in the soil. The purpose of this study was the short-term monitoring of spring wheat cultivation technologies to observe their influence on crop productivity and soil agrocenosis. A virgin plot was used as a standard of soil fertility. Determination of nutrients in the soil was carried out by using the method of "wet chemistry" with spectrophotometric termination. An infrared analyzer was used to assess the grain quality. The identification of soil microorganisms was carried out on nutrient microbiological media, such as meat-and-peptone agar, starch-and-ammonia agar, and Czapek-Dox agar. The results of three-year studies showed that the humus content in the variants with permanent wheat decreased to 3.26–3.38%. The greatest decrease in humus content was observed in the two-field grain and fallow crop rotation (2.48%). The decrease in the amount of humus occurred as a result of insufficient intake of plant residues and mineral fertilizers. The content of nitrate nitrogen and mobile phosphorus in virgin soil is low. Soil micromycetes dominate on virgin lands, whereas ammonifiers and immobilizers dominate on cultivated soils. The high level of carbon dioxide emissions on virgin land (3.0 C2 kg/ha/hour) is due to the presence of a large amount of plant biomass. The most optimal variant out the considered technological backgrounds from the point of view of increasing yields up to 15.8 c/ha and preserving soil fertility (3.26% humus content) is the cultivation of permanent wheat with the introduction of fertilizers and herbicides. The use of two-field grain and fallow crop rotation leads to irreplaceable losses of organic matter (2.48%).
Rocznik
Strony
49--58
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 32 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • Scientific Production Center of Grain Farming named after A.I. Barayev, Shortandy 1, 021601, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan
autor
  • Scientific Production Center of Grain Farming named after A.I. Barayev, Shortandy 1, 021601, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan
autor
  • Scientific Production Center of Grain Farming named after A.I. Barayev, Shortandy 1, 021601, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan
autor
  • Scientific Production Center of Grain Farming named after A.I. Barayev, Shortandy 1, 021601, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan
  • Scientific Production Center of Grain Farming named after A.I. Barayev, Shortandy 1, 021601, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan
Bibliografia
  • 1. Akhmetov K.A. 1988. Field crop rotation productivity on the Southern Chernozems of North Kazakhstan. [in Russian] Available at: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=SU19890086395
  • 2. Ayupov Z.Z., Anokhina N.S., Minnebayeva I.F., Rytseva N.G. 2009. Influence of agriculture biologization elements on the dynamics of labile humic substances, yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Vestnik OGU, 6(100), 537–539. [in Russian]
  • 3. Chimitdorzhieva E.O. 2017. Carbon stocks in postagrogenic dry steppe soils of western Transbaikal. Aridnye ekosistemy, 23(3(72)), 59–65.[in Russian]
  • 4. Committee for Technical Regulation and Metrology of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2002. ST RK 1054-2002. Grain. Methods for determining the quantity and quality of gluten in wheat using mechanized means. Astana. [in Russian]
  • 5. Committee for Technical Regulation and Metrology of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2006. ST RK 1564-2006. Determination of the main indicators of grain quality using infrared analyzers. Astana. [in Russian]
  • 6. Committee of Standards, Measures and Measuring Instruments under the USSR Council of Ministers. 2001a. GOST 10840-64. Grain. Methods for performing the weight-per-bushel test. IPK Izdatel’stvo standartov, Moscow. [in Russian]
  • 7. Committee of Standards, Measures and Measuring Instruments under the USSR Council of Ministers. 2001b. GOST 10987-76 Grain. Methods for determining vitreousness. IPK Izdatel’stvo standartov, Moscow. [in Russian]
  • 8. Ershov Y.I. 2004. Organic matter of the biosphere and soil. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 104.
  • 9. Fedorets N.G., Medvedeva M.V. 2009. Methodology for the study of soils in urbanized areas. Karelskii nauchnyi tsentr RAN, Petrozavodsk, 84. [in Russian]
  • 10. Funakawa S., Nakamura I., Akshalov K., Kosaki T. 2004. Soil organic matter dynamics under grain farming in Northern Kazakhstan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 50, 1211–1218.
  • 11. Karabutov A.P., Tyutyunov S.I., Solovichenko V.D. 2019. Humus status of typical black soil under different intensity of arable land usage. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 13(2), 1317–1321.
  • 12. Karbozova-Saljnikov E., Funakawa S., Akhmetov K., Kosaki T. 2004. Soil organic matter status of Chernozem soil in North Kazakhstan: Effects of summer fallow. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 36(9), 1373–1381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.027
  • 13. Kenenbayev S.B., Yesenbayeva G.L. 2020.Adaptation of priority research direction in agriculture to climate change in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology, 6(1), 46–49.
  • 14. Koroleva I.E., Lebedeva I.I., Grebennikov A.M. 2013. Gumusnoe i azotnoe sostoyanie tselinnykh pakhotnykh chernozemov [Humus and nitrogen state of virgin arable chernozems]. Bulletin of the Soil Institute named after V.V. Dokuchaev, 71, 27–35.
  • 15. Kunanbayev K., Churkinа G., Rukavitsina I., Filippova N., Utebayev M. 2019. Potential Attractiveness of Soil Fungus Trichoderma Inhamatum for Biodegradation of the Glyphosate Herbicide. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(11), 240–245.
  • 16. Kunanbayev K.K. 2017. Group composition of soil organic matter in agrocenoses of Northern Kazakhstan. Agrofizika, 3, 27–33.
  • 17. Liaudanskiene I., Zukaitis T., Velykis A., Satkus A., Parasotas I. 2021. The impact of tillage practices on the distribution of humified organic carbon in a clay loam. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 108(1), 11–18.
  • 18. Methodological guidelines for conducting a comprehensive agrochemical survey of agricultural soils. 2004. GU “Respublikanskii nauchno – metodicheskii tsentr agrokhimicheskoi sluzhby” MSKh RK, Nauchnyi, 91. [in Russian]
  • 19. Mineev V.G., Ed. 2001. A practical course in agricultural chemistry: a manual, 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, 689. [in Russian]
  • 20. Pashkov S.V., Baibusinova S.B. 2017. Natural agrogenic conditionality of soil fertility in Northern Kazakhstan. Vestnik Zabaykal’skogo Gosudarvtsennogo Universiteta, 2, 15–27. [in Russian]
  • 21. Polupan N.I. 1986. The nature and intensity of humus formation in the soils of the southern dry steppe of Ukraine under various anthropogenic influences. Agrokhimiya, 12, 62–72. [in Russian]
  • 22. Raiesi F. 2021. The quantity and quality of soil organic matter and humic substances following dry-farming and subsequent restoration in an upland pasture. CATENA, 202, 105249.
  • 23. Saparov A., Pachikin K., Mazhitovich M.B., Schindler U., Müller L., Eulenstein F. 2019. The current state of soil cover in Kazakhstan, problems and solution-Langfassung. Jahrestagung der DBG 2017: Horizonte des Bodens, Göttingen, Germany, 2–7 September 2017.
  • 24. Sharkov I.N., Ed. 2010. Reproduction of humus as an integral part of the soil fertility management system. Rosselkhozakademiya. GNU Sib.NIIZiKh, Novosibirsk, 34. [in Russian]
  • 25. Suleimenov M., Akhmetov K., Kaskarbayev Z., Kireyev A. 2005. Role of wheat in diversified cropping systems in dryland agriculture of Central Asia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29(2), 143–150.
  • 26. Takata Y., Funakawa S., Akshalov K., Ishida N., Kosaki T. 2007. Influence of land use on the dynamics of soil organic carbon in northern Kazakhstan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 53(2), 162–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00127.x
  • 27. Takata Y., Funakawa S., Akshalov K., Ishida N., Kosaki T. 2008. Regional evaluation of the spatio-temporal variation in soil organic carbon dynamics for rainfed cereal farming in northern Kazakhstan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 54(5), 794–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00298.x
  • 28. Titova N.A., Kogut B.M. 1991. The transformation of organic matter in agricultural soil use. Pochvovedenie i agrokhimiya, 8, 3–156.
  • 29. Toktar M., Koshen B.M., Shayakhmetova A.S., Kushenov B.M., Nurgaziev R. 2019. Dehumification of soils in the northern Kazakhstan region. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 19(3.2), 109–116.
  • 30. Vasiliev I.P., Tulikov A.M., Bezdyrev G.I. 2004. A practical course in agriculture. Kolos, Moscow, 424. [in Russian]
  • 31. Voltr V., Menšík L., Hlisnikovsky L., Hruška M. 2021. The soil organic matter in connection with soil properties and soil inputs. Agronomy, 11(4), 779.
  • 32. Zelles L., Scheundert I., Korte F. 1985. Side effects of some pesticides on non-target soil microorganisms. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 20, 457–488. [in Russian]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-54c7cc97-9e58-4efe-ab42-c31a7dafcbf9
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.