Tytuł artykułu
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Objective: The literature has approved that the use of the concept of diagnostic reference level (DRL) as a part of an optimization process could help to reduce patient doses in diagnostic radiology comprising the Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. There are four public/governmental CT centers in the province (Semnan, Iran) and, to our knowledge, after about 12 years since the launch of the first CT scanner in the province there is no dosimetry information on those CT scanners. The aim of this study was to evaluate CT dose indices with the aim of the establishment of the DRL for head, chest, cervical spine, and abdomen-pelvis examinations. Methods: Scan parameters of 381 patients were collected during two months from 4 CT scanners. The CT dose index (CTDI) was measured using a calibrated ionization chamber on two cylindrical poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms. For each sequences, weighted CTDI (CTDIw), volumetric CTDI (CTDIv) and dose length product (DLP) were calculated. The 75th percentile was proposed as the criterion for DRL values. Results: Proposed DRL (CTDIw, CTDIv, DLP) for the head, chest, cervical spine, and abdomen-pelvis were (46.1 mGy, 46.1 mGy, 723 mGy × cm), (13.8 mGy, 12.0 mGy, 377 mGy × cm), (40.0 mGy, 40.0 mGy, 572 mGy × cm) and (14.9 mGy, 12.1 mGy, 524 mGy × cm), respectively. Conclusion: Comparison with the others results from the other countries indicates that the head, chest and abdomen-pelvis scans in our region are lower or in the range of the other studies investigated in terms of dose. In the case of cervical spine scanning it’s necessary to review and regulate scan protocols to reach acceptable dose levels.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
51--55
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Medical Physics, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Science
autor
- Department of Medical Physics, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Science
autor
- Department of Medical Physics, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Science
Bibliografia
- [1] Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun F, et al. Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;142(2-4):244-254.
- [2] Mulkens T, Salgado R, Bellinck P. Dose Optimization and Reduction in CT of the Brain and Head and Neck Region. In: Tack D, Kalra M, Gevenois P (eds). Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2011. p. 281-306.
- [3] Tack D, Gevenois P (eds). Radiation Dose from Adult and Pediatric Multidetector Computed Tomography. Springer. 2007. section 6:276.
- [4] Karim MKA, Hashim S, Bradley DA, et al. Radiation doses from computed tomography practice in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Radiat Phys Chem. 2016;121:69-74.
- [5] Reiser MF, Hricak H, Knauth M. Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT. Springer-Verlag. 2012. p. 642.
- [6] European Commission. Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures: Radiation Protection 109. Directorate-General, Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, European Commission; 1999. p. 26.
- [7] Vassileva J, Rehani M. Diagnostic reference levels. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(1):W1-W3.
- [8] Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Rainford LA. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1018):1390-1397.
- [9] Cousins C. Changes Impacting on Radiation Protection in Medicine Since the Malaga Conference. in: Radiation Protection in Medicine: Setting the Scene for the Next Decade. Proceedings of an International Conference 3-7 December 2012, Bonn, Germany. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): IAEA. 2015 p. 31-35.
- [10] Zhang M, Chu C. Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography. J Digit Imaging. 2012;25(1):196-200.
- [11] Hart D, Wall B. UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(3):285-291.
- [12] Jurkovic S, Segota D, Posedel D, et al. Radiation Doses on CT Scanner in University Hospital Rijeka and Comparison with European Commision Dose Reference Levels. in: Knezevic Z; Krajcar Bronic I; Majer M. (eds). Proceedings of 9th Symposium of the Croatian Radiation Protection Association. 2013. p.259-264.
- [13] Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: Review and additional advice. Annals of the ICRP. 2001;31(4):33-52.
- [14] McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, et al. AAPM Report No. 96. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Report of AAPM Task Group 23. 2008.
- [15] Khoramian D, Sistani S. Estimation and comparison of the radiation effective dose during coronary computed tomography angiography examinations on single-source 64-MDCT and dual-source 128-MDCT. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37(4):826-836.
- [16] Janbabanezhad Toori A, Shabestani-Monfared A, Deevband MR, et al. Dose Assessment in Computed Tomography Examination and Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Mazandaran, Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2015;5(4):177-184.
- [17] van der Molen A, Schilham A, Stoop P, et al. A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(3):383-890.
- [18] Hiles P, Brennen S, Scott S, Davies J. A survey of patient dose and image quality for computed tomography scanners in Wales. J Radiol Prot. 2001;21(4):345-354.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-54833a80-1ac9-4e2d-b7d2-ddec2e528c45
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.