Pattern of Energy Productivity and Gross Domestic Product Among European Countries

Stoenoiu, Carmen Elena

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Pattern of Energy Productivity and Gross Domestic Product Among European Countries

Autorzy

Stoenoiu Carmen Elena

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Wzór produktywności energetycznej i produktu krajowego brutto wśród krajów europejskich

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The first part of the study performs a comparative analysis over a period of 5 years between countries grouped by regions and regions through the energy intensity indicator using the data available in the Eurostat database. A statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis using the Tukey test, and the three indicators surveyed (energy productivity, energy intensity of the economy, gross domestic product at market prices) allowed comparisons between countries. Thus, groups that differ in average have been highlighted. Using the Tukey test, all comparisons were made between the analyzed countries, taking two in two of each region, for each indicator, allowing the determination of homogeneous groups by checking the null hypothesis.

W artykule przeprowadzono analizę porównawczą odnoszącą się do okresu 5 lat między krajami pogrupowanymi według regionów oraz regionów pogrupowanych za pomocą wskaźnika intensywności energii, korzystając z danych dostępnych w bazie Eurostatu. Analizę statystyczną przeprowadzono za pomocą jednokierunkowej analizy wariancji ANOVA i analizy post-hoc przy użyciu testu Tukeya, a trzy analizowane wskaźniki (wydajność energetyczna, energochłonność gospodarki, produkt krajowy brutto po cenach rynkowych) umożliwiły dokonanie właściwych porównań pomiędzy wybranymi krajami. Wyróżniono grupy, które różnią się średnią. Korzystając z testu Tukeya, dokonano wszystkich porównań między analizowanymi krajami, biorąc po dwa z każdego regionu, dla każdego wskaźnika, umożliwiając określenie homogenicznych grup poprzez sprawdzenie hipotezy zerowej.

Słowa kluczowe

economic growth development country significant differences

wzrost ekonomiczny rozwój kraju znaczące różnice

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2018

Tom

Vol. 13, nr 2

Strony

113--123

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 41 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Stoenoiu Carmen Elena

Carmen.Stoenoiu@emd.utcluj.ro

Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Machinery and Electric Drives, Romania

Bibliografia

1. ABOSEDRA S., DAH A., GHOSH S., 2009, Electricity consumption and economic growth, the case of Lebanon, in: Appl. Energy, 86, p. 429-32.
2. ALLEN R.C., 2009, The British industrial revolution in global perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Available at: http://assets.cambri dge.org/97805218/68273/frontmatter/97805218682 73 _frontmatter.pdf.
3. AL-MULALI U., SHEAU-TING L., 2014, Econometric analysis of trade, exports, imports, energy consumption and CO2 emission in six regions, in: Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev., 33, p.484-498.
4. APERGIS N., PAYNE J. E., 2012, Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: Evidence from a panel error correction model, in: Energy Econ. 34 (3), p. 733-738.
5. BERNDT E.R., 1990, Energy use, technical progress and productivity growth: a survey of economic issues, in: J. Prod. Anal., 2, p. 67-83.
6. BLACK K., 2010, Business statistics: For contemporary decision making, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Available at: https://books.google.ro /books?hl=ro&lr=&id=KQ25WExx5usC&oi=fnd& pg=PR17&ots=Jmd_b2LNdT&sig=_kXoF49sZtPgg16j25OYQjb6Zm0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage& q &f=false.
7. BOUSSEMART J.P., BRIEC W., KERSTENS K., POUNTINEAU J.C., 2003, Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices: theoretical comparisons and empirical illustration, in: Bull. Econ. Res. 55, p. 391-405.
8. CHALVATZIS J.K., IOANNIDIS A., 2017, Energy Supply Security in Southern Europe and Ireland, in: Energy Procedia, 105, p. 2916- 2922.
9. CHALVATZIS J.K., 2009, Electricity generation development of Eastern Europe: A carbon technology management case study for Poland, in: Renew Sustain Energy Rev., 13, p.1606-1612.
10. CHAMBERS R.G., CHUNG Y., FäRE R., 1998, Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency, in: J. Optim. Theory Appl., 98, p. 351364.
11. CHENM S.T., KUOM H.I., CHENM C.C., 2007, The relationship between GDP and electricity consumption in 10 Asian countries, in: Energy Policy, 35 (4), p. 2611-2621.
12. COGMAN D., JASLOWITZER P., RAPP M.S., 2015, Why emerging-market companies acquire abroad?, McKinsey & Company. Available at: https ://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategyand-corporate-finance/our-insights/why-emergingmarket-companies-acquire-abroad.
13. DALY H., 1997a, Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz, in: Ecological Economics, 22, p. 261266.
14. DALY H., 1997b, Reply to Solow/Stiglitz, in: Ecological Economics, 22, p. 271-273.
15. EUROPA EU, http://publications.europa.eu/code/ro/ ro-5000500.htm (1.02.2018).
16. FLOYD J.E., 2010, Statistics for economists: A beginning, University of Toronto. Available at: https:// www.economics.utoronto.ca/jfloyd/stats/ecs10.pdf.
17. GAN L., ESKELAND G.S., KOLSHUS H.H., 2007, Green electricity market development: Lessons from Europe and the US, in: Energy Policy, 35 (1), p. 144155.
18. GELMAN A., 2005, Discussion paper analysis of variance – Why it is more important than ever, in: The Annals of Statistics, 33 (1), p. 1-53. DOI: 10.1214/009053604000001048
19. IMF (International Monetary Fund, 2015, World economic outlook – Adjusting to lower commodity prices, IMF Publications, Washington.
20. LUENBERGER D.G., 1992, New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium, in: J. Optim. Theory Appl. 75, p. 221-264.
21. MANAGI S., 2003, Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices in Japan, 1955-1995, in: Appl. Econ. Lett. 10, p. 581-584.
22. MAPS OF WORLD, http://www.mapsofworld.com/ europe/country-groupings/ (1.02.2018).
23. MARQUES A.C., FUINHAS J.A., GASPAR J.S., 2016, On the nexus of energy use – economic development: a panel Approach, in: Energy Procedia, 106, p. 225-234. 24. MARTCHAMADOL J., KUMAR S., 2012, Thailand's energy security indicators, in: Renew Sustain Energy Rev., 16, p. 6103-6122.
25. MAXWELL, S.E., DELANEY H.D., 2003, Designing experiments and analysing data: A model comparison perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
26. MIGA (Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency), 2010, World Investment and Political Risk 2009, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington.
27. MURRY D.A., NAN G.D., 1996, A definition of the gross domestic product–electrification interrelationship, in: Journal of Energy and Development, 19 (2), p. 275-283.
28. NARAYAN P.K., WONG P., 2009, A panel data analysis of the determinants of oil consumption: the case of Australia, in: Appl. Energy, 86, p. 2771-2775.
29. NEL W.P., van ZYL G., 2010, Defining limits: energy constrained economic growth, in: Appl. Energy, 87, p. 168-177.
30. OECD/IEA, 2015, Energy efficiency – Market report 2015, Market trends and medium-term prospects, International Energy Agency Publications, Paris. Available at: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/MediumTermEnergyeffici encyMarketReport2015.pdf.
31. PATTERSON M.G., 1996, What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators, and methodological issues, in: Energy Policy, 24, p. 377-390.
32. SADORSKY P., 2014, The effect of urbanization and industrialization on energy use in emerging economies: Implications for sustainable development, in: The American journal of economics and sociology, 73 (2), p. 392-409.
33. SELTMAN H.J., 2015, Experimental design and analysis - Chapter 7: One-way ANOVA. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 171-190, Available at: http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman.
34. SOLOW R.M., 1997, Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz, in: Ecological Economics, 22, p. 267-268.
35. STIGLITZ J., 1997, Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz, in: Ecological Economics, 22, p. 269-270.
36. TOPPING J.C., 2013, Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options, by Marilyn A. Brown and Benjamin Sovacool, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011, DOI:10.1002/pam.21712.
37. TUGCU C.T., OZTURK I., ASLAN A., 2012, Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited: Evidence from G7 countries, in: Energy Econ. 34 (6), p. 1942-1950.
38. WANG C., WANG A., 2011, Analyze the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in China, in: Energy Procedia, 5, p. 974- 979.
39. WANGA Z., WANGA Q., WENNERSTENA R., SUNA Q., 2015, Transitions to sustainable energy and material systems – outline of principles for scenarios, in: Energy Procedia, 75, p. 2683- 2693.
40. WOLDE-RUFAEL Y., 2006, Electricity consumption and economic growth: a time series experience for 17 African countries, in: Energy Policy, 34 (10), 1106-1114.
41. YANQING X., MINGSHENG X., 2011, A 3E model on energy consumption, Environment pollution and economic growth – An empirical research based on panel data, in: Energy Procedia, 16, p. 2011-2018.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-53d9a7a7-07c8-407e-8ce8-b8b21119f230