PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Exploring green packaging acceptance in fast moving consumer goods in emerging economy: the case of Malaysia

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background: Green packaging plays an important role to reduce environmental wastes and protect the environments which aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). However, the lack of environmental awareness, inconvenience of support, cost, and lack of government enforcement is the most frequently cited reasons for discouraging green packaging usage. This study aims to establish a model to understand the motivational drivers of green packaging acceptance from the lens of the Theory of Consumption Value. Methods: Data from self-administered questionnaire were obtained for this qualitative study to address the affirmation hypotheses. A total of 426 questionnaires were distributed among the shopping centres consumer’s in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Each individual was approached at the major shopping centers where the green packaging was in practice. The researchers employed a partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach using the SmartPLS 3 package to analyze the data. Results: Findings from this study indicated that three values have a significant impact on consumer's green packaging acceptance which is emotional, functional, and social value while conditional and epistemic have no statistical impact on consumer's green packaging acceptance. Conclusion: These research findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the drivers that motivate consumers to shift from traditional packaging to green packaging and subsequently contributing to long-term urban sustainability and quality of life predominantly in the emerging economy. Future researcher should be taken forward by undertaking further studies which include longitudinal and comparative studies of consumer acceptance towards green packaging in both developed and developing countries..
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
503--517
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 58 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Fakulti Ekonomi dan Pengurusan, Universiti Kebangsaan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • E-Production Performance Operation Department Zalora, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Order Department, LKL Fruit Trading, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Ahmad N., Buniamin S., Rauf F., Johari N., Rashid A., 2016. Green Government Procurement Practices (GGP) in Malaysian Public Enterprises. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 27-34. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00006-X.
  • 2. Ali J., 2017. Consumer Perception Towards Green Practice: An Empirical Study on Young Consumer from Bangladesh Perspective. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 8(23), 10-18.
  • 3. Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W., 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • 4. Asshidin N., Abidin N., Borhan H., 2016. Perceived Quality and Emotional Value that Influence Consumer's Purchase Intention towards American and Local Products. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 639-643. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00078-2.
  • 5. Auliandri T.A., Thoyib A., Rohman F., Rofiq A., 2018. Does green packaging matter as a business strategy? Exploring young consumers’ consumption in an emerging market. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 376-384.
  • 6. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y., Phillips L.W., 1991. Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458.
  • 7. Barber N., Bishop M., Gruen T., 2014. Who pays more (or less) for pro-environmental consumer goods? Using the auction method to assess actual willingness-to-pay. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 218-227. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.010.
  • 8. Barnes C., 2016. Omni-Channel RetailChallenges and Opportunities for Packaging Innovation. Integrating the Packaging and Product Experience in Food and Beverages, 59-76. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100356-5.00004-8.
  • 9. Biswas A., Roy M., 2015a. Green products: an exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 463-468. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.075
  • 10. Biswas A., Roy M., 2015b. Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: testing the structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 332-340. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.042
  • 11. Czajkowski M., Hanley N., Nyborg K., 2015. Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(4), 647-670.
  • 12. Dharmadhikari S., 2012. Eco-friendly packaging in supply chain. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 7-18.
  • 13. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., Lang A.G., 2009. Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
  • 14. Gadenne D., Sharma B., Kerr D., Smith T., 2011. The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7684-7694.
  • 15. Gilli M., Nicolli F., Farinelli P., 2018. Behavioural attitudes towards waste prevention and recycling. Ecological Economics, 154, 294-305. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.009.
  • 16. Gonçalves H., Lourenço T., Silva G., 2016. Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1484-1491.
  • 17. Groh K., Backhaus T., Carney-Almroth B., Geueke B., Inostroza P., Lennquist A., Leslie H., Maffini M., Slunge D., Trasande L., Warhurst A., Muncke J., 2019. Overview of known plastic packaging associated chemicals and their hazards. Science of The Total Environment, 651(2), 3253-3268.
  • 18. Guillard V., Gaucel S., Fornaciari C., Angellier-Coussy H., Buche P., Gontard N., 2018. The Next Generation of Sustainable Food Packaging to Preserve Our Environment in a Circular Economy Context. Frontiers in Nutrition. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00121
  • 19. Hair J.F., Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Gudergan S.P., 2017. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, Research Gate. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • 20. Hao Y., Liu H., Chen H., Sha Y., Ji H., Fan J., 2019. What affect consumers’ willingness to pay for green packaging? Evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 21-29. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.001.
  • 21. Hellström D., Olsson A., 2017. Managing Packaging Design for Sustainable Development: A Compass for Strategic Directions. John Willy & Son, Ltd.
  • 22. Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
  • 23. Huang J., 2017. Sustainable Development of Green Paper Packaging. Environment and Pollution, 6(2), 1-5.
  • 24. Joshi Y., Rahman Z., 2015. Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2), 128-143.
  • 25. Kato T., Tsuda K., 2017. Related Verification of Emotional Value and Company Brand Emitted from Pure Recall. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 1298-1307. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.093.
  • 26. Khan S., Mohsin M., 2017. The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 65-74. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.187
  • 27. Krejcie R.V., Morgan D.W., 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
  • 28. Kristensson P., Wästlund E., Söderlund M., 2017. Influencing consumers to choose environment friendly offerings: Evidence from field experiments. Journal of Business Research, 76, 89-97. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.003
  • 29. Liang D., Hou C., Jo M., Sarigöllü E., 2019. Pollution avoidance and green purchase: The role of moral emotions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1301-1310. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.103
  • 30. Lin P., Huang Y., 2012. The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values. Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 11-18.
  • 31. Ma X., Park C., Moultrie J., 2020. Factors for eliminating plastic in packaging: The European FMCG experts’ view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120492. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120492.
  • 32. Majid I., Ahmad Nayik G., Mohammad Dar S., Nanda V., 2018. Novel food packaging technologies: Innovations and future prospective. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17(4), 454-462.
  • 33. Mamun A.A., Mohamad M.R., Yaacob M.R., Mohiuddin M., 2018. Intention and behavior towards green consumption among low-income households. Journal of Environmental Management, 227, 73-86. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.061.
  • 34. Martinho G., Pires A. Portela G., Fonseca M., 2015. Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 103, 58-68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.012
  • 35. McCarthy B., Liu H., 2017. Food waste and the ‘green’ consumer. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(2), 126-132.
  • 36. Mohamed Z., Hosseinpou M., Rezai G., Shamsudin M., AbdLatif I., 2015. How Go Green Campaign Effects on Malaysian Intention towards Green Behaviour. Journal of Applied Sciences, 15(6), 929-933.
  • 37. Moustafa H., Youssef A.M., Darwish N.A., Abou-Kandil A.I., 2019. Eco-friendly polymer composites for green packaging: Future vision and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 172, 16-25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.048.
  • 38. Nguyen A.T., Parker L., Brennan L., Lockrey S., 2020. A consumer definition of ecofriendly packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119792. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119792.
  • 39. Olaisen J., Revang O., 2017. Working smarter and greener: Collaborative knowledge sharing in virtual global project teams. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1441-1448.
  • 40. Osman A., Othman Y., Salahudin S., Abdullah M., 2016. The Awareness and Implementation of Green Concepts in Marketing Mix: A Case of Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 428- 433. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00053-8.
  • 41. Paul J., Modi A., Patel J., 2016. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123-134. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006.
  • 42. Prakash G., Pathak P., 2017. Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 385-393. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116
  • 43. Rajadurai J., Bathmanathan V., Azami N., 2018. Gen Y Green Purchasing Behavior in Relation YO Energy Conservation and Environmental Preservation Products in Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4). http://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.23113.
  • 44. Rajendran S.D., Wahab S.N., 2017. Purchasing Intention towards Green Packaged Products: An Exploratory Study among Malaysian Consumers. 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Business and Social Sciences, 29-30 March, 347-355, Langkawi, Malaysia.
  • 45. Rajendran S.D., Wahab S.N., Singh M.K.P., 2019. Malaysian Consumers Preference for Green Packaging. International Journal of Society Systems Science,11(4), 312-331.
  • 46. Rundh B., 2016. The role of packaging within marketing and value creation. British Food Journal, 118(10), 2491-2511.
  • 47. Sheth J., Newman B., Gross B., 1991. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
  • 48. Sijtsema S., Onwezen M., Reinders M., Dagevos H., Partanen A., Meeusen M., 2016. Consumer perception of bio-based products-An exploratory study in 5 European countries. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 77, 61-69. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.007.
  • 49. Singh G., Pandey N., 2018. The determinants of green packaging that influence buyers’ willingness to pay a price premium. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26(3), 221-230.
  • 50. Siracusa V., Rosa M., 2018. Sustainable Packaging. Sustainable Food Systems from Agriculture to Industry, 275-307. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811935-8.00008-1.
  • 51. Suki M.N., 2016. Consumer environmental concern and green product purchase in Malaysia: structural effects of consumption values. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 204-214. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.087
  • 52. Sun Y., Liu N., Zhao M., 2019. Factors and mechanisms affecting green consumption in China: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 481-493. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.241
  • 53. UNDP (United Nation Development Programme) (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
  • 54. Van Leeuwen G., Mohnen P., 2016. Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of Green innovation for the Netherlands. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1-2), 63-77.
  • 55. Wang Q., Zhou M., 2015. Research on the Food Green Packaging Under the Sustainable Development. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 7(12), 910-913.
  • 56. Wilson N., Rickard B., Saputo R., Ho S., 2017. Food waste: The role of date labels, package size, and product category. Food Quality and Preference, 55, 35-44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.004.
  • 57. Wong F., Yazdanifard R., 2015. Green Marketing: A Study of Consumers’ Buying Behavior in Relation to Green Products. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 15(5). 17-23.
  • 58. Xie C., Bagozzi R., Grønhaug K., 2015. The role of moral emotions and individual differences in consumer responses to corporate green and non-green actions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(3), 333-356.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-536b3ec9-2e58-4a0f-9509-865f7589cea1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.