Driver Workload Response to In-Vehicle Device Operations

• Autorzy: Jerome C. J. , Ganey H. C. N. , Mouloua M. , Hancock P. A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A central concern of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) is the effect of in-vehicle devices (e.g., cell phones, navigation systems, radios, etc.) on driver performance and safety. As diverse and innovative technologies are designed and implemented for in-vehicle use, questions regarding the presence and use of these devices assume progressively greater importance. Further concerns for advanced driver training require us to develop and validate reliable and effective procedures for assessing such effects. This work examines a number of candidate procedures, in particular the evaluation of change in cognitive workload as a strategy by which such goals might be achieved.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

driver distraction; telematics; workload; cellular phones

PL

obciążenie fizyczne; telefonia komórkowa; fizjologia pracy; kierowcy i maszyniści; psychologia pracy; radio; systemy nawigacji

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2002
• Tom: Vol. 8, No. 4
• Strony: 539--546
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 13 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Jerome C. J.

• Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA

autor

Ganey H. C. N.

• Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA

autor

Mouloua M.

• Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA

autor

Hancock P. A.

• Institute for Simulation and Training & Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA

Bibliografia

• 1.Brown, I.D., Tickner, A.H., & Simmons, D.C.V. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 419-424.
• 2.Edwards, M. (2001). Driver distraction and safety: Implications for telematic devices (AAA Report). Lake Mary, FL, USA: American Automobile Association (AAA).
• 3.Hancock, P.A., & Diaz, D. (2002). Ergonomics as a foundation for a science of purpose. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3(2), 115-123.
• 4.Hancock, P.A., & Meshkati, N. (Eds.). (1988). Human mental workload. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
• 5.Hancock, P.A., & Ranney, T. (1999). The effects of in-vehicle distraction on driver response during a crucial driving maneuver: A reply. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 313-316.
• 6.Hancock, P.A., & Scallen, S.F. (1999). The driving question. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 47-55. 7.Hancock, P.A., & Verwey, W.B. (1997). Fatigue, workload and adaptive driver systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 495-506.
• 8.Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 617-623.
• 9.McKnight, A.J., & McKnight, A.S. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident analysis and prevention, 25(3), 259-265.
• 10.Meshkati, N., Hancock, P.A., Rahimi, M., & Dawes, S.M. (1995). Techniques in mental workload assessment. In J. Wilson & E.N. Corlett (Eds.), Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology (2nd ed., pp. 749-782). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
• 11.Moray, N. (Ed.). (1979). Mental workload. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press.
• 12.Tijerina, L. (1999). Commentary on the effects of in-vehicle distraction on driver response during a crucial driving maneuver. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 311-312.
• 13.Wickens, C.D. (1987). Attention. In P.A. Hancock (Ed.), Human factors psychology (pp. 29–80). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.