Comparative dynamic analysis of the portal cranes of type H and X

• Autorzy: Vasiljević Rade

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15632/jtam-pl/126755

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper, a comparative dynamic analysis of the portal cranes of type H and X is described. The difference of the considered cranes arises from the difference of their portals. These two types of portals have the same main geometric measurements. They differ only at the medium level in the horizontal plane. The first type of the portal on the middle level has an H-frame, while the second type has an X-frame. In this paper, dynamic parameters of the two portals have been compared. Estimation has been done to find which of the two types of portals has more favourable dynamic stability for overturn.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

portal cranes; type H; type X; Finite Element Method; comparative dynamicanalysis

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Mechaniki Teoretycznej i Stosowanej
• Czasopismo: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 58 nr 4
• Strony: 825--839
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Vasiljević Rade

• Faculty of Maritime Academic Studies, Belgrade, Serbia

Bibliografia

• 1. Abdel-Rahman E.M., Nayfeh A.H, Masoud Z.N., 2003, Dynamics and control of cranes: a review, Journal of Vibration and Control, 9, 7, 863-909.
• 2. Bathe K.J., 1996, Finite Element Procedures, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
• 3. Chopra A.K., 2006, Dynamics of Structures, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
• 4. Gustafsson T., 1996, On the design and implementation of a rotary crane controller, European Journal of Control, 2, 3, 166-175.
• 5. Ito H., Hasegawa M., Irie T., Kato Y., 1985, Study on dynamic stability of a truck crane, Bulletin of JSME, 28, 244, 2467-2473.
• 6. Ju F., Choo Y.S., Cui F.S., 2006, Dynamic response of tower crane induced by the pendulum motion of the payload, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43, 376-389.
• 7. Jerman B., Hribar A., 2013, Dynamics of the mathematical pendulum suspended from a moving mass, Technical Gazette, 20, 1, 59-64.
• 8. Lee H.-H., 2004, A new motion-planning scheme for overhead cranes with high-speed hoisting, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 126, 2, 359-364.
• 9. Maczyński A., Szczotka M., 2002, Comparison of models for dynamic analysis of a mobile telescopic crane, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 40, 4, 1051-1074.
• 10. Petković Z., 1996, Metal Construction in Machine Building Industry 1 (in Serbian), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Belgrade, Belgrade.
• 11. Shaikh A.A., Kumar D.D., 2016, Lifting capacity enhancement of a crawler crane by improving stability, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 54, 1, 219-227.
• 12. Spyrakos C., 1994, Finite Element Modeling in Engineering Practice, Algor ®, Pittsburgh.
• 13. Towarek Z., 1998, The dynamic stability of a crane standing on soil during the rotation of the boom, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 40, 6, 557-574.
• 14. Vasiljević R., Gašić M., Savković M., 2016, Parameters influencing the dynamic behaviour of the carrying structure of a type H portal crane, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 62, 10, 591-602.
• 15. Vasiljević R., Savković M., Bulatović R., 2013, The approaches to the mathematical mechanical modeling supporting construction, IMK-14 – Research and Development in Heavy Machinery, 19, 1, EN29-38.
• 16. Wu J.J., 2004, Dynamic responses of a three dimensional framework due to a moving carriage hoisting a swinging object, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 59, 1679-1702.
• 17. Wu J.J., Whittaker A.R., Cartmell M.P., 2000, The use of finite element techniques for calculating the dynamic response of structures to moving loads, Computers and Structures, 78, 789-799.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).