The importance of heritage conservation in architectural education at university level

• Autorzy: Kirschke Krystyna

Warianty tytułu

PL

Znaczenie ochrony dziedzictwa w edukacji architektonicznej na poziomie uniwersyteckim

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The subject of the article covers analyses of the methods and effects of architectural and conservation education at the university level on the basis of the research results of the Erasmus+ SURE project and our own experience in creating and implementing conservation curricula at the Faculty of Architecture of Wroclaw University of Science and Technology. The observations concerning the works sent to the Professor Jan Zachwatowicz International Competition (ICOMOS Poland), in which master's diploma projects on the protection and restoration of architectural monuments were evaluated, were presented as a comparative material. It is a place of confrontation of the effects of teaching in the majors of architecture and heritage conservation, which shows differences in systems and methods of teaching at universities. This made it possible to draw conclusions regarding education in the specialization of architecture and urban planning as well as to outline necessary program changes, some of which were successfully implemented in Poland in 2020, by introducing a new core curriculum.

PL

Przedmiotem artykułu są analizy dotyczące metod i efektów kształcenia architektoniczno- konserwatorskiego na poziomie uniwersyteckim, poczynione w oparciu o rezultaty badań projektu Erasmus+ SURE oraz doświadczenie własne w tworzeniu i wdrażaniu programów nauczania konserwatorskiego na Wydziale Architektury Politechniki Wrocławskiej. Jako materiał porównawczy przedstawiono obserwacje dotyczące prac nadesłanych na międzynarodowy konkurs im. Jana Zachwatowicza (ICOMOS Poland), w którym oceniane są magisterskie projekty dyplomowe na temat ochrony i rewaloryzacji zabytków architektury. Jest to miejsce konfrontacji efektów nauczania na kierunkach architektura i konserwacja dziedzictwa, ukazujące różnice systemów i metod nauczania na uczelniach. Pozwoliło to na wyciągnięcie wniosków odnośnie kształcenia w specjalności architektura i urbanistyka, oraz na zarysowanie potrzebnych zmian programowych, z których część udało się wdrożyć w Polsce w 2020 r., poprzez wprowadzenie nowej podstawy programowej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

architectural heritage conservation; adaptive reuse; architectural education; monuments preservation

PL

konserwacja zabytków architektury; adaptacja budynków; edukacja architektoniczna; ochrona zabytków

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej ; Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Lublinie
• Czasopismo: Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: T. 17, nr 3
• Strony: 7--17
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., fig.

Twórcy

autor

Kirschke Krystyna

• Faculty of Architecture, Wroclaw University of Science & Technology (Poland)

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-263X

Bibliografia

• [1] Foster G., Saleh R., The Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage in European Circular City Plans: A Systematic Review, Sustainability 2021, 13, 2889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052889 Google Scholar
• [2] Ost C., Carpentier F,. New Paradigm for Cultural Heritage in Europe. J. Contemp. Ital. Cult. 2017, 2, 258−265. Google Scholar
• [3] Leeuwarden Declaration-Adaptive Re-Use of the Built Heritage: Preserving and Enhancing the Values of our Built Heritage for Future Generations. Adopted on 23 November 2018 in Leeuwarden. Available online: https://www.ace-cae.eu/fileadmin/New_Upload/_15_EU_Project/Creative_Europe/Conference_Built_Heritage/LEEUWARDEN_STATEMENT_FINAL_EN-NEW.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [4] Semes S.W., The Future of the Past: A Conservation Ethics for Architecture, Urbanism and Historic Preservation, W.W. Norton and Company, New York 2009. Google Scholar
• [5] EAAE: Teaching Conservation/Restoration of the Architectural Heritage. Goals, Contents and Methods, Muso F., de Marco L. Eds., 2008. Available online: https://www.eaae.be/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/38_teaching-conservation-restoration-in-architectural-heritage.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [6] Szmygin B. (Eds), Best Practices Handbook. Contemporary Realities and Needs of Sustainable Urban Rehabilitation; Lublin University of Technology, Lublin 2017. Google Scholar
• [7] Rules of the professor Jan Zachwatowicz international competition for the best master’s-degree works performed at the institutions of higher learning concerned with the cultural heritage protection (2017). Available online: http://www.icomos-poland.org/images/Aktualności_pliki/Rules_2017_ZACHWATOWICZ_Competition.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [8] The Council of Europe and cultural heritage 1954−2000. Intergovernmental work: basic texts; Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg 2001; pp. 65−86. Google Scholar
• [9] Polish Cultural Heritage legislation (2010). Available online: http://www.eui.eu/Projects/InternationalArtHeritageLaw/Poland and http://www.coe.int/en/web/herein-system/poland (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [10] ACT of 20 July 2018 The Law on Higher Education and Science (2021). Available online: http://www.gov.pl/web/science/constitution-for-science (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [11] Bergan S., Matei L., The Future of the Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area: New Perspectives on a Recurring Topic. In European Higher Education Area: Challenges for a New Decade, Curaj A., Deca L., Pricopie R. Eds.; Springer, Cham 2020; pp. 361−373. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345766838_The_Future_of_the_Bologna_Process_and_the_European_Higher_Education_Area_New_Perspectives_on_a_Recurring_Topic (accessed on 20 July 2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56316-5_23 Google Scholar
• [12] Kirschke K., Kirschke P., Komarzyńska-Świeściak E., Adaptive reuse of commercial and public buildings in Wroclaw Old Town in Poland. The occupant safety and comfort versus preservation of authenticity of monumental buildings. Commission of Architecture, Urban Planning and Landscape Studies 2018, 14, 3, pp. 24−41. Available online: http://bc.pollub.pl/dlibra/publication/13859/edition/13530/content?ref=desc (accessed on 20 July 2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.1796 Google Scholar
• [13] Verpoest L., Neuckermans H., De Jonge K., van Balen K., Presentation of the R. Lemaire Centre for Conservation. In EAAE: Teaching Conservation/Restoration of the Architectural Heritage. Goals, Contents and Methods, Muso F., de Marco L. Eds.; 2008; 38, pp. 33−37. Available online: https://www.eaae.be/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/38_teaching-conservation-restoration-in-architectural-heritage.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [14] Raymond Lemaire International Centre for Conservation (2021), Available online: https://set.kuleuven.be/rlicc/home (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [15] Schinkel-Wettbewerb (2021). Available online: https://www.aiv-berlin-brandenburg.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SWB2021_Auslobung.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [16] Sietko-Sierkiewicz D., Weclawowicz D., Kirschke P., Transformation TXL Architectus 2013, 33, 1, pp. 71−80. Available online: http://architectus.pwr.edu.pl/files/numery/33_07.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [17] Domus International Prize for Restoration and Conservation. Available online: https://www.archdaily.com/951377/viii-edition-domus-award-restoration-and-preservation-fassa-bortolo (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [18] Szczepański J., Sustainable monument preservation in architectural education, WTE&TE, 2019, 17, 1, 42−47. Google Scholar
• [19] Polski Komitet Narodowy ICOMOS 1965−2015, Pałubska K. ed.; PKN ICOMOS, Warszawa 2009. Google Scholar
• [20] Zachwatowicz J., Program i zasady konserwacji zabytków. Biuletyn Historii Sztuki i Kultury 1946, 8, 1−2, pp. 48−52. Available online: https://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/bhsk1946/0056 (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [21] Lubocka-Hoffmann M., The Post-War Rebuilding of Towns and Cities in Poland and the Retroversion of the Old Town in Elbląg. Ochrona Zabytków 2019, 274, 1, pp. 35−71. Available online: https://ochronazabytkow.nid.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/OZ_1−2019_02_Lubocka-Hoffmann.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [22] The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments (1931). Available online: http://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/167-the-athens-charter-for-the-restoration-of-historic-monuments (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [23] The Venice Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (1964). Available online: http://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [24] Leeuwarden Declaration—Adaptive Re-Use of the Built Heritage: Preserving and Enhancing the Values of our Built Heritage for Future Generations. Adopted on 23 November 2018 in Leeuwarden. Available online: https://www.ace-cae.eu/fileadmin/New_Upload/_15_EU_Project/Creative_Europe/Conference_Built_Heritage/LEEUWARD EN_STATEMENT_FINAL_EN-NEW.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [25] Dołęga M., Kirschke K., Museum of Steam Locomotives – Steam Centre – the best project in the ICOMOS competition 2016. Architectus 2017, 51 (3), pp. 78−84. Available online: http://architectus.pwr.edu.pl/files/numery/51_07.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [26] LafargeHolcim Foundation. Prize Winning Projects in Sustainable Construction (2021). Available online: https://www.lafargeholcim-foundation.org/projects/all-projects?page=6 (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [27] Rozporządzeniem Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z 18 lipca 2019 r. w sprawie standardu kształcenia przygotowującego do wykonywania zawodu architekta (Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education Dated 18 July 2019 on Teaching Standards Preparing to the Profession of Architect.). Available online in Polish: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20190001359 (accessed on 20 July 2021). Google Scholar
• [28] Gawlak A., Prusiewicz-Sipińska E., Bonenberg W., Drawing Skills of Candidates for Architectural Studies vs. Learning Outcomes of Graduates. Comparative Research Based on the Example of The Faculty of Architecture Poznan University of Technology, Educ. Sci. 2021, 11 (7), 339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070339 Google Scholar
• [29] Rusnak M.A., Rabiega M., The Potential of Using an Eye Tracker in Architectural Education: Three Perspectives for Ordinary Users, Students and Lecturers, Buildings 2021, 11(6), 245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060245 Google Scholar
• [30] Della Spina, L Cultural Heritage: A Hybrid Framework for Ranking Adaptive Reuse Strategies. Buildings 2021, 11(3), 132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030132 Google Scholar
• [31] Vardopoulos I., Stamopoulos C., Chatzithanasis G., Michalakelis C., Giannouli P. and Eleni Pastrapa E., Considering Urban Development Paths and Processes on Account of Adaptive Reuse Projects, Buildings 2020, 10(4), 74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10040073 Google Scholar
• [32] Lo Faro A., Miceli A., Sustainable Strategies for the Adaptive Reuse of Religious Heritage: A Social Opportunity Heritage, Buildings 2019, 9(10), 211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9100211 Google Scholar
• [33] Elefante C., The greenest building is… one that is already built. Forum J. 2007, 21, pp. 26−38. Google Scholar
• [34] Dyckhoff T., The Age of Spectacle: Adventures in Architecture and the 21st-Century; Windmill-Books: London 2018. Google Scholar