Application of the conductive method in the engineering geology: Ruczaj district in Kraków, Poland, as a case study

• Autorzy: Klityński Wojciech , Oryński Szymon , Dinh Chau Nguyen

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-019-00335-w

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Ruczaj district in Kraków is the potential building area of high flat blocks for inhabitants. This area is built of the gypsum basement covered by the soil and impermeable clay beds with several meters of thickness. The flat blocks must be set on the textured gypsum layer. In the result of the rainfall and static pressure of the blocks, the water with SO₄²⁻ increases up to the groundwater level, become the great threat for the flat blocks. The water creates specific hydrogeological conditions occurring in the zone of the building’s foundations. To eliminate the mentioned threat, we should determine precisely the thickness of the soil and impermeable clay as well as the depth of the gypsum basement. Based on the electromagnetic parameters of the geological formations, the Ground Conductivity Meter and DC resistivity methods were used to solve the mentioned problems.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mineralized water; near-surface geophysics; Occam inversion; Ground Conductivity Meters; DC resistivity

PL

woda zmineralizowana; geofizyka przypowierzchniowa; metoda inwersji Occama; mierniki przewodności elektrycznej

• Wydawca: Instytut Geofizyki PAN ; Springer
• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 67, no. 6
• Strony: 1791--1798
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Klityński Wojciech

• Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, AL. Mickiewicza 30, 30‑059 Kraków, Poland

autor

Oryński Szymon

• Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ks. Janusza 64, 01‑452 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Dinh Chau Nguyen

• Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, AL. Mickiewicza 30, 30‑059 Kraków, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Antoniuk J, Mościcki WJ, Janicki K (2003) Geoelectric investigation of migration of chemically-polluted waters from the post-flotation settlement reservoir “Żelazny Most”. IGSMiE PAN, Kraków, pp 383–391
• 2. Constable SC, Parker RL, Constable CG (1987) Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52(03):289–300
• 3. Das UC, Verma SK (1981) Versatility of digital linear filters used in computing resistivity and EM sounding curves. Geoexploration 18:297–310
• 4. Foltyn N, Oryński S, Klityński W (2015) Flooded zones recognition with the use of ground conductivity metres. In: Conference paper: 77th EAGE conference and exhibition 2015. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201412538
• 5. Ghosh DP (1971) The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical sounding measurements. Geophys Prospect 19:192–217
• 6. Gradziński R (1972) Przewodnik geologiczny po okolicach Krakowa. Wyd. Geol., Warszawa (in Polish)
• 7. Guinea A, Playa E, Rivero L, Himi M, Bosch R (2010) Geoelectrical classification of gypsum rocks. Surv Geophys 31:557–580
• 8. Jóźwiak W (2013) Electromagnetic study of lithospheric structure in the marginal zone of East European Craton in NW Poland. Acta Geophys 61(5):1101–1129. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-013-0127-z
• 9. Keller GV (1966) Electrical properties of rocks and minerals. In: Clark SP (ed) Handbook of physical constants, Memoir 97. The Geological Society of America, New York
• 10. King DE (2009) Dlib-ml: a machine learning toolkit. J Mach Learn Res 10:1755–1758. https://doi.org/10.1145/1577069.1755843
• 11. Kleczkowski AS (1989) Szkic zagadnień hydrogeologicznych Krakowa. Prz Geol 37(6):323–326 (in Polish)
• 12. Klityński W, Stelmach K, Stefaniuk S, Karczewski J (2014) Recognition of building sandstone deposit with the use of geophysical resistivity sounding and georadar methods. Prz Geol 62(10/2):621–628 (in Polish)
• 13. Kobranova VN (1989) Petrophysics. Springer, Berlin
• 14. Koefoed O, Ghosh DP, Polman GJ (1972) Computations of type curves for electromagnetic depth sounding with a horizontal transmitting coil by means of a digital linear filter. Geophys Prospect 20:406–420
• 15. Kowalczyk S, Żukowska KA, Mendecki MJ, Łukasiak D (2017) Application of electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) for the assessment of peat properties: a case study of the Całowanie Fen, Central Poland. Acta Geophys 65(1):223–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0018-9
• 16. Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–168
• 17. Loke H (2003) Rapid 2D resistivity & IP inversion using the least-squares method. Geotomo Software
• 18. McNeill JD (1980a) Electrical conductivity of soils and rocks. Technical note TN-5. Geonics Limited, Mississauga
• 19. McNeill JD (1980b) Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Technical note TN-6. Geonics Limited, Mississauga
• 20. Neska A, Neska M, Reda J (2013) On the influence of DC railway noise on variation data from Belsk and Lviv geomagnetic observatories. Acta Geophys 61(2):385–403. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-012-0058-0
• 21. Nowożyński K, Ślęzak K (2013) Analysis and usage of linear relationships between the magnetic field components recorded by INTERMAGNET. Acta Geophys 61(3):511–534. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-013-0103-7
• 22. Oryński S, Klityński W (2018) Combined quantitative interpretation of GCM and DC sounding data from selected area in Cracow, Poland. In: Conference paper: the 24th EM Induction Workshop, Helsingør, Denmark, 13–20 Aug 2018
• 23. Oryński S, Okoń M, Klityński W (2016) Very low frequency electromagnetic induction surveys in hydrogeological investigations; case study from Poland. Acta Geophys 64(6):2322. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0092
• 24. Oryński S, Klityński W, Neska A, Ślęzak K (2019) Deep lithospheric structure beneath the Polish part of the East European Craton as a result of magnetotelluric surveys. Stud Geophys Geod 63(2):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-017-1264-7
• 25. Pasierb B (2012) Resistivity topography in prospecting geological surface and anthropogenic objects. Tech Trans 23(109):201–209
• 26. Plewa M, Plewa S (1992) Petrofizyka. Wyd. Geol., Kraków (in Polish)
• 27. Pociask-Karteczka J (1994) Przemiany stosunków wodnych na obszarze Krakowa. Zesz. Nauk UJ, 1914, Pr Geogr 96 (in Polish)
• 28. Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics (2). Wiley, Chichester
• 29. Rutkowski J (1993) Objaśnienia do Szczegółowej Mapy Geologicznej Polski w skali 1: 50 000, ark. Kraków (973). Państw Inst Geol, Warszawa (in Polish)
• 30. Short guide for electromagnetic conductivity mapping and tomography GF Instruments (2016) Ver. 1.3. GF Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic
• 31. Tomecka-Suchoń S, Żogała B, Gołębiowska T, Dzik G, Dzik T, Jochymczyk K (2017) Application of electrical and electromagnetic methods to study sedimentary covers in high mountain areas. Acta Geophys 65(4):743–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0068-z

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).