The impact of mechanical pretreatment on biogas production from waste materials of the chemical and brewing industries

• Autorzy: Bernat Katarzyna , Zaborowska Magdalena , Goryszewska Katarzyna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37705/TechTrans/e2020037

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ wstępnego mechanicznego przetwarzania na produkcję biogazu z materiałów odpadowych z przemysłu chemicznego i browarniczego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Respirometric tests, carried out in OxiTop system, were used to determine biogas production (BP) from two waste materials, willow bark residue (W) from the chemical industry and brewer’s spent grain (BSG) from the brewing industry. Moreover, the kinetics of BP and the loss of organic compounds (expressed as COD) were investigated. In this investigation, W and BSG were used both in their unchanged forms and after mechanical pretreatment (grinding to a diameter of 1 mm) (W_G and BSG_G). The initial organic load in the bioreactors was 4 kg OM/m³. The BP from W was 154.1 dm³/kg DM (166.6 dm³/kg OM), and from BSG, it was 536.9 dm³/kg DM (559.5 dm³/kg OM). This probably resulted from the fact that the content of lignin that was hard to biodegrade was higher in W than in BSG. Mechanical pretreatment increased BP from W_G to 186.7 dm3/kg DM (201.9 dm³/kg OM), and from BSG_G to 564.0 dm³/kg DM (588.7 dm³/kg OM). The net biogas yield from W and BSG increased by 17% (35 dm³/kg OM) and 5 % (29 dm3/kg OM), respectively. The kinetic coefficient of BP (kB) and the rate of BP (rB) of W were lower than those of BSG. Mechanical pretreatment increased the kB and rB of biogas production from both waste materials.

PL

Wykorzystano testy respirometryczne (bioreaktory OxiTop) do określenia produkcji biogazu (BP) z materiałów odpadowych tj. pozostałości kory wierzby (W) oraz młóta (BSG). Ponadto wyznaczono kinetykę BP i usuwania związków organicznych (ChZT). W i BSG stosowano w formie niezmienionej oraz po mechanicznej obróbce wstępnej (rozdrobnienie do średnicy 1 mm) (W_G, BSG_G). Początkowe obciążenie ładunkiem związków organicznych w bioreaktorach wynosiło 4 kg s.m.o./m3. Produkcja biogazu z W oraz BSG wynosiła odpowiednio 154,1 dm³/kg s.m. (166,6 dm³/kg s.m.o.) i 536,9 dm³/kg s.m. (559,5 dm³/kg s.m.o). Prawdopodobnie było to wynikiem wyższej zawartości trudno biodegradowalnej ligniny w pozostałości kory wierzby. Po mechanicznym rozdrobnieniu, produkcja biogazu z W_G oraz z BSG_G zwiększyła się do 186,7 dm³ kg s.m. (201,9 dm³/kg s.m.o.) i 564,0 dm³/kg s.m. (588,7 dm³/kg s.m.o). Wydajność biogazu netto wzrosła odpowiednio o 17% (35 dm³/kg s.m.o) i 5% (29 dm³/kg s.m.o.). Współczynniki kinetyczne BP (kB) oraz szybkości produkcji biogazu (rB) były niższe gdy substratem była W. Po mechanicznym rozdrobnieniu parametry kinetyczne BP były wyższe.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

willow bark residue; brewer's spent grains; pretreatment step; kinetics of biogas production; kinetics of loss of COD; lignocellulosic biomass

PL

pozostałości kory wierzby; młóto; wstępne przygotowanie; kinetyka produkcji biogazu; kinetyka usuwania ChZT; biomasa lignocelulozowa

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej im. Tadeusza Kościuszki
• Czasopismo: Technical Transactions
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 117, iss. 1
• Strony: art. no. e2020037
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Bernat Katarzyna

• Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

autor

Zaborowska Magdalena

• Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

autor

Goryszewska Katarzyna

• Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Bibliografia

• 1. Abraham, A., Mathew, A. K., Park, H., Choi, O., Sindhu, R., Parameswaran, B., Ashok, P., Jung H. P, Sang, B. I. (2020). Pretreatment strategies for enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 301, 122725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122725
• 2. Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B. K. (2000). Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure. Water Science and Technology, 41(3), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0071
• 3. Bernat, K., Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A., Zielińska, M., Wojnowska-Baryła, I., Wersocka, J. (2019a). Valorisation of the selectively collected organic fractions of municipal solid waste in anaerobic digestion. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 148, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.05.003
• 4. Bernat, K., Zielińska, M., Kulikowska, D., Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A., Wojnowska-Baryła, I., Waszczyłko-Miłkowska, B., Piotrowicz, B. (2019b). The effect of the excess sludge pretreatment on biogas productivity. Technical Sciences, 1(22), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.31648/ts.4349
• 5. Bruni, E., Jensen, A. P., Angelidaki, I. (2010). Comparative study of mechanical, hydrothermal, chemical and enzymatic treatments of digested biofibers to improve biogas production. Bioresource Technology, 101(22), 8713-8717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.108
• 6. Buranov, A. U., Mazza, G. (2008). Lignin in straw of herbaceous crops. Industrial Crops and Products, 28(3), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.03.008
• 7. De Bere, L. (2000). Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art. Water Science and Technology, 41(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0082
• 8. De la Rubia, M. A., Fernández-Cegrí, V., Raposo, F., Borja, R. (2011). Influence of particle size and chemical composition on the performance and kinetics of anaerobic digestion process of sunflower oil cake in batch mode. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 58, 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2011.09.010
• 9. Dias, T., Fragoso, R., Duarte, E. (2014). Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy cattle manure and pear waste. Bioresource Technology, 164, 420-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.110
• 10. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. (2009). Official Journal of the European Union, 5, 2009.
• 11. Frigon, J. C., Mehta, P., Guiot, S. R. (2012). Impact of mechanical, chemical and enzymatic pre-treatments on the methane yield from the anaerobic digestion of switchgrass. Biomass and Bioenergy, 36, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.013
• 12. Gao, R., Yuan, X., Zhu, W., Wang, X., Chen, S., Cheng, X., Cui, Z. (2012). Methane yield through anaerobic digestion for various maize varieties in China. Bioresource Technology, 118, 611-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.051
• 13. Hartmann, H., Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B. K. (2000). Increase of anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter in full-scale biogas plants by mechanical maceration. Water Science and Technology, 41(3), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0066
• 14. Heerenklage, J., Stegmann, R. (2005). Analytical Methods for the Determination of the Biological Stability of Waste Samples. Proceedings Tenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. Italy: S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari.
• 15. Karimi, K., Taherzadeh, M. J. (2016). A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresource Technology, 200, 1008-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.022
• 16. Kowalska, A. (2017). Charakterystyka roślin energetycznych jako potencjalnego surowca do produkcji biogazu. Eliksir, 1(5), 11-15.
• 17. Kratky, L., Jirout, T. (2011). Biomass size reduction machines for enhancing biogas production. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 34(3), 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000357
• 18. Krzyżaniak, M., Stolarski, M. J., Waliszewska, B., Szczukowski, S., Tworkowski, J., Załuski, D., Śnieg, M. (2014). Willow biomass as feedstock for an integrated multi-product biorefinery. Industrial Crops and Products, 58, 230-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.033
• 19. Kumar, P., Barrett, D. M., Delwiche, M. J., Stroeve, P. (2009). Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(8), 3713-3729. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801542g
• 20. Ladisch, M. R., Lin, K. W., Voloch, M., Tsao, G. T. (1983). Process considerations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 5(2), 82-102.
• 21. Lechner, B. E., Papinutti, V. L. (2006). Production of lignocellulosic enzymes during growth and fruiting of the edible fungus Lentinus tigrinus on wheat straw. Process Biochemistry, 41(3), 594-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.08.004
• 22. Li, F., Zhang, M., Guo, K., Hu, Z., Zhang, R., Feng, Y., Yi, X., Zou, W., Wang, L., Wu C., Tian, J. (2015). High‐level hemicellulosic arabinose predominately affects lignocellulose crystallinity for genetically enhancing both plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic digestibility in rice mutants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 13(4), 514-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12276
• 23. Monlau, F., Barakat, A., Trably, E., Dumas, C., Steyer, J. P., Carrère, H. (2013). Lignocellulosic materials into biohydrogen and biomethane: impact of structural features and pretreatment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 43(3), 260-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.604258
• 24. Mshandete, A., Björnsson, L., Kivaisi, A. K., Rubindamayugi, M. S., Mattiasson, B. (2006). Effect of particle size on biogas yield from sisal fibre waste. Renewable Energy, 31(14), 2385-2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.10.015
• 25. Nichols, C. E. (2004). Overview of anaerobic digestion technologies in Europe. BioCycle, 45(1), 47-47.
• 26. Oslaj, M., Mursec, B., Vindis, P. (2010). Biogas production from maize hybrids. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(11), 1538-1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.016
• 27. Pakarinen, O. M., Tähti, H. P., Rintala, J. A. (2009). One-stage H2 and CH4 and two-stage H2+CH4 production from grass silage and from solid and liquid fractions of NaOH pre-treated grass silage. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33(10), 1419-1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.06.006
• 28. Rasi, S., Veijanen, A., Rintala, J. (2007). Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants. Energy, 32(8), 1375-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.018
• 29. Robertson, J. A., I’Anson, K. J., Treimo, J., Faulds, C. B., Brocklehurst, T. F., Eijsink, V. G., Waldron, K. W. (2010). Profiling brewers’ spent grain for composition and microbial ecology at the site of production. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 43(6), 890-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2010.01.019
• 30. Saxena, R. C., Adhikari, D. K., Goyal, H. B. (2009). Biomass-based energy fuel through biochemical routes: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(1), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.011
• 31. Thomsen, S. T., Spliid, H., Østergård, H. (2014). Statistical prediction of biomethane potentials based on the composition of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 154, 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.029
• 32. Tišma, M., Jurić, A., Bucić‐Kojić, A., Panjičko, M., Planinić, M. (2018). Biovalorization of brewers’ spent grain for the production of laccase and polyphenols. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 124(2), 182-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.479
• 33. Tsapekos, P., Kougias, P. G., Angelidaki, I. (2015). Biogas production from ensiled meadow grass; effect of mechanical pretreatments and rapid determination of substrate biodegradability via physicochemical methods. Bioresource Technology, 182, 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.025
• 34. Wikberg, H., Grönqvist, S., Niemi, P., Mikkelson, A., Siika-Aho, M., Kanerva, H., Käsper, A., Tamminen, T. (2017). Hydrothermal treatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization as means to valorise agro-and forest-based biomass residues. Bioresource Technology, 235, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.095
• 35. Yoshida, H., Tokumoto, H., Ishii, K., Ishii, R. (2009). Efficient, high-speed methane fermentation for sewage sludge using subcritical water hydrolysis as pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 100(12), 2933-2939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.047
• 36. Zhong, W., Zhang, Z., Qiao, W., Fu, P., Liu, M. (2011). Comparison of chemical and biological pretreatment of corn straw for biogas production by anaerobic digestion. Renewable Energy, 36(6), 1875-1879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.12.020
• 37. Zhu, J., Wan, C., Li, Y. (2010). Enhanced solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover by alkaline pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 101(19), 7523-7528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.060
• 38. Ziemiński, K., Kowalska-Wentel, M. (2017). Effect of different sugar beet pulp pretreatments on biogas production efficiency. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 181(3), 1211-1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2279-1

Uwagi

Section "Chemistry"

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).