The relationship between management support in training programs and motivation to perform task with motivation to learn as mediator

Mohamad, Nur Izzaty; Ismail, Azman; Mohamad Nor, Azmawaty

doi:10.17270/J.LOG.2020.458

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

The relationship between management support in training programs and motivation to perform task with motivation to learn as mediator

Autorzy

Mohamad Nur Izzaty , Ismail Azman , Mohamad Nor Azmawaty

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2020.458

Warianty tytułu

Zależność pomiędzy wspomaganiem zarządzania w programch szkoleniowych i motywacją realizacji zadań z motywacją do nauki jako mediatorem

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Background: Present studies recognize that commercial organizations and public organizations have work together to set up national logistic policies for the national development requirements. In order to support this aim, leadership of public sector has planned and implemented training programs to expose latest logistic management strategies and operations to employees. Latest findings from logistic management studies circulated in the 21st century revealed that the willingness of management to support training programs has strongly invoked employees’ motivation to learn creative logistic methods. As a result, this motivation may drive to an enhanced motivation to perform task. Even though this relationship is interesting, the role of motivation to learn as a significant mediating variable has largely been neglected in the logistic management literature. Thus, this situation stimulate the present study to extend the literature by examining the mediating effect of motivation to learn in the relationship between management support in training programs and motivation to perform task. Method: Survey questionnaires were employed to gather data from employees at central government agencies under controlled by the Malaysian federal government. The SmartPLS was used to measure the psychometrics properties of instrument and test the research hypotheses. Result: This study showed that motivation to learn did act as an important mediator of the relationship between management support in training programs and motivation to perform task. Conclusion: The mediating effect of motivation to learn between management support in training programs and motivation to perform task also is consistent and has extended previous logistic management studies published in Western and Asian countries.

Wstęp: Aktualnie publikowane prace wskazują na współpracę organizacji komercyjnych i publicznych w obszarze ustalenia narodowej polityki wymagań dla rozwoju narodowego. W tym celu, przywódcy sektora publicznego zaplanowano wali i wdrożyli programy szkoleniowe dotyczące strategii zarządzania logistycznego oraz operacyjnego dla pracodawców. Ostatnie badania naukowe dotyczące zarządzania logistycznego pokazują, że wśród pracodawców powstała silna motywacja nauki kreatywnych metod logistycznych. W rezultacie tej motywacji, wzrosła też motywacja do realizacji zadań. Jest to ciekawa zależność, aczkolwiek rola motywacji w nauce, jako istotnej zmiennej mediującej jest najczęściej pomijana w literaturze dotyczącej zarządzania logistycznego. Sytuacja ta spowodowała potrzebę zbadania efektu mediacyjnego motywacji do nauki w relacji pomiędzy wspomaganiem zarządzania w programach szkoleniowych i motywacją do realizacji zadań. Metody: Dane zebrano na podstawie przeprowadzonej ankiety wśród pracodawców w centralnych agencjach rządowych będących pod kontrolą malezyjskiego rządu federalnego. SmartPLS został użyty do mierzenia właściwości psychometrycznych oraz do testowania postawionych hipotez. Wyniki: Uzyskane wyniki wskazują, że motywacja do nauki jest istotnych mediatorem zależności pomiędzy wspomaganiem zarządzania w programach szkoleniowych i motywacją do realizacji zadań. Wnioski: Efekt mediacyjny motywacji do nauki pomiędzy wspomaganiem zarządzania w programach szkoleniowych i motywacją do realizacji zadań jest spójny i wzbogaca wcześniejsze badania dotyczące zarządzania logistycznego publikowane w krajach zachodnich i azjatyckich.

Słowa kluczowe

management support motivation to learn motivation to perform task SmartPLS

wsparcie zarządzania motywacja do nauki motywacja do realizacji zadań SmartPLS

Wydawca

Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki

Czasopismo

LogForum

Rocznik

2020

Tom

Vol. 16, no. 3

Strony

431--446

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 64 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Mohamad Nur Izzaty

nurizzaty_mohamad@yahoo.com

Institute of Islam Hadhari, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia

autor

Ismail Azman

azisma12@ukm.edu.my

Faculty of Economics & Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia

autor

Mohamad Nor Azmawaty

azy_mn@um.edu.my

Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Bibliografia

1. Abdul Aziz S. F., 2016. Evaluating training effectiveness using the Malaysian sample: Tracing the mediation effect of training motivation using SEM-AMOS, International Journal of Economics and Financial, 6 (6): 94 -100.
2. Abdul Aziz S. F., Selamat M. N., 2016. Stimulating workplace learning through training characteristics and motivation to learn. Jurnal Pengurusan, 49: 173-185.
3. Abdulkarim S., Al-Eisa Musaed A., Furayyan Abdulla M., Alhemoud, 2009. An empirical examination of the effects of self-efficacy, supervisor support and motivation to learn on transfer intention, Management Decision, 47 (8): 1221-1244.
4. Al-Minhas U., Ndubisi N. O., Barrane F. Z., 2020. Corporate environmental management: A review and integration of green human resource management and green logistics. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31 (2): 431-450
5. Amos K. J., Natamba B., 2015. The impact of training and development on job performance in Ugandan banking sector, Journal on Innovation and Sustainability 6 (2): 65-71.
6. Amabile T. M., 1983. Social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 997-101
7. Bolsche D., Klumpp M., Abidi H., 2013. Specific competencies in humanitarian logistics education. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 3 (2): 99-128. http://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-08-2012-0019
8. Bombiak E., Marciniuk-Kluska A., 2018. Green human resource management as a tool for the sustainable development of enterprises: polish young company experience. Sustainability, 10 (6): 1739. http://doi.org/10.3390/su10061739
9. Buics L., 2017. The role of logistics management in public services - research plan. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 2 (3): 33-43. http://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2017.3.4.
10. Cohen J., 1992. A Power Primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112: 155-159. http://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
11. Council of Logistics Management, 2000. In: Swamidass P. M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Production and Manufacturing Management. Springer, Boston, MA.
12. Dansereau F. Jr., Graen G., Haga W. J., 1975. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13: 46-78. http://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
13. Dermol V., Cater T., 2013. The influence of training and training transfer factors on organisational learning and performance. Personnel Review 42 (3): 324-348. http://doi.org/10.1108/00483481311320435
14. Diamantidis D. A., Chatzoglou P. D., 2014. Employee post-training behavior and performance: evaluating the results of the training process. International Journal of Training and Development, 18 (3):149-170. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12034
15. Eichhorn B. R., 2014. Common Method Variance Techniques. Paper AA11.
16. Forbes, 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomtaulli/2018/06/09/how-to-create-an-effective-company-training-program/#4944be42224a. [Accessed 20 04 2010]
17. Govaerts N., Kyndt E., Dochy F., 2017. The influence of specific supervisor support types on transfer of training: examining the mediating effect of training retention. Vocations and Learning, 11 (2): 265-288. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-017-9190-y
18. Hajjar S. T., Alkhanaizi M. S., 2018. Exploring the factors that affect employee training effectiveness: A Case Study in Bahrain, SAGE Open, 8 (2). http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018783033
19. Hai J. C., Nawi N. F., 2007. Principles of public administration: an introduction. Shah Alam, Selangor: Karisma Publications.
20. Hair J. F., Hult G. T. M., Ringle C. M., Sarstedt M., 2017. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), (2nd Ed.), Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.
21. Harris R., Simons M., Bone J., 2000. More than meets the eye? Rethinking the role of workplace trainer, NCVER, Adelaide.
22. Howard M.C., Lee J., 2019. Pre‐training interventions to counteract seductive details in virtual reality training programs. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1-17 http://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21378
23. Huchin T., 2001. Enterprise-Focused Management: Changing the Face of Project Management, London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
24. Iqbal Q., Hassan S. H., Akhtar S., Khan S., 2018. Employee’s green behaviour for environmental sustainability: a case of banking sector in Pakistan. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 15 (2): 118-130. http://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-08-2017-0025
25. Issah M., 2018. Change Leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. SAGE Open, 8 (3):1-6. http://doi:10.1177/2158244018800910
26. Ismail A., Mohd Zainol N. A., Ahmad N. N., 2016. Program pembangunan kepimpinan meningkatkan pemindahan latihan dalam tentera darat Malaysia: Kajian empirical. Jurnal Pengurusan, 46: 149 -161.
27. Jabbour C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour A. B. L., 2016. Green human resource management and green supply chain management: linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 1824-1833. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.052
28. Jehanzeb K., Basir N. A., 2013. Training and development program and its benefits to employee and organization: A conceptual study. European Journal of Business and Management, 5 (2).
29. Karatza A., Papadopoulos G., Godsell J., 2020. Servitization and The Effect of Training on Service Delivery System Performance. Production and Operations Management.
30. Kherbacha O., Mocana M. L., 2016. The importance of logistics and supply chain management in the enhancement of Romanian SMEs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221: 405-413.
31. Knowles M., 1984, Andragogy in Action, San Francisco: Jessey-Bass Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13165
32. Lee J. Y., Park S., Baker R., 2017. The moderating role of top management support on employees’ attitudes in response to human resource development efforts. Journal of Management & Organization, 24: 369-387. http://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.37
33. Locke E. A., Latham G. P., 1991. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Lomand T. C., 2016. Social Science Research: A Cross Section of Journal Articles for Discussion and Evaluation, 7th Ed, New York:Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265841
35. Madagamage G. T., Warnakulasooriya B. N. F., Wickramasuriya H. V. A., 2014. Factors influencing motivation to transfer training: an empirical study of a government sector training program in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research, 26(1):12-25. http://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v26i1.8068
36. Mahathir M., 1991. The way forward, working paper presented at the Ingaural Meeting of the Malaysian Business Council. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Business Council.
37. Mahathir M., 1997. Vision 2020: The way forward, keynote address at the Vision 2020 National Congress, Petaling Jaya, Kuala Lumpur. Prime Minister’s Department.
38. Meyer D. K., Turner J. C., 2002. Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research, Educational Psychologist, 37, 107-114. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_5
39. McCoy J. M., Evans G. W., 2005. Physical work environment. In: J. Barling, E., K, Morelli S.A., Lee I. A., Arnn M. E., Zaki J., 2015. Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15 (4): 484-493. http://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000084
40. Nadeem K., Ahmad A. 2017. Impact of work environment factors on employee performance; Empirical evidence from manufacturing industry of Lahore. Journal of Managerial Science, 11: 422-436.
41. Olumuyiwa O. S., Adelaja A. S., Oluwatosin O. A., 2012. Motivation an engine for organizational performance, A case study of Lagos State University. Journal of Business and Management, 6(2): 30-41.
42. Ospina S., El Hadidy W., Caicedo G., 2011. Advancing Diversity and Inclusion in Public Service: A Review of Leadership Development Programs in the US.
43. Park S., Kang H. S., Kim E. J., 2018. Does supervisor support make a difference in employees’ training and job performance? An empirical study of a professional development program. European Journal of Training and Development, 1-29. http://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2017-0054
44. PLS Logistics Services, 2020. Logistics management best practices all for superior customer service, 1-15. https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/wp_content/pls_wp_best_practices_092915.pdf [Accessed 03 05 2020]
45. Podsakoff P. M., Ahearne M., MacKenzie S. B., 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (2): 262-270. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262
46. Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P., 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research. A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879-903. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
47. Prime Minister Office. "GTP". Prime Minister Office of Malaysia. [Retrieved 06 04 2020].
48. Reinhold S., Gegenfurtner A., Lewalter D., 2018. Social support and motivation to transfer as predictors of training transfer: Testing full and partial mediation using meta-analytic structural equation modelling. International Journal of Training and Development, 22 (1):1-14. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12115
49. Ristovska N., Kozuharov S., Petkovski V., 2017. The Impact of Logistics Management Practices on Company’s Performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7 (1): 245-252.
50. Rivera L., Gligor D., Sheffi Y., 2016. The benefits of logistics clustering. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46 (3): 242-268.
51. Roblek V., Erenda I., Meško M., 2018. The Challenges of Sustainable Business Development, In The Post-Industrial Society in the First Half of the 21st Century. In Managerial Strategies for Business Sustainability during Turbulent Times, IGI Global, 1-194. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2716-9.ch001
52. Rosena M. A., Harlina Suzana J., Sabariah M., 2008. Logistics and Supply Chain in Malaysia: Issues and Challenges. EASTS International Symposium on Sustainable Transportation incorporating Malaysian Universities Transport Research Forum Conference 2008 (MUTRFC08). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 12-13 August 2008.
53. Saks A. M., Belcourt M., 2006. An investigation of training activities and transfer of training in organizations. Human Resource Management, 45(4): 629-648. http://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20135
54. Schindler L. A, Bukholders G. J., 2014. A mixed methods examination of the influence of dimensions of support on training transfer. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10 (3): 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814557132
55. Schwab K., 2017. The Fourth Industrial Revolution, New York: Crown Business.
56. Sekaran U., Bougie R., 2016. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed), United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
57. Ślusarczyk B., 2018. Industry 4.0 - Are We Ready?. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17 (1): 232-248.
58. Soon N. K., Ahmad N., 2012. Impact of motivation to learn on perceived training transfer: Empirical evidence from a bank. Proceedings International Conference of Technology Management, Business and Entrepreneurship.
59. Syed Ibrahim, 2007. Malaysia Kita. Panduan dan Rujukan untuk Peperiksaan Am Kerajaan. International Law Book Services.
60. Tajuddin Hussien, 2009. Malaysia negara kita. Kuala Lumpu, Malaysia: MDC Publishers.
61. The Ministry of Transport Malaysia, 2016. Logistics and trade facilitation masterplan: Performance report 2016. http://www.mot.gov.my/SiteCollectionDocuments/logistik/Logistics%20and%20Trade%20Facilitation%20Masterplan%20Performance%20Report%202016.pdf [Accessed 07 05 2020].
62. The Public Service Department, 2019. [Online] Available at: https://www.jpa.gov.my/ [Accessed at 20 04 2019]
63. Wang D. F., Dong Q. L., Peng Z. M., Khan S. A. R., Tarasov A., 2018. The green logistics impact on international trade: evidence from developed and developing countries. Sustainability, 10: 2235. http://doi.org/10.3390/su10072235
64. Zuraimi A. A., Mohd Rafi Y., Dahlan M., 2013. An Initial Study of Logistics Development in Malaysia East Coast Region. World Review of Business Research, 3 (3): 81-95.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-51c2194a-ca8e-4982-89bd-77ea7709016b