Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This study aimed to identify and compare the impact of production factors on the total ecological and economic efficiency of the potato land-use type in the two regions Primorsky Kray, Russia and Red River Delta, Vietnam using the Cobb-Douglas production function. The result of data analysis for the period of 2016–2019 showed that the contribution coefficient of factors such as initial investment, labor cost, expenses of machinery and equipment, and amounts of pesticides and fertilizers used for potato farming per hectare to the total ecological and economic efficiency of the potato land-use type in Primorsky was higher than in the Red River Delta. The results also show that the amounts of pesticides and fertilizers in the Red River Delta were used more than in Primorsky; therefore, they present a higher influence on the total ecological and economic efficiency. On the basis of the analysis of the impact of each factor, this study has proposed the solutions to enhance the influence of the factors that have a proportional effect and minimize the influence of factors that have an inversely proportional effect on the economic-environmental efficiency of potato land use in each study area.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
272--281
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Faculty of Environment, Ha Long University, No. 258, Bach Dang Street, Uong Bi City, Quang Ninh 200000, Vietnam
autor
- Faculty of Forestry, North East College of Agriculture and Forestry, No. 607, Mac Dang Dung Street, Quang Yen, Quang Ninh 200000, Vietnam
Bibliografia
- 1. Aydın B. 2014. Determining the structural characteristics and productive efficiency of farms in Thrace Region. Ph.D. Thesis, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
- 2. Bui N.H.A. 2013. Solutions to improve economic efficiency in agricultural land use in Yen Bai in the period of 2012–2020. Ph.D. Thesis, Thai Nguyen University, Vietnam.
- 3. Chebil A., Frija A., Thabet C. 2015. Economic efficiency measures and its determinants for irrigated wheat farms in Tunisia: a DEA approach. New Medit, 14, 32–39.
- 4. Cobb C.W., Douglas P.H. 1928. A Theory of Production”. American Economic Review. 18 (Supplement), 139–165. JSTOR, 1811556.
- 5. Do V.N., Nguyen T.A., Nguyen K.V.B. 2016. Assessing Efficiency of agricultural land use models for commodity production in Luong Tai District, Bac Ninh Province. Vietnam J. Agri. Sci. 2016, 14(9), 1418–1427.
- 6. Dang H.T., Vo T.D. 2011. Analysis of factors affecting the growth of Can Tho City: The approach to total factor productivity. Journal of Science, 17b, 120–129.
- 7. Ellis F. 1993. Peasant Economics: Farm Households and Agrarian Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- 8. Fadejeva L., Melihovs A. 2010. Measuring total factor productivity and variable factor utilization: Sector approach, the case of Latvia. Eastern European Economics, 48(5), 63–101.
- 9. Idong I.C. 2007. Estimation of farm level technical efficiency in smallscale swamp rice production in Cross River State of Nigeria: A stochastic frontier approach. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(5), 653–658.
- 10. Galawat F., Yabe M. 2012. Profit efficiency in rice production in Brunei Darussalam: A stochastic frontier approach. Journal of International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences, 18, 100–112.
- 11. Hu B., Mcaleer M. 2005. Estimation of Chinese agricultural production efficiencies with panel data. 68, 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2005.02.002
- 12. Lamers M., Anyusheva M., La N., Nguyen V. V., Streck T. 2011. Pesticide pollution in surface-and groundwater by paddy rice cultivation: A case study from Northern Vietnam. Clean-Soil, Air, Water, 39, 356–361.
- 13. Nguyen M.T., Nguyen T.B.P., Bui N.H. 2018. Efficiency assessment of agricultural land use in Con Cuong District, Nghe An Province. Journal of Forestry Science and Technology, 2018 (2), 65–74
- 14. Pham V.D. 2011. GAP for Rice in the Mekong Delta, progress and plans. Proc. of Workshop on Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Rice in Southeast Asia.
- 15. Rizzo M. 1979. The cost of crime victimization: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies, 8, 177–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467606.
- 16. Orawan S., Somporn I. 2012. Efficiency change in Thailand rice production: Evidence from panel data analysis. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 4(4), 101–108.
- 17. Theodore S. 1964. Transforming traditional agriculture. Yale University Press, New Haven,.
- 18. Tran T.A.T., Ho V.H., Ho N.L., Nguyen V.B., Nguyen T.P. 2021. Efficiency of agricultural land use of ethnic communities in A Luoi District, Thua Thien Hue Province. Hue University Journal of Science: Agriculture and Rural Development, 130(3B), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijard.v130i3B.6025
- 19. Truong V.T. 2007. Evaluating the economic efficiency of land use in Dak Lak Province. Journal of Science and Technology, University of Da Nang, 19, 1–4.
- 20. Vu T.T.H., Svetlana P.K. 2017. Ecological and economic analysis of agricultural land use in Vietnam in conditions of innovative development. State University of Management Bulletin. 12, 106–112. http://vestnik-old.guu.ru/?page_id=910. Accessed 10 Dec 2022.
- 21. Yang C.H. 2007. What factors inspire the high entry flow in Taiwan’s manufacturing industries-A count entry model approach. Applied Economics, 39(14), 1817–1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600690181
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-519577f8-b89b-45d6-b132-6337b592e3dd