A Characterization of Ultrasonic Full Angle Spatial Compounding as a Possible Alternative for Breast Cancer Screening

• Autorzy: Medina L. , Camacho J. , Fritsch C.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/aoa-2015-0033

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Breast cancer screening is based on X-ray mammography, while ultrasound is considered a complementary technique with improved detection in dense tissue. However, breast cancer screening requires a technique that provides repeatable results at the inspection interval which cannot be achieved with manual breast exploration. During the last years there have appeared several approaches to overcome this limitation by means of automated ultrasonic tomography performed with motorized probes or with a large set of array transducers. This work addresses these problems by considering a quite simple and low-cost arrangement, formed with a ring of conventional medical-grade array probes which are multiplexed to the electronics to build Full Angle Spatially Compounded (FASC) images. The work analyzes the performance of such arrangement in terms of resolution and isotropy, showing by numerical modelling and experimentally that it provides high resolution and homogeneity in the whole imaged region. The implementation of this technique would provide more than one circular FASC per second and a whole breast volume image in 1–2 minutes with conventional technology, a process fast enough to be clinically useful. Moreover, the automated technique is repeatable and can be used by the clinician to perform immediately the diagnosis without requiring additional data processing.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

breast cancer; Full Angle Spatial Compounding; resolution; isotropy

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki PAN ; Komitet Akustyki PAN ; Polskie Towarzystwo Akustyczne
• Czasopismo: Archives of Acoustics
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 40, No. 3
• Strony: 301--310
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Medina L.

• Group of Ultrasonic Systems and Technology (GSTU-ITEFI), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Serrano, 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain

autor

Camacho J.

• Group of Ultrasonic Systems and Technology (GSTU-ITEFI), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Serrano, 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain

autor

Fritsch C.

• Group of Ultrasonic Systems and Technology (GSTU-ITEFI), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Serrano, 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain

Bibliografia

• 1. Basoglu C., Kim Y., Chalana V. ( 1996), A realtime scan conversion algorithm on commercially available microprocessors, Ultras. Imag., 18, 241–260.
• 2. Camacho J., Medina L., Cruza J.F., Moreno J.M., Fritsch C. (2012), Multimodal Ultrasonic Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection, Archives of Acoustics, 37, 3, 253–260.
• 3. Chenevert T., Bylsky D., Carson P., Meyer C., Bland P., Adler D., Schmitt R. (1984), Ultrasonic Computed Tomography of the Breast. Improvement of image quality by use of cross-correlation time-of-flight and phase-insensitive attenuation measurements, Radiology, 152, 155–159.
• 4. Dapp R., Gemmeke H., Ruiter N. (2011), 3D Refraction-Corrected Transmission Reconstruction for 3D Ultrasound Computer Tomography, Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, 8320, 832014 1–7.
• 5. Dines K., Goss S. (1987), Computed Ultrasonic Reflection Tomography, IEEE Trans. UFFC, 34, 3, 309–318.
• 6. Entrekin R., Jackson P., Jago J.R., Porter B.A. (1999), Real Time Spatial Compound Imaging in breast ultrasound: technology and early clinical experience, Medicamundi, 43, 3, 35–43.
• 7. Gooding M., Finlay J., Shipley J., Halliwell M., Duck F. (2010), Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging of Mammary Ducts in Lactating Women. A Feasibility Study, J. Ultrasound Med., 29, 95–103.
• 8. Hansen Ch., H¨uttebr¨auker N., Hollenhorst M., Schasse A., Heuser L., Schulte-Altedorneburg G., Ermert H. (2008), An Automated System for Full Angle Spatial Compounding in Ultrasound Breast Imaging, IFMBE Proc., 22, 541–545.
• 9. Hiller D., Ermert H. (1984), System Analysis of Ultrasound Reflection Mode Computerized Tomography, IEEE Trans. Son. Ultrason., 31, 4, 240–250.
• 10. Jespersen S., Wilhjelm J., Sillesen H. (1998), Multi-Angle Compound Imaging, Ultrasonic Imaging, 20, 81–102.
• 11. Marmarelis V.Z., Jeong J., Shin D.C., Do S. (2007), High-resolution 3 –D imaging and tissue differentiation with transmission tomography in Acoustical Imaging, Springer Netherlands, 28, 195–206.
• 12. Nothacker M., Duda V., Hahn N., Warm M., Degenhardt F., Madjar H., Weinbrenner S., Albert U. (2009), Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review, BMC Cancer, 9, 335, 1–9.
• 13. Quan Y., Huang L. (2007), Sound-speed tomography using first-arrival transmission ultrasound for a ring transducer, Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, 6513, 651306.
• 14. Roy O., Schmidt S., Cuipin L., Allada V., West E., Kunz D., Duric N. (2013), Breast imaging using ultrasound tomography: From clinical requirements to system design, Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), IEEE International, 1174–1177.
• 15. Rouyer J., Mensah S., Lasaygues P., Lefebre J.P. (2010), Ultrasound Tomography dedicated to Anatomical Breast Inspection, Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2340–2343.
• 16. Ruiter N., Zapf M., Hopp T., Dapp R., Gemmeke H. (2012), Phantom image results of an optimized full 3D USCT, Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, 8320, 832005.
• 17. Steinberg B.D. (1976), Principles of Aperture and Array System Design, John Wiley & Sons.
• 18. Kino G.S. (2000), Acoustic waves, devices, imaging and analog signal processing, IEEE UFFC.
• 19. Stozka R., W¨urfel J., M¨uller T., Gemmeke H. (2002), Medical Imaging by Ultrasound Computer Tomography, Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, 4687, 110–119.
• 20. Teh W., Wilson A.R.M. (1998), The role of ultrasound in breast cancer screening. A Consensus Statement by the European Group for Breast Cancer Screening, European Journal of Cancer, 34, 4, 449–450.
• 21. Tot T. (2011), Breast Cancer: A Lobar Disease, Springer-Verlag, London.
• 22. Teboul M. (1998), Imaging System for Breast Sonography, US Pat. 5, 709, 206.
• 23. Teboul M. (2010), Advantages of Ductal Echography (DE) over Conventional Breast Investigation in the diagnosis of breast malignancies, Medical Ultrasonography, 12, 1, 32–42.
• 24. Waag R., Fedewa R. (2006), A Ring Transducer System for Medical Ultrasound Research, IEEE Trans. On UFFC, 53, 10, 1707–1718.
• 25. Wilhjelm J.E., Jensen M.S., Jespersen S.K., Sahl B., Falk E. (2004), Visual and Quantitative Evaluation of Selected Image Combination Schemes in Ultrasound Spatial Compound Scanning, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 23, 2, 181–190.
• 26. Wiskin J., Borup D., Johnson S., Berggren M., Robinson D., Smith J., Chen J., Parisky Y., Klock J. (2010), Inverse scattering and refraction corrected reflection for breast cancer imaging, Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, 7629, 7629K 1–12.