PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Efficient and Sustainable Remediation of Refinery Wastewater Using Electrocoagulation and Advanced Oxidation Techniques

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Effluent wastewater from industrial processes needs to be properly treated before being discharged into the environment. Conventional procedures for handling this wastewater can be problematic due to the presence of toxic elements, time constraints, and complexity. However, a new electrochemical procedure has been developed as an effective method for remediation. In a recent study, refinery wastewater was successfully treated using an electrochemical technique combined with ultrasonic irradiation and photocatalysis. The study found that electrocoagulation, which uses cheap and recyclable metal electrodes, was a simple, efficient, practical, and cost-effective way to handle refinery wastewater. Various parameters were investigated, including electrode metals, operating time, applied voltage, pH, inter-electrode gap, and temperature. The aim was to determine the optimal configuration for pollutant removal. The study also focused on the synergistic effects of combining electrocoagulation and photocatalysis to improve the efficiency of contaminant removal in oily wastewater. By integrating these two treatment technologies, the researchers aimed to enhance pollutant removal rates, energy efficiency, and overall system performance. The research provided valuable insights into the feasibility, optimization parameters, and applicability of the electrocoagulation-photocatalysis process for remediating organic contaminants in oily wastewater industrial effluents. The results showed that electrocoagulation, especially when combined with ultrasonic irradiation and TiO2 photocatalysis, was highly effective in pollutant removal within a short timeframe. These findings support the implementation of this procedure for remediating most industrial wastewater.In conclusion, the study contributes to the development of more effective and sustainable water treatment strategies. The electrocoagulation-photocatalysis process shows promise in addressing the remediation of organic contaminants in oily wastewater from industrial processes.
Twórcy
  • Oil and Gas Engineering Department, University of Technology - Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Oil and Gas Engineering Department, University of Technology - Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq
  • University of Technology - Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Department of Entrepreneurial Project Management, Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  • Office of the Vice President for Scientific Affairs and Graduate Studies, University of Technology - Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Oil and Gas Engineering Department, University of Technology - Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abuhasel, K., Kchaou, M., Alquraish, M., Munusamy, Y., Jeng, Y.T. 2021. Oily wastewater treatment: overview of conventional and modern methods, challenges, and future opportunities. Water, 13, 980.
  • 2. Akyol, A., Can, O.T., Bayramoglu, M. 2015. Treatment of hydroquinone by photochemical oxidation and electrocoagulation combined process. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 8, 45–54.
  • 3. Alardhi, S.M, Al-Jadir, T., Hasan, A., Jaber, A., Al Saedi, L., 2023. Design of artificial neural network for prediction of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide concentrations in a natural gas sweetening plant. Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol., 24(2), 55-66.
  • 4. Al Jaberi, F.Y., Ahmed, S.A., Makki, H.F. 2020. Electrocoagulation treatment of high saline oily wastewater: evaluation and optimization. Heliyon, 6(6).
  • 5. Al-Jadir, T., Alardhi S.M., Alheety, M., Najim, A., Salih, I., Al-Furaiji, M., Alsalhy, Q. 2022. Fabrication and characterization of polyphenylsulfone/titanium oxide nanocomposite membranes for oily wastewater treatment. J. Ecol. Eng. 23(12): 1-13.
  • 6. Al-Rubaiey, N.A. 2022. A trends in ozone treatment of wastewater: A review. Iraqi Journal of Oil and Gas Research, 2(1), 55–64.
  • 7. Al-Rubaiey, N.A., Al-Barazanjy, M.G. 2017. Study the efficiency of electrocoagulation system using conductivity measurements for the removal of zinc heavy metal. In: International Conference on Environmental Impacts of the Oil and Gas Industries: Kurdistan Region of Iraq as a Case Study, 42–47.
  • 8. Al-Rubaiey, N.A., Al-Barazanjy, M.G. 2018a. Electrocoagulation treatment of oily wastewater in the oil industry. Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, 8(3), 274–289.
  • 9. Al-Rubaiey, N.A., Al-Barazanjy, M.G. 2018b. Ultrasonic technique in treating wastewater by electrocoagulation. Engineering and Technology Journal, 36(1), 54–62.
  • 10. Al-Rubaiey, N.A., Albrazanjy, M.G. 2019. The effect of some variables on the removal of synthetic bentonite suspension in water by electrocoagulation using turbidity measurements. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP 012009. ,(1)579 ,‏Publishing
  • 11. Al-Rubaiey, N.A., Albrazanjy, M.G., Abdulkareem, M. 2020. Electrocoagulation treatment of oil-based mud wastewater. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 737(1), 012191.
  • 12. Al-Rubaiey, N.A., Albrazanjy, M.G., Kadhim, W.A. 2022. Combined electrocoagulation and photocatalytic for oily wastewater treatment using TiO2 nanocatalysts.Egyptian Journal of Chemistry,65(7), 55–64.
  • 13. Asfaha, Y.G., Zewge, F., Yohannes, T., Kebede, S. 2022. Investigation of cotton textile industry wastewater treatment with electrocoagulation process: performance, mineralization, and kinetic study. Water Science and Technology, 85(5), 1549–1567.
  • 14. Asgharian, F., Khosravi‐Nikou, M.R., Anvaripour, B., Danaee, I. 2017. Electrocoagulation and ultrasonic removal of humic acid from wastewater. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 36(3), 822–829.
  • 15. Aswathy, P., Gandhimathi, R., Ramesh, S.T., Nidheesh, P.V. 2016. Removal of organics from bilge water by batch electrocoagulation process. Separation and Purification Technology, 159, 108–115.
  • 16.Bagastyo, A.Y., Sidik, F., Anggrainy, A.D., Lin, J.L., Nurhayati, E. 2022. The performance of the electrocoagulation process in removing organic and nitrogenous compounds from landfill leachate in a three-compartment reactor. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(2), 235–245.
  • 17.Benazzi, T.L., Dallago, R.M., Steffens, J., Bopsin, M.H. 2015. Effect of ph and conductivity in the electrocoagulation treatment of synthetic dairy effluent. Revista Ciências Exatas e Naturais (Impresso), 17, 105–118.
  • 18. Chafi, M., Gourich, B., Essadki, A.H., Vial, C., Fabregat, A. 2011. Comparison of electrocoagulation using iron and aluminium electrodes with chemical coagulation for the removal of a highly soluble acid dye. Desalination, 281, 285–292.‏
  • 19. Changmai, M., Pasawan, M., Purkait, M.K. 2019. Treatment of oily wastewater from drilling site using electrocoagulation followed by microfiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 210, 463–472.
  • 20. Chen, G., Hung, Y.T. 2007. Electrochemical wastewater treatment processes. In: Advanced Physicochemical Treatment Technologies. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 57–106.
  • 21.Chen, X., Ren, P., Li, T., Trembly, J.P., Liu, X. 2018. Zinc removal from model wastewater by electrocoagulation: Processing, kinetics and mechanism. Chemical Engineering Journal, 349, 358–367.‏
  • 22. Demirbas, E., Kobya, M. 2017. Operating cost and treatment of metalworking fluid wastewater by chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation processes. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 105, 79–90.
  • 23. Elazzouzi, M., Haboubi, K., Elyoubi, M.S. 2017. Electrocoagulation flocculation as a low-cost process for pollutants removal from urban wastewater. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 117, 614–626.‏
  • 24. Fayad, N. 2017. The application of electrocoagulation process for wastewater treatment and for the separation and purification of biological media (Doctoral dissertation), Université Clermont Auvergne, 2017–2020.
  • 25. Gadad, V. F., Manjunatha, B.M., Lokeshappa, B. 2016. Colour and COD removal of distillery spent wash by electrocoagulation followed by photocatalytic method. International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science & Technology, 3(8), 30–33.
  • 26. Ghaffarian Khorram, A., Fallah, N. 2020. Comparison of electrocoagulation and photocatalytic process for treatment of industrial dyeing wastewater: Energy consumption analysis. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 39(1), 13288.‏
  • 27. Hassani, A., Malhotra, M., Karim, A.V., Krishnan, S., Nidheesh, P.V. 2022. Recent progress on ultrasound-assisted electrochemical processes: A review on mechanism, reactor strategies, and applications for wastewater treatment. Environmental ‏112463. 205, ,Research
  • 28. He, C.C., Hu, C.Y., Lo, S.L. 2016. Evaluation of sono-electrocoagulation for the removal of Reactive Blue 19 passive film removed by ultrasound. Separation and Purification Technology, 165, 107–113.‏
  • 29.Jabbar, N., Alardhi S.M, Al-Jadir, T, Dhahad H. 2023. Contaminants removal from real refinery wastewater associated with energy generation in microbial fuel cell. J. Ecol. Eng., 24(1), 107-114.
  • 30.Jovanović, T., Velinov, N., Petrović, M., Najdanović, S., Bojić, D., Radović, M., Bojić, A. 2021. Mechanism of the electrocoagulation process and its application for treatment of wastewater: A review.Advanced Technologies, 10(1), 63–72.‏
  • 31. Khaled, B., Wided, B., Béchir, H., Elimame, E., Mouna, L., Zied, T. 2019. Investigation of electrocoagulation reactor design parameters effect on the removal of cadmium from synthetic and phosphate industrial wastewater. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 12(8), 1848–1859.‏
  • 32. Kobya, M., Ozyonar, F.U.A.T., Demirbas, E., Sik, E., Oncel, M.S. 2015. Arsenic removal from groundwater of Sivas-Şarkişla Plain, Turkey by electrocoagulation process: comparing with iron plate and ball electrodes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(2), 1096–1106.‏
  • 33. Linares-Hernández, I., Barrera-Díaz, C., Roa-Morales, G., Bilyeu, B., Ureña-Núñez, F. 2009. Influence of the anodic material on electrocoagulation performance.Chemical Engineering Journal,148(1), 97–105.
  • 34. Magnisali, E., Yan, Q., Vayenas, D.V. 2022. Electrocoagulation as a revived wastewater treatment method‐practical approaches: a review. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 97(1), 9–25.‏
  • 35. Maher, E.K., O’Malley, K.N., Dollhopf, M.E., Mayer, B.K., McNamara, P.J. 2020. Removal of estrogenic compounds from water via energy efficient sequential electrocoagulation-electrooxidation. Environmental Engineering Science, 37(2), 99–108.‏
  • 36. Mahvi, A.H. 2009. Application of ultrasonic technology for water and wastewater treatment. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 38(2), 1–17.‏
  • 37. Mengistu, L.R., Samuel, Z.A., Kitila, C.D., Bayu, A.B. 2022. Comparison study on sonodirect and sonoalternate current electrocoagulation process for domestic wastewater treatment. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2022.‏
  • 38. Muttaqin, R., Ratnawati, R., Slamet, S. 2022. Batch electrocoagulation system using aluminum and stainless steel 316 plates for hospital wastewater treatment. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 963(1), 012056.
  • 39. Naje, A.S., Chelliapan, S., Zakaria, Z., Ajeel, M.A., Alaba, P.A. 2017. A review of electrocoagulation technology for the treatment of textile wastewater.Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 33(3), 263–292.
  • 40. Naje, A.S., Chelliapan, S., Zakaria, Z., Ajeel, M.A., Sopian, K., Hasan, H.A. 2016. Electrocoagulation by solar energy feed for textile wastewater treatment including mechanism and hydrogen production using a novel reactor design with a rotating anode. RSC Advances, 6(12), 10192–10204.‏
  • 41. Ngala, S., Lekhlif, B., Jamal, J.E., Lakhdar, M., Afrine, L. 2019. Investigation of electrocoagulation on the removal of nickel in waste water from an electroplating bath using aluminium and iron electrodes. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 7(4), 7–4.‏
  • 42. Qing, Y., Hang, Y., Xuelei, L., Hui, W., Shu, X. 2016. Combined electrocoagulation, electrolysis and photocatalysis technologies applied to ship sewage treatment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 7(4), 248.
  • 43. Rakhmania, Kamyab, H., Yuzir, M.A., Abdullah, N., Quan, L.M., Riyadi, F.A., Marzouki, R. 2022. Recent applications of the electrocoagulation process on agro-based industrial wastewater: a review. Sustainability, 14(4), 1985.
  • 44. Rookesh, T., Samaei, M.R., Yousefinejad, S., Hashemi, H., Derakhshan, Z., Abbasi, F., Bilal, M. 2022. Investigating the electrocoagulation treatment of landfill leachate by iron/graphite electrodes: process parameters and efficacy assessment. Water, 14(2), 205.
  • 45. Sathya, K., Nagarajan, K., Carlin Geor Malar, G., Rajalakshmi, S., Raja Lakshmi, P. 2022. A comprehensive review on comparison among effluent treatment methods and modern methods of treatment of industrial wastewater effluent from different sources. Applied Water Science, 12(4), 70.
  • 46. Vymazal, J. 2022. The historical development of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Land, 11(2), 174.
  • 47. Sen, S., Prajapati, A.K., Bannatwala, A., Pal, D. 2019. Electrocoagulation treatment of industrial wastewater including textile dyeing effluent – a review. Desalination and Water Treatment, 161(1), 21–34.
  • 48. Setyawati, H., Galuh, D., Yunita, E. 2021. Effect of electrode distance and voltage on Cr, COD, and TSS reduction in waste water tanning industry using electrocoagulator batch. Journal of Sustainable Technology and Applied Scienc, 2(1), 24–30.
  • 49. Sharma, G., Choi, J., Shon, H.K., Phuntsho, S. 2011. Solar-powered electrocoagulation system for water and wastewater treatment. Desalination and water treatment, 32(1–3), 381–388.
  • 50. Sister, V.G., Kirshankova, E.V. 2005. Ultrasonic techniques in removing surfactants from effluents by electrocoagulation. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 41(9–10), 553–556.
  • 51. Sun, P., Elgowainy, A., Wang, M., Han, J., Henderson, R.J. 2018. Estimation of US refinery water consumption and allocation to refinery products. Fuel, 221, 542–557.
  • 52. Tahreen, A., Jami, M.S., Ali, F. 2020. Role of electrocoagulation in wastewater treatment: A developmental review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 37, 101440.
  • 53. Um, S.E., Chang, I.S. 2017. Effect of current density and contact time on membrane fouling in electrocoagulation-MBR and their kinetic studies on fouling reduction rate. Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 31(4), 321–328.
  • 54. UNEP in Iraq: Post-Conflict Assessment, Clean-up and Reconstruction. Report 2007, United Nations Environment Programme. Job No.: DEP/1035/GE.
  • 55. Xu, X., Zhu, X. 2004. Treatment of refectory oily wastewater by electro-coagulation process. Chemosphere, 56(10), 889–894.
  • 56. Zeboudji, B., Drouiche, N., Lounici, H., Mameri, N., Ghaffour, N. 2013. The influence of parameters affecting boron removal by electrocoagulation process. Separation Science and Technology, 48(8), 1280–1288.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-51671133-413f-44aa-9c79-250542de15ee
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.