Two entropy theory wings as a new trend for the modern means of air transport operational reliability measure

• Autorzy: Goncharenko Andriy Viktorovich

Identyfikatory

DOI

0.2478/tar-2020-0017

Warianty tytułu

PL

Dwa kierunki w teorii entropii jako nowy trend badań niezawodności operacyjnej współczesnych środków transportu lotniczego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper deals with the uncertainty of the operated system’s possible states hybrid combined optional functions. Traditionally, the probabilities of the system’s possible states are treated as the reliability measures. However, in the framework of the proposed doctrine, the optimality (for example, the maximal probability of the system’s state) is determined based upon a plausible assumption of the intrinsic objectively existing parameters. The two entropy theory wings consider on one hand the subjective preferences functions in subjective analysis, concerning the multi-alternativeness of the operational situation at an individual’s choice problems, and on the other hand the objectively existing characteristics used in theoretical physics. The discussed in the paper entropy paradigm proceeds with the objectively presented phenomena of the state’s probability and the probability’s maximum. The theoretical speculations and mathematical derivations are illustrated with the necessary plotted diagrams.

PL

Artykuł dotyczy niepewności możliwych stanów eksploatowanego systemu hybrydowych połączonych funkcji opcjonalnych. Tradycyjnie jako miary niezawodności traktuje się prawdopodobieństwa możliwych stanów systemu. Jednak w ramach proponowanej doktryny optymalność (na przykład maksymalne prawdopodobieństwo stanu systemu) jest określana na podstawie wiarygodnego założenia o obiektywnie istniejących parametrach wewnętrznych. Dwa kierunki w teorii entropii uwzględniają z jednej strony subiektywne funkcje preferencji w analizie subiektywnej, dotyczące wielowariantowości sytuacji operacyjnej przy indywidualnych problemach wyboru, a z drugiej strony obiektywnie istniejące cechy stosowane w fizyce teoretycznej. Omawiany w artykule paradygmat entropii kontynuuje obiektywnie przedstawione zjawiska prawdopodobieństwa stanu i maksimum prawdopodobieństwa. Spekulacje teoretyczne i wyprowadzenia matematyczne zilustrowano za pomocą niezbędnych wykresów.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

entropy; preference; option; optimization; probability; maximum; alternative; functional; condition

PL

entropia; preferencja; optymalizacja; prawdopodobieństwo; alternatywa; funkcjonalność; warunek

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwa Naukowe Sieci Badawczej Łukasiewicz - Instytutu Lotnictwa
• Czasopismo: Transactions on Aerospace Research
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Nr 3 (260)
• Strony: 64--74
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., wykr., wzory

Twórcy

autor

Goncharenko Andriy Viktorovich

• National Aviation University, Aerospace Faculty,1, Liubomyra Huzara Avenue, Kyiv, 03058, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• [1] Kroes, M. J., Watkins, W. A., Delp, F. and Sterkenburg, R., 2013, Aircraft maintenance and repair, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, p. 736.
• [2] Wild, T. W. and Kroes, M. J., 2014, Aircraft powerplants, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New york, p. 756.
• [3] Smith D. J., 2005, Reliability, maintainability and risk. Practical methods for engineers, Elsevier, London, p. 365.
• [4] Dhillon, B. S., 2006, Maintainability, maintenance, and reliability for engineers. Taylor & Francis Group, New York, p. 214.
• [5] Kasianov, V., 2013, Subjective entropy of preferences. Subjective analysis, Institute of Aviation, Warsaw, Poland, p. 644 (ISBN 978-83-63539-08-5).
• [6] Jaynes, E. T., 1957, ”Information theory and statistical mechanics”, Physical review, 106(4), pp.620-630.
• [7] Jaynes, E. T., 1957, ”Information theory and statistical mechanics. II”, Physical review, 108(2), pp. 171-190.
• [8] Jaynes, E. T., 1982, ”On the rationale of maximum-entropy methods”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 70, pp. 939-952.
• [9] Kasjanov, V. and Szafran, K., 2015, ”Some hybrid models of subjective analysis in the theory of active systems”, Transactions of the Institute of Aviation, 3(240), pp. 27-31.10.5604/05096669.1194963.
• [10] Pagowski Z. T., Szafran K., 2014, ”Ground effectinter-modal fast sea transport”, The InternationalJournal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 8(2), pp. 317-320.10.12716/1001.08.02.18
• [11] Szafran K., 2014, ”Flight safety – the principle of maximum entropy,” Safety on land, sea and air in the 21st century, 1, pp. 247-251, ISBN 978-83-61520-02-3, (in Polish).
• [12] Szafran, K. and Kramarski, I., 2015, ”Safety of navigation on the approaches to the ports of the republic of Poland on the basis of the radar system on the aerostat platform”, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 9(1), pp. 129-134.10.12716/1001.09.01.16
• [13] Szafran K., 2014, ”Traction vehicle operator safety – laboratory dynamic”, Logistyka, 6, pp. 192-197, (in Polish).
• [14] Goncharenko, A. V., 2017, ”Aircraft operation depending upon the uncertainty of maintenance alternatives”, Aviation, 21(4), pp. 126-131, 10.3846/16487788.2017.1415227.
• [15] Goncharenko, A. V., 2018, ”Active systems communicational control assessment in multialternative navigational situations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control (MSNMC), pp. 254-257, IEEE, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 2018.
• [16] Goncharenko, A. V., 2017, ”Optimal UAV maintenance periodicity obtained on the multi-optional basis,” Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD), pp. 65-68, IEEE, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 2017.
• [17] Goncharenko, A. V., 2018, ”A multi-optional hybrid functions entropy as a tool for transportation means repair optimal periodicity determination,” Aviation, 22(2), pp. 60-66, 10.3846/aviation.2018.5930.
• [18] Goncharenko, A. V., 2018, ”Multi-optional hybrid effectiveness functions optimality doctrine for maintenance purposes,” Proceedings of the IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelectronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET-2018), S8: Quality, reliability and diagnostics of electronic and information systems and devices, pp. 771-775, IEEE, Lviv-Slavske, Ukraine, February 2018.
• [19] Goncharenko, A. V., 2018, ”Aeronautical and aerospace materials and structures damages to failures: theoretical concepts,” International Journal of Aerospace engineering, Article ID 4126085, pp. 1-7. 10.1155/2018/4126085.
• [20] Goncharenko, A. V., 2018, ”Development of a theoretical approach to the conditional optimization of aircraft maintenance preference uncertainty,” Aviation, 22(2), pp. 40-44, 10.3846/aviation.2018.5929.
• [21] Goncharenko, A. V, 2018, ”An entropy model of the aircraft gas turbine engine blades restoration method choice,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer InformationTechnologies (ACIT’2018), pp. 2-5, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, June 2018.
• [22] Goncharenko, A. V, 2018, ”Airworthiness support measures analogy to the prospective roundabouts alternatives: theoretical aspects,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, Article ID 9370597, pp. 1-7. 10.1155/2018/9370597.
• [23] Goncharenko, A. V., 2016, ”Several models of artificial intelligence elements for aircraft control, ”Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control (MSNMC), pp. 224-227, IEEE, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 2016.
• [24] Goncharenko, A. V., 2015, ”Applicable aspects of alternative UAV operation,” Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD), pp. 316-319, IEEE, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 2015.
• [25] Goncharenko, A. V., 2014, ”Navigational alternatives, their control and subjective entropy of individual preferences,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control (MSNMC), pp. 99-103, IEEE, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 2014.
• [26] Goncharenko, A. V., 2013, ”Expediency of unmanned air vehicles application in the framework of subjective analysis,” Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD), pp. 129-133, IEEE, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 2013.
• [27] Goncharenko, A. V., 2018, ”Optimal controlling path determination with the help of hybrid optional functions distributions,” Radio electronics, Computer Science, Control, 1(44), pp. 149-158, 10.15588/1607-3274-2018-1-17.
• [28] Goncharenko, A. V., 2019, ”Relative pseudo-entropy functions and variation model theoretically adjusted to an activity splitting,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT’2019), pp. 52-55, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, June 2019.
• [29] Goncharenko, A. V., 2019, "Multi-Optional Hybridization for UAV Maintenance Purposes, "Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD), Kiev, Ukraine, pp. 48-51. 10.1109/APUAvD47061.2019.8943902.
• [30] Goncharenko, A. V., 2013, “Measures for estimating transport vessels operators’ subjective preferences uncertainty,” Transactions of the Institute of Aviation, vol. 228(1), pp. 13-21.