Cantrang: A Dilemma in Policy Implementation (Case in Lampung Bay, Indonesia)

• Autorzy: Febryano Indra Gumay , Supono , Damai Abdullah Aman , Hardian Debi , Winarno Gunardi Djoko , Tresiana Novita

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2021.1.14

Warianty tytułu

PL

Sieć trałowa: Dylemat we wdrażaniu polityki (przypadek zatoki Lampung w Indonezji)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Cantrang is a section of seine nets which has been banned in all regions of Indonesia. However, this policy can stir to pros and cons due to implementation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the success of the stage and the effectiveness of policy implementation on cantrang prohibition in Lampung Bay, Indonesia. Data were collected by interview, observation, and documentation studies, next the policy implementation was reviewed by the marketing policy studies then for further analyze was using ambiguity-conflict matrix. The result of this research shows the unsuccessful of the policy marketing on implementing cantrang prohibition policy from policy acceptance side and policy adoption, also on readiness strategy side is failed. Fisher community do not fulfil the policy and not become a part of it, hesitancy of local government as an executor of the policy, vertical conflict between fisherman and government. The analysis of ambiguity-conflict matrix gives the choice of effectiveness politic model implementation and experimentation, replace the administrative policy implementation. Effective but non-destructive fishing gear can be encouraged to be developed by the government through studies that involving all stakeholders including fisherman and academics. The government is also expected to replace the prohibition policy with a regulatory policy on the cantrang construction and capture area arrangement. In addition, the government is expected to create legal certainty in the field, so it may minimize the fisherman’s conflicts and opposition to cantrang prohibition policies.

PL

Kantrang to sieć trałowa, której użytkowania zakazano we wszystkich regionach Indonezji. Jej wdrażanie ma jednak tak wady, jak i zalety. Celem niniejszej pracy jest analiza sukcesu i skuteczności wdrażania polityki dotyczącej zakazu kantrangu w zatoce Lampung w Indonezji. Dane zebrano na podstawie wywiadów, obserwacji i badań dokumentacji, a następnie wdrożenie polityki zostało przeanalizowane z pozycji polityki marketingowej, po czym do dalszej analizy wykorzystano macierz niejednoznaczności-konfliktu. Wyniki tych badań pokazują, że marketing dotyczący wdrażania polityki zakazu kantrang od strony jej akceptacji i przyjęcia, a także od strony gotowości jej wdrażania, nie powiódł się. Społeczność rybacka nie realizuje polityki i nie staje się jej częścią, samorząd jako wykonawca polityki także zawodzi, następuje wertykalny konflikt między rybakami a rządem. Analiza macierzy niejednoznaczności konfliktu wskazuje na możliwości poprawy skuteczności wdrażania modelu politycznego i przygotowania nowej polityki administracyjnej. Rząd może zachęcać do opracowywania skutecznych, ale nieniszczących narzędzi połowowych opracowanych z udziałem wszystkich zainteresowanych stron, w tym rybaków i naukowców. Oczekuje się również, że rząd zastąpi politykę zakazową polityką regulacyjną dotyczącą dopuszczalnych form budowy sieci kantrangu i jej zdolności połowowych. Ponadto oczekuje się, że rząd stworzy skuteczne prawa w tej dziedzinie, dzięki czemu zmniejszeniu ulegnie zakres sprzeciwu wobec polityki zakazu kantrangu.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fishing gear; IUU fishing; Lampung Bay; policy implementation; cantrang

PL

sprzęt połowowy; połowy IUU; Zatoka Lampung; wdrażanie polityki; sieć trałowa

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 16, nr 1
• Strony: 133--142
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Febryano Indra Gumay

• Department of Coastal and Marine Zone Management, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-656X

autor

Supono

• Department of Coastal and Marine Zone Management, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8712-090X

autor

Damai Abdullah Aman

• Department of Coastal and Marine Zone Management, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

autor

Hardian Debi

• Department of Coastal and Marine Zone Management, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

autor

Winarno Gunardi Djoko

• Department of Coastal and Marine Zone Management, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

autor

Tresiana Novita

• Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-656X

Bibliografia

• 1. ANNA Z., YUSUF A.A., ALISJAHBANA A.S., GHINA A.A., RAHMA, 2019, Are Fisherman Happier? Evidence from A Large-Scale Subjective Well-Being Survey in A Lower-Middle-Income Country, in: Marine Policy, 106, p. 103559.
• 2. ARCEO H.O., CAZALET B., ALINO P.M., MANGIALAJO L., FRANCOUR P., 2013, Moving Beyond A Top-Down Fisheries Management Approach in The Northwestern Mediterranean: Some Lessons from The Philippines., in: Marine Policy, 39, p. 29- 42.
• 3. BACALSO R.T.M., WOLFF M., ROSALES R.M., ARMADA N.B., 2016, Effort Reallocation of Illegal Fishing Operations: A Profitable Scenario for The Municipal Fisheries of Danajon Bank, Central Philippines, in: Ecological Modelling, 331, p. 5-16.
• 4. BAMBANG N., 2006, Petunjuk Pembuatan dan Pengoperasian Cantrang dan Rawai Dasar Pantai Utara Jawa Tengah [Instruction on Making and Operating Cantrang and Bottom Longline in North Coast of Central Java], Balai Besar Pengembangan Penangkapan Ikan, Semarang (in Indonesian).
• 5. BEN-HAIM Y., OSTEEN C.D., MOFFITT L.J., 2013, Policy Dilemma of Innovation: An Info-Gap Approach, in: Ecological Economics, 85, p. 130-138.
• 6. BLADON A.J., MOHAMMED E.Y., ALI L., MILNER-GULLAND E.J., 2018, Developing A Frame of Reference for Fisheries Management and Conservation Interventions, in: Fisheries Research, 208, p. 296-308.
• 7. BPPI [Balai Pengembangan Penangkapan Ikan], 1999, Kumpulan Paket Teknologi [Collection of Technology Packages], Balai Pengembangan Penangkapan Ikan, Semarang (in Indonesian).
• 8. BULL J.W., GORDON A., LAW E.A., SUTTLE K.B., MILNER-GULLAND E.J., 2014, Importance of Baseline Specification in Evaluating Conservation Interventions and Achieving No Net Loss of Biodiversity, in: Conservation Biology, 28, p. 799-809.
• 9. CHARLES A., 2001, Sustainable Fishery System, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
• 10. DAMAI A.A., 2012, Sistem Perencanaan Tata Ruang Wilayah Pesisir: Studi Kasus Teluk Lampung [Spatial Planning System on Coastal Area], Dissertation, Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. (in Indonesian).
• 11. DAS M.R., RAY S., KUMMAR U., BEGUM S., TARAFDAR S.R., 2015, Livelihood Assessment of The Fisherman Community in The South West Region of Bangladesh, in: Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 3(4), p. 353-361.
• 12. DAVIES T., MEES C., MILNER-GULLAND E.J., 2015, Second-Guessing Uncertainty: Scenario Planning for Management of The Indian Ocean Tuna Purse Seine Fishery, in: Marine Policy, 62, p. 169- 177.
• 13. DIGAL L.N., PLACENCIA S.G.P., 2017, Factors Affecting The Adoption of Sustainable Tuna Fishing Practices: The Case of Municipal Fishers in Maasim, Sarangani Province, Region 12, Philippines, in: Marine Policy, 77, p. 30-36.
• 14. DINAS PERIKANAN DAN KELAUTAN PROVINSI LAMPUNG, 2007, Pemetaan Terumbu Karang di Teluk Lampung [Coral Reefs Mapping in Lampung Bay]. Dinas Perikanan dan Kelautan Provinsi Lampung, Bandar Lampung. (in Indonesian).
• 15. DINAS PERIKANAN DAN KELAUTAN PROVINSI LAMPUNG, 2018, Statistik Perikanan [Statistics of Fisheries], Dinas Perikanan dan Kelautan Provinsi Lampung, Bandar Lampung (in Indonesian).
• 16. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 2016, Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing, http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6069e.pdf (18.9. 2019).
• 17. FALAUTANO M., CASTRIOTA L., CILLARI T., VIVONA P., FINOIA M.G., ANDALORO F., 2018, Characterization of Artisanal Fishery in A Coastal Area of The Strait of Sicily (Mediterranean Sea): Evaluation of Legal and IUU Fishing, in: Ocean and Coastal Management, 151, p. 77-91.
• 18. HAKIM L., NURHASANAH., 2016, Cantrang: Masalah dan Solusinya [Cantrang: Problems and Solutions], in: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif (Senari) ke-4 Tahun 2016, p. 216-225. (in Indonesian).
• 19. HARDIAN D., SUPONO, FEBRYANO I.G., DAMAI A.A., WIDIASTUTI L.L., 2019, Perception of Fisherman and Government on Implementation of The Cantrang Fishing Ban in Lampung Bay. Proceeding The International Conference on Marine Sciences and Coastal Engineering and Sciences 2019.
• 20. HILL M., HUPE P., 2006, Implementing Public Policy, Sage, London.
• 21. LEROY A., GALLETTI F., CHABOUD C., 2016, The EU Restrictive Trade Measures Against IUU Fishing, in: Marine Policy, 64, p. 82-90.
• 22. LIAO C-P., HUANG H-W., LU H-J., 2019, Fisherman's Perceptions of Coastal Fisheries Management Regulations: Key Factors to Rebuilding Coastal Fishery Resources in Taiwan, in: Ocean and Coastal Management, 172, p. 1-13.
• 23. LINDLEY J., TECHERA E.J., 2017, Overcoming Complexity in Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported Fishing to Achieve Effective Regulatory Pluralism, in: Marine Policy, 81, p. 71-79.
• 24. MATLAND R.E., 1995, Synthesizing The Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), p. 145-174.
• 25. MIRRASOOLI E., GHORBANI R., GORGIN S., AGHILINEJHAD S.M., JALALI A., 2019, Factors Associated with Illegal Fishing and Fisher Attitudes Toward Sturgeon Conservation in The Southern Caspian Sea, in: Marine Policy, 100, p. 107-115.
• 26. MULLIE W.C., 2019, Apparent Reduction of Illegal Trawler Fishing Effort in Ghana's Inshore Exclusive Zone 2012-2018 as Revealed by Publicly Available AIS Data, in: Marine Policy, 108, p. 103623.
• 27. MUNTALIM, CHOIRUDDIN M.S., 2016, Pengaruh Kebijakan Penggunaan Alat Tangkap Pukat Tarik (Seine Nets) terhadap Pendapatan Nelayan di Kabupaten Lamongan [The Influence of Trawl Fishing Gear (Seine Nets) Utilization of Fisherman Income in Lamongan Regency], in: Jurnal Grouper, 7(1), p. 20-24 (in Indonesian).
• 28. MURSHED-E-JAHAN K., BELTON B., VISWANATHAN K.K., 2014, Communication Strategies for Managing Coastal Fisheries Conflicts in Bangladesh, in: Ocean & Coastal Management, 92, p. 65-73.
• 29. MSOMPHORA M.R., 2016, Conflict Resolution and The Delegation of Authority In Fisheries Management: The Case of Outer Hebrides Inshore Fisheries Group in Scotland, in: Marine Policy, 73, p. 263-275.
• 30. NABABAN B.O., SOLIHIN A., CHRISTIAN Y., 2018, Dampak Sosial Ekonomi Kebijakan Larangan Pukat Hela dan Pukat Tarik di Pantai Utara Jawa [Socio-Economic Impact of Pukat Hela and Pukat Tarik Prohibition in North Coast of Java], https:// www.conservation-strategy.org/sites/default/files/fie ldfile/MFP_Trawl_Ban_Java_Bahasa_Optimized.pd f (18.09. 2019) (in Indonesian).
• 31. NAHUELHUAL L., SAAVEDRA G., BLANCO G., WESSELINK E., CAMPOS G., VERGARA X., 2018, On Super Fishers and Black Capture: Images of Illegal Fishing in Artisanal Fisheries of Southern Chile, in: Marine Policy, 95, p. 36-45.
• 32. NIELSEN K.N., HOLM P., ASCHAN M., 2015, Results based Management in Fisheries: Delegating Responsibility to Resource Users, in: Marine Policy, 51, p. 442-451.
• 33. NUGROHO R., 1995, Public Policy, Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.
• 34. OKAFOR-YARWOOD I., 2019, Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing, and The Complexities of The Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs) for Countries in the Gulf of Guinea, in: Marine Policy, 99, p. 414-422.
• 35. PAHLEVI M.F.R., HIDAYAT Z., 2017, Implementasi Kebijakan Pelarangan Alat Tangkap Cantrang di Kabupaten Rembang [The Implementation on Cantrang Prohibition Policy in Rembang Regency], in: Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 6(2), p. 200-214 (in Indonesian).
• 36. PETROSSIAN G.A., 2015, Preventing Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing: A Situational Approach, in: Biological Conservation, 189, p. 39-48.
• 37. RISKAS K.A., TOBIN R.C., FUENTES M.M.P.B., HAMANN M., 2018, Evaluating The Threat of IUU Fishing to Sea Turtles in The Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia Using Expert Elicitation, in: Biological Conservation, 217, p. 232-239.
• 38. RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA O.U., SEIJO J.C., DE ANDA-MONTANEZ J.A., 2019, Recovery Timelines of Vulnerable High Value Species Under Moratoria: Dealing with Uncertain Levels of Illegal Fishing, in: Fisheries Research, 220, p. 105345.
• 39. SANDER K., LEE J., HICKEY V., MOSOTI V.B., VIRDIN J., MAGRATH W.B., 2014, Conceptualizing Maritime Environmental and Natural Resources Law Enforcement – The Case of Illegal Fishing, in: Environmental Development, 11, p. 112- 122.
• 40. SARI HR, BRATA NT., 2017, Studi etnoekologi tentang nelayan dan jaring cantrang di Kabupaten Rembang [Ethnoecological study of fisherman and cantrang nets in Rembang Regency], in: Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo, 1(2), p. 135-146 (in Indonesian).
• 41. SUBANI W., BARUS H.R., 1989, Alat Penangkapan Ikan dan Udang Laut di Indonesia [Fishing and catching shrimp gear in Indonesia], Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Jakarta (in Indonesian).
• 42. SUKANDAR, RAKA D.G., SETYOHADI D., SAMBAH A.B., BINTORO G., DARMAWAN, IKA L., FUAD., 2015, Tinjauan Akademis terhadap Permen KP No.2/Permen-KP/2015 [Academic Review of Permen KP No.2/Permen-KP/2015]. BPPFPIK Universitas Brawijaya, Malang (in Indonesian).
• 43. SUPRAPTI Y., DHUHA R.S., MUNIR M., 2017, Persepsi nelayan cantrang terhadap Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 [Fisherman's perception on the Minister of Maritime and Fisheries Regulation No. 2 on 2015], in: Journal of Economic and Social of Fisheries and Marine, 5(1), p. 104-115 (in Indonesian).
• 44. SUWARSIH, 2013, Pengaruh lama penarikan pada pengoperasian alat tangkap cantrang terhadap hasil tangkapan ikan demersal di perairan Brondong [The effect of pullout period on cantrang to demersal fishes catches in Brondong], in: Jurnal Harpodon Borneo, 6(2), p. 143-151 (in Indonesian).
• 45. XUE G., 2003, China and International Fisheries Law and Policy, Martinus Nijhof Publisher, Cambridge.
• 46. YOUNG M.A., 2016, International Trade Law Compatibility of Market-Related Measures to Combat Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing, in: Marine Policy, 69, p. 209-219.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).