Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
19th KKMGiIG
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Stress history acquired by any cohesive soil influences, to a large extent, three groups of fundamental properties indispensable in geotechnical design i.e. state of soil, shear strength, and stiffness characteristics. The basic stress history parameter (from which other parameters are derived) determined directly from laboratory tests is a pre consolidation stress σ′p. Since the first method proposed by Casagrande in 1936, value σ′p is determined in the oedometer test as a border between over consolidated (OC) and normally consolidated (NC) zones. Approach based on division between predominantly elastic, (recoverable) strain, and plastic (irrecoverable) strain is a main principle of several methods of σ′p determination, which have been proposed over the past eighty-six years. Accumulated experiences have revealed that any laboratory procedure based on the oedometer test does not provide realistic value of pre consolidation stress, especially in heavy pre consolidated soils. The major reason for that results from the fact that the mechanism responsible for natural over consolidation is more complicated than mechanical preloading. Therefore, there is a necessity to reevaluate effectiveness of standard methods and look for another solution of evaluation yield stress σ′Y in natural soils. This article presents the comparison between σ′Y determined for various soils with use of standard methods based on conventional oedometer test and yield stress determined on the basis of alternative procedures. The latter are represented by various approaches as e.g. based on SHANSEP procedure or initial shear modulus and others. The most promising among these alternative methods is a new concept based on dilatancy phenomenon that takes place during shearing of a dense soil. The parameter reflecting stress history is derived from pore pressure response and is based on characteristic values of Skempton's parameter A record. Consistency of data concerning stress history parameters profile obtained for deep subsoil on the basis of various methods is shown for comparison.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
350--361
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 28 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Warsaw University of Life Sciences-WULS, Institute of Civil Engineering, Nowoursynowska Str. 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
autor
- Warsaw University of Life Sciences-WULS, Institute of Civil Engineering, Nowoursynowska Str. 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
- [1] Becker, D.B., Crooks, J.H.A., Been, K., & Jefferies M.G. (1987). Work as a criterion for determining in situ and yield stresses in clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 24 (4), 549–564.
- [2] Boone, S. J. (2010). A critical reappraisal of ‘‘preconsolidation pressure’’ interpretations using the oedometer test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 47, 281 - 296.
- [3] Burland, J.B. (1990). On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays. Gèotechnique, Vol. 40 (3), 329-378.
- [4] Burmister D.M. (1951). The application of controlled test methods in consolidation testing. Consolidation Testing of Soils. American Society for Testing Materials,126, 83-91.
- [5] Butterfield, R. (1979). A natural compression law for soils (an advance on e-logp′). Géotechnique, Vol. 24 (4), 469–479.
- [6] Casagrande, A. (1936). Determination of the Pre-consolidation load and its practical significance. Proceedings, 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Cambridge, Vol. 3, 60-64
- [7] Crawford, C.B. (1964). Interpretation of Consolidation Tests. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division ASCE, Vol. 90, SM 5.
- [8] Das, B.M. (1983). Advanced Soil Mechanics, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington.
- [9] Grønbech, G.L., Ibsen, L., B., & Nielsen, B.N.(2015). Preconsolidation of Søvind Marl - a highly fissured Eocene clay. ASTM Geotechnical testing Journal, Vol.38, No.4, 501-510.
- [10] Jamiolkowski, M., Ladd, C.C., Germaine, J.T., & Lancellotta, R. (1985) New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils. 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, 57–154.
- [11] Janbu, N. (1969). The resistance concept applied to deformation of soils. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, 25–29 August 1969. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Vol. 1, 191–196.
- [12] Janbu, N., & Senneset, K. (1979). Interpretation Procedures for Obtaining Soil Deformation Parameters, Proceedings of the 7th ESCMFE, Brighton, Vol. 1, 185–188.
- [13] Jose, B.T., Sridharan, A., & Abraham, B.M. (1989). Log-log method for determination of preconsolidation pressure. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 12, 230-237.
- [14] Józsa, V., (2016) Estimation and Separation of Preconsolidation Stress Using Triaxial, and Oedometer Test in Kiscelli Clay. Periodica Polytechnica of Civil Engineering, 60(2), pp. 297–304.
- [15] Kootahi, K. & Mayne, P.W. (2018). A two-fold empirical approach for estimating the preconsolidation stress in clay deposits. Proceedings, 4th GeoShanghai International Conference.
- [16] Ladd, C.C. & Foott, R. (1974). New design procedure for stability of soft clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE 100 (7), 763-786.
- [17] Ladd,C.C., Foott,R., Ishihara,K., Schlosser,F., & Poulos,H. (1977): Stress-deformation ana strength characteristics. Proceedings. 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundatien Engineering, Tokyo. Vol,2, State of-the-Art Report, 421-494.
- [18] Lipiński. M. J. & Wdowska, M. (2017). A new method for evaluation of yield stress in cohesive soils. 19th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Sep. 17 -22, 2017, Coex, Seoul, Koreae : proceedings. - Seoul : Korea Geotechnical Society, 435-438.
- [19] Marks, L. (2005). Pleistocene glacial limits in the territory of Poland. Przegląd Geologiczny, Vol. 53, nr 10/2, 988-993
- [20] Mayne, P.W. (2007). In-situ test calibrations for evaluating soil parameters, characterization & engineering properties of natural soils. Proc. Singapore 2006, Taylor & Francis Group, London, v. 3, 1602-1652.
- [21] Pacheco Silva, F. (1970). A new graphical construction for determination of the pre-consolidation stress of a soil sample. Proceedings of the 4th Brazilian Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Vol. 2 (1), 225-232.
- [22] Sällfors, G. (1975). Preconsolidation pressure of soft high plastic clays. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- [23] Schmertmann, J.H. (1955). The undisturbed consolidation behavior of clay. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 120, 1201-1233.
- [24] Şenol A., Seglamer A. (2000) Determination of Pre-consolidation Pressure with a New “Strain Energy –Log Stress” Method. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1-11.
- [25] Şenol, A., Hatipoglu, M. & Ozudogru, T.Y. (2005). The evaluation of pre-consolidation pressure results of “CL” subgrades. GeoProb 2005 – International Conference on Problematic Soils, Famagusta, TRN Cyprus.
- [26] Tavenas, F., Mieussens, C. & Bourges, F. (1979). Lateral displacements in clay foundations under embankments. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 16 (3), 532-550.
- [27] Van Zelst, T.W. (1948). An Investigation of the Factors Affecting Laboratory Consolidation of Clay. Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Soil Mechanics, Rotterdam, Vol. 7, 52-61.
- [28] Wdowska, M., (2010). Influence of stress history on deformation parameters of cohesive soils. PhD thesis (in Polish). Warsaw University of Life Sciences. Warsaw.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-51275366-7de8-4183-8de3-26043f10334b