PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Managing temporary agency workers’ well-being: the role of resilience and work alienation

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Zarządzanie dobrostanem pracowników tymczasowych: rola odporności i alienacji w pracy
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The well-being of temporary workers is still understudied, especially the role of individual resources as promoters of well-being. As such, this paper aims to examine the role of resilience as a resource for enhancing work engagement and reducing burnout of temporary agency workers. Additionally, this study tests the mediating role of work alienation. The study follows a quantitative approach. Based on a sample of 2.054 temporary agency workers, a set of hypotheses were tested using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), using SmartPLS3.0. The results show that resilience is positively related to work engagement and negatively related to burnout. Work alienation plays a mediating role between resilience and burnout and work engagement of temporary agency workers by reducing the effect of resilience. This study novelty highlights the contribution of resilience as a mechanism to reduce burnout and enhance work engagement, but also about the importance of preventing work alienation. Since resilience can be learned and work alienation can be avoided, this study has important implications for human resources management strategies and practices.
PL
Dobrostan pracowników tymczasowych jest wciąż niedostatecznie zbadany, zwłaszcza rola indywidualnych zasobów jako promotorów dobrostanu. W związku z tym niniejszy artykuł ma na celu zbadanie roli odporności jako zasobu zwiększającego zaangażowanie w pracę i zmniejszającego wypalenie zawodowe pracowników tymczasowych. Dodatkowo, niniejsze opracowanie poddaje analizie pośredniczącą rolę alienacji w pracy. Opracowanie opiera się na metodzie ilościowej. Na przykładzie 2 054 pracowników tymczasowych, przetestowano zestaw hipotez za pomocą modelowania równań strukturalnych metodą najmniejszych kwadratów (PLS-SEM), przy użyciu SmartPLS3.0. Wyniki pokazują, że odporność jest pozytywnie związana z zaangażowaniem w pracę i negatywnie związana z wypaleniem zawodowym. Alienacja w pracy odgrywa rolę pośredniczącą między odpornością a wypaleniem zawodowym i zaangażowaniem w pracę pracowników tymczasowych poprzez zmniejszenie wpływu odporności. To nowatorskie badanie podkreśla wkład odporności jako mechanizmu zmniejszającego wypalenie zawodowe i zwiększającego zaangażowanie w pracę, ale także znaczenie zapobiegania alienacji w pracy. Jako że odporności można się nauczyć, a alienacji w pracy można uniknąć, niniejsze opracowanie ma istotne znaczenie dla strategii i praktyk zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi.
Rocznik
Strony
62--80
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Department of Economics and Management, University Portucalense
autor
  • Department of Economics and Management, University Portucalense
Bibliografia
  • 1.Amir, M. T., Mangundjaya, W. L., (2021). How resilience affects employee engagement? A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 1147-1156.
  • 2.Becker, K., Engel, T., (2015). Reduziertes Schutzniveau jenseits der Normalarbeit [Reduced level of protection beyond normal working conditions]. WSI-Mitteilungen, 68, 178-86.
  • 3.Boyce, A. S., Ryan, A. M., Imus, A. L. and Morgeson, F. P., (2007). Temporary worker, permanent loser? A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management, 33(1), 5-29.
  • 4.Cao, X., Chen, L., (2021). The impact of resilience on turnover intention in dialysis nurses: The mediating effects of work engagement and compassion fatigue. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 18(3), e12414.
  • 5.Campbell-Sills, L., Stein, M. B., (2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Conor- Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 1019-28.
  • 6.Chambel, M. J., Castanheira, F., (2006). Different Temporary Work Status, Different Behaviors in Organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(3), 351-367.
  • 7.Chambel, J., Castanheira F. and Sobral, F., (2014). Temporary agency versus permanent workers: a multigroup analysis of human resource management, work engagement and organizational commitment. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1-25.
  • 8.Contreras, F, Espinosa, J. C. and Esguerra, G. A., (2020). Could Personal Resources Influence Work Engagement and Burnout? A Study in a Group of Nursing Staff. SAGE Open, 10, 2158244019900563.
  • 9.Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Peeters, M. C. and Breevaart, K., (2021). New directions in burnout research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(5), 686-691.
  • 10.Eichhorst, W., Tobsch, V., (2017). Risk of Precariousness: Results from the European Working Conditions Survey 2010 and 2015. Brussels: European Parliament, Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_IDA(2017)595370 (accessed on 18 February 2022).
  • 11.EUROSTAT., (2021). Temporary Employees as Percentage of the Total Number of Employees, by Sex, Age and Citizenship (%). Available online: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  • 12.Fedi, A., Pucci, L., Tartaglia, S. and Rollero, C., (2016). Correlates of work-alienation and positive job attitudes in high-and low-status workers. Career Development International.
  • 13.Ferreira, P., Gomes, S., (2021). The role of resilience in reducing burnout: A study with healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences, 10, 317.
  • 14.Ferreira, P., Gomes, S., (2022). Temporary Work, Permanent Strain? Personal Resources as Inhibitors of Temporary Agency Workers’ Burnout. Administrative Sciences, 12, 87.
  • 15.Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C. M., (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
  • 16.Hobfoll, S. E., (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
  • 17.Hünefeld, L., Gerstenberg, S. and Hüffmeier, J., (2020). Job satisfaction and mental health of temporary agency workers in Europe: A systematic review and research agenda. Work and Stress, 34(1), 82-110.
  • 18.International Labour Organization (ILO)., (2022a). What Is Temporary Employment? Geneva: International Labour Organization, Available online: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/non-standard-employment/WCMS_534826/langen/index.htm (accessed on 16 February 2022).
  • 19.International Labour Organization (ILO)., (2022b). What Is a Multi-Party Employment Relationship? Geneva: International Labour Organization, Available online: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/non-standard-employment/WCMS_534834/langen/index.htm (accessed on 16 February 2002).
  • 20.Jiang, H., Chen, Y., Sun, P. and Li, C., (2019). Authoritarian leadership and employees’ unsafe behaviors: The mediating roles of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1668-1678.
  • 21.Kartal, N., (2018). Evaluating the relationship between work engagement, work alienation and work performance of healthcare professionals. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11(3), 251-259.
  • 22.Kozhina, A. A., Vinokurov, L. V., (2020). Work alienation during covid-19: main factors and conditions (an example of university professors). Psychology in Russia: State of the art, 13(4), 106-118.
  • 23.Luthans, F., (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
  • 24.Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., (2017) Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 4(1), 339-366.
  • 25.Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2, 99-113.
  • 26.Maslach, C., Leiter, M. P., (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 498-512.
  • 27.Mitlacher, Lars W., (2008). Job quality and temporary agency work: Challenges for human resource management in triangular employment relations in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 446-460.
  • 28.Moczydłowska, J., (2016). Organisational reasons of job burnout. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 8(2), 7-12.
  • 29.Nair, N., Vohra, N., (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision, 48(4), 600-615.
  • 30.Nair, N., Vohra, N., (2012). The concept of alienation: towards conceptual clarity. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 20(1), 25-50.
  • 31.Nemteanu, M. S., Dinu, V. and Dabija, D. C., (2021). Job insecurity, job instability, and job satisfaction in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2), 65.
  • 32.Ojo, A. O., Fawehinmi, O. and Yusliza, M. Y., (2021). Examining the predictors of resilience and work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(5), 2902.
  • 33.Riley, M. R., Mohr, D. C. and Waddimba, A. C., (2017). The reliability and validity of threeitem screening measures for burnout: Evidence from group-employed health care practitioners in upstate New York. Stress and Health, 34, 187-93.
  • 34.Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. and Becker, J. M., (2015). "SmartPLS 3." Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com.
  • 35.Sarwar, A., Zakariya, R., Afshari, L. and Ishaq, E., (2022). But I've got my powers: Examining a moderated mediation model of punitive supervision, work alienation and well-being in hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 51, 303-311.
  • 36.Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. and Bakker, A. B., (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
  • 37.Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. and Salanova, M., (2006), The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. A cross-national study, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
  • 38.Shaikh, A. A., Shaikh, A, Kumar, R. and Tahir, A., (2019). Assessment of burnout and its factors among doctors using the abbreviated Maslach burnout inventory. Cureus, 11(2), e4101.
  • 39.Shantz, A., Alfes, K., Bailey, C. and Soane, E., (2015). Drivers and outcomes of work alienation: Reviving a concept. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 382-393.
  • 40.Shantz, A., Alfes, K. and Truss, C., (2012). Alienation from work: Marxist ideologies and twenty-first-century practice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(18), 2529-2550.
  • 41.Striler J, Shoss M. and Jex S., (2021) The relationship between stressors of temporary work and counterproductive work behaviour. Stress Health, 37(2), 329-340.
  • 42.Szostek, D., Balcerzak, A. P. and Rogalska, E., (2020). The relationship between personality, organizational and interpersonal counterproductive work challenges in industry 4.0. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25(4), 577-592.
  • 43.Tummers, L. G., Den Dulk, L., (2013). The effects of work alienation on organisational commitment, work effort and work‐to‐family enrichment. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(6), 850-859.
  • 44.Vanderstukken, A., Caniëls, M. C. J., (2021). Predictors of work alienation: differences between hierarchical levels. Career Development International, 26(5), 640-656.
  • 45.Vanhove, A. J., Herian, M. N., Perez, A. L., Harms, P. D. and Lester, P. B., (2016). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta‐analytic review of resilience‐building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 278-307.
  • 46.Wang, Z., Lu, H. and Wang, X., (2019). Psychological resilience and work alienation affect perceived overqualification and job crafting. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 47(2), 1-10.
  • 47.Xie F., (2021) A Study on Chinese EFL Teachers' Work Engagement: The Predictability Power of Emotion Regulation and Teacher Resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 735969.
  • 48.Youssef, C. M., Luthans, F., (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774-800.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-51053092-e781-40ee-9d88-6e8140c5b512
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.