Geometrical parameters of the mandible in 3D CBCT imaging

• Autorzy: Ryniewicz Wojciech , Ryniewicz Anna , Bojko Łukasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1016/j.bbe.2018.09.005

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study is to report on a method for the measurement and analysis of the accuracy in mapping the shape of the mandible spatially modeled based on cone beam imaging. To achieve this goal, the geometrical determinants of the mandible shape were identified; in addition, the accuracy of their cone beam in computer tomography (CBCT) images was verified. The latter – verification of images – was based on reference measures made by a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). The parameters that were analyzed were: Bonville's triangle, the occlusal plane, and the mandible symmetry in relation to the sagittal plane. Descriptive statistics and distribution of individual variables were determined. The results were analyzed statistically using the U-Mann Whitney test. The geometrical parameters of the mandible determined on the basis of CBCT and CMM imaging do not differ significantly.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

3D dimensional analysis; virtual model; volumetric imaging; coordinate measurement; mandible shape parameters

PL

analiza trójwymiarowa; model wirtualny; obrazowanie wolumetryczne; pomiar współrzędnościowy; parametry kształtu żuchwy

• Wydawca: Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Elsevier
• Czasopismo: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 39, no. 2
• Strony: 301--311
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Ryniewicz Wojciech

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, Kraków, Poland

autor

Ryniewicz Anna

• Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Kraków, Poland

autor

Bojko Łukasz

• Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Kraków, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Kalia V, Kalra G, Singh G, Sharma V. Localization of broken surgical bur in the submandibular space: its prevention, retrieval and the role of CBCT. Clin Dent 2016;10(2): 0974–3979.
• [2] Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, Sakamaki K, Harata Y, Sakaino R, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRayTM): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillof Radiol 2014;33(1):51–9.
• [3] Gollmer ST, Buzug TM. Fully automatic shape constrained mandible segmentation from cone-beam CT data. Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 9th IEEE International Symposium on IEEE. 2012. pp. 1272–5.
• [4] Kamburoglu K, Acar B, Yüksel S, Paksoy CS. CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients. Surg Radiol Anat 2015;1–7.
• [5] Shelley AM, Ferrero A, Brunton P, Goodwin M, Horner K. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before–after study. Dentomaxillof Radiolgy 2015;44(4):20140316.
• [6] Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillof Radiol 2004;33 (5):291–4.
• [7] Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Bahrampour E, Beladi AS, Khojastepour L. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2016;15–280.
• [8] Lim SY, Jiang T, Oh MH, Kook MS, Cho JH, Hwang HS. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the changes in condylar long axis according to asymmetric setback in sagittal split ramus osteotomy patients. Angle Orthod 2016;87(2):254–9.
• [9] Ibrahim N, Parsa A, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Aartman IH, Wismeijer D. The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of human mandible. Dentomaxillof Radiol 2013;42 (10):20130206.
• [10] Nakawaki T, Yamaguchi T, Tomita D, Hikita Y, Adel M, Katayama K, et al. Evaluation of mandibular volume classified by vertical skeletal dimensions with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2016;86 (6):949–54.
• [11] Garcia-Sanz V, Bellot-Arcis C, Hernandez V, Serrano- Sanchez P, Guarinos J, Paredes-Gallardo V. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for linear and volumetric mandibular condyle measurements. A human cadaver study. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):11993.
• [12] Berco M, Rigali Jr PH, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(1):17. e11–19.
• [13] Liu L, Li J, Ji H, Zhang N, Wang Y, Zheng G, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the maxillofacial features of patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis undergoing condylar reconstruction with an autogenous coronoid process graft. PLoS One 2017;12(3): e0173142.
• [14] Sheikhi M, Dakhil-Alian M, Bahreinian Z. Accuracy and reliability of linear measurements using tangential projection and cone beam computed tomography. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12(3):271–7.
• [15] Ryniewicz W, Ryniewicz AM, Bojko Ł, Pełka P, Filipek J, Williams S, et al. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of intrusion of the maxillary central incisor. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2016;36(2):385–90.
• [16] Wang D, He X, Wang Y, Zhou G, Sun C, Yang L, et al. Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT. Sci Rep 2016;6:39268.
• [17] Petersen LB, Matzen LH, Schropp L, Wenzel A. CBCT-interpreted bony non-separation between the mandibular canal and the root complex of the mandibular third molar as a marker to predict neurosensoric disturbances following surgical removal. A pilot study. XVth European Congress of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology; 2016.
• [18] Chen Y, Liu J, Pei J, Liu Y, Pan J. The risk factors that can increase possibility of mandibular canal wall damage in adult: a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study in a Chinese population. Med Sci Monit: Int Med J Exp Clin Res 2018;24:26–36.
• [19] Koivisto T, Chiona D, Milroy LL, McClanahan SB, Ahmad M, Bowles WR. Mandibular canal location: cone-beam computed tomography examination. J Endod 2016;42 (7):1018–21.
• [20] Hourfar J, Bister D, Lisson JA, Goldbecher C, Ludwig B. Vestibulo-Oral inclination of maxillary and mandibular canines and bicuspids – a CBCT investigation. Head Face Med 2016;12(1):22.
• [21] Ryniewicz W, Ryniewicz AM, Bojko Ł. The effect of a prosthetic crown's design on the accuracy of mapping an abutment teeth's shape. Measurement 2016;91:620–7.
• [22] Blacher J, Van DaHuvel S, Parashar V, Mitchell JC. Variation in location of the mandibular foramen/inferior alveolar nerve complex given anatomic landmarks using cone-beam computed tomographic scans. J Endod 2016;42(3):393–6.
• [23] Zeltner M, Flückiger LB, Hämmerle CH, Hüsler J, Benic GI. Volumetric analysis of chin and mandibular retromolar region as donor sites for cortico-cancellous bone blocks. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27(8):999–1004.
• [24] Park JB, Kim N, Park S, Kim Y, Ko Y. Evaluation of root anatomy of permanent mandibular premolars and molars in a Korean population with cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2013;7(1):94.
• [25] Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Eitner S, Zöller JE, Kreppel M. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT. J Cranio-Maxillof Surg 2015;43(2):254–9.
• [26] Urtane I, Gardovska K, Krisjane Z, Krumina G. Assessment of osseous structure disorders of TMJ in class II and class III patients with different mandibular rotation using CBCT. Med Pharm 2016.
• [27] Borghesi A, Pezzotti S, Nocivelli G, Maroldi R. Five mental foramina in the same mandible: CBCT findings of an unusual anatomical variant. Surg Radiol Anat 2018;1–6.
• [28] Oliveira-Santos C, Capelozza ALÁ, Dezzoti MSG, Fischer CM, Poleti ML, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT crosssectional images. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19(3):240–3.
• [29] Schulze D, Blessmann M, Pohlenz P, Wagner KW, Heiland M. Diagnostic criteria for the detection of mandibular osteomyelitis using cone-beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillof Radiol 2014;35(4):232–5.
• [30] da Silva Ramos LMP, Capelozza ALÁ, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Absence and hypoplasia of the mental foramen detected in CBCT images: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 2011;33 (8):731–4.
• [31] Sekerci AE, Cantekin K, Aydinbelge M. Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the shape, height, and location of the mandibular lingula in a population of children. BioMed Res Int 2013.
• [32] Caceres F, Pardo S, Concha G, Soto R. Presence and morphometry of lingual foramina and canal in cone beam CT of chilean dry mandibles. Correlation with direct bone measures. Int J Morphol 2017;35(1):299–305.
• [33] Çiftçi ME, Aktan AM, Isman Ö, Yildirim E. Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone. Surg Radiol Anat 2016;38(3):313–20.
• [34] Srebrzynska-Witek A, Koszowski R, Rózyło-Kalinowska I. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines—a CBCT study. Clin Oral Investig 2017;1–12.
• [35] Nolte JW, Verhoeven TJ, Schreurs R, Bergé SJ, Karssemakers LHE, Becking AG, et al. 3-Dimensional CBCT analysis of mandibular asymmetry in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. J Cranio-Maxillof Surg 2016;44(12):1970–6.
• [36] Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillof Radiol 2014;35(6):410–6.
• [37] Temple KE, Schoolfield J, Noujeim ME, Huynh-Ba G, Lasho DJ, Mealey BL. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study of buccal plate thickness of the maxillary and mandibular posterior dentition. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27(9):1072–8.
• [38] Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, Kumazawa Y, Yosue T. Observation of the retromolar foramen and canal of the mandible: a CBCT and macroscopic study. Oral Radiol 2012;28(1):10–4.
• [39] Katayama K, Yamaguchi T, Sugiura M, Haga S, Maki K. Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values. Angle Orthod 2013;84(2):337–42.
• [40] Lakatos E, Magyar L, Bojtar I. Material properties of the mandibular trabecular bone. J Med Eng 2014;2014:470539.
• [41] Vijayan S, Allareddy V. Accuracy of 3D-printed mandibles constructed from CBCT volumes of different voxel sizes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017;124(1):e32.
• [42] Ryniewicz AM, Skrzat J, Ryniewicz A, Ryniewicz W, Walocha J. Geometry of the articular facets of the lateral atlanto-axial joints in the case of occipitalization. Folia Morphol (Praha) 2010;69(3):147–53.
• [43] Ryniewicz AM, Ryniewicz A, Ryniewicz W, Gaska A. Measurements of surface layer of the articular cartilage using microscopic techniques. J Phys Conf Ser 2010;238 (1):012059.
• [44] El-Beialy AR, Fayed MS, El-Bialy AM, Mostafa YA. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography measurements: influence of head orientation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140(2):157–65.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).