Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
A field study was done to evaluate different seat designs in the aspect of minimizing vibration transmission and reducing the level of discomfort experienced by drivers subjected to transient vibration. Two seat designs (sliding or fixed in the horizontal direction) were compared in an experimental based on variation of sitting posture, speed, and type of obstacle. The comparison was done by assessing discomfort and perceived motion and by vibration measurement. Ten professional drivers were used as participants. Maximum Transient Vibration Value and Vibration Dose Value were used in the evaluation. The results showed that a sliding seat is superior in attenuating vibration containing transient vibration in the horizontal direction. It was also perceived as giving less overall and low back discomfort compared to a fixed seat.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
193--210
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Human Work Sciences, Luleå, Sweden
autor
- Department of Human Work Sciences, Luleå, Sweden
autor
- Department of Human Work Sciences, Luleå, Sweden
Bibliografia
- 1.Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., & Hunter, J.S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters: An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
- 2.Brenstrup, T., & Biering-Sorensen, F. (1987). Effects of fork-lift truck driving on low-back trouble. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 13, 445-452.
- 3.Burdoff, A., & Swuste, P. (1993). The effects of seat suspension on exposure to whole-body vibration of professional drivers. Annual Occupational Hygiene, 37(1), 45-55.
- 4.Corbridge, C. (1987). Vibration in vehicles: Its effect on comfort. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- 5.Donati, P., Grosjean, A., Mistrot, P., & Roure, L. (1983). The subjective equivalence of sinusoidal and random whole-body vibration in the sitting position (an experimental study using the “floating reference vibration” method). Ergonomics, 26, 251-273.
- 6.European Committee for Standardization. (CEN). (1999). Safety of industrial trucks-Test methods for measuring vibration (Standard No. prEN 13059:1999). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
- 7.Fairley, T.E., & Griffin, M.J. (1990). The apparent mass of the seated human body in fore-and-aft and lateral directions. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 139(2), 299-306.
- 8.Hanley, P., & Bednall, A.W. (1995). Lift truck-Vibration and related ergonomic hazards (Health and Safety Executive [HSE] Specialist Inspector Report No. 49). Sudbury, UK: Health and Safety Executive.
- 9.Hansson J.E., & Kjellberg, A. (1981). Vibration exposure and discomfort during truck driving on goods stations (Research Report No. 1981:1). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health.
- 10.International Organization for Standardization. (ISO). (1997). Mechanical vibration and shock- Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration-Part 1: General requirements (Standard No. ISO 2631-1:1997). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
- 11.Magnusson, M.L. (1991). Effects of seated whole body vibrations on the spine: An experimental study in man. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- 12.Paddan, G.S., & Griffin, M.J. (1988). The transmission of translational seat vibration to the head. II. Horizontal seat vibration. Journal of Biomechanics, 21, 199-206.
- 13.Parsons, K.C., & Griffin, M.J. (1982). Vibration and comfort. III. Translational vibration of the feet and back. Ergonomics, 8, 705-719.
- 14.Seidel, H., & Heide, R. (1986). Long term effects of whole body vibration: A critical survey of the literature. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 58, 1-26.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-50e0c7d3-f7d2-4e8e-9750-5b918929c0cf