Managing environmental social responsibility in cities according to the young generation

• Autorzy: Sukiennik Katarzyna , Dziadkiewicz Michał

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.198.29

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Objective: The subject matter discussed in the article presents a very important issue regarding the environmental social responsibility of the young generation. The main objective is to assess the awareness and social and environmental activities implemented in Poland in the field of environmental social responsibility. Project/methodology/approach: The objective of the work was achieved through theoretical and practical analysis. The article analyzes the results of the conducted research and compares the authors' own research with national studies on the presented subject matter. Findings: The work indicates similarities and differences relating to environmental social responsibility. During the analysis of the collected materials, it was noticed that there is a high level of knowledge in the field of environmental protection and great opportunities and willingness, especially of the young generation, to implement environmental projects. Limitations/research implications: The subject matter discussed in the article is very important and up-to-date, therefore research in this area should be published. However, research opportunities are limited, and significant changes occur from year to year. Therefore, there is a need to carry out repeated tests and to expand the area covered. The authors plan to continue conducting both domestic and international research, which will increase the knowledge of the investigated subject matter. Practical implications: Due to the information provided in the article, entrepreneurs can find out what the social demand for eco-friendly products and initiatives is. They can use this knowledge to increase competitiveness and acquire new customers. Social implications: The presented research will influence public awareness in the field of ecology and environmental protection. Recipients will learn about the state's capabilities in terms of environmental protection and what actions they can implement in their immediate surroundings. The article will allow the assessment of own attitudes towards natural resources and their protection. Originality/value: The added value of the article is the opportunity to learn about attitudes and social awareness in various regions of Poland. The presented subject matter is up-to-date and very important in terms of future activities and the functioning of future generations in the city.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

environmental social responsibility; ecology; environmental awareness; ecological generation

PL

ekologiczna odpowiedzialność społeczna; ekologia; świadomość ekologiczna; generacja ekologiczna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 198
• Strony: 527--541
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Sukiennik Katarzyna

• Politechnika Częstochowska, Wydział Zarządzania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0195-7002

autor

Dziadkiewicz Michał

• Politechnika Częstochowska, Wydział Zarządzania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5450-1669

Bibliografia

• 1. Ali, H.Y., Danish, R.Q., Asrar-ul-Haq, M. (2019). How corporate social responsibility boosts firm financial performance: The mediating role of corporate image and customer satisfaction. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ csr.1781.
• 2. Alonso-Almeida, M.D.M., Llach, J. (2019). Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross-national analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pp. 238-247. DOI: 10.1002/csr.1675.
• 3. Arruda Filho, N.D.P. (2017). The agenda 2030 for responsible management education: An applied methodology. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2, Part B), 183-191. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.010.
• 4. Böcker, L., Meelen, T. (2017). Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Elsevier, 23, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2016.09.004.
• 5. Borda, A., Morales, O., Teegen, H., Rees, G., Gonzalez-Perez, M.A. (2021). Addressing Sustainable Rural Development with Shared Value: A Peruvian Model from the Cacao Industry. Sustainability, 13, 8028.
• 6. Butler, T., Hackney, R. (2021). The role of informational mechanisms in the adoption of Green IS to achieve eco-sustainability in municipalities. Information & Management, Vol. 58, Iss. 3, April, p. 103320.
• 7. Chi-Shiun Lai, Chih-Jen Chiu, Chin-Fang Yang, Da-Chang Pai (2010). The effect of corporate social responsibility on Brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial Brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics; 95(3), 457-469.
• 8. Cubilla-Montilla, M., Nieto-Librero, A.-B., Galindo-Villardón, M. P., Vicente Galindo, M.P., Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2019). Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 938-955. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1733.
• 9. Fazlagić, J. (2010). Szczególne zjawisko. Pokolenie Y wyzwaniem dla pracodawców. Personel i Zarządzanie, 3.
• 10. Gast, J., Gundolf, K., Cesinger, B. (2017). Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2017.01.065.
• 11. Giuliano, R., Mahy, B., Rycx, F., Vermeylen, G. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility make over-educated workers more productive? Applied Economics, 49(6), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00036846.2016.1203061.
• 12. Gonzalez-Perez, M.A. (2016). Climate Change and the 2030 Corporate Agenda for Sustainable Development, Climate Change and the 2030 Corporate Agenda for Sustainable Development. Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice, Vol. 19. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-503020160000019005.
• 13. Hąbek, P., Wolniak, R. (2016). Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z.
• 14. Hur, W.-M., Kim, H., Kim, H.K. (2018). 'Does customer engagement in corporate social responsibility initiatives lead to customer citizenship behaviour? The mediating roles of customer-company identification and affective commitment'. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, November 2017, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/csr.1636.
• 15. Kim, S.-S., Baek, W.-Y., Byon, K.K., Ju, S.-B. (2021). Creating Shared Value to Enhance Customer Loyalty: A Case of a Sporting Goods Company in Korean Athletic Shoe Market. Sustainability, 13, 7031.
• 16. Kureshi, S., Thomas, S. (2020). Testing the influence of message framing, donation magnitude, and product category in a cause-related marketing context. Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 26, No. 3.
• 17. Kurz, C.J., Li, G., Vine, D.J. (2019). Are millennials different? In: Handbook of US Consumer Economics. Academic Press Cambridge.
• 18. Lamarche, T., Bodet, C. (2018). Does CSR contribute to sustainable development? What a regulation approach can tell us. Review of Radical Political Economics, 50(1), 154-172.
• 19. Luten, S., Ryan, E., Wakefield, J. (2021). Born into the Climate Crisis: Why we must act now to secure children's rights.
• 20. Lyon, T.P., Maxwell, J.W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 240-260.
• 21. Nureen, N., Liu, D., Irfan, M., Işik, C. (2023). Nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm performance: a green innovation and environmental sustainability paradigm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 21, 10.1007/s11356-023-26675-1 (59349-59365).
• 22. Pencarelli, T., Ali Taha, V., Škerháková, V., Valentiny, T., Fedorko, R., (2020). Luxury Products and Sustainability Issues from the Perspective of Young Italian Consumers. Sustainability, 12.
• 23. Raport z badania przeprowadzonego przez PBS Sp. z o.o. na zlecenie Ministerstwa Klimatu i Środowiska (2023). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska, www.gov.pl/web/klimat/badania-swiadomosci-ekologicznej
• 24. Ren, S., Huang, M., Liu, D., Yan, J. (2022). Understanding the impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. British Journal of Management. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12609.
• 25. Salehi-Amiri, A., Zahedi, A., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Akbapour, N. (2021). Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network for walnut industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 141, 110821.
• 26. Schembera, S. (2018). Implementing corporate social responsibility: empirical insights on the impact of the UN global compact on its business participants. Business & Society, 57(5), 783-825.
• 27. Shams, G., Rehman, M., Samad, S., Oikarinen, E. (2020). Exploring customer's mobile banking experiences and expectations among generations X, Y and Z. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 25.
• 28. Shiu, Y.M., Yang, S.L. (2017). Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance-like effects? Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 455-470.
• 29. Stranieri, S., Orsi, L., Banterle, A., Ricci, E.C. (2019). Sustainable development and supply chain coordination: The impact of corporate social responsibility rules in the European Union food industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1698.
• 30. Sullivan, K., Thomas, S., Rosano, M. (2018). Using industrial ecology and strategic management concepts to pursue the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 237-246. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.201.
• 31. Tewari, S., Bhattacharya, B. (2022). Financial resources, corporate social responsibility, and ownership type: Evidence from India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-022-09810-3.
• 32. Tliche, Y., Taghipour, A., Canel-Depitre, B. (2020). An improved forecasting approach to reduce inventory levels in decentralized supply chains. European Journal Operational Research, 287, 511-527.
• 33. Wenbing Jiang, Xuejun Wang, Lei Du (2023). Intergenerational externalities and corporate innovation. Sustainable Development, 31, 4, 10.1002/sd.2501 (2212-2221).
• 34. Wright, C., Nyberg, D. (2017). An inconvenient truth: how organizations translate climate change into business as usual. The Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1633-1661.
• 35. www.stat.gov.pl

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).