The Geoworld and its reflection in the daytime surface structure

• Autorzy: Kovalyov Alexander
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The author proposes the new presentations about nature of information appearance and causes of development in a whole, the conception of the Geospace as the result of the Earth spherical symmetry breach and conception of a landscape as the communicative surface organization in the whole case. It shows that two-dimensional Fourier-spectrums is good method of analyze a daytime surface. For the geographical landscape it is the daytime surface organization. The presentation about Geoworld structure including mineral geosphere, biosphere, anthroposphere (agrosphere, technosphere, noosphere) and divosphere is given.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

landscape; Geoworld; landscape structure; landscape perception

PL

krajobraz; struktura krajobrazu; percepcja krajobrazu

• Wydawca: Komisja Krajobrazu Kulturowego Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego
• Czasopismo: Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: nr 9
• Strony: 38--62
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Kovalyov Alexander

• Kharkiv National University, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Simonov Y.G.,1876: Analiz geomorphologicheskij sistem. Actualnie problemi teoreticheskoy i pricladnoy geomorphologii.–M.– p. 69 – 92.
• 2. Schumm S.A., Mosley M.P., Weaver W.E., 1987: Experimental fluvial geomorphology. A Wiley-interscience Publication John & Sons – New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore. – p. 413
• 3. Bak P., Chan K., 1991: Self-Organized Criticality. Scientific American, p. 26 – 33.
• 4. Kovalyov O., 2005: Geographicheski landshaft: naucni, estheticeski i phenomenologicheski aspects. Kharkiv: Ecograph. – p. 388.
• 5. Klironomos J.N., 2002: Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature. Vol. 417 .2 MAY.- p. 67 – 70.
• 6. Fellmann J., Getis A., Getis J. Human Geography., 1997: Landscapes of Human Activities. USA: WCB/Me Graw-Hill (Nimes Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc.), 545 p.
• 7. Keitt T.H., 2000: Spectral representation of neutral landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15: 479–493.
• 8. Pusanov I., 1912: Ocherky Severo-Vostochnoho Sudana. Zametky i nabludenia naturalista. Glava Ш. Port Sudan. Zemlevedenie.–M.–Knizhka Ш – IУ.– p. 150 – 171.
• 9. Eco U.,1968: La structure assente. – Milano. – 369 p.
• 10. Zotov A.V., Saranin A.A., 2006: Magicheskie klasteri i drugie atomnie konstruktii. Samoorganizacia uporyadochennih nanostructur na poverhnosty kremniya. Priroda – M.: akademizdatcsentr “Nauka” RAN, N 4. – P. 11 – 18.
• 11. Nature Writing 2002. The Tradition in English. By R. Finch and J. Elder. – New York, London, Norton, 1152 p.
• 12. Morlean-Ponty M., 1948: Le cinema et la Nouzelle Psychologie. – In: Sens et nonsens, Paris, Nagel. - pp. 97-122.
• 13. Arnheim R., 1974: Art and visual perception. A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
• 14. Keitt T.H., 2000: Spectral representation of neutral landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15: 479–493.
• 15. Пузанов И., 1912: Очерки Северо-Восточнаго Судана. Заметки и наблюдения натуралиста. Глава Ш. Порт Судан. Землеведение – М. - Книжка Ш – ІУ. - С. 150– 171.
• 16. Симонов Ю.Г., 1976: Анализ геоморфологических систем. Актуальные проблемы теоретической и прикладной геоморфологии.–М. – С. 69 – 92.
• 17. Зотов А.В., Саранин А.А., 2006: Магические кластеры и другие атомные конструкции. Самоорганизация упорядоченных наноструктур на поверхности кремния. Природа. – М.: Академиздатцентр «Наука» РАН, № 4. – С. 11 – 18.