Analytical modeling of surface generation in ultrasonic ball burnishing including effects of indentation pile-up/sink-in and chipping fracture

• Autorzy: Teimouri Reza , Liu Zhanqiang , Wang Bing

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-020-00146-7

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In mechanical based machining processes, the surface topography is generated through series of hierarchical pattern. Plastic deformation as result of contact and kinematic of motion are two main factors which determine evolution of surface generation. To basically optimize the surface quality, accurate predictive model of surface generation and constraints are required. In the present work, analytical models of dimple formation and hierarchical surface generation in ultrasonic assisted ball burnishing process are proposed. Pile-up and sink-in as two phenomena of indentation during both of loading and unloading phases were taken into the developed models. Considering interaction of indentation profile and kinematic of motion, three-dimensional surface topography and surface roughness are also analytically predicted. A criterion for surface failure is defined to perform process without any erosion. Confirmation of results have been made by series of single trace and multi-traces burnishing experiments on AA6061-T6 and AISI 1045. The results of indention profile, surface topography, roughness and failure criterion which were derived from predictive models were completely consistent with confirmatory experiments.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

burnishing; surface topography; hierarchical pattern; failure criterion

PL

satynowanie; topografia powierzchni; kryterium zniszczenia

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 20, no. 4
• Strony: 684--709
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Teimouri Reza

• School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jingshi Road 17923, Jinan 250061, People’s Republic of China
• Key National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education/Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture of MQE, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

autor

Liu Zhanqiang

• School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jingshi Road 17923, Jinan 250061, People’s Republic of China
• Key National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education/Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture of MQE, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

autor

Wang Bing

• Manufacturing Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA

Bibliografia

• [1] Zhang P, Du J, Zhang H, Su G, Shen X, Huang W, Liu Z. Effect of turning-induced initial roughness level on surface roughness and residual stress improvements in subsequent burnishing. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2020;20(3):1–13.
• [2] Sagbas A. Analysis and optimization of surface roughness in the ball burnishing process using response surface methodology and desirability function. Adv Eng Softw. 2011;42(11):992–8.
• [3] Dwivedi SP, Sharma S, Mishra RK. Effects of roller burnishing process parameters on surface roughness of A356/5% SiC composite using response surface methodology. Adv Manuf. 2014;2(4):303–17.
• [4] John MS, Vinayagam BK. Optimization of ball burnishing process on tool steel (T215Cr12) in CNC machining center using response surface methodology. Arab J Sci Eng. 2011;36(7):1407–22.
• [5] John MS, Banerjee N, Shrivastava K, Vinayagam BK. Optimization of roller burnishing process on EN-9 grade alloy steel using response surface methodology. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2017;39(8):3089–101.
• [6] Amdouni H, Bouzaiene H, Montagne A, Nasri M, Iost A. Modeling and optimization of a ball-burnished aluminum alloy flat surface with a crossed strategy based on response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;88(1–4):801–14.
• [7] Korzynski M. Modeling and experimental validation of the force-surface roughness relation for smoothing burnishing with a spherical tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2007;47(12–13):1956–64.
• [8] Li FL, Xia W, Zhou ZY, Zhao J, Tang ZQ. Analytical prediction and experimental verification of surface roughness during the burnishing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2012;62:67–75.
• [9] Hiegemann L, Weddeling C, Khalifa NB, Tekkaya AE. Prediction of roughness after ball burnishing of thermally coated surfaces. J Mater Process Technol. 2015;217:193–201.
• [10] Hiegemann L, Weddeling C, Tekkaya AE. Analytical contact pressure model for predicting roughness of ball burnished surfaces. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;232:63–77.
• [11] Bougharriou A, Bouzid W, Sai K. Analytical modeling of surface profile in turning and burnishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2014;75(1–4):547–58.
• [12] Taljat B, Pharr GM. Development of pile-up during spherical indentation of elastic-plastic solids. Int J Solids Struct. 2004;41(14):3891–904.
• [13] Kim SH, Lee BW, Choi Y, Kwon D. Quantitative determination of contact depth during spherical indentation of metallic materials-a FEM study. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;415(1–2):59–65.
• [14] Bartier O, Hernot X, Mauvoisin G. Theoretical and experimental analysis of contact radius for spherical indentation. Mech Mater. 2010;42(6):640–56.
• [15] Karthik V, Visweswaran P, Bhushan A, Pawaskar DN, Kasiviswanathan KV, Jayakumar T, Raj B. Finite element analysis of spherical indentation to study pile-up/sink-in phenomena in steels and experimental validation. Int J Mech Sci. 2012;54(1):74–83.
• [16] Ma L, Low S, Song J. A method to determine the spherical indentation contact boundary diameter in elastic-plastic materials. Mech Mater. 2014;69(1):213–26.
• [17] Liang Y, Qin H, Mehra N, Zhu J, Yang Z, Doll GL, Ye C, Dong Y. Controllable hierarchical micro/nanopatterns on biomaterial surfaces fabricated by ultrasonic nanocrystalline surface modification. Mater Des. 2018;137:325–34.
• [18] Grochała D, Berczyński S, Grządziel Z. Modeling of burnishing thermally toughened X42CrMo4 steel with a ceramic ZrO2 ball. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2017;17(4):1011–8.
• [19] Revankar GD, Shetty R, Rao SS, Gaitonde VN. Analysis of surface roughness and hardness in ball burnishing of titanium alloy. Measurement. 2014;58:256–68.
• [20] Amini S, Bagheri A, Teimouri R. Ultrasonic-assisted ball burnishing of aluminum 6061 and AISI 1045 steel. Mater Manuf Process. 2018;33(11):1250–9.
• [21] Teimouri R, Amini S. A comprehensive optimization of ultrasonic burnishing process regarding energy efficiency and workpiece quality. Surf Coat Technol. 2019;375:229–42.
• [22] Teimouri R, Amini S, Guagliano M. Analytical modeling of ultrasonic surface burnishing process: evaluation of residual stress field distribution and strip deflection. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;747:208–24.
• [23] Kucharski S, Mroz Z. Identification of plastic hardening parameters of metals from spherical indentation tests. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001;318(1–2):65–76.
• [24] Hill R, Storåkers B, Zdunek AB. A theoretical study of the Brinell hardness test. Proc R Soc Lond Math Phys Sci. 1989;423(1865):301–30.
• [25] Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1992;7(6):1564–83.
• [26] Johnson KL. Contact mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
• [27] Brake MR. An analytical elastic-perfectly plastic contact model. Int J Solids Struct. 2012;49(22):3129–41.
• [28] Stronge WJ. Contact problems for elasto-plastic impact in multi-body systems. In Impacts in mechanical systems. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 189–234.
• [29] Abrate S. Impact on composite structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
• [30] Li JK, Mei Y, Duo W, Renzhi W. Mechanical approach to the residual stress field induced by shot peening. Mater Sci Eng A. 1991;147(2):167–73.
• [31] Shen S, Atluri SN. An analytical model for shot-peening induced residual stresses. Comput Mater Contin. 2006;4(2):75–85.
• [32] Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Lévesque M. An analytical approach to relate shot peening parameters to Almen intensity. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;205(7):2055–66.
• [33] Hua Y, Liu Z, Wang B, Jiang J. Residual stress regenerated on low plasticity burnished Inconel 718 surface after initial turning process. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2019;141(12):121004.
• [34] Liu ZY, Fu CH, Sealy MP, Guo YB. Prediction and analysis of residual stress and deflections of Almen strip by burnishing. Prod Eng Res Dev. 2017;11(3):265–74.
• [35] Boldyrev IS, Shchurov IA, Nikonov AV. Numerical simulation of the aluminum 6061-T6 cutting and the effect of the constitutive material model and failure criteria on cutting forces’ prediction. Proced Eng. 2016;150:866–70.
• [36] Murugesan M, Jung DW. Johnson Cook material and failure model parameters estimation of AISI-1045 medium carbon steel for metal forming applications. Materials. 2019;12(4):609.
• [37] Hua Y, Liu Z. Effects of cutting parameters and tool nose radius on surface roughness and work hardening during dry turning Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;96(5–8):2421–30.
• [38] Shi YL, Shen XH, Xu GF, Xu CH, Wang BL, Su GS. Surface integrity enhancement of austenitic stainless steel treated by ultra-sonic burnishing with two burnishing tips. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2020;20(3):1–17.
• [39] Liu Z, Dai Q, Deng J, Zhang Y, Ji V. Analytical modeling and experimental verification of surface roughness in the ultrasonic-assisted ball burnishing of shaft targets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;1:1–21.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021)