Factors Responsible for Rapid Diminishing of Endangered Grass Plant Elymus farctus subsp. boreoatlanticus in Phytocoenoses on Dunes Coast of Baltic Sea

• Autorzy: Wróbel Mariola , Banaś-Stankiewicz Urszula

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15052249PJE2019.67.1.004

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sand couch-grass Elymus farctus (Viv.) Runemark ex Melderis subsp. boreoatlanticus (Simonet & Guin.) Melderis is a species of psammophytic perennial grass which grows on low embryo dunes, less frequently on white dunes, on a sandy substrate which is rich in chlorides, with a neutral or alkaline pH. The occurrence of E. farctus subsp. boreoatlanticus was confirmed on the Polish Baltic coast only in six stands out of 20 quoted in the 19th century and at the beginning of the 20th century, and the species is classified as critically endangered (CR). One of the largest populations of that species is situated on the Wolin Island (the Baltic Sea, west coast of Poland). The population of this species was monitored between 2015-2017 in the habitat of initial white coastal dunes (Nature 2000 site, code 2110), where the sand couch-grass is a characteristic species of Honckenyo-Agropyretum juncei R.Tx. 1955 plant association. The results of the conducted research show that the main reason for the rapid decline of the population of Elymus farctus subsp. boreoatlanticus on the western coast of Poland is recreational use of beaches, which is growing in an uncontrollable manner and puts pressure on this habitat, followed by complete destruction of psammophilous and halophilous vegetation. In addition, impact from marine abrasion inhibits the development of white coastal dunes where E. farctus subsp. boreoatlanticus occurs, and intensive aeolian sand accumulation hinder the regenerative ability of shoots and significantly limit vegetative reproduction.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Elymus farctus subsp. boreoatlanticus; critically endangered species; dune habitats; PLH 320019; Natura 2000 sites; special areas of habitat protection; Wolin; Uznam

PL

Elymus farctus subsp. boreoatlanticus; perz sitowy; gatunki krytycznie zagrożone; siedliska wydmowe; PLH 320019; obszary Natura 2000; specjalne obszary ochrony siedlisk; Wolin; Uznam

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 67, nr 1
• Strony: 53--61
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wróbel Mariola

• Department of Meteorology, Botany and Green Areas Management, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Banaś-Stankiewicz Urszula

• Pracownia Przyrodnicza Urszula Banaś-Stankiewicz, Antoniego Kaliny 15, Szczecin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Bartacchi A., Zuffi M. A. L., Lombardi T. 2016 – Foredune psammophilous communities and coastal erosion in a stretch of the Ligurian sea (Tuscany, Italy) – Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 27: 639-651.
• 2. Ciccarelli D., Bacaro G., Chiarucci A. 2012 – Coastline Dune Vegetation Dynamics: Evidence of No Stability – Folia Geobot. 47: 263-275.
• 3. Coombes E. G., Jones A. P., Sutherland W. J. 2008 – The biodiversity implications of changes in coastal tourism due to climat change – Environm. Conservation, 35: 319-330.
• 4. Dzwonko Z. 2007 – [Guide to phytosociological research] – Sorus, Poznań-Kraków, 304 pp. (in Polish).
• 5. Forey E. Lortie Ch. J., Michalet R. 2009 – Spatial patterns of association at local and regional scales in coastal sand dune communities – J. Veget. Sci. 20: 916-925.
• 6. Frey L. 1999 – The Agropyron-Elymus complex (Poaceae) in Poland: disappearance of Elymus farctus ssp. boreoatlanticus on the coast of the Baltic Sea – Fragm. Flor. et Geobot. 44: 35-42.
• 7. Frey L., Szczepaniak M. 2001 – [The new site for the Elymus farctus subsp. boreoatlanticus on the Polish coast of the Baltic Sea] – Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 57: 120-122 (in Polish, English summary).
• 8. Frey L. 2014 – [Elymus farctus (Viv.) Runemark ex Melderis. Sand couch-grass] (In: [Polish Red Data Book of Plants. Pteridophytes and flowering plants], Eds: R. Kaźmierczakowa, K. Zarzycki, Z. Mirek ) – Institute of Nature Protection, Polish Academy of Sciences, III edition, Kraków, pp. 639-641 (in Polish).
• 9. Garcia-Mora M. R., Gallego-Fernandez J. B., Garcia-Novo F. 1999 – Plant functional types in coastal foredunes in relation to environmental stress and disturbance – J. Veg. Sci. 10: 27-34.
• 10. Głowaciński Z. 1997 – [New IUCN/WCU categories for endangered and threatened species] – Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 53: 60-66 (in Polish, English summary).
• 11. Kaźmierczakowa R., Bloch-Orłowska J., Celka Z., Cwener A., Dajdok Z., Michalska-Hejduk D., Pawlikowski P., Szczęśniak E., Ziarnek K. 2016 – Red list of pteridophytes and flowering plants – Institute of Nature Protection, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, 99 pp. (in Polish).
• 12. Laps J., Smilauer P. 2003 – Multivariate Analysis of Ecologica Data using CANOCO – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 266 pp.
• 13. Łabuz T. A. 2002 – [Covering the beaches with vegetation as an indicator of the dynamics of the coast of the Pomeranian Bay] – Czasopismo Geograficzne, 73: 245-256 (in Polish, English summary).
• 14. Łabuz T. A. 2003 – Initial foredune field as a factor of accumulative character of coastal dunes of the Swina Gate Barrier (West Polish coast) – Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St. XXXII, 1: 39-58 (in English).
• 15. Łabuz T. A. 2005 – [Diversification of dynamics and development of coastal dunes of the Świna Gate Spit] (In: [The natural environment of the coast of the Pomeranian Bay and the Szczecin Lagoon] Eds: R. K. Borówka, S. Musielak ) – Oficyna IN PLUS, Szczecin, pp. 54-60 (in Polish, English summary).
• 16. van der Maarel E. 1979 – Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effect on community similarity – Vegetatio, 39: 97-114.
• 17. Matuszkiewicz W. 2013 – [Guide to the plant communities of Poland] – Polish Scientific Publishers, III edition, Warszawa, 357 pp. (in Polish).
• 18. Miller T. E., Gornish E. S., Buckley H. 2010 – Weather and coastal vegetation: effects of storms and drought – Pl. Ecol. 206: 97-104.
• 19. Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa H., Zając A., Zając M. 2002 – Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist – Institute of Nature Protection, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, 442 pp. (in Polish).
• 20. Mizianty M., Frey L. 2006 – Morphology and karyology of wild growing Polish representatives of Triticaceae (Poaceae) – Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1-2: 34-36.
• 21. Mróz W. 2015 – [Monitoring of natural habitats. Methodological guide] – Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Warszawa, 332 pp. (in Polish).
• 22. Muňoz Halle S., Gallego Fernandez JB., Dellafiore C. 2005 – Foredune fragmentation and tourist pressure in two natural places in the coast of Huelva, SW Spain. (In: Report on the first international conference on coastal conservation and management in the Atlantic and Mediterranean, Eds: AAVV) – Tavira, pp. 375-378.
• 23. Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 13 April 2010, on the natural habitats and species of interest of the Community, as well as the criteria for selecting areas eligible for recognition or designation as the Nature 2000 areas. (Dz. U. nr 00, 16 października 2014, poz.1409) – Official Journal of April 13, 2010, number 77, item 510, with later changes (in Polish).
• 24. Wróbel M., Kowalski W. W. A. 2016 – Factors affecting development of pioneering psammophilous dune vegetation on Przytorska Sandbar (Nature 2000 site „Wolin and Uznam” PLH320019) – Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stettin., Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 325 (37) 1: 89-100.
• 25. Zając A., Zając M. 2001 – Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Poland – Edited by Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, 714 pp. (in Polish).