Development of Indicators of Sustainability of Economic Growth and Quality of Life

• Autorzy: Majerník Milan , Daneshjo Naqib , Repková Štofková Katarina , Malega Peter

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/133330

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the past, the assessment of the level of socio-economic growth in the form of indicators was focused only on the economic indicators that did not reflect environmental, social, safety and other aspects and the related comprehensive quality of life in society. These shortcomings have become increasingly stronger in relation to the development of the concept of sustainable development and the principles of globalized markets. The paper analysed the development of indicators of economic growth in conjunction with the level of consumption of natural resources and energy, social well-being and the comprehensive quality of social life. The comparison of indicators was realised in relation to their overlap with the economic, social and environmental indicators of sustainable development and the possibilities of use for growth assessment under specific conditions of globalization and within standardized indicators from the OECD and UNEP level and in organizational practice in Slovakia.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable growth; economic indicators; environmental safety; social welfare; quality of life; evaluation indicators

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, iss. 2
• Strony: 39--45
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Majerník Milan

• Research Institute of Commerce and Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Commerce, University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovak Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7092-5891

autor

Daneshjo Naqib

• Faculty of Commerce , University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovak Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-6738

autor

Repková Štofková Katarina

• University of Zilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Slovak Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-9889

autor

Malega Peter

• Institute of Management, Industrial and Digital Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6354-5364

Bibliografia

• 1. Ayres, R.U., Kneese, A.V. 1996. production, consumption, and externalities. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 282–297.
• 2. Butek, M., Stofkova, Z. 2016. Relocalisation trends in the context of globalization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Business Management (ISSGBM). Hong Kong, Sept. 03-04.
• 3. Carson, R.T. 2010. The environmental kuznets curve: Seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure Oxford journals. Review Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(1).
• 4. Daly, H.E., Cobb, J.B. Jr. 1989. For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon Press, Boston.
• 5. EEA 2015. The European environment-state and outlook. Synthesis report. European Environment Agency. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp. 212.
• 6. Islam, S.M.N., Clarke, M. 2002. The relationship between economic development and social welfare: A new adjusted GDP measure of welfare. In: Social Indicators Research, 201-216.
• 7. Chovancová, J., Vavrek, R. 2019. Decoupling analysis of energy consumption and economic growth of V4 countries. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 14(1).
• 8. Chovancová, J., Vavrek, R. 2020. (De)coupling analysis with focus on energy consumption in EU countries and its spatial evaluation. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29(3).
• 9. Kemm, J, Parry, J. 2004. What is HIA? Introduction and overview. Health impact assesment: concept, theory, techniques and applications. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 3.
• 10. Lequiller, F. 2005. Is GDP a satisfactory measure of growth? In: The OECD Observer, 246/247, 30-31.
• 11. OECD 2011. Towards Green Growth. Monitoring Progres, OECD Indicators, pp. 144.
• 12. OECD 2014. Green Growth. Green Growth Indicators.
• 13. Rowe, J. 2009. The cult of GDP (Gross Domestic Product ignores wealth generated by the commons). http://onthecommons.org/cult-gdp-0.
• 14. Soltes, V., Kubas, J., Stofkova, Z. 2018. Education as one of the indicators of quality of life. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED). Valencia, Spain, pp. 6849-6855.
• 15. UNDESA 2012. A quide book to the green economy. Issue 2: Exploring green economy principles, pp. 24.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).