The Zangezur corridor as part of the global transport route (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region)

• Autorzy: Gawliczek Piotr , Iskandarov Khayal

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35467/sdq/161993

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The restoration of historical transport routes and the creation of new ones is a strategic objective of most states in modern times. Located at the intersection of the North–South and East–West transport routes, Azerbaijan is currently recognised as an important transport and logistics hub. Successful cooperation with European Union countries in this field is taking place. The East–West and North–South international transport routes passing through the territory of Azerbaijan are very convenient for cargo transportation in terms of distance and duration. This paper discusses the plausibility of the Zangezur corridor being used (which is mentioned in the tripartite agreement that dates back to 10 November 2020) and highlights its importance as an integral element of the global transit route. A comparative analysis of different transit routes was carried out, and the advantages of opening this corridor for all stakeholders was justified.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Zangezur corridor; TRACECA; One Belt One Road; middle corridor; silk road; north south transport

• Wydawca: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
• Czasopismo: Security and Defence Quarterly
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 41, No. 1
• Strony: 36--53
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Gawliczek Piotr

• University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Elk Campus Branch, Tadeusz Kosciuszko Street 23, 19-300 Elk, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-1168

autor

Iskandarov Khayal

• Military Scientific Research Institute, National Defence University, Yasamal District, Str. Academician Shafaet Mehdiev 136, AZ1065, Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-6530

Bibliografia

• 1. Aze.Media (2022) Zangezur corridor: new transport route to connect Europe and Asia. August 9. Available at: https://aze.media/zangezur-corridor-new-transport-route-to-connect-europe-and-asia/ (Accessed: 16 November 2022).
• 2. Blank S. (2022) Armenia must build the Zangezur corridor. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/armenia-must-build-zangezur-corridor-204894?fbclid=IwAR2oovCprqH7m7f9kWCsxItHhwqDullbFXKO4ibvNlMXtLuclavRtG8KgE0 (Accessed: 16 November 2022).
• 3. Carafano J. (2022) Central Asia’s middle corridor gains traction at Russia’s expense. Available at: https://.gisreportsonline.com/r/middle-corridor/ (Accessed: 11 October 2022).
• 4. Choong R. (2017) The old silk road. Available at: https://.bfm.my/podcast/bigger-picture/live-and-learn/ron-choong-the-old-silk-road (Accessed: 14 December 2022).
• 5. Desierto D. (2017) China’s ‘one belt, one road’ initiative: Can a bilaterally negotiated “globalization 2.0” internalize human rights, labor, and environmental standards? Available at: https://.ejiltalk.org/chinas-one-belt-one-road-initiative-can-a-bilaterally-negotiated-globalization-2-0-internalize-human-rights-labor-and-environmental-standards/ (Accessed: 10 November 2022).
• 6. De Waal T. (2021) In the South Caucasus, can new trade routes help overcome a geography of conflict? Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/de_Waal_South_Caucasus_Connectivity.pdf (Accessed: 3 January 2023).
• 7. Eldem T. (2022) ‘Russia’s war on Ukraine and the rise of the middle corridor as a third vector of Eurasian connectivity’, SWP Comment, 2022/C 64, 28 October. doi: 10.18449/2022C64.
• 8. Gavin G. (2022) Iran is filling Armenia’s power vacuum Tehran has been eager to make up for Russia’s newfound absence in the South Caucasus. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/12/01/iran-armenia-azerbaijan-conflict-russia-nagorno-karabakh-syunik/ (Accessed: 14 December 2022).
• 9. GUAM (2017) The routes of the TRACECA corridor and ‘Viking’ train. Available at: https://guam-organization.org/en/development-concept-for-the-guam-transport-corridor/karta-3-marshruty-koridora-traseka-i-poezda-viking-2-2/ (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
• 10. Insights on India (n.d.) International North–South transport corridor. Available at: https://.insightsonindia.com/international-relations/bilateral-regional-and-global-groupings-and-agreements-involving-india-and-or-affecting-indias-interests/india-central-asia/international-north-south-transport-corridor/ (Accessed: 19 January 2023).
• 11. Iskandarov Kh. and Gawliczek P. (2020) ‘The ‘new great game’ in the South Caucasus: Competition for power and influence’, Journal of Scientific Papers Social Development and Security, 10(1), pp. 25–33. doi: 10.33445/sds.2020.10.1.4.
• 12. Iskandarov Kh. and Gawliczek P. (2021a) ‘Characteristic features of the second Karabakh war’, Journal of Scientific Papers Social Development and Security, 11(3), pp. 30–40. doi: 10.33445/sds.2021.11.3.3.
• 13. Iskandarov Kh. and Gawliczek P. (2021b) ‘The second Karabakh war as a war of new generation’, Journal of Scientific Papers, Social Development and Security, 11(2), pp. 91–99. doi: 10.33445/sds.2021.11.2.9.
• 14. Iskandarov Kh. and Gawliczek P. (2022) ‘Economic coercion as a means of hybrid warfare: The South Caucasus as a focal point’, Security and Defence Quarterly, 40(4), pp. 47–57. doi: 10.35467/sdq/151038.
• 15. Iskandarov Kh., Mahammadali V. and Gardashkhan A. (2020) ‘Caspian region: Geopolitical arena. Clash of interests and energy security’, Civitas Et Lex, 26(2), pp. 7–22. doi: 10.31648/cetl.5138.
• 16. Iskandarov Kh., Simons G. and Gawliczek P. (2019) ‘The South Caucasus: Stage for a “new great game” between NATO and Russia?’, Connections QJ, 18(3–4), pp. 7–34. doi: 10.11610/Connections.18.3-4.01.
• 17. JAM-News (2022) If Armenia does not make a choice, the choice will be made for it. Opinion, 19 September. Available at: https://jam-news.net/if-armenia-does-not-make-a-choice-the-choice-will-be-made-for-it-opinion/ (Accessed: 14 December 2022).
• 18. Kucera J. (2023) Armenia and Azerbaijan stalled in negotiations over ‘corridor’. Available at: https://eurasianet.org/armenia-and-azerbaijan-stalled-in-negotiations-over-corridor (Accessed: 23 January 2023).
• 19. Martirosyan R. (2021) Iran opposes the Zangezur corridor and is trying to cancel it – Aharon Vardanyan. Available at: https://168.am/2021/06/26/1539803.html (Accessed: 23 January 2023).
• 20. Mirzoyan A. (2022) Aliyev says Armenia, Iran cannot prevent ‘Zangezur corridor’. Available at: https://hetq.am/en/article/150512. (Accessed: 23 February 2023).
• 21. Nasirov E., Iskandarov K. and Sadiyev S. (2017) ‘The South Caucasus: A playground between NATO and Russia?”, Connections, 16(3), pp. 47–56. doi: 10.11610/Connections.16.3.03.
• 22. Panorama.am (2022) Stepan Danielyan: Political scientist. Why has the French Senate become active? Available at: https://.panorama.am/am/news/2022/11/28/%D5%96%D6%80%D5%A1%D5%B6%D5%BD%D5%AB%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%AB-%D5%8D%D5%A5%D5%B6%D5%A1%D5%BF/2761997 (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
• 23. Papatolios N. (2022) Middle corridor unable to absorb northern volumes, opportunities still there. Available at: https://.railfreight.com/specials/2022/03/18/middle-corridor-unable-to-absorb-northern-volumes-opportunities-still-there/?gdpr=deny/ (Accessed: 17 January 2023).
• 24. Piriyev H., Iskandarov Kh. and Tahirov R. (2022) The second Karabakh war. Military-political analysis. Baku: Military Publishing House.
• 25. Poghosyan B. (2021) Commentary: The debate about the ‘corridors war’ is not based on reality. Available at: https://.commonspace.eu/commentary/commentary-debate-about-corridors-war-not-based-reality (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
• 26. Press Service of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan (2023) Ilham Aliyev was interviewed by TV channels in Munich. 18 February. Available at: https://president.az/en/articles/view/58995 (Accessed: 21 February 2023).
• 27. Report News Agency (2021) Russian expert: Zangezur corridor to improve logistics in South Caucasus. Available at: https://report.az/en/foreign-politics/russian-expert-zangezur-corridor-to-improve-logistics-in-south-caucasus/ (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
• 28. Sadiyev S. and Iskandarov Kh. (2018) ‘The evolution of the security environment in the South Caucasus since the end of the Cold War’, in 17th workshop of the PfP consortium study group regional stability in the South Caucasus, ‘What a new European security deal’ could mean for the South Caucasus. pp. 47–53. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Defence.
• 29. Sadiyev S., Nasirov E., Iskandarov Kh. and Simons G. (2021) ‘South Caucasus and a “new great game”: The communication of competition in securitized international relations’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 29(2), pp. 282–294. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2020.1826914.
• 30. Saha D., Giucci R., Lücke M., Kirchner R., Movchan V. and Zachmann G. (2018) The economic effect of a resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on Armenia and Azerbaijan. Berlin Economics GmbH. Available at: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://berlin-economics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/The-economic-effect-of-a-resolution-of-the-Nagorno-Karabakh-conflict.pdf (Accessed: 11 December 2022).
• 31. Shokri U. (2022) Why Iran opposes Azerbaijan’s Zangezur corridor project. Available at: https://gulfif.org/why-iran-opposes-azerbaijans-zangezur-corridor-project/ (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
• 32. Stepanyan D. (2022) Iran concerned over ‘Zangezur corridor’ not over demarcation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border – Expert. Available at: https://arminfo.info/full_news.php?id=69936&lang=3 (Accessed: 1 December 2022).
• 33. The Office to the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia (2020) Statement by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the President of the Russian Federation. Available at: https://.primeminister.am/en/press-release/item/2020/11/10/Announcement/ (Accessed: 26 December 2022).
• 34. Von Witte (n.d.) New silk road. Available at: http://vonwitte.org/silk-road/ (Accessed: 17 January 2023).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).