The Influence of Man-Made Elements on the State of Soil Pollution and Ways to Improve Environmental Safety

• Autorzy: Nazarova Zinaida M. , Zabaikin Yuri V. , Kharlamov Mikhail F. , Leonidova Yulia A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/147765

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the paper research of environmental hazards based on the study of individual factors presented. The first stage was the analysis of the state of environmental hazard of equipment and technological processes. A system of organizational and technical measures and technological solutions was developed that will reduce the level of environmental risk. Soils was considered separately with the study of physical and chemical processes. Heavy metals that come from electroplating and etching processes interact with the soil system, that is, with the components of the soil and with each other, which leads to mutations in the physico-chemical system of soil. We identified two areas of possible forms and consequences of combining heavy metals in soils – the formation of hard-to-dissolve compounds, and its absorption by its components. Studies shown that the accumulation of heavy metals passing through the atmosphere and soil, created in plants, and then with the help of the food chain gets into the human body.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

development; eco-safe system; ecology; soil

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 23, iss. 3
• Strony: 215--220
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Nazarova Zinaida M.

• Russian State Geological Exploration University named after Sergo Ordzhonikidze (MGRI), 23 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-6184

autor

Zabaikin Yuri V.

• Russian State Geological Exploration University named after Sergo Ordzhonikidze (MGRI), 23 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-7567

autor

Kharlamov Mikhail F.

• Russian State Geological Exploration University named after Sergo Ordzhonikidze (MGRI), 23 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-6215

autor

Leonidova Yulia A.

• Russian State Geological Exploration University named after Sergo Ordzhonikidze (MGRI), 23 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2745-6206

Bibliografia

• 1. Al Mamun, A.; Mohamad, M.R.; Bin Yaacob, M.R. 2018. Intention and behavior towards green consumption among low-income households. J. Environ. Manag. 227, 73–86.
• 2. Biswas, A.; Roy, M. 2015. Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: Testing the structural model. J. Clean. Prod, 95, 332–340.
• 3. Carfora, V.; Caso, D.; Sparks, P.; Conner, M. 2017. Moderating effects of pro-environmental self-identity on pro-environmental intentions and behaviour: A multi-behaviour study. J. Environ. Psychol. 53, 92–99.
• 4. Cerri, J.; Testa, F.; Rizzi, F. 2018. The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production in Fl Uence consumers’ attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products.
• 5. Chekima, B.C.; Syed KhalidWafa, S.A.W.; Igau, O.A.; Chekima, S.; Sondoh, S.L. 2016. Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? J. Clean. Prod. 112, 3436–3450.
• 6. Chen, S.-C.; Hung, C.-W. 2016. Technological forecasting & social change elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 112, 155–163.
• 7. Choi, D.; Johnson, K. 2019. Influences of environmental and hedonic motivations on intention to purchase green products: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 18, 145–155.
• 8. De Vicente Bittar, A. 2018. Selling remanufactured products: Does consumer environmental consciousness matter? J. Clean. Prod. 181, 527–536.
• 9. Do Paço, A.; Shiel, C.; Alves, H. 2019. A new model for testing green consumer behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 207, 998–1006.
• 10. Follows, S.B.; Jobber, D. 2014. Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. Eur. J. Mark. 34, 723–746.
• 11. Foukaras, A.; Toma, L. 2014. Buying and wasting sustainably. Determinants of green behaviour in Cyprus and Sweden. Procedia Econ. Financ. 14, 220–229.
• 12. Gonçalves, H.M.; Lourenço Ferreira, T.; Graça, M.S. 2016. Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. J. Bus. Res. 69, 1484–1491.
• 13. Grimmer, M.; Bingham, T. 2013. Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions. J. Bus. Res. 66, 1945–1953.
• 14. Huang, H.; Lin, T.; Lai, M.; Lin, T 2014.. International journal of hospitality management environmental consciousness and green customer behavior: An examination of motivation crowding effect. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 40, 139–149.
• 15. Joshi, Y.; Rahman, Z. 2015. Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. Int. Strat. Manag. Rev. 3, 128–143.
• 16. Schlegelmilch, B.B.; Bohlen, G.M.; Diamantopoulos, A. 1996. The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. Eur. J. Mark. 30, 35–55.
• 17. Seo, S.; Ahn, H.-K.; Jeong, J.; Moon, J. 2016. Consumers’ attitude toward sustainable food products: Ingredients vs. Packaging. Sustainability. 8, 1073.