Impact of the Agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector of the Member States

• Autorzy: Shintaeva Saule S. , Pyagay Alexandr A. , Iskakova Makhabbat K. , Naukenova Botagoz N. , Zhumasheva Saule T.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2022.1.19

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ porozumień Euroazjatyckiej Unii Gospodarczej na konkurencyjność sektora rolnego państw członkowskich

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this study is to obtain scientific and practical results aimed at the use of the advantages of integration processes within the Eurasian Economic Union to increase the sustainability and competitiveness of the development of sensitive industries of the agri-food sector in the Eurasian Economic Union member states. The assessment of the potential for export growth and the potential for import substitution was performed according to the methodology for assessing the potential for export growth and is based on previous research developments. The study assessed the impact of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union on the stability and competitiveness of such processing industries as: canned milk (condensed and non-condensed products), cheese making, production of sunflower oil, sausages and white sugar. It has been established that competitive pressure from foreign producers in the context of the development of integration processes can revive the internal competitive environment.

PL

Celem niniejszego opracowania jest uzyskanie wyników naukowych i praktycznych mających na celu wykorzystanie zalet procesów integracyjnych w ramach Eurazjatyckiej Unii Gospodarczej dla zwiększenia zrównoważoności i konkurencyjności rozwoju wrażliwych branż sektora rolno-spożywczego w krajach Eurazjatyckiej Unii Gospodarczej. Ocena potencjału wzrostu eksportu i potencjału substytucji importu została przeprowadzona zgodnie z metodologią oceny potencjału wzrostu eksportu i opiera się na wcześniejszych osiągnięciach badawczych. W opracowaniu oceniono wpływ Traktatu o Unii Euroazjatyckiej na stabilność i konkurencyjność takich gałęzi przemysłu przetwórczego jak: konserwy mleczne (produkty skondensowane i nieskondensowane), serowarstwo, produkcja oleju słonecznikowego, wędlin i cukru białego. Ustalono, że presja konkurencyjna ze strony producentów zagranicznych w kontekście rozwoju procesów integracyjnych może ożywić wewnętrzne środowisko konkurencyjne.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

free trade; economic benefits; product promotion; globalisation; integration

PL

wolny handel; korzyści ekonomiczne; promocja produktu; globalizacja; integracja

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 17, nr 1
• Strony: 211--221
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Shintaeva Saule S.

• Turan-Astana University, Department of Economics and Innovative Business, Faculty of Business and Information Technologies, 010000, 29 Dukenuly Str., Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6837-3338

autor

Pyagay Alexandr A.

• Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Department of Accounting and Audit, Faculty of Economics, 010011, 62 Zhenis Ave., Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan

autor

Iskakova Makhabbat K.

• Turan-Astana University, Department of Economics and Innovative Business, Faculty of Business and Information Technologies, 010000, 29 Dukenuly Str., Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan

autor

Naukenova Botagoz N.

• Turan-Astana University, Department of Economics and Innovative Business, Faculty of Business and Information Technologies, 010000, 29 Dukenuly Str., Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan

autor

Zhumasheva Saule T.

• Kazakh Research Institute of Economics of Agro-Industrial Complex and Rural Development, Department of State Regulation in the Agro-Industrial Complex, 050057, 30B Satpayev Str., Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan

Bibliografia

• 1. ABDRAKHMANOVA R.S., 2013, Integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan into the CES: Methodology, Practice, Results, Eurasian National University. L.N. Gumilyov, Astana.
• 2. ALCALÁ F., GONZÁLEZ-MAESTRE M., MARTÍNEZ-PARDINA I., 2014, Information and Quality with an Increasing Number of Brands, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37: 109-117.
• 3. BALDWIN R., 2016, The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multilateralism, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1): 95-116.
• 4. BULATOV A.S., 2002, Economics, Economist, Moscow.
• 5. CAVUSGIL S.T., KNIGHT G., 2015, The Born Global Firm: An Entrepreneurial and Capabilities Perspective on Early and Rapid Internationalization, Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 3-16.
• 6. DE LUCA A.I., IOFRIDA N., LESKINEN P., STILLITANO T., FALCONE G., STRANO A., GULISANO G., 2017, Life Cycle Tools Combined with Multi-Criteria and Participatory Methods for Agricultural Sustainability: Insights from a Systematic and Critical Review, Science of The Total Environment, 595: 352-370.
• 7. GAIDAR E., 2005, Long Time. Russia in the World. Essays on Economic History, Business, Moscow.
• 8. GELVANOVSKY M.I., 2011, International Integration: Methodological Aspects of the Problem of Increasing Competitiveness in the Context of Globalisation, Kazakh Economic Bulletin, 1-2: 2-14.
• 9. HAUSMANN R., KLINGER B., 2006, Structural transformation and patterns of comparative advantage in the product space, CID Working Paper No. 128 (pp. 1-38), Center for International Development Kennedy School of Government Harvard University, Harvard.
• 10. HIRST P., THOMPSON G., BROMLEY S., 2015, Globalization in Question, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
• 11. HITT M.A., LI D., XU K., 2016, International Strategy: From Local to Global and Beyond, Journal of World Business, 51(1): 58-73.
• 12. HUSSEIN I.YA., OGURTSOVA E.V., 2017, The Impact of Globalisation on the Functioning of the Capital Market, Saratov University Bulletin. New series. Series Economics. Management. Law, 17(2): 134-140.
• 13. JAIMOVICH E., MERELLA V., 2012, Quality Ladders in a Ricardian Model of Trade with Nonhomothetic Preferences, Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(4): 908-937.
• 14. KAMSHIBAEV R.A., KULMAGANBETOVA A.B., 2015, Ensuring the economic security of Kazakhstan in the context of the integration processes of the Eurasian Economic Union. Innovative Development of Modern Science: A Collection of Articles by Students, Graduate Students, Young Scientists, and Teachers (pp. 65-69), RIO MTsII OMEGA SCIENCE, Ufa.
• 15. KHASBULATOV R.I., 2006, World Economy and International Economic Relations, Gardariki, Moscow.
• 16. KHEIFETS V.P., OVDEENKO A.A., 2003, International Integration, GUAP, Saint Petersburg.
• 17. KHUDYAKOVA O.V., 2007, International Integration and its Impact on the Development of the National Economy, P. O. Sukhoi Gomel State Technical University, Gomel.
• 18. KOFNER J., BALAS P., EMERSON M., HAVLIK P., ROVENSKAYA E., STEPANOVA A., VINOKUROV E., KABAT P., 2017, Highlevel Consultation Meeting on Eurasian Economic Integration. IIASA Project ’Challenges and Opportunities of Economic Integration within a Wider European and Eurasian Space’, Workshop Report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg.
• 19. KÜHN W.M., 2017, The Eurasian Economic Union – Risks and Opportunities of an Emerging Bipolar Europe, Zeus Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 20(2): 185-234.
• 20. LAURSEN F., 2018, Comparative Regional Integration, Routledge, London.
• 21. LIPSITS I.V., 2012, International trade and its impact on the country's economy. Economics: 237-244, VITA-PRESS, Moscow.
• 22. Main Integration Associations in the World Economy, 2020, https://laws.studio/mirovaya-ekonomika-knigi/osnovnyie-integratsionnyie-obyedineniya-60991.html.
• 23. MIRONOV M., 2013, Your Competitiveness, Scientific Book, Voronezh.
• 24. MOISEEVA YU.O., VYATKINA E.A., OSANKINA T.V., 2019, Integration Processes and their Impact on the National Economy, Contentus, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/integratsionnye-protsessy-i-ih-vliyanie-na-natsionalnuyu-ekonomiku
• 25. MOLDASHEV A.B., NIKITINA G.A., 2015, Assessment of the Impact of the EAEU Agreements and Changes in the Conditions of Interaction with the External Market upon Joining the WTO on the Main Sectors of the Agro-Industrial Complex of Kazakhstan, KazNIIE APK and RST, Almaty.
• 26. MOREAU-DEFARGE F., 1996, Introduction to Geopolitics, Concord, Moscow.
• 27. MOSTAFA G., MAHMOOD M., 2018, Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, Challenges and Possible Future Directions, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2): 163-172.
• 28. MURAVSKA T., BERLIN A., 2016, Towards a new European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP):What benefits of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements (DCFTAs) for shared prosperity and security? Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy: 23-37, Springer, Cham.
• 29. SCHOPER Y.G., WALD A., INGASON H.T., FRIDGEIRSSON T.V., 2018, Projectification in Western Economies: A Comparative Study of Germany, Norway and Iceland, International Journal of Project Management, 36(1): 71-82.
• 30. SHKVARYA L.V., 2015, The World Economy in Diagrams and Tables, UNITY-DANA, Moscow.
• 31. SURUGIU M.R., SURUGIU C., 2015, International Trade, Globalization and Economic Interdependence between European Countries: Implications for Businesses and Marketing Framework, Procedia Economics and Finance, 32(15): 131-138.
• 32. VINOKUROV E., 2017, Eurasian Economic Union: Current State and Preliminary Results, Russian Journal of Economics, 3(1): 54-70.
• 33. ZIYADULAEV N.S., 2015, Development of the Eurasian Economic Union: Risks and Opportunities in a Period of Turbulence, Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 5: 3-18.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).