Designing the framework of human resource department ecosystem in Indonesia: a grounded theory approach

• Autorzy: Khristiningrum Veronica Afridita , Gustomo Aurik , Ginting Henndy , Wisesa Anggara , Saputra Jumadil

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2023.27.2.10

Warianty tytułu

PL

Projektowanie ram ekosystemu działu zasobów ludzkich w Indonezji: uziemione podejście teorii

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Over the past ten years, ecosystems have drawn more attention from management researchers. Recent business and innovation studies have given the ecosystem approach much attention as a thorough method of comprehending multi-aspect situations. To the best of our knowledge, none of the articles covered the dynamic interaction between the players and elements that affect how the HR function develops; additionally, in light of how challenging it is for the HR division to manage its resources and work together with other players to build a BP role. Thus, this study aims to design a human resource department ecosystem (HRDE) framework by exploring the essential actors and factors of the same to ensure the collaborative efforts of different stakeholders in developing HR business partner roles in consumer goods companies. This study adopted the grounded theory approach to designing a comprehensive human resource department ecosystem framework. This study indicated that the proposed framework comprised three interconnected layers representing the stakeholders' micro, meso, and macro layers. This study provides a framework for companies to build a human resource ecosystem in developing HR business partner roles. The proposed human resource department ecosystem framework is new to the literature and provides a fruitful avenue for future research.

PL

W ciągu ostatnich dziesięciu lat ekosystemy przyciągały coraz większą uwagę naukowców zajmujących się zarządzaniem. Ostatnie badania biznesu i innowacji poświęciły wiele uwagi podejściu ekosystemowym jako gruntownej metodzie zrozumienia wieloaspektowych sytuacji. Zgodnie z naszą najlepszą wiedzą żaden z artykułów nie dotyczył dynamicznej interakcji między graczami i elementów wpływających na rozwój funkcji HR; dodatkowo, biorąc pod uwagę, jak trudne jest dla działu HR zarządzanie swoimi zasobami i współpraca z innymi graczami w celu zbudowania roli BP. Dlatego niniejsze badanie ma na celu zaprojektowanie ram ekosystemu działu zasobów ludzkich (Human Resource Department Ecosystem-HRDE) poprzez zbadanie jego podstawowych aktorów i czynników, aby zapewnić wspólne wysiłki różnych interesariuszy w rozwijaniu ról partnerów biznesowych HR w firmach zajmujących się dobrami konsumpcyjnymi. W tym badaniu przyjęto podejście teorii ugruntowanej do projektowania kompleksowych ram ekosystemu działu zasobów ludzkich. Badanie to wykazało, że proponowane ramy obejmowały trzy połączone ze sobą warstwy reprezentujące warstwy mikro, mezo i makro interesariuszy. To badanie zapewnia firmom ramy do budowania ekosystemu zasobów ludzkich w rozwijaniu ról partnerów biznesowych HR. Proponowane ramy ekosystemu działu zasobów ludzkich są nowością w literaturze i zapewniają owocną drogę do przyszłych badań.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

human resource department ecosystem; ecosystem framework; grounded theory; collaboration

PL

ekosystem działu zasobów ludzkich; ramy ekosystemu; teoria ugruntowana; współpraca

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 27, No. 2
• Strony: 155--170
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Khristiningrum Veronica Afridita

• SBM Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-3541

autor

Gustomo Aurik

• SBM Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-7145

autor

Ginting Henndy

• SBM Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-9037

autor

Wisesa Anggara

• SBM Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7298-469X

autor

Saputra Jumadil

• Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-5756

Bibliografia

• 1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Ritala, P., (2017). Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 23-36.
• 2. Adner, R., (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.
• 3. Ananthram, S., Nankervis, A., (2013). Strategic agility and the role of HR as a strategic business partner: an Indian perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(4), 454-470.
• 4. Antila, E. M., Kakkonen, A., (2008). Factors affecting the role of HR managers in international mergers and acquisitions: A multiple case study. Personnel Review, 37(3), 280-299.
• 5. Beirão, G., Patrício, L. and Fisk, R. P., (2017). Value cocreation in service ecosystems: Investigating health care at the micro, meso, and macro levels. Journal of Service Management, 28(2), 227-249.
• 6. Bougie, R., Sekaran, U., (2019). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Sons.
• 7. Brandl, J., Pohler, D., (2010). The human resource department’s role and conditions that affect its development: Explanations from Austrian CEOs. Human Resource Management, 49(6), 1025-1046.
• 8. Bronfenbrenner, U., (1981). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Merican Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51(2), 363-365.
• 9. Caldwell, R., (2008). HR business partner competency models: re‐contextualising effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(3), 275-294.
• 10. Chandler, J. D., Vargo, S. L., (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35-49.
• 11. Charmaz, K., (1996). The search for Meanings-Grounded Theory. In. Smith JA, Harre R., and Van Langenhove L.(Eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology (pp. 27-49). London, United Kingdom: Sage.
• 12. Ciasullo, M. V., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M. and Leone, D., (2020). Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(4), 1167-1195.
• 13. Corbin, J. M., Strauss, A., (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
• 14. Creswell, J. W., (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
• 15. Fenech, R., Baguant, P. and Ivanov, D., (2019). The changing role of human resource management in an era of digital transformation. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 22(2), 176-180.
• 16. Garavan, T. N., McCarthy, A. and Carbery, R., (2019). An ecosystems perspective on international human resource development: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Human Resource Development Review, 18(2), 248-288.
• 17. Gobble, M. M., (2014). Charting the innovation ecosystem. Research-Technology Management, 57(4), 55-59.
• 18. Hassan, M. A., Manso, N. N. A., Rahman, W. M. Z. W. A. and Kelana, B. W. Y., (2015). Do line managers’ have ‘linking pin’ in HR roles? Intangible Capital, 11(1), 1-12.
• 19. Iansiti, M., Levien, R., (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-78.
• 20. Intarakumnerd, P., (2017). Human resource management and coordination for innovative activities in production networks in Asia: A synthesis. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 25(2), 199-205.
• 21. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C. and Gawer, A., (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
• 22. Kapoor, R., (2018). Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1-16.
• 23. Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M. and Francis, G., (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31(7), 721-742.
• 24. Kim, A., Ryu, S., Kim, S. and Lepak, D. P., (2017). Determinants of the strategic involvement of human resource departments: evidence from large South Korean firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 44-63.
• 25. Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Klein, K. J., (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Multi-level theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). Jossey-Bass.
• 26. Kuipers, B. S., Giurge, L. M., (2017). Does alignment matter? The performance implications of HR roles connected to organizational strategy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(22), 3179-3201.
• 27. Ludwikowska, K., (2021). The mediating role of employee-oriented human resource policy in the relationship between strategic human resource management and organisational performance. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(2), 131-150.
• 28. McLeod, C. M. Nite, C., (2019). Human Capital Ecosystem Construction in an Emerging Rugby Market. Journal of Sport Management, 33(4), 261-274.
• 29. Meijerink, J., Keegan, A., (2019). Conceptualizing human resource management in the gig economy: Toward a platform ecosystem perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 214-232.
• 30. Miller, G. T., Spoolman, S., (2011). Living in the environment: principles, connections, and solutions (17th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• 31. Moore, J. F., (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
• 32. Moore, J. F., (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 31-75.
• 33. Morris, S., Shenkar, O. and Mackey, A., (2019). Managing Across Organisational Boundaries: The New Employment Relationship and its Human Resource Management Implications. In The sage handbook of human resource management (pp. 110-120). SAGE Publications.
• 34. Renkema, M., Meijerink, J. and Bondarouk, T., (2017). Advancing multi-level thinking in human resource management research: Applications and guidelines. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 397-415.
• 35. Roundy, P. T., Burke-Smalley, L., (2022). Leveraging entrepreneurial ecosystems as human resource systems: A theory of meta-organizational human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 100863.
• 36. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., (2009). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson education.
• 37. Scaringella, L., Radziwon, A., (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: old wine. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Forthcoming, 136, 59-87.
• 38. Seková, M., Ďuríková, V., (2016). Human resource management creativity in companies operating in intercultural environment. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 4(2), 59-67.
• 39. Shea, K., Chesson, P., (2002). Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17(4), 170-176.
• 40. Shorey, R. C., Martino, S., Lamb, K. E., LaRowe, S. D. and Santa Ana, E. J., (2015). Change talk and relatedness in group motivational interviewing: A pilot study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 51, 75-81.
• 41. Snell, S. A., Morris, S. S., (2021). Time for realignment: The HR ecosystem. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 219-236.
• 42. Ulrich, Dave, Dulebohn, J. H., (2015). Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 188-204.
• 43. Ulrich, Dave, Younger, J. and Brockbank, W., (2008). The twenty‐first‐century HR organization. Human Resource Management, 47(4), 829-850.
• 44. Ulrich, Dave, Younger, J., Brockbank, W. and Ulrich, M. D., (2013). The state of the HR profession. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 457-471.
• 45. Ulrich, David., (1996). Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Harvard Business Press.
• 46. Valkokari, K., (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 17-24.
• 47. Yusliza, M. Y., Choo, P. W., Jayaraman, K., Rimi, N. N. and Muhammad, Z., (2019). HR line manager’s reflections on HRM effectiveness through HR roles and role stressors. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 14(1), 34-48.
• 48. Zhao, S., Sheehan, C., De Cieri, H. and Cooper, B., (2019). A comparative study of HR involvement in strategic decision-making in China and Australia. Chinese Management Studies, 13(2), 258-275.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).