Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Offshore wind farms are developing well all over the world, providing green energy from renewable sources. The evaluation of possible consequences of a collision involves Finite Element computer simulations. The goal of this paper was to analyse the influence of selected strain-based failure criteria on ship damage resulting from a collision with an offshore wind turbine monopile. The case of a collision between an offshore supply vessel and a monopile-type support structure was examined. The results imply that simulation assumptions, especially the failure criteria, are very important. It was found that, using the strain failure criteria according to the minimum values required by the design rules, can lead to an underestimation of the ship damage by as much as 6 times, for the length of the hull plate, and 9 times, for the area of the ship hull opening. Instead, the adjusted formula should be used, taking into account both the FE element size and the shell thickness. The influence of the non-linear representation of the stress-strain curve was also pointed out. Moreover, a significant influence of the selected steel grade on collision damages was found.
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
42--52
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
autor
- Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. L. Ramirez, D. Fraile, and G. Brindley, “Offshore wind in Europe: Key trends and statistics 2019,” 2019.
- 2. L. Ramirez, D. Fraile, and G. Brindley, “Offshore wind in Europe: Key trends and statistics 2020,” 2021.
- 3. EMSA, “Marine Casualties and Incidents PRELIMINARY ANNUAL OVERVIEW OF MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS 2014-2020,” no. April, 2021.
- 4. L. Junlai, X. Yonghe, W. Weiguo, and Z. Chi, “Analysis of the Dynamic Response of Offshore Floating Wind Power Platforms in Waves,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 17–25, 2020. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0062
- 5. A. Karczewski and Ł. Piątek, “The influence of the cuboid float’s parameters on the stability of a floating building,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 107, pp. 16–21, 2020. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0042
- 6. K. Niklas and A. Karczewski, “Determination of seakeeping performance for a case study vessel by the strip theory method,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 108, pp. 4–16, 2020. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0061
- 7. F. Wang and N. Chen, “Dynamic response analysis of drill pipe considering horizontal movement of platform during installation of subsea production tree,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 22–30, 2020. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0043
- 8. J.T. Wu, J.H. Chen, C.Y. Hsin, and F.C. Chiu, “Dynamics of the FKT System with Different Mooring Lines,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2019. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0003
- 9. E. Mieloszyk, M. Abramski, and A. Milewska, “CFGFRPT Piles with a Circular Cross-Section and their Application in Offshore Structures,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 128–137, 2019. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0053
- 10. W. Litwin, W. Leśniewski, D. Piątek, and K. Niklas, “Experimental Research on the Energy Efficiency of a Parallel Hybrid Drive for an Inland Ship,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1675, 2019.
- 11. V.S. Blintsov, K.S. Trunin, and W. Tarełko, “Determination of Additional Tension in Towed Streamer Cable Triggered by Collision with Underwater Moving Object,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2020. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0027
- 12. K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, “Full scale CFD seakeeping simulations for case study ship redesigned from V-shaped bulbous bow to X-bow hull form,” Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 89, pp. 188–201, Aug. 2019.
- 13. F. Biehl, “Collision Safety Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbines,” 4th LSDYNA Eur. Conf., pp. 27–34, 2005.
- 14. K. Niklas, “Strength analysis of a large-size supporting structure for an offshore wind turbine,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 24, pp. 156–165, 2017. doi: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0034
- 15. P. Dymarski, “Design of Jack-Up Platform for 6 MW Wind Turbine: Parametric Analysis Based Dimensioning of Platform Legs,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 183–197, 2019. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0038
- 16. B. Rozmarynowski, “Spectral Dynamic Analysis of A Stationary Jack-Up Platform,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 1, 2019. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0005
- 17. WindEurope, “Offshore wind in Europe - Key trends and statistics 2020,” WindEurope, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 14–17, 2021.
- 18. N. Ren and J. Ou, “Dynamic numerical simulation for ship-OWT collision,” Proc. 2009 8th Int. Conf. Reliab. Maintainab. Safety, ICRMS 2009, no. July, pp. 1003–1007, 2009.
- 19. E. Homayoun, H. Ghassemi, and H. Ghafari, “Power Performance of the Combined Monopile Wind Turbine and Floating Buoy with Heave-Type Wave Energy Converter,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 107–114, 2019. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0051
- 20. J.R.A.Tomporowski, A.Al-Zubiedy, J.Flizikowski, W.Kruszelnicka, P.Bałdowska-Witos, “Analysis of the Project of innovative floating turbine,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 121–183, 2020. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0074
- 21. A. Bela, L. Buldgen, P. Rigo, and H. Le Sourne, “Numerical crashworthiness analysis of an offshore wind turbine monopile impacted by a ship,” Anal. Des. Mar. Struct. - Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Mar. Struct. MARSTRUCT 2015, no. 2013, pp. 661–669, 2015.
- 22. A. Bela, H. Le Sourne, L. Buldgen, and P. Rigo, “Ship collision analysis on offshore wind turbine monopile foundations,” Mar. Struct., vol. 51, pp. 220–241, 2017.
- 23. H. Jia, S. Qin, R. Wang, Y. Xue, D. Fu, and A. Wang, “Ship collision impact on the structural load of an offshore wind turbine,” Glob. Energy Interconnect., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2020.
- 24. E. Lehmann and J. Peschmann, “Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions,” Mar. Struct., vol. 15, no. 4–5, pp. 429–441, 2002.
- 25. K. Niklas and J. Kozak, “Experimental investigation of Steel-Concrete-Polymer composite barrier for the ship internal tank construction,” Ocean Eng., vol. 111, pp. 449–460, 2016.
- 26. Ringsberg, J., Amdahl, J., Chen, B., Cho, S.-R., Ehlers, S., Hu, Z., Kubiczek, J., Korgesaar, M., Liu, B., Marinatos, J., Niklas, K., Parunov, J., Quinton, B., Rudan, S., Samuelides, M., Soares, C., Tabri, K., Villavicencio, R., Yamada, Y., Yu, Z., & Zhang, S., “MARSTRUCT benchmark study on nonlinear FE simulation of an experiment of an indenter impact with a ship side-shell structure,” Mar. Struct., vol. 59, pp. 142–157, 2018.
- 27. A. AbuBakar and R.S. Dow, “The impact analysis characteristics of a ship’s bow during collisions,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 100, no. August 2018, pp. 492–511, 2019.
- 28. K. Niklas, “Numerical calculations of behaviour of ship double-bottom structure during grounding,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 15, no. SUPPL. 1, 2008.
- 29. M.A.G. Calle and M. Alves, “A review-analysis on material failure modelling in ship collision,” Ocean Eng., vol. 106, pp. 20–38, 2015.
- 30. O. Kitamura, “FEM approach to the simulation of collision and grounding damage,” Mar. Struct., vol. 15, no. 4–5, pp. 403–428, 2002.
- 31. DNVGL, “DNV-RP-C208: Determination of Structural Capacity by Non-linear FE analysis Methods,” 2019.
- 32. J.L. Martinez, J.C.R. Cyrino, and M.A. Vaz, “FPSO collision local damage and ultimate longitudinal bending strength analyses,” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2020.
- 33. G. Wang, K. Arita, and D. Liu, “Behavior of a double hull in a variety of stranding or collision scenarios,” Mar. Struct., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 147–187, 2000.
- 34. S. Yagi, H. Kumamoto, O. Muragishi, Y. Takaoka, and T. Shimoda, “A study on collision buffer characteristic of sharp entrance angle bow structure,” Mar. Struct., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2009.
- 35. S. Ehlers, “The influence of the material relation on the accuracy of collision simulations,” Mar. Struct., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 462–474, 2010.
- 36. S. Ehlers, J. Broekhuijsen, H.S. Alsos, F. Biehl, and K. Tabri, “Simulating the collision response of ship side structures: A failure criteria benchmark study,” Int. Shipbuild. Prog., vol. 55, no. 1–2, pp. 127–144, 2008.
- 37. Standards Norway, “NORSOK Standard - Design of steel structure N-004, Rev.3,” 2013.
- 38. DNVGL, “DNVGL-RP-C204 - Design against Accidental Loads,” 2017.
- 39. M. Scharrer, L. Zhang, and E.D. Egge, “Final report MTK0614, Collision calculations in naval design systems, Report Nr. ESS 2002.183,” Hamburg, 2002.
- 40. DNVGL, “DNV-RP-C208: Determination of Structural Capacity by Non-linear FE analysis Methods,” 2013.
- 41. S. Zhang, “The mechanics of ship collisions,” Technical University of Danemark, 1999.
- 42. Verband Deutscher Ingenieure, “Systematic calculation of high duty bolted joints joints with one cylindrical bolt,” Berlin, 2003.
- 43. O. Ozgur, “Numerical Assessment of FPSO Platform Behaviour in Ship Collision,” Trans. Marit. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, 2020.
- 44. T. S. Boe, “Analysis and Design of Stiffened Columns in Offshore Floating Platforms Subjected to Supply Vessel Impacts,” Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2018.
- 45. M.P. Mujeeb-Ahmed, S.T. Ince, and J.K. Paik, “Computational models for the structural crashworthiness analysis of a fixed-type offshore platform in collisions with an offshore supply vessel,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 154, no. June, p. 106868, 2020.
- 46. Livermore Software Technology, “LS-DYNA – KEYWORD USER’S MANUAL, VOLUME II Material Models,” 2020.
- 47. Y.G. Ko, S.J. Kim, J.M. Sohn, and J.K. Paik, “A practical method to determine the dynamic fracture strain for the nonlinear finite element analysis of structural crashworthiness in ship–ship collisions,” Ships Offshore Struct., vol. 13, no. 4, 2018.
- 48. J. Travanca and H. Hao, “Energy dissipation in high-energy ship-offshore jacket platform collisions,” Mar. Struct., vol. 40, pp. 1–37, 2015.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4de64df5-a3e7-463c-867d-2550c711d797