Development of the Nash instantaneous unit hydrograph to predict subsurface fow in catchments

Babaali, H. R.; Sabzevari, T.; Ghafari, S.

doi:10.1007/s11600-021-00638-x

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Development of the Nash instantaneous unit hydrograph to predict subsurface fow in catchments

Autorzy

Babaali H. R. , Sabzevari T. , Ghafari S.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-021-00638-x

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

For many permeable catchments with proper plant cover, subsurface flows play a key role in generating surface runoff. In this regard, developing subsurface flow models is of great importance and requires further studies. In Dunne-Black mechanism, it is subsurface flow causing saturated zone in hillslopes and generating surface runoff. The Nash model is an instantaneous unit hydrograph (IUH) model commonly used to predict the surface runoff. In this study, the Nash model was applied to estimate subsurface flow hydrograph in the catchments. The parameters of the subsurface Nash IUH (SNIUH) model were determined by developing of the subsurface travel time equations with the concept of celerity. The efficiency of the SNIUH model was verified by two rainfall simulator laboratory models. The mean error of the peak subsurface flow estimation ranged from 6.7 to 11.21% for both laboratory models, which was acceptable. Ultimately, the SNIUH model was used to estimate the subsurface flow hydrograph in Heng-Chi and San-Hsia catchments in Taiwan, and the results were compared with results of the subsurface geomorphologic IUH (SGIUH) model. The coefficients of efficiency (CE) of SNIUH were higher than 0.9 in four events for both catchments and the subsurface peak error values were between 10 and 16%.

Słowa kluczowe

Nash model GIUH subsurface flow IUH

model Nasha GIUH przepływ podpowierzchniowy IUH

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 69, no. 5

Strony

1877--1886

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 51 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Babaali H. R.

hambabaali1979@gmail.com

Department of Civil Engineering, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran

autor

Sabzevari T.

Department of Civil Engineering, Estahban Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran

autor

Ghafari S.

Department of Civil Engineering, Estahban Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran

Bibliografia

1. Adib A, Salarijazi M, Vaghefi M, Shooshtari MM, Akhondali AM (2010) Comparison between GcIUH-Clark, GIUH-Nash, Clark-IUH, and Nash-IUH models. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 34(2):91–104
2. Aryal SK, O’Loughlin EM, Mein RG (2005) A similarity approach to determine response times to steady-state saturation in landscapes. Adv Water Resour 28(2):99–115
3. Berne, A., Uijlenhoet, R., & Troch, P. A. (2005). Similarity analysis of subsurface flow response of hillslopes with complex geometry. Water Resour Res, 41(9)
4. Beven, K. J., Lamb, R., Kirkby, M. J., & Freer, J. E. (2020). A history of TOPMODEL. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss, 1–44
5. Chang CH, Lee KT (2008) Analysis of geomorphologic and hydrological characteristics in catchment saturated areas using topographic-index threshold and geomorphology-based runoff model. Hydrol Process 22:802–812
6. Chen Y, Shi P, Qu S, Ji X, Zhao L, Gou J, Mou S (2019) Integrating XAJ model with GIUH based on nash model for rainfall-runoff modelling. Water 11(4):772
7. Ciarapica L, Todini E (2002) TOPKAPI: A model for the representation of the rainfall-runoff process at different scales. Hydrol Process 16(2):207–229
8. Dooge JCI (1957) Discussion [of ‘the form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph’ (Nash, 1957)]. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol Publ 45:120–121
9. Eidipour A, Akhondali AM, Zarei H, Salarijazi M (2016) Flood hydrograph estimation using GIUH model in ungauged Karst Basins (Case study: Abolabbas Basin). TUEXENIA 36(36):26–33
10. Fariborzi H, Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Mohammadpour R (2019) Prediction of the subsurface flow of hillslopes using a subsurface time-area model. Hydrogeol J 27(4):1401–1417
11. Freeze RA (1972) Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2 Upstream Source Areas. Water Resour Res 8(5):1272–1283
12. Ghorbani K, Salarijazi M, Abdolhosseini M, Eslamian S, Ahmadianfar I (2019) Evaluation of Clark IUH in rainfall-runoff modeling (case study: Amameh Basin). Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 9(2):137–153
13. Hann CT, Barfield BJ, Hayes JC (1994) Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. Academic, New York, p 79
14. Jeannot B, Weill S, Eschbach D, Schmitt L, Delay F (2018) A low-dimensional integrated subsurface hydrological model coupled with the 2-D overland flow: Application to a restored fluvial hydrosystem (Upper Rhine River–France). J Hydrol 563:495–509
15. Keshtkaran, P., & Sabzevari, T. (2016). Prediction of geomorphologic parameters of catchment without GIS to estimate runoff using GIUH model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1–24
16. Kumar A, Kumar D (2008) Predicting direct runoff from hilly watershed using geomorphology and stream-order-law ratios: case study. J Hydrol Eng 13(7):570–576
17. Kumar R, Chatterjee C, Singh RD, Lohani AK, Kumar S (2004) GIUH based Clark and Nash models for runoff estimation for an ungauged basin and their uncertainty analysis. Int J River Basin Manag 2(4):281–290
18. Kumar R, Chatterjee C, Singh RD, Lohani AK, Kumar S (2007) Runoff estimation for an ungauged catchment using geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUM) models. Hydrol Process 21(14):1829–1840
19. Lee KT, Chang C-H (2005) Incorporating subsurface-flow mechanism into geomorphology-based IUH modeling. J Hydrol 311:91–105
20. McDonnell JJ, Beven K (2014) Debates The future of hydrological sciences: a (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities, and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015141
21. Menberu, M.W., Torabi Haghighi, A., Ronkanen, A., Kvaerner, J., Kløve, B., 2014. Runoff Curve Numbers for Peat-Dominated Watersheds. J Hydrol Eng. 040, 4058–1–04014058–10
22. Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, Flammini A, Cifrodelli M, Corradini C, Govindaraju RS (2015) Infiltration on sloping surfaces: laboratory experimental evidence and implications for infiltration modeling. J Hydrol 523:79–85
23. Naden P (1992) Spatial variability in flood estimation for large catchments: the exploitation of channel network structure. Hydrol Sci J 37(1):53–71
24. Narayan K, Dikshit PKS, Dwivedi SB (2012) GIS supported geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) of Varuna river basin using geomorphological characteristics. Int J Adv Earth Sci 1(2):68–76
25. Nash JE (1957) The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol, Publ 3:114–121
26. O’Kelly JJ (1955) The employment of unit-hydrographs to determine the flow of Irish arterial drainage channels. ICE Proc 4:365–412
27. Petroselli, A. (2020a). A generalization of the EBA4SUB rainfall-runoff model considering surface and subsurface flow. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1–12
28. Petroselli A., Piscopia R., Grimaldi S. (2020b). Design discharge estimation in small and ungauged basins: EBA4SUB framework sensitivity analysis. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 2020; LI:1040
29. Petroselli A, Asgharinia S, Sabzevari T, Saghafian B (2020b) Comparison of design peak flow estimation methods for ungauged basins in Iran. Hydrol Sci J 65(1):127–137
30. Piscopia R, Petroselli A, Grimaldi S (2015) A software package for the prediction of design flood hydrograph in small and ungauged basins. J Agricult Eng XLVI 432:74–84
31. Pishvaei MH, Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Mohammadpour R (2020) Effects of hillslope geometry on spatial infiltration using the TOPMODEL and SCS-CN models. Hydrol Sci J 65(2):212–226
32. Robinson JS, Sivapalan M (1996) Instantaneous response functions of overland flow and subsurface stormflow for catchment models. Hydrol Process 10(6):845–862
33. Sabzevari T (2017) Runoff prediction in ungauged catchments using the gamma dimensionless time-area method. Arab J Geosci 10(6):131
34. Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S (2014) Effects of hillslope geometry on surface and subsurface flows. Hydrogeol J 22(7):1593–1604
35. Sabzevari T, Talebi A, Ardakanian R, Shamsai A (2010) A steady-state saturation model to determine the subsurface travel time (STT) in complex hillslopes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(6):891–900
36. Sabzevari T, Fattahi MH, Mohammadpour R, Noroozpour S (2013) Prediction of surface and subsurface flow in catchments using the GIUH. J Flood Risk Manag 6(2):135–145
37. Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Pishvaei MH (2015) Effects of geometry on runoff time characteristics and time-area histogram of hillslopes. J Hydrol 531:638–648
38. Sadeghi SHR, Mostafazadeh R, Sadoddin A (2015) Changeability of simulated hydrograph from a steep watershed resulted from applying Clark’s IUH and differenttime–area histograms. Environ Earth Sci 74(4):3629–3643
39. Sahoo B, Chatterjee C, Raghuwanshi NS, Singh R, Kumar R (2006) Flood estimation by GIUH-based clark and nash models. J Hydrol Eng 11(6):515–525
40. Sahoo S, Sahoo B, Panda SN (2018) Hillslope-storage Boussinesq model for simulating subsurface water storage dynamics in scantily-gauged catchments. Adv Water Resour 121:219–234
41. Saravanan S, Manjula R (2015) Geomorphology based semi-distributed approach for modeling rainfall-runoff modeling using GIS. Aquatic Procedia 4:908–916
42. Scanlon TM, Raffensperger JP, Hornberger GM, Clapp RB (2000) Shallow subsurface storm flow in a forested headwater catchment: observations and modeling using a modified TOPMODEL. Water Resour Res 36(9):2575–2586
43. Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MTh, Šejna M (2005) The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media. Version 3.0. HYDRUS Software Series 1. University of California, Riverside, CA
44. Singh, V. P. (1988). Hydrologic systems. Volume I: Rainfall-runoff modeling. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs New Jersey. 1988. 480
45. Singh SK (2000) Transmuting synthetic unit hydrograph into gamma distribution. J Hydrol Eng 5(4):380–385
46. Singh SK (2004) Simplified use of gamma-distribution/Nash model for runoff modeling. J Hydrol Eng 9(3):240–243
47. Todini, E., & Ciarapica, L. (2001). The TOPKAPI model. Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology, 471–506
48. Wan H, Xia J, Zhang L, Zhang W, Xiao Y, Gippel CJ, Xu C (2016) A generalized concentration curve (GCC) method for storm flow hydrograph prediction in a conceptual linear reservoir-channel cascade. Hydrol Res 47(5):932–950
49. Yuan Y, Mitchell JK, Hirschi MC, Cooke RA (2001) Modified SCS curve number method for predicting subsurface drainage flow. Trans ASAE 44(6):1673
50. Zhu H, Liu T, Xue B, Wang G (2018) Modified Richards’ equation to improve estimates of soil moisture in two-layered soils after infiltration. Water 10(9):1174
51. Zoch RT (1934) On the relation between rainfall and streamflow-1. Mon Weather Rev 62(9):315–322

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-4d829941-6e05-40ce-91cc-3e24c3b2d947