Use of Chosen Methods for Determination of the USLE Soil Erodibility Factor on the Example of Loess Slope

• Autorzy: Kruk Edyta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/128861

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The investigations were carried out on a loess slope in the Brzeźnica village, in the Rudnik commune. Nine points were chosen, in which particular parameters being parts of the examined models, were determined. On the basis of the literature, eight models for the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) erodibility factor determination were designated. The chosen models were the ones proposed by: Wishmeier, Monchareonm, Torii et al. and Walker (all based on texture and organic matter content, Wischmeier and Smith (based on texture organic matter content and additionally on aggregate classes), Wiliams et al. (based on texture and organic carbon content), Renard et al. as well as Stone and Hilborn (both based only on texture). The investigated site was characterized as well. The statistical conclusions were drawn and the obtained results were compared with the results presented in the literature.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soil erodibility factor; model USLE

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, nr 1
• Strony: 151--161
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kruk Edyta

• Department of Land Reclamation and Environmental Development, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8364-6672

Bibliografia

• 1. Bahadur K.C.K. 2009. Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS: A case of the Upper Nam Wa Watersched, Nan Province, Thailand. Environmental Geology, 57(3), 695–705
• 2. Baryła A. 2012. Estimating the loss of soil At different probabilities of erosive rainfalls – a case study of experimental farm in Puczniew (in Polish). Woda – Środowisko – Obszary Wiejskie, 12, 4(40), 7–16.
• 3. Boroń K., Klatka S., Ryczek M., Liszka P. 2016. The formation of the physical, physico-chemical and water properties reclaimed and not reclaimed sediment reservoir of the former Cracow Soda Plant “Solvay” (in Polish). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus, 15(3), 35–43.
• 4. Boroń K., Klatka S., Ryczek M., Zając E. 2010. Reclamation and cultivation of Cracow soda plant lagoons (in Polish). In: Construction for Sustainable Environment. Sarsby & Meggyes, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group London, A Balkema, 245–250.
• 5. Chodak T., Tasz W., Kaszubkiewicz J. 2008. An attempt to estimate and verify the USLE model In the area of a single slope and agricultural microcatchment (in Polish). Materiały Konferencji, Polanica Zdrój.
• 6. Drzewiecki W., Mularz S. 2005. Model USPED as a tool for assessment of soil erosion and deposition effect) (in Polish). Rocz. Geomat., Tom III, z. 2, 5–9.
• 7. Klatka, S. T. 2020. Soil Productivity Index in the Selected Area of Post-Mining Geomechanical Deformations. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21(5), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/122514
• 8. Klatka S., Malec M., Ryczek M., Boroń K. 2015. Influence of mine activity of the coal mine “Ruch Borynia” on water management of chosen soils on mining area (in Polish). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus, 14 (1), 115–125.
• 9. Kruk E. 2016. Determination of the probabilisty of ravine erosion with the use of selected topographic parameters of a mountains catchment In the ArcGIS software (in Polish). In: Szałata Ł., Doskocz J., Kardasz P. (Eds.) Innowacje w polskiej nauce w obszarze life science i ochrony środowiska: Przegląd aktualnej tematyki badawczej. Wydawnictwo Nauka i Biznes, 106–117.
• 10. Kondracki J. 2000. Regional geography of Poland (in Polish). Wydanie drugie poprawione, PWN, Warszawa.
• 11. Mocek A., Drzymała S., Maszner P. 1997. Genesis analysis and classification of soils (in Polish). Wyd. Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu.
• 12. Mocek A. 2015. Soil science (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
• 13. NRCS (National Resources Conservation Service). 2007. Part 618 – Soil Properties and Qualities. US Department of Agriculture, http://soil.usda.gov/technical/handbook/contents/part618.html#55.
• 14. Oleksynowa K., Tokaj J., Jakubiec J. 1991. Guide to exercies in soil science and geology (in Polish). Wydawnictwo AR, Kraków.
• 15. Panagos P., Meusburger K., Ballabio C., Borrelli P., Alewell C. 2014. Soil erodibility in Europe: A highresolution dataset based on LUCAS. Science of the Total Environment 479–480, 189–200.
• 16. PN-R-04032. 1998. Soil and mineral soil materials – Sampling and determination of the grain size composition (in Polish).
• 17. Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze. 2008. Classification of soil and mineral formation (in Polish).
• 18. Radomski C. 1987. Agrometeorology (in Polish). PWN, Warszawa.
• 19. Renard K.G., Foster G.R., Weesies G.A, McCool D.K., Yoder D.C. 1997. Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 73, pp. 251.
• 20. Rudnicki F. 1992. Agricultural experimental (in Polish). Wydawnictwo ATR, Bydgoszcz, pp. 210.
• 21. Ryczek M., Kruk E., Boroń K., Klatka S., Stabryła J. 2013a. Comparison of methods for determination of soil erodibility factor (k-usle) on the example of the Kasińczanka stream basin. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus 12, 2, 103–110.
• 22. Ryczek M., Kruk E., Malec M., Klatka S. 2013b. Estimation of water erosion threat of the Smuga stream basin in the Beskid Wyspowy. Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych 24, 4, 33–37.
• 23. Shabani F., Kumar L., Esmaeili A., 2014. Improvement to the prediction of the USLE K factor, Geomorphology 204, 229–234.
• 24. Stone R.P., Hilborn D., 2000. Universal soil loss equation (USLE). Ontario: Min. Agricult. Food Rural Affairs: 1–9.
• 25. Święchowicz, J. 2016. Susceptibility to water erosion soils derived from less-like depo sits (Brzesko Poreland), Southern Poland (in Polish). In: J. Święchowicz & A. Michno (Eds.), Wybrane zagadnienia geomorfologii eolicznej: Monografia dedykowana dr hab. Bogdanie Izmaiłow w 44. rocznicę pracy naukowej. Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ Kraków, pp. 331–366.
• 26. Torri D., Poesen J., Borselli L. 1997. Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. Elsevier Science B.V., 7–10.
• 27. Twardowski K., Drożdżak R. 2006. Indirect methods of estimating hydraulic properties of grounds (in Polish). Wiertnictwo Nafta Gaz, 23/1, 477–486.
• 28. USDA. 1951. Soil Survey Manual U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Staff, U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash. D.C.
• 29. 2Walker S.J. 2017. An alternative methods for deriving a USLE nomograph K factor equation. 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 3 to 8 December 2017, 964–970.
• 30. Wischmeier W.H. 1977. Soil erodibility by rainfall and runoff. In: Toy T.J. (Ed.) Erosion: Research techniques, erodibility and sediment delivery. GEO Abstracts, Lid., Norwich, England, 45–56.
• 31. Wischmeier W.H., Smith D D. 1978. Predicting Rainfall erosion losses – a guide to conservation planning. Supersedes Agriculture Handbook No. 282; Washington, 4–11.
• 32. Woś A. 1993. Climatic regions of Poland In the light of the frequency of various weathers types (in Polish). Zeszyty Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania, PAN, 20.
• 33. Vaezi A.R, Bahrami H.A., Sadeghi S.H.R, Mahdian M.H. 2010. Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility Factor (K) of the USLE in North West of Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 12, 241–252.
• 34. Zhang C., Liu S., Fang J., Tan K. 2008. Research on the spatial variability of soil moisture based on GIS. The International Federation for Information Processing, 258, Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture, 1, 719–727.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).