Influence of disability type on upper-limb motor skills

Tokarski, T.; Roman-Liu, D.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Influence of disability type on upper-limb motor skills

Autorzy

Tokarski T. , Roman-Liu D.

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This study was carried out in order to determine the effect of physical disability (paraplegia) and sensory disability (deafness) on motor skills of the upper limbs. Studies were distinguished by two parameters: the nature of the control curve (sine or random) and the magnitude of the isometric force exerted on the lever (10 N, 20 N, 40 N, 80 N). A comparison of the quality of manual force control in a visual detection task among groups of people with sensory disability (deaf), people with physical disability (paraplegic) and people without disability showed differences among those groups. Values of force above 20 N create conditions of lower quality of control and of direction of force exertion outside the body. At the same time, the study proved that people with some types of disability can perform certain work tasks as effectively as people without disability.

Słowa kluczowe

accuracy precision steering disabled deaf paraplegics

zachorowalność pracownik niepełnosprawny schorzenia kończyn górnych bezpieczeństwo i higiena pracy

Wydawca

Taylor & Francis

Czasopismo

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

Rocznik

2016

Tom

Vol. 22, No. 4

Strony

463--472

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Tokarski T.

tomto@ciop.pl

Central Institute for Labour Protection - National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB), Poland

autor

Roman-Liu D.

Central Institute for Labour Protection - National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB), Poland

Bibliografia

1. Kujala T, Lehtokoski A, Alho K, et al. Faster reaction times in the blind than sighted during bimodal divided attention. Acta Psychol. 1997;96:75-82. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00007-3
2. Röder B, Rösler F, Hennighausen E, et al. Event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory discrimination in sighted and blind human subjects. Cogn Brain Res. 1996;4:77-93. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(96)00024-9
3. Rönnberg J, Nilsson L. The modality effect, sensory handicap and compensatory functions. Acta Psychol. 1987;65:263–283. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(87)90053-9
4. Neville HJ. Intermodal competition and compensation in development. Evidence from studies of the visual system in congenitally deaf adults. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1990;608:71-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48892.x
5. Neville HJ, Lawson D. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language. Brain Res. 1987;405(2):284-294. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90297-6
6. Neville HJ, Lawson D. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res. 1987;405(2):268-283. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90296-4
7. Dye MWG, Baril DE, Bavelier D. Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the attention network test. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(8):1801-1811.doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.019
8. Stivalet P, Moreno Y, Richard J, et al. Differences in visual search tasks between congenitally deaf and normally hearing adults. Cogn Brain Res. 1998;6:227-232. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00026-8
9. Hiroshi E. Pressing movements and perceived force and displacement are influenced by object stiffness. Physiol Behav. 2016;163:203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.022
10. Madeley P, Hulley JL, Wildgust H, et al. Parkinson’s disease and driving ability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53(7):580–582. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.7.580
11. Serrien DJ, Nirkko AC, Loher TJ, et al. Movement control of manipulative tasks in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Brain. 2002;125(2):290-300. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf024
12. Serrien DJ, Burgunder JM, Wiesendanger M. Control of manipulative forces during unimanual and bimanual tasks in patients with Huntington’s disease. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(3):328–334. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0992-6
13. Serrien DJ, Strens LH, Oliviero A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) degrades bimanual movement control in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2002;328(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00499-8
14. Serrien DJ, Brown P. The functional role of interhemispheric synchronization in the control of bimanual timing tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2002;147(2):268-272. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1253-z
15. Smith AD, Flanegin FR. E-procurement and automatic identification: enhancing supply chain management in the healthcare industry. Int J Electron Healthc. 2004;1(2):176-198. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2004.005866
16. Smith E, Boyle M, MacPherson J. The development of a quality assessment tool for ambulance patient care records. HIM J. 2004;33(4):112-120.
17. Smith KP, Evans CK, Dill-Macky R, et al. Host genetic effect on deoxynivalenol accumulation in fusarium head blight of barley. Phytopathology. 2004 Jul;94(7):766-771. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.7.766
18. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Stolze H, Gölge M, et al. Analyses of gait, reaching, and grasping in children after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(3):424-430. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50017
19. Heuer H, Klein W. Involuntary rotations of a steering device induced by voluntary rotations of the head and maintained eccentric head positions. J Mot Behav. 1999;31(3):248–264. doi: 10.1080/00222899909600992
20. Vaillancourt DE, Russell DM. Temporal capacity of short-term memory in continuous force production. Exp Brain Res. 2002;145:275–285. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1081-1
21. Slifkin AB, Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM. Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84(4):1708-1718.
22. Davis NJ. Memory and coordination in bimanual isometric force production. Exp Brain Res. 2007;182:137–142. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1082-1
23. Hamilton AFC, Jones KE, Wolpert DM. The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans. Exp Brain Res. 2004;157:417-430. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1856-7
24. Moritz C, Barry B, Pascoe MA, et al. Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:2449–2459. doi: 10.1152/jn.01122.2004
25. Hong SL, Lee M-H, Newell KM. Magnitude and structure of force variability: mechanical and neurophysiological influences. Motor Control. 2007;11:119-135.
26. Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM. Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61(2):P117-P124. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.2.P117
27. Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM. Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force. Exp Brain Res. 2006;170(3):423-432. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0225-5
28. Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM. The generalization of perceptual-motor intra-individual variability in young and old adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61(5):P304-P310. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.5.P304
29. Sosnoff JJ, Valantine AD, Newell KM. Independence between the amount and structure of variability at low force levels. Neurosci Lett. 2006;392(3):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.010

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-4cde6b13-6c1a-4c4d-8c2d-70dd09eb6281