Safety critical components (SCC) in the maintenance management system for railway vehicle

• Autorzy: Gawlak Katarzyna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29354/diag/156166

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Maintenance management systems have been operating in the European railway market for many years. However, implementation of the new legal regulations means that the impact of the structured system approach is constantly developing. This new approach focuses on management of the safety critical components (SCC), where the main involved parties are rolling stock manufacturers and the certified entities in charge of maintenance (ECM). The aim of this article is to present how changes to legislation affect development of the maintenance systems, both in the context of their requirements and criteria used, as well as in relation to a requirement of rolling the certification process out to all ECMs, irrespectively of the types of vehicles are used by them. Furthermore, the article focuses on critical safety components and respectively challenges faced by entities on the railway market. Therefore, the process of identifying SCC is described and analysed by providing examples of components that most frequently appear on the list of safety critical components which were developed in the Polish railway market.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

bezpieczeństwo kolei; pojazd szynowy; system zarządzania utrzymaniem

EN

safety critical components; maintenance management system; railway safety

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Diagnostyki Technicznej
• Czasopismo: Diagnostyka
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 4
• Strony: art. no. 2022408
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Gawlak Katarzyna

• Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-6292

Bibliografia

• 1. Belanova N, Ershova N, Pyatkova N, Alpackaya I. Assessment of the risks of construction of transport infrastructure facilities. Transportation Research Procedia. 2022;63:1660-1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.179.
• 2. Catelani M, Ciani L, Galar D, Guidi G, Matucci S, Patrizi G. FMECA Assessment for railway safetycritical systems investigating a new risk threshold method. IEEE Access. 2021 June; 9:86243-86253. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088948.
• 3. Cheng X, Xing Z, Qin Y, Zhang Y, Pang S, Xia J. Reliability analysis of metro door system based on FMECA. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications. 2013:5(4):216-220. DOI: 10.4236/jilsa.2013.54024.
• 4. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/762 of 8 March 2018 establishing common safety methods on safety management system requirements pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulations (EU) No 1158/2010 and (EU) No 1169/2010.
• 5. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/545 of 4 April 2018 establishing practical arrangements for the railway vehicle authorisation and railway vehicle type authorisation process pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
• 6. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/776 of 16 May 2019 amending Commission Regulations (EU) No 321/2013, (EU) No 1299/2014, (EU) No 1301/2014, (EU) No 1302/2014, (EU) No 1303/2014 and (EU) 2016/919 and Commission Implementing Decision 2011/665/EU as regards the alignment with Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the implementation of specific objectives set out in Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/1474.
• 7. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/779 of 16 May 2019 laying down detailed provisions on a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance of vehicles pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 445/2011.
• 8. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009.
• 9. Commission Regulation (EU) No. 445/2011 of 10 May 2011 in relation to a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for freight wagons which amended Regulation (EC) No. 652/2007.
• 10. CEN/TR 17696:2021 Railway applications - Vehicle Maintenance - Guide for identification and management of Safety Critical Components for railway vehicles.
• 11. CSN EN 17023 - Railway applications - Railway vehicle maintenance - Creation and modification of maintenance plan.
• 12. Deprez L, Antonio K, Boute R. Empirical risk assessment of maintenance costs under full-service contracts. European Journal of Operational Research. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.055.
• 13. Dinmohammadi F, Alkali B, Shafiee M, et al. Risk evaluation of railway rolling stock failures using FMECA technique: A case study of passenger door system. urban rail transit 2; 2016: 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-016-0043-z.
• 14. Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety.
• 15. European Union Agency for Railways: European Rail Safety Days, Porto 2021.
• 16. European Union Agency for Railways: Guide for the application of Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2016/798 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2019/779 on a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for vehicles. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.2821/731954.
• 17. Fernandez P, Lopez A, Marques A, Fernandez J, Marcos J. Dynamic risk assessment for CBM-based adaptation on maintenance planning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2020 July; 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108359.
• 18. Garbatov Y, Sisci F, Ventua M. Risk-based framework for ship and structural design accounting for maintenance planning. Ocean Engineering. 2018;166:12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.058.
• 19. Gierszewski J, Kubiak M. O istocie pojęć i paradygmatach w naukach bezpieczeństwa. Kultura bezpieczeństwa w teorii i praktyce: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek; 2019:332.
• 20. Grencik J, Gallikova J, Volna P. A novel methodology of risk assessment for railway freight wagons. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie. 2020;63(135):17-22. https://doi.org/10.17402/435.
• 21. Grencik J, Poprocky R, Gallikova J, Volna P. Use of risk assessment methods in maintenance for more reliable rolling stock operation. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018;157. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815704002.
• 22. Hopkin P. Fundamentals of risk management. understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management (5th edition): Kogan Page; 2018.
• 23. International Union of Wagon Keepers. Verband der Güterwagenhalter in Deutschland e.V.: Applying the definition of Safety Critical Components to the freight wagon business – Technical Guideline. 2021.
• 24. Khan F, Hashemi S, Paltrinieri N, Amyotte P, Cozzani V, Reniers G. Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2016;14:9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2016.07.006.
• 25. Kowalewski K. Positions and Tasks Office of Rail Transport after implementing the 4th Railway Package. Krytyka Prawa, i. 13/2021, Akademia Leona Koźminńskiego, Warszawa. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.437.
• 26. Leite M, Costa M, Alves T, Infante V, Andrade A. Reliability and availability assessment of railway locomotive bogies under correlated failures. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2022;135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106104.
• 27. Letiner B. A General model for railway system risk assessment with the use of railway accident scenarios analysis. Procedia Engineering. 2017; 287: 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.361.
• 28. Li Y. He X, Shuai J. Risk analysis and maintenance decision making of natural gas piplines with external corrosion based on Bayesian network. Petrolum Science. 2022;19(3):1250-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2021.09.016.
• 29. Li Y, Wang D, Zhao W. Bogie failure mode analysis for railway freight car based on FMECA. 8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRMS.2009.5270253.
• 30. Melnik R, Koziak S, Sowiński B, Chudzikiewicz A. Reliability analysis of metro vehicles operating in Poland. Transportation Research Procedia. 2019; 40: 808-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.114.
• 31. Mendes N, Vieira J, Mano A. Risk management in aviation maintenance: A systematic literature review. Safety Science. 2020;153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105810.
• 32. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Word: critical. Available from: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/.
• 33. Petchrompo S, Li H, Erguido A, Riches Ch, Parlikad A. A value-based approach to optimizing long-term maintenance plans for multi-asset k-out-of-N system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2020; 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106924.
• 34. Poveda-Reyes S, Rizzetto L, Triti Ch, Shi D, GarcíaJiménez E, Molero G, Santarremigia F. Risk evaluation of failures of the running gear with effects on rail infrastructure. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2021;128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105613.
• 35. Prussi M, Lonza L. Passenger aviation and high speed rail: a comparison of emissions profiles on selected European routes. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6205714.
• 36. Sanchis I, Franco R. Zuriaga P, Fernandez. Risk on increasing temperature due to climate change on operation. Of the Spanish rail network. Transportation Research Procedia 2020;45:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.056.
• 37. Skrucany T, Kendra M, Kalina T, Jurkovic M, Vojtek M, Synak Frantistek. Environmental Comparison of Different Transport Modes. NASE MORE International Journal of Maritime Science & Technology. 2018;65(4):192-196. https://doi.org/10.17818/NM/2018/4SI.5.
• 38. Szaciłło L, Jacyna M, Szczepański E, Izdebski M. Risk assessment for rail freight transport operations. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność. 2021;23(3):476-488. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.3.8.
• 39. Szkoda M, Kaczor G. Reliability and availability assessment of diesel locomotive using fault tree analysis. Archives of Transport. 2016;40(4):65-75. https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1225470.
• 40. Yu K, Strauss J, Li H, Kuang X, Wu J. Effects of railway speed on aviation demand and CO2 emissions in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2021;94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102772.
• 41. Zio E. The future of risk assessment. Reliability engineering and System Safety. 2018 September; 177: 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.020.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).