Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The current study is devoted to comparison between vehicle-track dynamic interaction models focusing on responses of both vehicle and track components. In this regard, at the beginning, equations of a two-dimensional, 10 degrees of freedom vehicle model are derived, and then the equations of various track model types including one to five layers are derived. The coupled model of the vehicle and various types of track structures are simultaneously solved by using a numerical integration method. Moreover, numerical results are compared with those measured in the field and the validity of results is confirmed. In the next Section of the work, by comparison of both the vehicle and track responses in various track models, the applicability range of each track model is defined. Results for the track without rail irregularity indicate that there are no noticeable differences between track model types for estimating carbody accelerations, wheel-rail contact forces, rail velocities and accelerations when the equivalent method is used. However, the responses of rail displacements and track support forces are different between various track models. Therefore, in the railway track problems, the type of the track model should be determined based on the research purpose.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
273--284
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
autor
- School of Railway Engineering, Center of Excellence in Railway Transportation, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
autor
- School of Railway Engineering, Center of Excellence in Railway Transportation, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Bibliografia
- 1. Bogacz R., Czyczuła W., 2008, Response of beam on visco-elastic foundation to moving distributed load, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 46, 4, 763-775.
- 2. Cai Z., Raymond G.P., 1994, Modelling the dynamic response of railway track to wheel/rail impact loading, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2, 1, 95-112.
- 3. Dahlberg T., 2001, Some railroad settlement models – a critical review, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 215, 4, 289-300.
- 4. Frýba L., 2013, Vibration of Solids and Structures under Moving Loads, Springer Science & Business Media.
- 5. Kerr A.D., 2000, On the determination of the rail support modulus k, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 37, 32, 4335-4351.
- 6. Kerr A.D., 2003, Fundamentals of Railway Track Engineering, Simmons-Boardman Books, Incorporated.
- 7. Leaflet No. 301, 2002, Technical and general specification of Ballasted Railway, Management and planning organization of Iran.
- 8. Montalbán L., Real J., Real T., 2013,Mechanical characterization of railway structures based on vertical stiffness analysis and railway substructure stress state, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 227, 1, 74-85.
- 9. Mosayebi S.A., Zakeri J.A., Esmaeili M., 2016, Field test investigation and numerical analysis of ballasted track under moving locomotive, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30, 3, 1065-1069.
- 10. Mosayebi S.A., Zakeri J.A., Esmaeili M., 2017, Vehicle/track dynamic interaction considering developed railway substructure models, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 61, 6, 775-784.
- 11. Puzavac L., Popović Z., Lazarević L., 2012, Influence of track stiffness on track behaviour under vertical load, PROMET – Traffic and Transportation, 24, 5, 405-412.
- 12. Real J.I., Gómez L., Montalbán L., Real T., 2012, Study of the influence of geometrical and mechanical parameters on ballasted railway tracks design, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26, 9, 2837-2844.
- 13. Rezvani M.A., Vesali F., Eghbali A., 2013, Dynamic response of railway bridges traversed simultaneously by opposing moving trains, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 46, 5, 713-734.
- 14. Suzuki T., Ishida M., Abe K., Koro K., 2005, Measurement on dynamic behaviour of track near rail joints and prediction of track settlement, Quarterly Report of RTRI, 46, 2, 124-129.
- 15. Thambiratnam D., Zhuge Y., 1996, Dynamic analysis of beams on an elastic foundation subjected to moving loads, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 198, 2, 149-169.
- 16. Uzzal R.U.A., Ahmed W., Rakheja S., 2008, Dynamic analysis of railway vehicle-track interactions due to wheel flat with a pitch-plane vehicle model, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 39, 2, 86-94.
- 17. Uzzal R.U.A., Ahmed A.K.W., Rakheja S., 2009, Analysis of pitch plane railway vehicle-track interactions due to single and multiple wheel flats, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 223, 4, 375-390.
- 18. Wang C., Zhou S., Wang B., Guo P., Su H., 2015, Differential settlements in foundations under embankment load: Theoretical model and experimental verification, Geomechanics and Engineering, 8, 2, 283-303.
- 19. Weining L., He X., Wenjun G., 1996, Study of vibration effects of underground trains on surrounding environments, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 15, S1, 586-593.
- 20. Xia H., Cao Y.M., De Roeck G., 2010, Theoretical modeling and characteristic analysis of moving-train induced ground vibrations, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329, 7, 819-832.
- 21. Xia H., Deng Y., Xia C., De Roeck G., Qi L., Sun L., 2013, Dynamic analysis of coupled train-ladder track-elevated bridge system, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 47, 5, 661-678.
- 22. Zakeri J.A., Xia H., Fan J.J., 2009, Dynamic responses of train-track system to single rail irregularity, Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 6, 2, 89-104.
- 23. Zakeri J.A., Mosayebi S.A., Esmaeili M., 2016, Numerical and field investigations of track dynamic behavior caused by light and heavy railway vehicles, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 54, 3, 871-879.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4bc9853c-3586-4fac-ab65-41cbdee56c9f