Sustainable mobility planning prerequisites and perspectives - Gdynia Maritime University case study

Kaszuba, A.; Przybyłowski, A.; Kościk, K.; Lachowicz, A.; Kuzia, M.

doi:10.12716/1001.17.04.25

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Sustainable mobility planning prerequisites and perspectives - Gdynia Maritime University case study

Autorzy

Kaszuba A. , Przybyłowski A. , Kościk K. , Lachowicz A. , Kuzia M.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.17.04.25

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Sustainable mobility is one of the key elements determining the correct operationalization of the idea of sustainable development. This concept also appears more and more often in modern cities, whose authorities strive to improve the quality of life of their inhabitants, among others by creating SUMP -Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan. This is followed by all kinds of facilities that generate big traffic in cities. One of the institutions willing to meet the challenges of the ever-growing number of trips in its vicinity is Gdynia Maritime University (GMU), which is one of the largest employers in this seaport city, and thus – is one of the biggest traffic generators. The objective of this paper is to investigate the prerequisites and perspectives of creating and implementing mobility plan for GMU in order to make transport more sustainable in its vicinity. For this purpose, pilot research survey has been carried out among employees and students regarding their behaviour and transport preferences in reaching this destination. The research hypothesis stating that the transport habits of the GMU commuters are not compatible with the concept of sustainable mobility was confirmed. The implementation of a sustainable mobility plan in this institution will help to change the standards of traveling in the area of the University and will contribute to better quality of life in the city. It is recommended to enhance the cooperation with the Gdynia City Hall in order to create a synergy effect and bring an added value to sustainable development of this congested seaport urban space.

Słowa kluczowe

carbon footprint sustainable mobility seaport urban space mobility planning resilient smart seaport cities climate change traffic generators quality of life

Wydawca

Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University

Czasopismo

TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 17 No. 4

Strony

981--990

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 61 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kaszuba A.

Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Przybyłowski A.

Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Kościk K.

Gdynia City Hall, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Lachowicz A.

Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Kuzia M.

Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

1. United Nations. Economic Commission for Europe, UNECE nexus: sustainable mobility and smart connectivity.
2. Przybyłowski A.: Global Trends Shaping Life Quality in Agglomerations with Particular Emphasis on Mobility in Seaport Agglomerations. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 3, doi:10.12716/1001.13.03.18, pp. 615-620, 2019.
3. N. M. Dali, A. A. Sarkawi, and A. Abdullah, “An Analytical Study of Malaysia’s Quality of Life Indicators,” Journal of Business and Economics, 2017.
4. E. Bielińska-Dusza, M. Hamerska, and A. ˙ Zak, “Sustainable Mobility and the Smart City: A Vision of the City of the Future: The Case Study of Cracow (Poland),” 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14237936. - doi:10.3390/en14237936.
5. R. M. Savithramma, B. P. Ashwini, and R. Sumathi, “Smart Mobility Implementation in Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Review on State-of-art Technologies,” 2022. doi: 10.1109/icssit53264.2022.9716288. - doi:10.1109/ICSSIT53264.2022.9716288.
6. N. Tcholtchev and I. Schieferdecker, “Sustainable and reliable information and communication technology for resilient smart cities,” Smart Cities, vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.3390/smartcities4010009. - doi:10.3390/smartcities4010009.
7. E. Bielińska-Dusza, M. Hamerska, and A. Żak, “Sustainable mobility and the smart city: A vision of the city of the future. the case study of Cracow (Poland),” Energies (Basel), vol. 14, no. 23, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14237936. - doi:10.3390/en14237936.
8. K. Krauss, M. Krail, and K. W. Axhausen, “What drives the utility of shared transport services for urban travellers? A stated preference survey in German cities,” Travel Behav Soc, vol. 26, pp. 206–220, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.010. - doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.010.
9. G. Kırdar and S. İ. Ardıç, “A design proposal of integrated smart mobility application for travel behavior change towards sustainable mobility,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 8, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.13189/cea.2020.080536. - doi:10.13189/cea.2020.080536.
10. K. H. HEBEL and M. WOLEK, “PERCEPTION OF MODES OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT COMPARED TO TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR OF URBAN INHABITANTS IN LIGHT OF MARKETING RESEARCH,” Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport, vol. 92, pp. 65–75, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.20858/sjsutst.2016.92.7. - doi:10.20858/sjsutst.2016.92.7.
11. R. Okraszewska, A. Romanowska, M. Wołek, J. Oskarbski, K. Birr, and K. Jamroz, “Integration of a multilevel transport system model into sustainable Urban mobility planning,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10020479. - doi:10.3390/su10020479.
12. M. Suchanek and A. Szmelter-Jarosz, “Environmental aspects of generation Y’s sustainable mobility,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 11, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11113204. - doi:10.3390/su11113204.
13. M. Gallo and M. Marinelli, “Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies”, doi: 10.3390/su12187499. - doi:10.3390/su12187499.
14. K. Pietrzak and O. Pietrzak, “Environmental effects of electromobility in a sustainable urban public transport,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 3, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12031052. - doi:10.3390/su12031052.
15. E. Pisoni, P. Christidis, P. Thunis, and M. Trombetti, “Evaluating the impact of ‘Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans’ on urban background air quality,” J Environ Manage, vol. 231, pp. 249–255, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.10.039. - doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.039.
16. M. Kiba-Janiak and J. Witkowski, “Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work?”, doi: 10.3390/su11174605. - doi:10.3390/su11174605.
17. S. Werland, “Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU”, doi: 10.3390/su12208436. - doi:10.3390/su12208436.
18. E. Arsenio, K. Martens, and F. Di Ciommo, “Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets?,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 55, pp. 30–39, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.RETREC.2016.04.008. - doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.008.
19. E. Arsenio, K. Martens, and F. Di Ciommo, “Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets?,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 55, pp. 30–39, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.RETREC.2016.04.008. - doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.008.
20. A. D. May, “Encouraging good practice in the development of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans,” Case Stud Transp Policy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–11, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.CSTP.2014.09.001. - doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2014.09.001.
21. S. Rupprecht, L. Brand, S. Böhler-Baedeker, and L. M. Brunner, “GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLAN SECOND EDITION.” [Online]. Available: www.rebekkadold.de.
22. D. Kaszubowski, “Recommendations for Urban Freight Policy Development in Gdynia,” in Transportation Research Procedia, Elsevier B.V., 2016, pp. 886–899. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.041. - doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.041.
23. T. Studzieniecki and A. Przybylowski, “Baltic Sea Region cities advancing towards sustainable urban mobility-Copenhagen and Gdynia case studies Transport investments as a tool for sustainable development in the Polish regions View project baseline and target scenarios of tourism development in the Kaliningrad region (KR) of Russia View project Baltic Sea Region cities advancing towards sustainable urban mobility-Copenhagen and Gdynia case studies,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321333426.
24. B. Decker, H. Hećimović, and M. Wołek, “Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in Central Eastern Europe: Case Examples from Poland and Croatia,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 48, pp. 2748–2757, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1244. - doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1244.
25. R. Okraszewska, A. Romanowska, M. Wołek, J. Oskarbski, K. Birr, and K. Jamroz, “Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning,” 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10020479. - doi:10.3390/su10020479.
26. J. Rześny-Cieplińska, A. Szmelter-Jarosz, and S. Moslem, “Priority-based stakeholders analysis in the view of sustainable city logistics: Evidence for Tricity, Poland,” Sustain Cities Soc, vol. 67, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102751. - doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102751.
27. G. Masik and J. Stępień, “Smart Local Governance: The Case of the Gdańsk-Gdynia-Sopot Metropolitan Area in Poland,” Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 63–81, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10630732.2021.1930841. - doi:10.1080/10630732.2021.1930841.
28. J. Rześny-Cieplińska and A. Szmelter-Jarosz, “Stakeholders’ analysis of environmental sustainability in urban logistics: A case study of tricity, Poland,” Energies (Basel), vol. 14, no. 5, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14051274. - doi:10.3390/en14051274.
29. M. Kuzia, “Mobility Plan as a Tool for Traffic Generators. The Process of Implementation,” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego Problemy Transportu i Logistyki, vol. 36, pp. 71–78, 2016, doi: 10.18276/ptl.2016.36-07. - doi:10.18276/ptl.2016.36-07.
30. M. Jaller, X. C. Wang, and J. Holguín-Veras, “Large urban freight traffic generators: Opportunities for city logistics initiatives,” J Transp Land Use, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–67, 2015, doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.406. - doi:10.5198/jtlu.2015.406.
31. M. Jaller, X. C. Wang, and J. Holguín-Veras, “Large urban freight traffic generators: Opportunities for city logistics initiatives,” J Transp Land Use, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–67, 2015, doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.406. - doi:10.5198/jtlu.2015.406.
32. A. Chandra, A. Pani, P. K. Sahu, B. B. Majumdar, and S. Sharma, “Identifying large freight traffic generators and investigating the impacts on travel pattern: A decision tree approach for last-mile delivery management,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 43, p. 100695, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.RTBM.2021.100695. - doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100695.
33. A. C. S. Souza, L. Bittencourt, and P. W. G. Taco, “Women’s perspective in pedestrian mobility planning: the case of Brasília,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 33, pp. 131–138, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2018.10.085. - doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.085.
34. M. Dejeammes, “Urban Mobility Plans and Accessibility,” 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26201632 - doi:10.5198/jtlu.v2i2.38.
35. F. Cirianni, C. Monterosso, P. Panuccio, and C. Rindone, “A Review Methodology of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: Objectives and Actions to Promote Cycling and Pedestrian Mobility,” in Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions, A. Bisello, D. Vettorato, P. Laconte, and S. Costa, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 685–697. - doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_46.
36. M. Á. Mozos-Blanco, E. Pozo-Menéndez, R. Arce-Ruiz, and N. Baucells-Aletà, “The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 72, pp. 45–54, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2018.07.001. - doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.07.001.
37. M. Wołek, “Sustainable mobility planning in Poland,” Transport Economics and Logistics, vol. 76, pp. 13–22, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.26881/etil.2018.76.01. - doi:10.26881/etil.2018.76.01.
38. W. Ross, “Mobility abd accessibility: the yin and yang of planning,” World transport policy and practice, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 13–19, 2000, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/.
39. “/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (Text with EEA relevance).”
40. M. Barrow et al., “GHG Protocol and Carbon Trust Team Natural Resources Defense Council Johannes Partl and Duncan Noble, PE International and Five Winds International.”
41. M. KUZIA and A. PRZYBYŁOWSKI, “Challenges for Urban Sustainable Mobility – Gdynia Maritime University Case Studym,” Economic and Environmental Studies, vol. 17, no. 44, pp. 1071–1085, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.25167/ees.2017.44.27. - doi:10.25167/ees.2017.44.27.
42. “GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING A MOBILITY PLAN,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.eltis.org/resources/tools/sump-participation-kit.
43. T. A. Litman and T. Litman, “Developing Indicators For Comprehensive And Sustainable Transport Planning,” VTPI, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.vtpi.org - doi:10.3141/2017-02.
44. I. Kawgan-Kagan, “Are women greener than men? A preference analysis of women and men from major German cities over sustainable urban mobility,” Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, vol. 8, p. 100236, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.TRIP.2020.100236. - doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100236.
45. S. Nasrin and J. Bunker, “Analyzing significant variables for choosing different modes by female travelers,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 114, pp. 312–329, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.10.017. - doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.10.017.
46. R. C. McIlroy, “Mobility as a service and gender: A review with a view,” Travel Behav Soc, vol. 32, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100596. - doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100596.
47. M. Polk, “Are women potentially more accommodating than men to a sustainable transportation system in Sweden?,” Transp Res D Transp Environ, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 75–95, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00034-2. - doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00034-2.
48. J. E. Desrochers, G. Albert, T. L. Milfont, B. Kelly, and S. Arnocky, “Does personality mediate the relationship between sex and environmentalism?,” Pers Individ Dif, vol. 147, pp. 204–213, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.PAID.2019.04.026. - doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.026.
49. “CYCLING ACROSS THE WORLD A 30-country Global Advisor survey.”.
50. M. Wolek, M. Suchanek, and T. Czuba, “Factors influencing walking trips. Evidence from Gdynia, Poland,” 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254949. - doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254949.
51. K. B. Watson, G. P. Whitfield, S. Bricka, and S. A. Carlson, “Purpose-Based Walking Trips by Duration, Distance, and Select Characteristics, 2017 National Household Travel Survey,” 2021, doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0096. - doi:10.1123/jpah.2021-0096.
52. S. D. Towne et al., “Physical activity and associated medical cost savings among at-risk older adults participating a community-based health & wellness program,” 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198239. - doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198239.
53. M. Buchanan, “The benefits of public transport,” Nat Phys, doi: 10.1038/s41567-019-0656-8. - doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0656-8.
54. J. Berg and J. Ihlström, “The Importance of Public Transport for Mobility and Everyday Activities among Rural Residents,” 2019, doi: 10.3390/socsci8020058. - doi:10.3390/socsci8020058.
55. R. Mackett, “Why do people use their cars for short trips?,” Transportation (Amst), vol. 30, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1023/A:1023987812020. - doi:10.1023/A:1023987812020.
56. Z. Tao, Q. Nie, and W. Zhang, “Travel Behavior with Car Sharing under Smart City Conditions,” 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/8879908. - doi:10.1155/2021/8879908.
57. “Thematic Analysis Roads Task Force-Technical Note 15 Why do people travel by car?”.
58. Przybyłowski A.: Global Trends Shaping Life Quality in Agglomerations with Particular Emphasis on Mobility in Seaport Agglomerations. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 3, doi:10.12716/1001.13.03.18, pp. 615-620, 2019.
59. Popek M., Dereszewska A., Dembska G., Pazikowska-Sapota G.: The Impact of Transport on the Quality of Water in the Port of Gdynia. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 16, No. 1, doi:10.12716/1001.16.01.20, pp. 167-173, 2022.
60. Koznowski W., Łebkowski A.: Control of Electric Drive Tugboat Autonomous Formation. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 17, No. 2, doi:10.12716/1001.17.02.16, pp. 391-396, 2023.
61. Serry A.: Polish Container Ports, New Baltic Hubs?. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 17, No. 2, doi:10.12716/1001.17.02.13, pp. 365-371, 2023.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-4b1b2894-2e69-40f2-95a2-2a1de2717754