Industry 5.0 as a new concept of development within high volatility environment: about the industry 5.0 based on political and scientific studies

Gajdzik, Bożena

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2023.169.15

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Industry 5.0 as a new concept of development within high volatility environment: about the industry 5.0 based on political and scientific studies

Autorzy

Gajdzik Bożena

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.169.15

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Purpose: the aim of the paper is to present the frameworks of Industry 5.0 in a labile environment. Until the COVID-19 pandemic, the notion of a dynamic environment was used, due to the speed of the changes taking place in economies and society, which could be anticipated and proactive measures taken. The pandemic, whose impact was experienced worldwide, changed the environment, which took economies, societies and businesses by surprise. Such an unpredictable, unstable environment is called environmental volatility. Design/methodology/approach: After COVID-19 instability has prevailed in many areas of human activities and societies, as well as in businesses and economies. The strongly popularised, for more than a decade, the concept of Industry 4.0 was transformed. In the new reality more important there were socio-economic and environmental problems. In the new concept called Industry 5.0 three aspects are important: human factors, resilience and sustainability. The above-mentioned aspects were included by the European Commission in the document: “Industry 5.0. Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European Industry”. The document was published in January 2021. The idea of Industry 5.0 refers to the concept of Society 5.0 in the labile environment after the COVID-19. The paper was realized based on the SLR method. The author used the bibliometrics of scientific publications about Industry 5.0 available in the scientific database Scopus. Findings: This paper presents the policy assumptions of Industry 5.0 based on studies from the political documents and scientific papers. The first scientific publications on Industry 5.0 were registered in scientific databases in 2016. Originality/value The presented frameworks of the Industry 5.0 based on literature review complemented (expanded) the understanding of the European development policy presented in the document: Industry 5.0. Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry (European Commission, Brussels, Manuscript completed in January 2021).

Słowa kluczowe

Industry 5.0 human factors resilience sustainability environmental volatility

Przemysł 5.0 czynniki ludzkie odporność zrównoważony rozwój zmienność środowiskowa

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2023

Tom

z. 169

Strony

255--279

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 73 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Gajdzik Bożena

bozena.gajdzik@polsl.pl

Silesian University of Technology

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-1691

Bibliografia

1. Al Mubarak, M. (2022). Sustainably Developing in a Digital World: harnessing artificial intelligence to meet the imperatives of work-based learning in Industry 5.0. Development and Learning in Organizations.
2. ASTOR (2017). Inżynierowie Przemysłu 4.0 (Nie)gotowi do zmian? Whitepaper, Kraków. Retrieved from: https://www.astor.com.pl/images/Industry_4-0_Przemysl_4-0/ASTOR_ Inzynierowie_4.0_ whitepaper.pdf.
3. Becker, K.D. (2015). Arbeit in der Industrie 4.0 - Erwartungen des Instituts für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft.
4. Biały, W., Gajdzik, B., Jimeno, C.L., Romanyshyn, L. (2019). Engineer 4.0 in a metallurgical enterprise. In W., Biały, (Ed..) Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering; Monograph, Engineering and Technology, Pt. 1. Warszawa: Sciendo, pp. 172-182. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2019-0017.
5. Böhle, F. (2014). Digitalisierung braucht Erfahrungswissen. Retrieved from: http://denk-doch-mal.de/wp/fritz-boehle-digitalisierungerfordert-erfahrungswissen/, 25.05.2017.
6. Botthof, A., Hartmann, E.A. (Hg.). Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
7. Carayannis, E.G., Draper, J., Bhaneja, B. (2021). Towards Fusion Energy in the Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 Context: Call for a Global Commission for Urgent Action on Fusion Energy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 1891-1904.
8. Czakon, W. (2011). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3.
9. Daugherty, P.R., Wilson, H.J. (2018). Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
10. De, D., Karmakar, A., Banerjee, P.S., Bhattacharyya, S., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. (2022). BCoT: Introduction to Blockchain-Based Internet of Things for Industry 5.0. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 112, 1-22.
11. Dhiman, G., Nagar, A.K. (2022). Editorial: Blockchain-based 6G and industrial internet of things systems for Industry 4.0/5.0. Expert Systems, 39(10), e13162.
12. Duda, J., Olszek, S. (2021). Koncepcja realizacji zamkniętej pętli PLM na podstawie zintegrowanego środowiskowego systemu. In: R. Knosala (Ed.), Inżynieria Zarządzania. Cyfryzacja Produkcji. Cz. 3 (pp. 12-24). Warszawa: PWE.
13. EC Document: Industry 5.0. Towards a sustainable, human centric and resilient European industry. Brussels: European Commission. Manuscript completed in January 2021.
14. EC: European Commission (May 2020). Blueprint for sectoral cooperation on skills: towards an EU strategy addressing the skills needs of the steel sector. European vision on steel-related skills and supporting actions to solve the skills gap today and tomorrow in Europe. Brussels: European Commission Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Unit A1 - COSME.
15. Flores, E., Xu, X., Lu, Y. (2020). Human Cyber-Physical Systems: A skill-based correlation between humans and machines. 16th IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) August 20-21, 2020, Online Zoom Meeting, pp. 13131318.
16. Fraga-Lamas, P., Lopes, S.I., Fernández-Caramés, T.M. (2021). Green IoT and edge AI as key technological enablers for a sustainable digital transition towards a smart circular economy: An industry 5.0 use case. Sensors, 21(17), 5745.
17. Gajdzik, B., Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S., Wieczorek, T. (2020). Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0. Energies, 13(16) (art. no. 4254), 1-27. doi:10.3390/en13164254.
18. Gajdzik, B. (2021). Operator maszyn i urządzeń w Przemyśle 4.0 - wprowadzenie do tematu. Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logistyka, t. LXXIII, nr 5. doi 10.33226/12312037.2021.5.1
19. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R. (2022). Smart Production Workers in Terms of Creativity and Innovation: The Implication for Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8.
20. Gajdzik, B., Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S. (2021). Key socio-economic megatrends and trends in the context of the industry 4.0 framework. Forum Sci. Oecon., 9(3), 5-21. doi: 10.23762/fso_VoL9_no3_1.
21. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M.F., (...), Rejeb, A., Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying Industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716-737.
22. Glenszczyk, M. (2022). Wartość jako czynnik uodparniający model biznesu przedsiębiorstwa w sytuacji dużej labilności otoczenia. In: B. Barszczowska, M. Kot-Radojewska, A. Sobczyk-Kolbuch (Eds.), Gospodarka w pandemii. Wyzwania i działania (pp. 11-28). Dąbrowa Górnicza: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB.
23. Grabowska, S. (2021). Model biznesu 4.0. Architektura, tworzenie wartości, ocena konkurencyjności i efektywności. Toruń: TNOiK.
24. Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S., Gajdzik, B. (2022). Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0. Scientometrics, 127(6), 3117-3144.
25. Gracel, J., Makowiec, M. (2017). Kluczowe kompetencje menedżera w dobie czwartej rewolucji przemysłowej - przemysłu 4.0. Zarządzanie, XLIV(4), 105-129. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/AUNC_ZARZ.2017.054, 2017-10-24.
26. Hancock, P.A., Jagacinski, R.J., Parasuraman, R. et al. (2013). Human-automation interaction research: past present and future. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 21(2), 9-14. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/
1064804613477099.
27. Heredi-Szabo, G. (2022). Przemysł 5.0: Kolejny krok w rozwoju produkcji przemysłowej?, Retrieved from: https://knowhow.distrelec.com/pl/internet-rzeczy-iot/przemysl-5-0-
kolejny-krok-w-rozwoju-produkcji-przemyslowej/, 28.05.2022.
28. Ivanov, D. (2022). The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. International Journal of Production Research.
29. Johri, P., Singh, J.N., Sharma, A., Rastogi, D. (2021). Sustainability of Coexistence of Humans and Machines: An Evolution of Industry 5.0 from Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2021, pp. 410-414.
30. Kasinathan, P., Pugazhendhi, R., Elavarasan, R.M., (...), Devendiran, R., Alsharif, M.H. (2022). Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22), 15258.
31. Kaur, M., Jadhav, A., Akter, F. (2022). Resource Selection from Edge-Cloud for IIoT and Blockchain-Based Applications in Industry 4.0/5.0. Security and Communication Networks, 9314052.
32. Kiritsis, D. (2009). Product lifecycle management and embedded information devices. Springer Handbook of Automation. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-78831-7_43.
33. Kiritsis, D. (2010). Closed-loop for intelligent products in the rea of the Internet of Things. Computer-Aided Design. doi 10.1016.j.cad.2010.03.02.
34. Lee, J. (2015). Smart Factory Systems. Informatik Spektrum, 38, 230-235.
35. Lee, J.D., Seppelt, B.D. (2012). Human factors and ergonomics in automation design. In: G. Salvendy (ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 1615-1642). Hoboken: Wiley. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118131350.ch59.
36. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H. (2015). Research Letters: A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett., 3, 18-23.
37. Leng, J., Chen, Z., Huang, Z., (...), Lin, Z., Zhang, D. (2022). Secure Blockchain Middleware for Decentralized IIoT towards Industry 5.0: A Review of Architecture, Enablers, Challenges, and Directions. Machines, 10(10), 858.
38. Liu, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, B., Yao, S., Liu, Z. (2017). Review on cyber-physical systems. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin., 4, 27-40. doi:10.1109/jas.2017.7510349.
39. Lorenz, M., Rüfimann, M., Strack, R., Luetk, K.L. and Bolle (2015). Man and Machine in Industry 4.0. How Will Technology Transform the Industrial Workforce Through 2025? BCG Perspectives.
40. Majerník, M., Daneshjo, N., Malega, P., Drábik, P., Barilová, B. (2022). Sustainable Development of the Intelligent Industry from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 16(2), 12-18.
41. Manual 4.0. Opracowanie, Inspire Consulting Sp. z o.o., w ramach projektu dofinansowywanego z Funduszy Europejskich pt.: "Ja pracownik 4.0": Manual 4.0. Metodologia organizacji szkoleń i doradztwa w dobie przemysłu 4.0. Retrieved from: https://inspire-consulting.pl/files/16052022/ Inspire_Consulting_Manual4_A4_3mmspad_ final_nowe_web.pdf, 2022.11.20.
42. Margherita, E.G., Braccini, A.M. (2021). Socio-technical perspectives in the Fourth Industrial Revolution - Analysing the three main visions: Industry 4.0, the socially sustainable factory of Operator 4.0 and Industry 5.0. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3016, pp. 74-82.
43. Mazur, B., Walczyna, A. (2022). Sustainable Development Competences of Engineering Students in Light of the Industry 5.0 Concept. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12), 7233.
44. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0-a human-centric solution. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16), 4371.
45. Nakanishi, H. (2019). Modern Society has reached its limits - “Society 5.0” Will Liberate us. Davos: World Economic Forum.
46. OECD Library, Part: Economics. Economic Outlook Report. Retrieved from https://oecde-library.org/economics/oecd-economic-outlook/vilum-2020/issue-1, 5.08.2020.
47. Özdemir, V., Hekim, N. (2018). Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence, "the Internet of Things" and Next-Generation Technology Policy. OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22(1), 65-76.
48. Piątek, Z. (2018). Industry 5.0? Na kolejną rewolucję jest raczej zbyt wcześnie. Gospodarka. Retrieved from: https://automatykab2b.pl/magazyn, 23.02.2018.
49. Przemysł 5.0 - człowiek, technologia, stabilność, https://www.mecalux.pl/blog/przemysl-5-00, 4.04.2022.
50. Qahtan, S., Alsattar, H.A., Zaidan, A.A., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M. (2022). Integrated sustainable transportation modelling approaches for electronic passenger vehicle in the context of Industry 5.0. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100277.
51. Raport 2019. Skills for the Future of Manufacturing. World Manufacturing Organization. Retrieved from: https://worldmanufacturing.org/report/report-2019/, 2022.12.10.
52. Romero, D., Noran, O., Stahre, J., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Ä. (2015). Towards a humancentred reference architecture for next generation balanced automation systems: human- automation symbiosis. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems-APMS. Advances in Production Management Systems: Initiatives for a Sustainable World, 556-566. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/ 10.1007/978-3-319-22759-7_64.
53. Romero, D., Stahre, J., Wuest, T., Noran, O., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Ä., Gorecky, D. (2016). Towards an Operator 4.0 Typology: A Human-Centric Perspective on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE46), Tianjin, China, October, Vol. 11(29-31), 1-11.
54. Romero, D.; Bernus, P.; Noran, O.; Stahre, J.; Fast-Berglund, Ä. (2016). The Operator 4.0: Human Cyber-Physical Systems & Adaptive Automation Towards Human-Automation Symbiosis Work Systems. In APMS 2016, Advances in Production Management Systems: Initiatives for a Sustainable World, IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems; Springer: Cham Switzerland, 2016; pp. 677-686. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-51133-7_80.
55. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów w sprawie ustanowienie określonych ograniczeń, nakazów i zakazów w związku z wystąpieniem stanu epidemii. Dz.U. 2020, poz. 2091. Retrieved from: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20200002091.pdf, 26.11.2020.
56. Ruppert, T., Jaskó, Sz., Holczinger, T., Abonyi, J. (2018). Enabling Technologies for Operator 4.0: A Survey. Apply Science, 8, 1650; MDPI. doi:10.3390/app8091650.
57. Sachsenmeier, P. (2016). Industry 5.0-The Relevance and Implications of Bionics and Synthetic Biology. Engineering, 2(2), 225-22.
58. Salimova, T., Guskova, N., Krakovskaya, I., Sirota, E. (2019). From Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Challenges for sustainable competitiveness of Russian industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 497(1), 012090.
59. Sharma, R., Arya, R. (2022). UAV based long range environment monitoring system with Industry 5.0 perspectives for smart city infrastructure. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 168, 108066.
60. Sheridan, T., Parasuraman, R. (2006). Human-automation interaction. Hum. Factors Ergon. 1(1), 89-129.
61. Silva, P. et al. (2020). COVID-ABS. An agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 139, 1110088. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110088, 8.12.2022.
62. Singh, S.K., Yang, L.T., Park, J.H. (2023). FusionFedBlock: Fusion of blockchain and federated learning to preserve privacy in Industry 5.0. Information Fusion, 90, 233-240.
63. Sriman, B., Annie Silviya, S.H., Santhosh Kumar, E., Suryaa Narayanan, K., Nishaalu, S. (2022). Blockchain Industry 5.0: Next Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Innovative Computing, Intelligent Communication and Smart Electrical Systems, ICSES 2022.
64. Szpringer, W. (2021). Smart industries 5.0: Challenges for regulation (Book Chapter). The Economics of Sustainable Transformation, pp. 193-219.
65. Taleb, N. (2020). Czarny łabędź. Jak nieprzewidywalne zdarzenia rządzą naszym życiem. Poznań: Zysk i Sk-a, pp. 8-10.
66. Tzafestas, S. (2006). Concerning Human-Automation Symbiosis in the Society and the Nature. Int’l J. of Factory Automation, Robotics and Soft Computing, 1(3),16-24.
67. Verma, S., Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emergency COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253, 261.
68. Wang, F.Y., Sun, Q., Jiang, G.J., (...), Dong, X.S., Wang, L. (2018). Nuclear Energy 5.0: New Formation and System Architecture of Nuclear Power Industry in the New IT Era. Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, 44(5), 922-934.
69. Windelband, L. (2014). Zukunft der Facharbeit im Zeitalter „Industrie 4.0“. Journal of Technical Education, 2. Jg., H. 2, p. 155.
70. Yang, H., Asheralieva, A., Zhang, J., (...), Niyato, D.T., Raza, K.A. (2022). User-Centric Blockchain for Industry 5.0 Applications. IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, ICC Workshops 2022, pp. 25-30.
71. Zaho, B. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic, health risks, and economic consequences: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 64, 101561. Retrieved from: https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1043951X20301589?via%3Dihub, 24.02.2021.
72. Zengin, Y., Naktiyok, S., Kaygin, E., Kavak, O., Topęuoglu, E. (2021). An investigation upon Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 within the context of sustainable development goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), 2682, 1-16.
73. Zhu, N. et al. (2019). A novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China. The New England Journal Medicine, 382(8), 727-733.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-4a8fc927-6260-4c38-bd79-e7cad8552ebd