PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Preferable Ways of Decision-Making in IT Teams

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Software development team collaboration requires various decisions regarding essential aspects of a project’s progress. General and particular decision-making models are considered, and their main aspects such as team types, problem solving categories, and decision-making ways are analyzed. The research concerns representative groups of IT specialists and their preferences in decision-making are investigated. Four possible cases were tested: hierarchical choice (by leader) team members’ choice (team consensus or voting) and external expert impact. It allows one to show some differences in the behaviors of both traditional and virtual teams.
Rocznik
Strony
37--51
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 15 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk, Poland
  • Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Bourgault, M., Dronin, N., Homel, E., 2008. Decision-making with distributed project teams: an exploration of formalization and autonomy as determinants. Project Management Journal, 39(3), pp. 9–110.
  • [2] Cohen, B., 2013. PaaS: New Opportunities for cloud Application Development. IEEE Computer, 46(9), pp. 9–100.
  • [3] Cordes, S., 2016. Virtual team learning: The role of collaboration process and technology affordance in team decision making. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8(4), pp. 602–627.
  • [4] Dávideková, M., Hvorecký, J., 2017. ICT Collaboration Tools for Virtual Teams in Terms of the SECI Model. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 7(1), pp. 95–116.
  • [5] Eseryel, Y., Wei, K., & Crowston, K., 2020 Decision-making processes in community-based Free/libre Open Source Software development teams with internal governance: An extension to decision-making theory. Communication of the AIS (CAIS) (in press).
  • [6] Falkowski, G., Troutman, S., 2005. Remote Control: A Practitioner’s Guide to Managing Virtual Teams. An IHRIM Press Book, USA.
  • [7[ McNamara, K., Dennis, A.R., Cart, T.A., 2008. It’s the Thought that Counts: The Mediating Effects of Information Processing in Virtual Team Decision Making. Information Systems Management, 25(1), pp. 20–32.
  • [8] Nemiro, J., Beyerlein, M., Bradley, L., Beyerlein, S. (eds.) 2008. The Handbook of High Performance Virtual Teams. John Wiley & Sons.
  • [9] Phillips, J., 2004. IT Project Management. On Track from start to Finish 2e. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • [10] Pollice, P., Augustine, L., Lowe, Ch., Madhur, J., 2004. Software Development for Small Teams: A RUP-Centric Approach. The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series. Pearson Education, Inc.
  • [11] Schmidt, J.B., 2001. New Product Development Decision-Making Effectiveness: Comparing Individuals, Face-To-Face Teams, and Virtual Teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), pp. 575–600.
  • [12] Shalloway, A., Beaver, G., Trott, J.R., 2009. Lean-Agile Software Development. Achieving Enterprise Agility. Addison-Wesley Professional. Pearson Education, Inc.
  • [13] Turban, E., Liang, T., Wu, S.P.J., 2011. A Framework for Adopting Collaboration 2.0 Tools for Virtual Group Decision Making. Group Decision Making, 20, pp. 137–154.
  • [14] Vasan, R., 2011. A Venture Perspective on Cloud Computing. IEEE Computer, 44(3), pp. 60–62.
  • [15] Zofi, Y., 2012. A Manager’s Guide to Virtual Teams. Amacom, USA.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4a61fcab-2fac-4d7c-b222-6e4192404e4c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.