Comparison of different types of maximum power point techniques for photovoltaic systems

• Autorzy: Ostrowski Mariusz , Mroczka Janusz , Płachta Kamil

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mms.2024.149706

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper a comparison of different types of maximum power point search methods for the photovoltaic panels is presented. The methods that represent each group of maximum power point techniques will be implemented in the software that allows to test the behaviour of photovoltaic panels in different environment conditions including partial shading. In this paper each implemented method was compared including time of convergence with the maximum power point, tracking error and differences in the energy obtained from photovoltaics during the simulation time. The algorithms were compared under both uniform lighting and partial shade conditions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maximum power point; partial shading conditions; comparison of MPPT methods; direct MPPT methods; indirect MPPT methods; hybrid MPPT methods

• Wydawca: Komitet Metrologii i Aparatury Naukowej PAN
• Czasopismo: Metrology and Measurement Systems
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 31, nr 2
• Strony: 401--416
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Ostrowski Mariusz

• Wroclaw University of Technology, Faculty of Microsystem Electronics and Photonics, Chair of Electronic and Photonic Metrology, Bolesława Prusa 53/55, 50-317 Wroclaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2388-5203

autor

Mroczka Janusz

• Wroclaw University of Technology, Faculty of Microsystem Electronics and Photonics, Chair of Electronic and Photonic Metrology, Bolesława Prusa 53/55, 50-317 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Płachta Kamil

• Wroclaw University of Technology, Faculty of Microsystem Electronics and Photonics, Chair of Electronic and Photonic Metrology, Bolesława Prusa 53/55, 50-317 Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Mesbahi, O., Tlemçani, M., Janeiro, F. M., Hajjaji, A., & Kandoussi, K. (2021). Sensitivity analysis of a new approach to photovoltaic parameters extraction based on the total least squares method. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 28(4), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2021.137707
• [2] Kamarzaman, N. A., & Tan, C. W. (2014). A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 585-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.045
• [3] Ram, J. P., Babu, T. S., & Rajasekar, N. (2017). A comprehensive review on solar PV maximum power point tracking techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 826-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.076
• [4] Goud, J. S., Kalpana, R., Singh, B., & Kumar, S. (2019). A Global Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique of Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Systems for Constant Voltage Applications. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 10(4), 1950-1959. https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2018.2876756
• [5] Lan, J. (2023). Development and performance test of a novel solar tracking sensor. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 30(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2023.144870
• [6] Maziuk, M., Jasińska, L., Domaradzki, J., & Chodasewicz, P. (2023). Imaging methods of detecting defects in photovoltaic solar cells and modules: a survey. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 30(3), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2023.146426
• [7] Chalh, A., El Hammoumi, A., Motahhir, S., El Ghzizal, A., Derouich, A., Masud, M., & AlZain, M. A. (2021). Investigation of Partial Shading Scenarios on a Photovoltaic Array’s Characteristics. Electronics, 11(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11010096
• [8] Bartczak, M. (2017). Partial Shading Detection in Solar System Using Single Short Pulse of Load. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 24(1), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2017-0016
• [9] Salas, V., Olías, E., Barrado, A., & Lázaro, A. (2006). Review of the maximum power point tracking algorithms for stand-alone photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 90(11), 1555-1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2005.10.023
• [10] Katche, M. L., Makokha, A. B., Zachary, S. O., & Adaramola, M. S. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Techniques Used in Solar PV Systems. Energies, 16(5), 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052206
• [11] de Brito, M. A. G., Galotto, L., Sampaio, L. P., e Melo, G. de A., & Canesin, C. A. (2013). Evaluation of the Main MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaic Applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(3), 1156-1167. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2012.2198036
• [12] Tajuddin, M. F. N., Arif, M. S., Ayob, S. M., & Salam, Z. (2015). Perturbative methods for maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of photovoltaic (PV) systems: a review. International Journal of Energy Research, 39(9) 1153-1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3289
• [13] Pathak, D., Sagar, G., & Gaur, P. (2020). An Application of Intelligent Non-linear Discrete-PID Controller for MPPT of PV System. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 1574-1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.368
• [14] Motahhir, S., El Hammoumi, A., & El Ghzizal, A. (2020). The most used MPPT algorithms: Review and the suitable low-cost embedded board for each algorithm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118983
• [15] Premkumar, M., & Sowmya, R. (2019). Certain study on MPPT algorithms to track the global MPP under partial shading on solar PV module/array. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 8(04), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/080409.
• [16] Kermadi, M., Salam, Z., Eltamaly, A. M., Ahmed, J., Mekhilef, S., Larbes, C., & Berkouk, E. M. (2020). Recent developments of MPPT techniques for PV systems under partial shading conditions: a critical review and performance evaluation. IET Renewable Power Generation, 14(17), 3401-3417. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0454
• [17] Harrag, A., & Messalti, S. (2015). Variable step size modified P&O MPPT algorithm using GA-based hybrid offline/online PID controller. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 1247-1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.003
• [18] Karami, N., Moubayed, N., & Outbib, R. (2017). General review and classification of different MPPT Techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.132
• [19] Daraban, S., Petreus, D., & Morel, C. (2013, November). A novel global MPPT based on genetic algorithms for photovoltaic systems under the influence of partial shading. IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2013.6699353
• [20] Ishaque, K., Salam, Z., Amjad, M., & Mekhilef, S. (2012). An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-Based MPPT for PV with Reduced Steady-State Oscillation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(8), 3627-3638. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2012.2185713
• [21] Bollipo, R. B., Mikkili, S., & Bonthagorla, P. K. (2020). Critical Review on PV MPPT Techniques: Classical, Intelligent and Optimisation. IET Renewable Power Generation, 14(9), 1433-1452. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.1163
• [22] Ahmed, J., & Salam, Z. (2014). A Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) for PV system using Cuckoo Search with partial shading capability. Applied Energy, 119, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.062
• [23] Sarvi, M., & Azadian, A. (2021). A comprehensive review and classified comparison of MPPT algorithms in PV systems. Energy Systems, 13(2), 281-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-021-00427-x
• [24] Charin, C., Ishak, D., Mohd Zainuri, M. A. A., & Ismail, B. (2021). Modified Levy Flight Optimization for a Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm under Partial Shading. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 992. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11030992
• [25] Mohapatra, A., Nayak, B., Das, P., & Mohanty, K. B. (2017). A review on MPPT techniques of PV system under partial shading condition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 854-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.083
• [26] Koutroulis, E., & Blaabjerg, F. (2012). A New Technique for Tracking the Global Maximum Power Point of PV Arrays Operating Under Partial-Shading Conditions. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2(2), 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2012.2183578
• [27] Patel, H., & Agarwal, V. (2008). Maximum Power Point Tracking Scheme for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(4), 1689-1698. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2008.917118
• [28] Mroczka, J., & Ostrowski, M. (2014). A Hybrid Maximum Power Point Search Method Using Temperature Measurements in Partial Shading Conditions. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 21(4), 733-740. https://doi.org/10.2478/mms-2014-0056
• [29] Ostrowski, M. (2018, June). An Adaptative OCV and SCC-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for Photovoltaic Panels in the Partial Shading Conditions. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe). https://doi.org/10.1109/eeeic.2018.8493918
• [30] Walczak, M., Bychto, L., Kraśniewski, J., & Duer, S. (2022). Design and evaluation of a low-cost solar simulator and measurement system for low-power photovoltaic panels. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 29(4), 685-700. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2022.143067
• [31] Mroczka, J., & Ostrowski, M. (2014). Photovoltaic array simulation technique for non-uniform insolation conditions. Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal, (12), 1-5. https://www.icrepq.com/icrepq’14/296.14-Mroczka.pdf