PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Research of dynamic processes of the system “Vehicle – Track” using the new method of vehicle wheel with metal scale

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Badanie dynamicznych procesów zachodzących w układzie „pojazd-tor” z wykorzystaniem nowej metody dla kół z metalową łuską
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Mathematical models of vehicle wheel with metal scales are introduced in this article. When analysing the interaction between vehicle wheel with a metal scale and rail in the system “Vehicle – Track”, the changes of the kinematic and dynamic parameters of the wheel and rail contact points in time are examined, depending on the height of the 2 mm metal scale, when the length of the metal scale is 100 mm and the speed of movement is V = 40 - 100 km/h. The results obtained after the research of the system “Vehicle – Track”, when the wheel has a metal scale, help to better understand and evaluate the impact of metal scale on wheel on dynamic loads of rail and vehicle and the regularities of their movement. The appearance of a metal scale on the wheel’s surface causes technical and maintenances problems for the rolling stock. Railway standards limit the speed of movement that depends on a certain size of metal scale.
PL
W niniejszym artykule przedstawiono modele matematyczne koła pojazdu szynowego z powstałą w wyniku zużycia metalową łuską. Analizując oddziaływania pomiędzy kołem pojazdu z łuską a szyną w układzie "pojazd–tor", badano zmiany kinematycznych i dynamicznych parametrów punktów kontaktu koła z szyną zachodzące w czasie, w zależności od wysokości metalowej łuski (2mm), przy długości łuski 100 mm i zakresie prędkości ruchu pojazdu V = 40–100 km/h. Wyniki uzyskane w badaniu układu "pojazd–tor" dla kół na powierzchni których powstała metalowa łuska, umożliwiają lepsze zrozumienie oraz ocenę wpływu łuski na dynamiczne obciążenia szyny i pojazdu oraz prawidłowości ruchu pojazdu. Pojawienie się metalowej łuski na powierzchni koła powoduje problemy techniczne i obsługowe w utrzymaniu ruchu taboru kolejowego. Normy kolejowe ograniczają prędkość ruchu pojazdów szynowych, uzależniając ją od rozmiaru łuski.
Rocznik
Strony
638--649
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • Department of Mobile Machinery and Railway Transport Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Plytines g. 27, 10105 Vilnius, Lithuania
autor
  • Department of study program of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Kaunas University of Applied Engineering Sciences, Tvirtoves al. 35, 50155 Kaunas, Lithuania
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bian J, Gu Y, Murray M H. A dynamic wheel–rail impact analysis of railway track under wheel flat by finite element analysis. Vehicle System Dynamics 2013; 1(6): 784-797, https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.774031.
  • 2. Bogdevicius M, Zygienė R, Dailydka S, Bartulis V, Skrickij V, Pukalskas S. The dynamic behaviour of a wheel flat of a railway vehicle and rail irregularities. Transport 2015; 30(2): 217-232, https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1051108.
  • 3. Bogdevicius M, Zygiene R, Skrickij V, Methodology for the determination of maximum contact vertical wheel loads. Transbaltica 2015: Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Conference, May 7–8, 2015.Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2016; 134: 348-352, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.018.
  • 4. Bogdevicius M, Zygiene R. Simulation dynamic processes of rail vehicle and rail with irregularities. Journal KONES. 2014; 21(2): 48-51, https://doi.org/10.5604/12314005.1133858.
  • 5. Bogdevicius M., Zygiene R., Bureika G., Dailydka S. An analytical mathematical method for calculation of the dynamic wheel–rail impact force caused by wheel flat. Vehicle System Dynamics 2016; 54(5): 689-705, https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2016.1153114.
  • 6. Bureika G,Bekintis G, Liudvinavičius L,Vaičiūnas G.Applying analytic hierarchy processto assesstraffic safety risk ofrailway infrastructure. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2013; 15(4): 376-383.
  • 7. Chudzikiewicz A, Bogacz R St, Kostrzewski M, Konowrocki R. Condition Monitoring of Railway Track Systems by Using Acceleration Signals on Wheelset Axle-Boxes. Transport 2018; 33(2): 30-42, https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2017.1342101.
  • 8. Domin R, Domin I, Cherniak G. Estimation of dynamic performances of the safe operation of highspeed electric train. Archives of Transport 2017; 41(1): 7-16, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0009.7374.
  • 9. Ferrara R, Leonardi G, Jourdan F. Numerical Modelling of Train Induced Vibrations. Procedia– Social and Behavioral Sciences (Sciencedirect) 2012; 53: 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.869
  • 10. Jazykov Vl. Priminenie modeli negercevskogo kontakta kolesa s relsom dlia ocenki dinamicheskix kachestv gruzovogo teplovoza. Dissertacija na soiskanije stepeni kandidata technicheskih nauk. Briansk: BGTU, 2004. (in Russian).
  • 11. KeropyanAM. Determination of Rational Values of the Coefficients of Friction and Roughness of the Surfaces of Rails and Ties Locomotives.Nedelia gorniaka, 2014.
  • 12. Keršys R, Bazaras Ž, Griškevičius P. Vagono vertikalios dinamikos modeliavimas. Transport engineering 1999; 5: 40-42.
  • 13. Konop J, Konowrocki R. On Evaluation of the Wheelsets-Track Interaction Quality in Railway Engineering. Machine Dynamics Research 2013; 37(4): 61-70.
  • 14. Kostrzewski M. Analysis of selected vibroacoustic signals recorded on EMU vehicle running on chosen routes under supervised operating conditions JVE International LTD. Vibroengineering Procedia. Sep. 2017; 13: 2345-0533, https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2017.18958.
  • 15. Kouroussis G, Gazetas G, Anastasopoulos I, Conti C, Verlinden O. Discrete modelling of vertical track–soil coupling for vehicle–track dynamics. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2011; 31(12): 1711-1723, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.007.
  • 16. Kumar V, Rastogi V. Investigation of vertical dynamic behaviour and modelling of a typical Indian rail road vehicle through bond graph. World Journal of Modelling and Simulation 2009; 5(2): 130-138.
  • 17. Nielsen J C O. High-frequency vertical wheel-rail contact forces – Validation of a prediction model by field testing. Wear 2008; 265: 1465-1471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.038.
  • 18. Nielsen J, Igeland A. Vertical dynamic interaction between train and track influence of wheel and track imperfections. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1995; 187(5): 825-839, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.0566.
  • 19. Pieringer A, Kropp W, Nielsen J C O. The influence of contact modelling on simulated wheel/rail interaction due to wheel flats. Wear 2014; 314(1-2): 273-281, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.12.005.
  • 20. Sackfield A, Dini D, Hills D A. Contact of a rotating wheel with a flat. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2007; 44(10): 3304-3316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.025.
  • 21. Sackfield A, Dini D, Hills D A. The contact problem for a wheel having a 'flat'. Wear 2006; 261(11-12): 1265-1270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.009.
  • 22. Shabana A A, Rathod C. Geometric coupling in the wheel/rail contact formulations: a comparative study. Journal of Multi–body Dynamics 2007; 221(2): 147-160, https://doi.org/10.1243/14644193JMBD103.
  • 23. Shabana A A, El–Ghandour A I, Zaazaa K E. Study of the effect of the spiral geometry on wheel/rail contact forces. Journal of Multi–body Dynamics 2011; 225(2): 111-125, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419311406626.
  • 24. Sivilevičius H, Maskeliūnaitė L. The numerical example for evaluating the criteria describing the quality of the trip by international. E&M Economics and Management 2014; 2: 73-86, https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-006.
  • 25. Sladkowski A, Sitarz M. Analysis of wheel–rail interaction using FE software. Wear 2005; 258(7–8), 1217-1223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.032.
  • 26. TNN. Techninio gelezinkelių naudojimo nuostatai. Lietuvos Respublikos susisiekimo ministro 1996 m. rugsėjo 20 d. įsakymas Nr. 297.
  • 27. Turskis Z, Zavadskas E K. A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport 2010; 25: 423-432, https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.52.
  • 28. Vasauskas V, Bazaras Ž, Čapas V. Strength anisotropy of railway wheels under contact load. Mechanika 2005; 1(51): 31-38.
  • 29. Wang K, Liu P F, Zhai W, Huang Ch, Chen Z, Gao J. Wheel/rail dynamic interaction due to excitation of rail corrugation in high–speed railway. Special Topic: High–speed Railway Infrastructure 2015; 58(2): 226-235, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5633-y.
  • 30. Wasiwitono U, Zheng D, Chiu W K. How useful is track acceleration for monitoring impact loads generated by wheel defects? In Proc. Of the 5th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, ACAM 2007, 10–12 December 2007, Brisbane, Australia, 2007: 502-507.
  • 31. ZygienėR,Bogdevicius M, Dabulevicienė L.Amathematical model and simulation results ofthe dynamic system railway vehicle wheel–track with a wheel flat. Science – The future of Lithuania: Transport engineering, 2014; 6(5): 95-101, https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2014.696.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4a0b741a-d173-4f61-9d6f-7d4dc5c2ce33
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.