Lithofacies and terrestrial sedimentary environments in AMS measurements: case study from Neogene of Oravica River section, Čimhová, Slovakia.

Łoziński, M.; Ziółkowski, P.; Wysocka, A.

doi:10.7306/gq.1293

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Lithofacies and terrestrial sedimentary environments in AMS measurements: case study from Neogene of Oravica River section, Čimhová, Slovakia.

Autorzy

Łoziński M. , Ziółkowski P. , Wysocka A.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Łoziński_M_Lthofacies_Geol. Quart_Vol. 60_No 2_2016.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7306/gq.1293

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) of sedimentary rocks has been used for interpreting wide range of processes: early rock deformations, palaeotransport directions, as well as the evolution of mineral content. Various sedimentary factors which may determine magnetic susceptibility within lacustrine, river, floodplain and swamp deposits have been examined in the Oravica section of the Orava-Nowy Targ Basin. Multiple components of mineral content: illite, chlorite, smectite, kaolinite, quartz and unidentified high susceptibility phase make an AMS interpretation of this content ambiguous. However, this method may be useful for tracing early diagenetic geochemical/microbial processes where iron element is involved. Some sedimentary processes may be recognized from AMS when an assemblage of parameters is studied together: bulk susceptibility, the degree and the shape of anisotropy, principal directions, and the distribution of all these parameters within a set of specimens. Debris-flow processes, as well as lacustrine and floodplain sedimentation are especially well-defined in AMS results. Palaeotransport directions are ambiguous because studied rocks have undergone weak deformation what overprints this sedimentary feature. Most specimens represent an oblate shape of anisotropy and show a good correlation of minimum susceptibility axis and normal to bedding plane.

Słowa kluczowe

anisotropy magnetic susceptibility facies analysis terrestrial environments Neogene Orava-Nowy Targ Basin

Wydawca

Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

Czasopismo

Geological Quarterly

Rocznik

2016

Tom

Vol. 60, No. 2

Strony

259--272

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 46 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Łoziński M.

maciej.lozinski@student.uw.edu.pl

University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geology, Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland

autor

Ziółkowski P.

University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geology, Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland

autor

Wysocka A.

University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geology, Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland

Bibliografia

1. Baumgart-Kotarba, M., 1996. On ori gin and age of the Orava Basin, West Carpathians. Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica, 30: 101-116.
2. Baumgart-Kotarba, M., 2001. Continuous tectonic evolution of the Orava basin from Late Badenian to the present-day. Geologica Carpathica, 52: 103-110.
3. Bojanowski, M., Jaroszewicz, E., Košir, A., Łoziński, M., Marynowski, L., Wysocka, A., Derkowski, A., 2016. Root-related rhodochrosite and concretionary siderite formation in oxygen-deficient conditions induced by a ground-water table rise. Sedimentology, 63: 523-551.
4. Callaway, W.S., McAtee, J.L., 1985. Magnetic susceptibilities of representative smectites. American Mineralogist, 70: 996-1003.
5. Chadima, M., Jelínek, V., 2009. Anisoft 4.2: anisotropy data browser for Windows. AGICO, Brno, Czech Republic, http://www.agico.com
6. Chung, F.H., 1974a. Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. I. Matrix-flushing method for quantitative multicomponent analysis. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 7: 51 9-525.
7. Chung, F.H., 1974b. Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. II. Adiabatic principle of X-ray diffraction analysis of mixtures. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 7: 526-531.
8. Copons, R., Parés, J.M., Dinarès-Turell, J., Bordonau, J., 1997. Sampling induced AMS in soft sediments: a case study in holocene glaciolacustrine rhythmites from Lake Barrancs (Central Pyrenees, Spain). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 22: 137-141.
9. Garecka, M., 2005. Calcareous nannoplankton from the Podhale Flysch (Oligocene-Miocene, Inner Carpathians, Poland). Studia Geologica Polonica, 124: 353-370.
10. Graham, J.W., 1954. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy, an unexploited petrofabric element. GSA Bulletin, 65: 1257-1258.
11. Graham, J.W., 1966. Significance of magnetic anisotropy in Appalachian sedimentary rocks. Geophysical Monograph Series, 10: 627-648.
12. Gross, P., Köhler, E., Haško, J., Halouzka, R., Mello, J., Nagy, A., 1993. Geológia juźnej a východnej Oravy (in Slovak) (Geology of southern and eastern Orava). Štátny Geologický Ústav Dionýza Štúra. Bratislava.
13. Hrouda, F., 1982. Magnetic anisotropy of rocks and its application in geology and geophysics. Geofyzika, Brno: 37-82.
14. Hunt, C.P., Moskowitz, B.M., Banerjee, S.K., 1995. Magnetic properties of rocks and minerals. In: Rock Physics and Phase Relations: a Handbook of Physical Constants (ed. T.J. Ahrens). AGU Reference Shelf, 3: 189-204.
15. Ising, G., 1942. On the magnetic properties of varved clay. Arkiv för Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik, 29a: 1-37.
16. Jaroszewicz, E., Grafka, O., Marynowski, L., 2013. Source-indicating and maturity-related biomarkers from Miocene deposits from Orava-Nowy Targ basin - preliminary results. 30th Annual Meeting of the TSOP 2013, Sosnowiec, Poland: 56.
17. Jelínek, V., 1977. The statistical theory of measuring anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks and its application. Geofyzika, Brno: 1-88.
18. Jelínek, V., 1978. Statistical processing of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility measured on groups of specimens. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 22: 50-62.
19. Kanamatsu, T., Herrero-Bervera, E., Taira, A., 2001. Magnetic fabrics of soft-sediment folded strata within a neogene accretionary complex, the Miura group, central Japan. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 187: 333-343.
20. Kawamura, K., Ogawa, Y., 2004. Progressive change of pelagic clay microstructure during burial process: examples from piston cores and ODP cores. Marine Geology, 207: 131-144.
21. Kołcon, I., Wagner, M., 1991. Brown coal from Neogene sediments of the Orawa-Nowy Targ basin - petrological study (in Polish with English summary). Geological Quarterly, 35 (3): 305-322.
22. Lexa, J., Bezák, V., Elečko, M., Mello, J., Polák, M., Potfaj, M., Vozár, J., 2000. Geo logi cal Map of the Western Carpathians and Adj acent Areas, 1:500 000. Geo i ogi cal Survey of Slovak Republic, Bratislava.
23. Łoziński, M., Wysocka, A., Ludwiniak, M., 2015. Neogene terrestrial sedimentary environments of the Orava-Nowy Targ Basin: a case study of the Oravica River section near Čimhová, Slovakia. Geological Quarterly, 59 (1): 21-34.
24. Martín-Hernández, F., Hirt, A.M., 2003. The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in biotite, muscovite and chlorite single crystals. Tectonophysics, 367: 13-28.
25. Mazzoli, S., Szaniawski, R., Mittiga, F., Ascione, A., Capalbo, A., 2012. Tectonic evolution of Pliocene-Pleistocene wedge-top basins of the southern Apennines: new constraints from magnetic fabric analysis. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49:492-509.
26. Nagy, A., Vass, D., Petrík, F., Pereszlényi, M., 1996. Tectogenesis of the Orava Depression in the light of latest biostratigraphic investigations and organic matter alteration studies. Slovak Geological Magazine, 1/96: 49-58.
27. Olszewska, B., Wieczorek, J., 1998. The Paleogene of the Podhale Basin (Polish Inner Carpathians) - micropaleontological perspective (in Polish with English summary). Przegląd Geologiczny, 46: 721-728.
28. Parés, J.M., 2015. Sixty years of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in deformed sedimentary rocks. Frontiers in Earth Science, 3: 1-12.
29. Parés, J.M., van der Pluijm, B.A., Dinarès-Turell, J., 1999. Evolution of magnetic fabrics during incipient deformation of mudrocks (Pyrenees, northern Spain). Tectonophysics, 307: 1-14.
30. Pešková, I., Vojtko, R., Starek, D., Sliva, L., 2009. Late Eocene to Quaternary deformation and stress field evolution of the Orava region (Western Carpathians). Acta Geologica Polonica, 59: 73-91.
31. Pomianowski, P., 2003. Tectonics of the Orava-Nowy Targ Basin - results of the combined analysis of the gravity and geoelectrical data (in Polish with English summary). Przegląd Geologiczny, 51 : 498-506.
32. R Core Team, 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org
33. RStudio Team, 2015. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com
34. Shimono, T., Yamazaki, T., Inoue, S., 2014. Influence of sampling on magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of soft sediments: comparison between gravity and piston cores. Earth, Planets and Space, 66 (3).
35. Soták, J., 1998a. Sequence stratigtaphy approach to the Central Carpathian Paleogene (Eastern Slovakia): eustasy and tectonics as controls of deep sea fan deposition. Slovak Geological Magazine, 4: 185-190.
36. Soták, J., 1998b. Central Carpathian Paleogene and its constraints. Slovak Geological Magazine, 4: 203-211.
37. Sikora, W., Wieser, T., 1974. Utwory piroklastyczne w utworach neogeńskich śródgórskiej niecki Orawy-Nowego Targu (in Polish). Kwartalnik Geologiczny, 18 (2): 441-443.
38. Struska, M., 2008. Neogeńsko-czwartorzędowy rozwój strukturalny Kotliny Orawskiej w świetle badań geologicznych, geomorfologicznych oraz teledetekcyjnych (in Polish). Ph.D thesis, Wydział Geologii, Geofizyki i Ochrony Środowiska, AGH, Kraków.
39. Tarling, D.H., Hrouda, F., 1993. The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks. Chapman and Hall, London.
40. Tokarski, A.K., Zuchiewicz, W., 1998. Fractured clasts in the Domański Wierch series: Contribution to structural evolution of the Orava Basin (Carpathians, Poland) during Neogene through Quaternary times (in Polish with English summary). Przegląd Geologiczny, 46: 62-66.
41. Tokarski, A.K., Świerczewska, A., Zuchiewicz, W., Starek, D., Fodor, L., 2012. Quaternary exhumation of the Carpathians: a record from the Orava-Nowy Targ Intramontane Basin, Western Carpathians (Poland and Slovakia). Geologica Carpathica, 63: 257-266.
42. Watycha, L., 1976. The Neogene of the Orava-Nowy Targ Basin (in Polish with English summary). Geological Quarterly, 20 (3): 575-585.
43. Wickham, H., 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York.
44. Wiewióra, A., Wyrwicki, R., 1980. Clay minerals of the Neogene sediments in the Orava-Nowy Targ basin (in Polish with English summary). Geological Quarterly, 24 (2): 333-348.
45. Winkler, A., Alfonsi, L., Florindo, F., Sagnotti, L., Speranza, F., 1997. The magnetic anisotropy of rocks: principles, techniques and geodynamic applications in the Italian peninsula. Annals of Geophysics, 40: 729-740.
46. Ziółkowski, P., Hinnov, L.A., 2010. High-resolution cyclo- stratigraphic analysis of the magnetic susceptibility record from the Upper Bajocian to Upper Bathonian of Central Poland and the mineralogical link between magnetic susceptibility and palaeoclimatic changes. Earth Science Frontiers, 17: 37.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-496d731c-5526-42be-bebb-e0fec4875097