Methane fermentation of poultry manure — shortcomings and advantages of the technology: fermentation or co-fermentation?

• Autorzy: Sakiewicz P. , Cebula J. , Piotrowski K. , Bohdziewicz J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24426/eco-energetics.v2i2.114

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Overcoming of technological barriers in methane fermentation of substrates including poultry manure derived from poultry-breeding industry is regarded as one of strategic trends in biogas-technology development. The essential limitations and possibilities of such substrates for biogas production is presented here. It should be emphasized, that biogas production based on poultry manure from industrial-scale farms is effective solution of important ecological problem with simultaneous production of green energy and efficient solution of odours emission from the poultry breeding farm. Methane co-fermentation of post-processed bedding premixed with poultry manure solves, at least partly, problem of correct C/N ratio in the substrate mixture.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

methane fermentation; biogas; poultry breeding industry; poultry manure; co-fermentation

• Wydawca: Gdańska Szkoła Wyższa
• Czasopismo: Eco-Energetics : technologies, environment, law and economy
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: T. 2
• Strony: 97--104
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Sakiewicz P.

• Institute of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland

autor

Cebula J.

• Institute of Environmental Protection and Engineering, Faculty of Materials and Environmental Sciences, University of Bielsko-BialaI

autor

Piotrowski K.

• Department of Chemical Engineering and Process Design, Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland

autor

Bohdziewicz J.

• Institute of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Albertson, O.E. (1961). Ammonia nitrogen and the anaerobic environment. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 33, 978–995.
• 2. Bharathiraja, B., Sudharsana, T., Jayamuthunagai, J., Praveenkumar, R., Chozhavendhan, S., Iyyappan, J. (2018). Biogas production — A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 570–582.
• 3. Braun, R., Huber, P., Meyrath, J., (1981). Ammonia toxicity in liquid piggery manure digestion. Biotechnology Letters, 3, 159–164.
• 4. Koster, I.W., Lettinga, G., (1988). Anaerobic digestion at extreme ammonia concentrations. Biological Wastes, 25, 51–59.
• 5. Melbinger, N.R., Donnellon, J. (1971). Toxic effects of ammonia nitrogen in high-rate digestion. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 43, 1658–1670.
• 6. Nakakubo, R., Moller, H.B., Nielsen, A.M., Matsuda, J. (2008). Ammonia inhibition of methanogenesis and identification of process indicators during anaerobic digestion. Environmental Engineering Science, 25, 1487–1496.
• 7. Van Velsen, A.F.M. (1979). Adaptation of methanogenic sludge to high ammonia nitrogen concentrations. Water Research, 13, 995–999.
• 8. Walker, M., Iyer, K., Heaven, S., Banks, C.J. (2011). Ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion by biogas stripping: An evaluation of process alternatives using a first order rate model based on experimental findings. Chemical Engineering Journal, 178, 138–145.
• 9. Yenigun, O., Demirel, B. (2013). Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: A review. Process Biochemistry, 48, 901–911.
• 10. Yetilmezsoy, K., Sapci-Zengin, Z. (2009). Recovery of ammonium nitrogen from the effluent of UASB treating poultry manure wastewater by MAP precipitation as a slow release fertilizer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 166, 260–269.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).