Experimental and numerical investigation on non-welding CFDST joint for seismic evaluation of moment resisting frame

• Autorzy: Guo Lei , Wang Jingfeng , Wang Wanqian , Liu Yong

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-020-00167-2

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper aims to evaluate the seismic performance of concrete filled double-skin steel tubular (CFDST) frame structures. An experimental investigation on internal joints to CFDST columns was conducted to assess their seismic behavior, in which non-welding connection method was employed to avoid possible premature welding fracture. Experimental results declared that this type of joint behaved in a semi-rigid manner. Numerical models were then established to simulate the seismic performance of the joints. The moment–rotation relationship and shear behavior of panel zone were both accounted according to the component method and strut model, respectively. Subsequently, a CFDST moment resisting frame with non-welding connections (NWF) was numerically analyzed to detect its seismic response under design-based and maximum considered earthquakes. The numerical results confirmed that the NWF could lower the seismic response in terms of base shear force and joint moment compared with namely rigid frame (NRF). It also verified that the maximum story drift ratios of the NWF were higher than those of the NWF. Increment dynamic analyses (IDA) were also performed to evaluate the collapse behavior. Furthermore, a detailed discussion was conducted to analyze the influence of joint stiffness on global behavior of the NWF. The analytical results verified that this type of NWF had satisfied seismic behavior and excellent anti-collapse performance. More importantly, the NWF could conveniently adjust the stiffness of each story by varying the stiffness of the non-welding connection to decrease the story drift and to achieve a uniform story drift distribution.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

circular concrete filled double-skin steel tubular; non-welding joint; seismic performance; time history analysis; numerical model

PL

rura stalowa; model numeryczny; badania sejsmiczne

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 21, no. 2
• Strony: 128--145
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Guo Lei

• School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China

autor

Wang Jingfeng

• School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6013-5618

autor

Wang Wanqian

• School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China

autor

Liu Yong

• School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China
• Anhui Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structures and Materials, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China

Bibliografia

• [1] Mahin SA. Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the North ridge earthquake. Eng Struct. 1998;20:261–70.
• [2] Wang JF, Guo L, Guo X, Ding ZD. Seismic response investigation on CFDST column to steel beam blind-bolted connections. J Constr Steel Res. 2019;161:137–53.
• [3] Guo L, Wang JF, Wu SC, Zhong LP. Experimental investigation and analytical modelling of blind bolted flush or extended end plate connections to circular CFDST columns. Eng Struct. 2019;192:233–53.
• [4] Mark DD, Jerome FH, Tiziano P, Roberto TL. Seismic performance factors for moment frames with steel-concrete composite columns and steel beams. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2016;45:1685–703.
• [5] Braconi A, Bursi OS, Salvatore W, Taucer F, Tremblay R. Seismic performance of a 3D full-scale high-ductile steel–concrete composite moment-resisting frame-Part II: test results and analytical validation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2008;37:1635–55.
• [6] Konstantinos AS, George DH, Dimitri EB. Modeling level selection for seismic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube/moment-resisting frames by using fragility curves. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2015;44:199–220.
• [7] He WH, Xiao Y, Guo YR, Fan YL. Pseudo-dynamic testing of hybrid frame with steel beams bolted to CFT columns. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;88:123–33.
• [8] Wang JF, Pan XB, Peng X. Pseudo-dynamic tests of assembly blind bolted composite frames to CFST columns. J Constr Steel Res. 2017;139:83–100.
• [9] Wang JF, Wang JX, Wang HT. Seismic behavior of blind bolted CFST frames with semi-rigid connections. Structures. 2017;9:91–104.
• [10] Hu Y, Zhao JH, Zhang DF, Chen C. Experimental seismic performance of CFDST- steel beam frames with different construction details. J Constr Steel Res. 2019;162:105736.
• [11] EN 1993-1-8 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures-Part 1–8: design of joints.
• [12] Montuori R, Piluso V, Troisi M. Theory of plastic mechanism control of seismic resistant MR-frames with set-backs. Open Construct Build Technol J. 2012;6:404–13.
• [13] GB50017-2017. Code for design of steel structures. Beijing: China Plan Press; 2017. ((in Chinese)).
• [14] FEMA. Quantification of building seismic performance factors, FEMA-P695. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2009.
• [15] ATC-24. Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council; 1992.
• [16] Huang H, Han LH, Tao Z, Zhao XL. Analytical behavior of concrete-filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST) beam-columns under cyclic loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2009;47:668–80.
• [17] Susantha KAS, Ge H, Usami T. Uniaxial stress-strain relationship of concrete confined by various shaped steel tubes. Eng Struct. 2001;23(10):1331–47.
• [18] Fukumoto T, Morita K. Elastoplastic behavior of panel zone in steel beam-to-concrete filled steel tube column moment connections. J Struct Eng. 2005;131(12):1841–53.
• [19] Li W, Han LH. Seismic performance of CFST column to steel beam joint with RC slab: joint model. J Constr Steel Res. 2012;73(11):66–79.
• [20] Yee YL, Melchers RE. Moment-rotation curves for bolted connections. J Struct Eng. 1986;112:625–35.
• [21] GB50010-2010. Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Plan Press; 2010. ((in Chinese)).
• [22] Krawinkler H, Medina R, Alavi B. Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions. Eng Struct. 2003;25(5):637–53.
• [23] Razavi M, Abolmaali A. Earthquake resistance frames with combination of rigid and semi-rigid connections. J Constr Steel Res. 2014;98:1–11.
• [24] Chao SH, Goel SC, Lee SS. A seismic design lateral force distribution based on inelastic state of structures. Earthq Spectra. 2007;23(3):547–69.
• [25] ASCE Task Committee. Design criteria for composite structures in steel and concrete, design guide for partially restrained composite connections. J Struct Eng ASCE. 1998;124(10):1099–114.