PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Biosurfactant Produced by Indigenous Bacteria During Composting Process of Crude Oil Polluted Soil: Properties and Role

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Bacterial co-metabolism in composting process has been widely used to remove hydrocarbons, aided by in-situ production of bio-based surfactants, in terms of compost humic acid-like substances and biosurfactants. The properties of compost humic acid-like substances have been shown in previous studies as potential surface tension reducers and emulsifiers for hydrocarbons. The current study aimed to analyze the properties of biosurfactant of surface tension decrease, emulsification activity, and hydrocarbon solubilization ability. Four indigenous bacteria consortia were isolated from composted materials of yard waste, rumen residue, crude oil-polluted soil, and the mixture of polluted soil with organic waste (1:1, w/w) at day 0th, 20th, 40th, and 60th. Organic waste consists of yard waste and rumen residue in the ratio of 1:1. The isolated indigenous bacteria consortia were incubated for 7 days in different media, i.e., organic waste extract, 6.00% of crude oil, and a mixture of organic waste extract with 6.00% crude oil. The results indicated that the surface tension decrease and emulsification activity of biosurfactants were 8.35–52.90 mN m-1 and 0.00–12.00%, respectively, which showed the potential as surface tension reducers with low emulsification activity. The higher hydrocarbon solubility was shown by the biosurfactant from the rumen residue (13 620 µg g-1) and the mixture (10 998 µg g-1) at day 40th, which was comparable to 1.50% of Tween 80. The biosurfactants in the current research were produced with the same materials, process, and time as compost humic acid-like substances which acts as in-situ bio-based surfactants. The respective ability to solubilize hydrocarbon might be combined and estimated to be higher than Tween 80 of 24 329 µg g-1 and 21 619 µg g-1 for rumen residue and the mixture, respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that the best composition for in-situ bio-based surfactant production to assist the degradation of hydrocarbon through composting process is polluted soil with organic waste (1:1, w/w). The solubility of hydrocarbons can be increased without synthetic surfactants addition, but through providing nutrients to maintain in-situ bio-based surfactant production with intermittent addition of organic waste every 40 days. This method is expected to be an appropriate approach in composting development as a cost-effective sustainable bioremediation technique for polluted soil.
Rocznik
Strony
297--314
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 45 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Jl. H.S. Ronggowaluyo, Puseurjaya, Telukjambe Timur, Karawang, West Java 41361, Indonesia
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil, Planning and Geo Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Jl. Raya ITS, Keputih, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia
  • Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno, Mulyorejo, Surabaya, East Java 60115, Indonesia
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil, Planning and Geo Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Jl. Raya ITS, Keputih, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia
  • Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Jl. H.S. Ronggowaluyo, Puseurjaya, Telukjambe Timur, Karawang, West Java 41361, Indonesia
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Jl. Jenderal Achmad Yani, Banjarbaru, South Kalimantan 70714, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999. Toxicological profile for total petroleum hydrocarbons. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta.
  • 2. Aguirre-Noyola J.L., Romero Ramírez Y., Ruvalcaba Ledezma J.C., Forero Forero A.V., León Rodríguez R., Toribio Jimenez J. 2020. Biosurfactants produced by metal-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Zea mays rhizosphere and compost. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 12, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.3849
  • 3. APHA-AWWA-WEF. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  • 4. ASTM D 1331. 2000. Annual book of ASTM standards: Soaps and other detergents, polishes, leather, resilient floor covering.
  • 5. ASTM D7066-04. 2011. Standard test method for dimer/trimer of chlorotrifluoroethylene (S-316) recoverable oil and grease and nonpolar material by infrared determination.
  • 6. Bamforth S.M., Singleton I. 2005. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 80, 723–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1276
  • 7. Bezza F.A., Chirwa E.M.N. 2015. Production and applications of lipopeptide biosurfactant for bioremediation and oil recovery by Bacillus subtilis CN2. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 101, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.05.007
  • 8. Cameotra S.S., Makkar R.S. 2004. Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules. Current Opinion in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.006
  • 9. Cerqueira V.S., Hollenbach E.B., Maboni F., Vainstein M.H., Camargo F.A.O., Peralba M. do C.R., Bento F.M. 2011. Biodegradation potential of oily sludge by pure and mixed bacterial cultures. Bioresource Technology, 102, 11003–11010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.074
  • 10. Chaprão M.J., Ferreira I.N.S., Correa P.F., Rufino R.D., Luna J.M., Silva E.J., Sarubbo L.A. 2015. Application of bacterial and yeast biosurfactants for enhanced removal and biodegradation of motor oil from contaminated sand. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 18, 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.09.005
  • 11. Fatimah. 2007. Biosurfactant Production Assay by Pseudomonas sp. on Different Substrates. Berkala Penelitian Hayati, 12, 181–185.
  • 12. Fenibo E.O., Ijoma G.N., Selvarajan R., Chikere C.B. 2019. Microbial surfactants: The next generation multifunctional biomolecules for applications in the petroleum industry and its associated environmental remediation. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7110581
  • 13. Hamzah A., Sabturani N., Radiman S. 2013. Screening and Optimization of Biosurfactant Production by the Hydrocarbon-degrading Bacteria. Sains Malaysiana, 42, 615–623.
  • 14. Handa S.S. 2008. An overview of extraction techniques for medicinal and aromatic plants.In: Handa, S.S., Khanuja S.P.S., Longo G., Rakesh D.D. (Eds.), Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. International Centre for Science and High Technology, Trieste, 1–33.
  • 15. Heryani H., Putra M.D. 2017. Kinetic study and modeling of biosurfactant production using Bacillus sp. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 27, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.03.005
  • 16. Hesnawi R.M., Mogadami F.S. 2013. Bioremediation of Libyan Crude Oil-Contaminated Soil under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions. APCBEE Procedia, 5, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2013.05.015
  • 17. Jahanshah G., Nahvi I., Zarkesh-Esfahani S.H., Ghanavati H., Khodaverdi H., Barani M. 2013. Enhancing compost quality by using whey-grown biosurfactant-producing bacteria as inocula. Annals of Microbiology, 63, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0448-1
  • 18. Jatnika A., Hadrah D. 2015. Solid/liquid ratio optimization of soil washing technique for contaminated soil from crude oil exploration process. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 21, 57–65.
  • 19. Jiménez-Peñalver P., Koh A., Gross R., Gea T., Font X. 2019. Biosurfactants from Waste: Structures and Interfacial Properties of Sophorolipids Produced from a Residual Oil Cake. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 23, 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsde.12366
  • 20. Kazemi K. 2017. Solid Waste Composting and the Application of Compost for Biosurfactant Production. Newfoundland and Labrador.
  • 21. Kulikowska D., Gusiatin Z.M., Bułkowska K., Kierklo K. 2015. Humic substances from sewage sludge compost as washing agent effectively remove Cu and Cd from soil. Chemosphere, 136, 42–49. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.083
  • 22. Li J.L., Chen B.H. 2009. Surfactant-mediated biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2010076
  • 23. Mizwar A., Sari G.L., Juliastuti S.R., Trihadiningrum Y. 2016. Bioremediation of soil contaminated with native polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from unburnt coal using an in-vessel composting method. Bioremediation Journal, 20, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2015.1124064
  • 24. Mulligan C.N. 2021. Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Soil Using Biosurfactants. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.635196
  • 25. Myers D. 2005. Surfactant Science and Technology, 3th ed. John Wiley & Son, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • 26. Ni'matuzahroh, Puspitasari A.O., Pratiwi I.A., Fatimah, Sumarsih S., Surtiningsih T., Salamun. 2016. Oil removal from petroleum sludge using bacterial culture with molasses substrate at temperature variation, in: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4943312
  • 27. Pacwa-Płociniczak M., Płaza G.A., Piotrowska-Seget Z., Cameotra S.S. 2011. Environmental applications of biosurfactants: Recent advances. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010633
  • 28. Pratiwi I.A. 2012. Effect of Varying Concentration of Crude Enzyme Lipase Micrococcus sp. L II 61 and Biosurfactant Acinetobacter sp. P2(1) to the Solubility of Oil Sludge. Surabaya.
  • 29. Pruthi V., Cameotra S.S. 1997. Short Communication: Production of a biosurfactant exhibiting excellent emulsification and surface active properties by Serratia marcescens. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 13, 133–135.
  • 30. Raza Z.A., Rehman A., Khan M.S., Khalid Z.M. 2007. Improved production of biosurfactant by a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant using vegetable oil refinery wastes. Biodegradation, 18, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-006-9047-9
  • 31. Rosenberg E., Delong E.F., Lory S., Stackebrandt E., Thompson F. 2011. The prokaryotes: applied bacteriology and biotechnology, 4th ed.
  • 32. Sakthipriya N., Doble M., Sangwai J.S. 2015. Action of biosurfactant producing thermophilic Bacillus subtilis on waxy crude oil and long chain paraffins. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 105, 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.09.004
  • 33. Sari G.L., Trihadiningrum Y., Ni'matuzahroh. 2019. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in crude oil contaminated soil from wonocolo public oilfields using aerobic composting with yard waste and rumen residue amendments. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 7, 482–492. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0262
  • 34. Sari G.L., Trihadiningrum Y., Ni'matuzahroh 2018a. Petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in soil and surface water by public oil fields in Wonocolo sub-district, Indonesia. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 19, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/82800
  • 35. Sari G.L., Trihadiningrum Y., Suci F.C., Hadining A.F. 2018b. Identification of total petroleum hydrocarbon and heavy metals levels in crude oil contaminated soil at wonocolo public mining. EnvironmentAsia, 11, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2018.26
  • 36. Sari G.L., Trihadiningrum Y., Wulandari D.A., Pandebesie E.S., Warmadewanthi I.D.A.A. 2018c. Compost humic acid-like isolates from composting process as bio-based surfactant: Properties and feasibility to solubilize hydrocarbon from crude oil contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 225, 356– 363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.010
  • 37. Sayara T., Sarrà M., Sánchez A. 2010. Effects of compost stability and contaminant concentration on the bioremediation of PAHs-contaminated soil through composting. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 179, 999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.104
  • 38. Sharma R., Chisti Y., Chand Banerjee U. 2001. Production, purification, characterization, and applications of lipases. Biotechnology Advances, 19, 627–662.
  • 39. Singh A., van Hamme J.D., Ward O.P. 2007. Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnology Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.10.004
  • 40. Torres L.G., Aguirre A.L., Verdejo A., Iturbe R. 2005. Enhanced soil-washing treatment for soils which are highly contaminated with crude oil. In: WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. WIT Press, 541–550.
  • 41. Trihadiningrum Y., Barakwan R.A., Sari G.L., Pandebesie E.S., Warmadewanthi I.D.A.A. 2018. Hydrocarbon Removal in Oil-Contaminated Soil Using In-Vessel Composting with Yard Waste and Rumen Waste. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 22, 04018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hz.2153-5515.0000412
  • 42. Tuleva B., Christova N., Jordanov B., NikolovaDamyanova B., Petrov P. 2005. Naphthalene degradation and biosurfactant activity by Bacillus cereus 28BN. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung Section C Journal of Biosciences, 60, 577–582. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2005-7-811
  • 43. Zhang B.Y., Huang G.H., Chen B., Guo Y., Zeng G.M. 2002. Production of biosurfactants in batch reactor for food waste comporting, in: Waste Management and the Environment. WIT Press, 131–140.
  • 44. Zhang J., Li G., Yang F., Xu N., Fan H., Yuan T., Chen L. 2012. Hydrophobically modified sodium humate surfactant: Ultra-low interfacial tension at the oil/water interface. Applied Surface Science, 259, 774–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.120
  • 45. Zhou W., Wang X., Chen C., Zhu L. 2013. Enhanced soil washing of phenanthrene by a plant-derived natural biosurfactant, Sapindus saponin. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 425, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.055
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4897b2a9-3366-4e56-8c08-dcdb89e98c38
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.