The future of knowledge organization and information organization

• Autorzy: Ohly H. P.
• Konferencja: ‘The Future of Knowledge Organization and ISKO’ - 13th conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) 2014 in Krakow
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

On the 13th conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) 2014 in Krakow a panel was held on ‘The Future of Knowledge Organization and ISKO’. Here a synopsis with additional information and more dense presentation is given by a panelist. The main items were: What is knowledge organization (KO)? What will be the most challenging for ISKO and KO in the future? What is your ideal picture of ISKO and KO of the future? The results were inter alia that KO is a general discipline and applicable in many areas, though it is mostly perceived as part of information and library science. To ameliorate its standing not only the fundamentals have to be worked out but also its diverse application fields and openness to new objects and methods. To integrate cultural and semantic diversity has to be seen as an important point.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

information; organization

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informacji Naukowej
• Czasopismo: PTINT Praktyka i Teoria Informacji Naukowej i Technicznej
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: T. 24, nr 2-3
• Strony: 63--70
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Ohly H. P.

• International Society for Knowledge Organization

Bibliografia

• [1] Buckland M. K.: Knowledge organization and the technology of intellectual work. In.: Babik W.: Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects. Proceedings of the 13th International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014 Kraków, Poland. Würzburg: Ergon, 2014, 14-21.
• [2] Capurro R.: Towards an Information Ecology. In.: Wormell, I.: Information Quality.Definitions and Dimensions. London 1990, 122-139, updated 2011. http:In.:www.capurro.de/nordinf.htm
• [3] Dahlberg I.: How to improve ISKO’s standing: ten desiderata for knowledge organization. “Knowl. Org.” 2011, Vol. 38, no. 1, 68-74.
• [4] Dahlberg I.: Concepts and terms: ISKO’s major challenge. “Knowl. Org.” 2009, Vol. 36 No., 2/3, 169-177.
• [5] Dahlberg I.: On the theory of the concept. In.: Neelameghan, A.: Ordering Systems for Global Information Networks; Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Classification Research, Bombay, India, January 6–11, 1975. Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, 1979, 54–63.
• [6] De Beer C. S: The troubadour of knowledge:a knowledge worker for the new knowledge age. In.: Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 11th International ISKO Conference. Würzburg: Ergon, 2010, 430-437.
• [7] DIN 2330 (1993). Begriffe und Benennungen – Allgemeine Grundsätze (concepts and esignations– general principles). Berlin: Beuth, 1988, updated: 1993, 2013.
• [8] Green R.: ISKO and Knowledge Organization’s 25th Anniversary: The Future of Knowledge Organization and ISKO. Panel Discussion. “Knowl. Org.” 2014, Vol. 41 no. 4, 327-331. See also: http://iskobrasil. org.br/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/relat_iskoCrac%C3%B3via2014.pdf
• [9] ISO 704 (2009). Terminology work - Principles and methods. 2000, updated: Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2009.
• [10] Hjørland B.: Theories of knowledge organization - Theories of knowledge. “Knowl. Org.” 2013, Vol. 40, no. 3: 169-81.
• [11] López-Huertas M. J.: Exploring the boundaries of knowledge organization. Towards future projects. In.: Babik, W.: Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects. Proceedings of the 13th International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014 Kraków, Poland. Würzburg: Ergon, 2014, 564-571.
• [12] McIlwaine, Ia C.; Mitchell J. S.: Preface to Special Issue. ‘What is Knowledge Organization’. “Knowl. Org.” 2008, Vol. 35, no. 2/3.
• [13] Ranganathan S.R.: Prolegomena to Library Classification. In.: The Five Laws of Library Science 1967, 1-73. http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/106370
• [14] Rodríguez-Bárcenas G.; López-Huertas M. J.: Saaty's analytic hierarchies method for knowledge organization in decision making.“Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology” 2013, Vol. 64, 7 (July), p 1454–1467.
• [15] San Segundo M., R.: From the invalidity of a general classification theory to a new organization of knowledge for the millennium to come. In.: Ohly, H. P.; Netscher, S.; Mitgusch, K.: Kompatibilität: Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation (Compatability, media and ethics in knowledge organization). Proceedings of the 10. conference of the German ISKO, Vienna, July 2006, Ergon: Würzburg 2008, p.12-17.
• [16] Serres M.:. Le Tiers-Instruit. Pans 1991. (published in English as: The Troubadour of Knowledge, University of Michigan Press, 1997)
• [17] Sidhom S.: e-mail ‘Re: CfP: 4th Int. SymISKO Maghreb’ sent to the Executice Committee of ISKO, 27th Jan. 2014.
• [18] Sidhom S.: ISKO-Maghreb (Tunisia, Algeria & Morocco) chapter Report May 2014, sent per e-mail to ISKO Executive Committee 16th May 2014.
• [19] Spinner H.: Die Wissensordnung: Ein Leitkonzept für die dritte Grundordnung des Informationszeitalters. Opladen: Leske and Budrich 1994.
• [20] Tennis J. T.: Canons, Affiliations, and Polytely: The Future of Knowledge Organization and ISKO. (unpuplished presentation for the 13th international ISKO conference, Krakow, May 2014)
• [21] Tennis J. T.: Candidacy Statements: Listen, Deliberate, Act (2014). http://www.isko.org/president2014tennis.pdf
• [22] Tennis J. T.: Epistemology, Theory, and Methodology. in Knowledge Organization: Toward a Classification, Metatheory, and Research Framework. “Knowl. Org.” 2008, Vol. 35, no. 2/3, 102-112. http://faculty.washington.edu/jtennis/Publications_files/Tennis2008KOEpist.pdf