PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Green supply chain performance and environmental sustainability : a panel study

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Rozwój zrównoważony w zielonym łańcuchu dostaw : studium panelowe
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background: The objective of this research is to identify the relationship between green logistics operations, national economic and environmental indicators in a panel of 42 selected global ranked logistics countries over the period from 2007 to 2018. The study aims to expand the domain of green logistics from the micro/firm level to the macro level. Methods: This research paper has used a summary OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) method to test hypotheses. From 2007 to 2018, data panels for 42 countries were downloaded from the World Bank website. Results: The findings of this study indicate that in selected panel countries, the green logistics business has a positive and statistically significant relationship with foreign direct investment inflows, renewable energy consumption, and energ demand. On the other hand, there is a significant negative correlation between CO2 emissions and green logistics. In addition, foreign direct investment and renewable energy are the driving factors of the green logistics business and also promote environmental sustainability. Conclusions: This research paper provides insights into the relationship between green logistics operations and economic and environmental sustainability. In addition, the scope of this research paper is much broader than previously published research papers, in which researchers discovered the relationship between green logistics and corporate performance. However, this research paper focuses on the macro level to understand the link between green logistics and national size indicators.
PL
Wstęp: Celem pracy jest zidentyfikowanie zależności pomiędzy operacjami zielonej logistyki wskaźnikami ekonomicznymi i ekologicznymi w oparciu o panel 42 wybranych krajów z globalnego rankingu logistycznej w okresie od 2007 do 2018. Badanie to w szczególności rozszerza domenę zielonej logistyki z poziomu mikro czy poszczególnych przedsiębiorstw do skali makro. Metody: W celu testowania hipotez zastosowano metodę OLS (najmniejszych kwadratów). Dane dotyczące wybranych 42 krajów zostały pobrane ze strony internetowej Banku Światowego dla okresu od 2007 do 2018. Wyniki: Uzyskane wyniki pokazują statystycznie istotną i pozytywną współzależność z bezpośrednimi zagranicznymi inwestycjami, konsumpcją energii odnawialnej oraz popytem na energię w analizowanych krajach. Z drugiej strony emisja CO2 oraz zielona logistyką są istotnie negatywne ze sobą skorelowane. Dodatkowo, FDI oraz źródła energii odnawialnej są kluczowymi czynnikami wspomagającymi operacje zielonej logistyki, która prowadzi do zrównoważonego rozwoju pod względem ekologicznym. Wnioski: Prezentowana praca daje wgląd w zależności pomiędzy operacjami zielonej logistyki a ekonomicznym i ekologicznym rozwojem zrównoważonym. Dodatkowo, praca ta ma znacznie szerszy zakres niż wcześniejsze prace dotyczące tej tematyki, w których to zostały przedstawione zależności pomiędzy zieloną logistyką a działalnością firmy. Prezentowana praca skupia się ma poziomie makro w celu uchwycenia zależności pomiędzy zieloną logistyką a wskaźnikami na poziomie krajowym.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
141--159
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 70 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • School of Economics and Management, Singhua University, Beijing, China
autor
  • School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China
  • University of Lagos, Akoka, Nigeria
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abbasi M., Nilsson F., 2016. Developing environmentally sustainable logistics. Exploring themes and challenges from a logistics service providers’ perspective, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46(2), 273-283. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.004.
  • 2. Abdul S., Khan R., 2017. Does national scale economic and environmental indicators spur logistics performance? Evidence from the UK, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(34), 26692-26705. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0222-9.
  • 3. Abdul S., Khan R., Qianli D., Zhang, Y., 2017. The Impact of Sustainable Supply Chain on Enterprise Performance: In the Perspective of China, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 4(13), 134-175.
  • 4. Abrams J., Becker D., Kudrna J., Moseley C., 2017. Does policy matter? The role of policy systems in forest bioenergy development in the United States, Forest Policy and Economics, 75, 41-48. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.007
  • 5. Ai T., Hon H., Sulaiman Z., 2015. Green Supply Chain Management, Environmental Collaboration, and Sustainability Performance, Procedia CIRP, 26, 695-699. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.035
  • 6. Aldakhil A.M., Nassani A. A., Awan U., Abro M. M. Q., Zaman K., 2018. Determinants of green logistics in BRICS countries: An integrated supply chain model for green business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 861-686. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.248
  • 7. Anable J., Brand C., Tran M. Eyre N., 2012. Modelling transport energy demand: A socio-technical approach, Energy Policy, 41, 125-138.
  • 8. Bai C., Kusi-Sarpong S., Ahmadi H.B., Sarkis J., 2019. Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach, International Journal of Production Research, http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1574042
  • 9. Bechtsis D., Tsolakis N., Vlachos D., Iakovou E., 2017. Sustainable supply chain management in the digitalization era: The impact of Automated Guided Vehicles, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(35), 3970–3984. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.057
  • 10. Bengoa M., Sanchez-Robles B., 2003. Foreign direct investment, economic freedom, and growth: new evidence from Latin America, European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 529-545.
  • 11. Bhattacharya M., Paramati S. R., Ozturk I., Bhattacharya S., 2016. The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries, Applied Energy, 162(3), 733-741. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.104
  • 12. Brooks C., 2008. Introductory Econometrics for Finance, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • 13. Ceranic B., Markwell G., Dean A., 2017. Too Many Empty Homes, Too Many Homeless- A Novel Design and Procurement Framework for Transforming Empty Homes through Sustainable Solutions, Energy Procedia, 111(12), 558-567. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.218
  • 14. Chunguang Q., Xiaojuan C., Kexi W., Pan P., 2008. Research on green logistics and sustainable development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, ICIII 2008(3), 162-165. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2008.114
  • 15. Colicchia C., Creazza A., Dallari F., 2017. Lean and green supply chain management through intermodal transport: insights from the fast moving consumer goods industry, Production Planning and Control, 28(4), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1282642
  • 16. Colicchia C., Creazza A., Dallari F., Melacini M., 2016. Eco-efficient supply chain networks: development of a design framework and application to a real case study, Production Planning and Control, 7287(11), 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1090030
  • 17. Dangelico R. M., Pontrandolfo P., 2013. Being Green and Competitive: The Impact of Environmental Actions and Collaborations on Firm Performance, Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(13), 142-185, http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1828
  • 18. Dekker R., Bloemhof J., Mallidis I., 2012. Operations Research for green Logistics- An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges, European Journal of Operational Research, 219(3), 671-679. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.010
  • 19. Ding Z., Wang Y., Zou P. X. W., 2016, An agent based environmental impact assessment of building demolition waste mana-gement: Conventional versus green mana-gement, Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 1136-1153. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.054
  • 20. Egilmez G., Park Y.S., 2014. Transportation related carbon, energy and water footprint analysis of U.S. manufacturing: An eco-efficiency assessment, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 32, 143-159. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.07.001.
  • 21. Esenduran G., Atasu A., Luk N. Van W., 2019. Valuable e-waste: Implications for extended producer responsibility, IISE Transactions, http://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1515515.
  • 22. Forte A., Zucaro A., Fagnano M., Fierro A., 2017. Potential environmental impact of bioethanol production chain from fiber sorghum to be used in passenger cars, Science of The Total Environment, 598, 365–376. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.244
  • 23. Golini R., Moretto A., Caniato F., Caridi M., Kalchschmidt M., 2017. Developing sustainability in the Italian meat supply chain: an empirical investigation, International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 1183–1209. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1234724
  • 24. Grekova K., Bremmers H. J., Trienekens J.H., Kemp R.G.M., Omta S.W.F., 2014. Exten-ding environmental management beyond the firm boundaries: An empirical study of Dutch food and beverage firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 174-187. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.019
  • 25. Gruner R.L., Power D., 2017. Mimicking natural ecosystems to develop sustainable supply chains: A theory of socio-ecological intergradation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 251-264. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.109
  • 26. Hansen H., Rand J., 2006. On the causal links between FDI and growth in developing countries, World Economy, 29(1), 21-41. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00756.x
  • 27. Hayami H., Nakamura M., Nakamura A.O., 2015. Economic performance and supply chains: The impact of upstream firms' waste output on downstream firms' performance in Japan, International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 47-65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.012
  • 28. Herold D.M., Lee K.-H., 2017. Carbon management in the logistics and transportation sector: an overview and new research directions, Carbon Management, 11(8), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1283923
  • 29. Isaksson O., Kossmann M., Bertoni M., Eres H., Monceaux A., Bertoni A., Wiseall S. Zhang X., 2013. Value-driven design - a methodology to link expectations to technical requirements in the extended enterprise, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual INCOSE International Symposium, Philadelphia, June 24 to 27 USA.
  • 30. Jingura R.M., 2011. Technical options for optimization of production of Jatropha as a biofuel feedstock in arid and semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe, Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(5), 2127-2132. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.015
  • 31. Kenneth W.G. Jr., Pamela J., Meacham J., Bhadauria V.S., 2012, Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 290-305.
  • 32. Khademian A., Bagherpour R., 2017, Environmentally sustainable mining through proper selection of explosives in blasting operation, Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(4), 128-147. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6483-2
  • 33. Khan S.A.R., Qianli D., 2017. Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms' performance: an empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 13(2), 173-201. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356017-9172-5
  • 34. Khan S.A.R., Qianli D., SongBo W., Zaman K., Zhang Y., 2017. Environmental logistics performance indicators affecting per capita income and sectoral growth: evidence from a panel of selected global ranked logistics countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(2), 1518-1531. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356016-7916-2
  • 35. Khan S.A.R., Dong Q., 2017a. Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms' performance: an empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(20), 16829-16844.
  • 36. Khan S.A.R., Zhang Y., 2019a. Strategic Supply Chain Management, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland AG, ISBN 978-3-030-15058-7, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15058-7.
  • 37. Khan S.A.R., Dong Q. Yu Z., 2016. Research on the measuring performance of green supply chain management: in the perspective of China, Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 27, 167-178.
  • 38. Khan S.A.R., Dong Q., Zhang Y., 2016. Research on the measuring performance of green supply chain management: In the perspective of China, International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 27(12), 167-178.
  • 39. Lanouar C., 2017. The impact of energy consumption and economic development on Ecological Footprint and CO2 emissions: Evidence from a Markov Switching Equilibrium Correction Model, Energy Economics, 5, 134-150. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.009
  • 40. Lee A.H.I., Chen H.H., Chen S., 2015. Suitable organization forms for knowledge management to attain sustainable competitive advantage in the renewable energy industry, Energy, 89(21), 1057-1064. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.047
  • 41. Lee K.H., Wu Y., 2014. Integrating sustainability performance measurement into logistics and supply networks: A multi-methodological approach, British Accounting Review, 46(4), 361-378. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.005
  • 42. Li W.Y., Chow P.S., Choi T.M., Chan H.L., 2016. Supplier integration, green sustainability programs, and financial performance of fashion enterprises under global financial crisis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135(15), 57-70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.048
  • 43. Lu Q., Cai S., Goh M., Souza R.De., 2010. Logistics Capability as a Factor in Foreign Direct Investment Location Choice, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE ICMIT, 163-168.
  • 44. Mäkelä M., 2017. Forest Policy and Economics Environmental impacts and aspects in the forest industry: What kind of picture do corporate environmental reports provide? Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 178-191. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.018
  • 45. Maritime K., 2016. A study of the influence of sustainable management activities on customer satisfaction and long-term orientation in the shipping industry: evidence from users of Korean flagged shipping service, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8(1), 1-20.
  • 46. Masoudipour E., Amirian H., Sahraeian R., 2017. A novel closed-loop supply chain based on the quality of returned products, Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 138-159. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.067
  • 47. Mohan N., Panda S., Sankar S., Basu M., 2017. ScienceDirect Corporate social responsibility, coordination and profit distribution in a dual-channel supply chain, Pacific Science Review, 16(14), 235-237.
  • 48. Mraihi R., Abid M., 2013. Road transport-related energy consumption: Analysis of driving factors in Tunisia, Energy Policy, 62(13), 247-253. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.007
  • 49. Nakajima K., Nansai K., Matsubae K., Tomita M., Takayanagi W., Nagasaka T., 2017. Global land-use change hidden behind nickel consumption, Science of the Total Environment, 586, 730-737. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.049
  • 50. Nakamichi K., Hanaoka S., Kawahara Y., 2016. Estimation of cost and CO2 emissions with a sustainable cross-border supply chain in the automobile industry: A case study of Thailand and neighboring countries, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 43, 158-168. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.018
  • 51. Nurjanni K. P., Carvalho M. S., Costa L., 2016. Green supply chain design: a mathematical modelling approach based on a multi-objective optimization model, International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 421-432. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.028
  • 52. Parajuli R., Dalgaard T., Jørgensen U., Adamsen A.P.S., Knudsen M.T., Birkved M., Gylling M., Schjørring J.K., 2015. Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 244-263. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.041
  • 53. Park D.H., Kashyap P., Visvanathan C., 2016. Comparative assessment of green supply chain management (GSCM) in drinking water service industry in Lao PDR, Thailand, and South Korea, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(59), 28684-28697. http://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1194232
  • 54. Qureshi R.N., Sheikh S., Khowaja A.R., Hoodbhoy Z., Zaidi S., Sawchuck D., Vidler M., Bhutta Z.A. Dadeslzen P.V., 2016. Health care-seeking behaviours in pregnancy in rural Sindh, Pakistan: a qualitative study, Reproductive Health, 13(34), 32-34, available at http://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0140-1
  • 55. Raza S.A., Shah N., Sharif A., 2019. Time-frequency relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental degradation in the United States: Evidence from transportation sector, Energy, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.077
  • 56. Scur G., Barbosa M.E., 2017. Green supply chain management practices: Multiple case studies in the Brazilian home appliance industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1293-1302. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.158
  • 57. Shahbaz M., Salah Uddin G., Ur Rehman I., Imran K., 2014. Industrialization, electricity consumption and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 575-586.
  • 58. Simão L.E., Gonçalves M.B., Taboada Rodriguez C.M., 2016. An approach to assess logistics and ecological supply chain performance using postponement strategies, Ecological Indicators, 63, 398-408. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.048
  • 59. Taylor P., Ganapathy S.P., Natarajan J., Gunasekaran A., 2014. Influence of eco-innovation on Indian manufacturing sector sustainable performance, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 6, 37-41. http://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.907832
  • 60. Vance L., Heckl I., Bertok B., Cabezas H., Friedler F., 2015. Designing sustainable energy supply chains by the P-graph method for minimal cost, environmental burden, energy resources input, Journal of Cleaner Production, 94(3), 144-154. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.011
  • 61. Walley N., Whitehead B.,1994. It's not easy being green, Harvardbusiness review, 72, 46-52.
  • 62. Wang S., Song M., 2017. Influences of reverse outsourcing on green technological progress from the perspective of a global supply chain, Science of The Total Environment, 595, 201-208. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.243
  • 63. Wanzala W.G., Zhihong J. 2016. Integration of the extended gateway concept in Supply Chain disruptions Management in East Africa-Conceptual paper, International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 20, 235-247. http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.20.235
  • 64. Wei J., Lowry P. B., Seedorf S., 2015. The assimilation of RFID technology by Chinese companies: A technology diffusion perspective, Information and Management, 52(6), 628-642. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.05.001.
  • 65. World Bank. 2016. World bank indicators, available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator (Accessed on June 2017).
  • 66. Zailani S., Jeyaraman K., Vengadasan G., Premkumar R., 2012. Sustainable supply chain mangaement (SSCM)in Malaysisa: A survey, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 330-340. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008
  • 67. Zaman K., Shamsuddin S. 2017. Green logistics and national scale economic indicators: Evidence from a panel of selected European countries, Journal of Cleaner Production. 143, 51-63. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.150
  • 68. Zaman K., Khan A., Rusdi M., Adeline T., Tengku A., Hussain S., 2016. Dynamic linkages among energy consumption, environment , health and wealth in BRICS countries: Green growth key to sustainable development, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 1263-1271. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.010
  • 69. Zawaydeh S., 2017. Economic, Environmental and Social Impacts of Developing Energy from Sustainable Resources in Jordan, Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 36(3), 24-52. http://doi.org/10.1080/10485236.2017.11810169
  • 70. Zhu Q., Sarkis J., Cordeiro J.J., Lai K.-H., 2008. Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context, Omega, 36(4), 577–591. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.11.009
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4714edbf-de79-4e6f-8c01-a4ae3a4b78e8
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.